GitLab

FromFloatSlice and FromIntSlice return an error if the shape doesn't
match the passed data or if memory can't be allocated. Since these
are inputs, the memory being allocated is system memory rather than VRAM.

In many cases, the caller can't really handle the error and panics.

Empty and Zeros directly panic if they can't allocate memory.

This makes things consistent by panicing for the first two cases,
removing a fair amount of error handling code. This is also consistent
with how Go typically handles these situations.

* fix mllama convert

- transform attn_gate and ffn_gate
- swap attention heads for vision models

* fix mllama

the mlp gate which was applied in the wrong place

* feat: qwen3 dense
* feat: qwen3moe
* fix llama4 moe

setting samebatch on the vision start token is problematic because it
will be shared with other inputs that also use images. this will cause
the input to be cached and the runner will not see SameBatch. SameBatch
will also be incorrect since it may be for a different image.

assigning samebatch to the input tokens resolves this by ensure it's
assigned correctly to inputs corresponding to the image.

not setting same batch correctly may cause panics during inference since
images are no longer guaranteed to be in the same batch.

* fix llama model

* fix mistral3.1 model

do not set default vision layers

* get eos_token_id from generation_config.json

* refactor

* include both ids and strings in trace

* comments

* remove special case for gemma3 special vocab (#10743)

For some multimodal models (such as gemma3), we create a single
graph that generates the image embedding and then use this in the
text model. The embedding tensor is completely opaque to the runner.

However, this doesn't work if we need to use the embedding in multiple
batches. This can arise if the embedding is larger than the batch size.
In these cases (as with llama4), we would like to create views that
are more appropriately sized. However, if we do this then the original
source tensor is used in multiple graphs, which isn't allowed. To
avoid that problem, models with this pattern compute the embedding
tensor on first use and recreate the individual views. There is no
longer a single vision and text graph.

This codifies the pattern of separating vision and text graphs. The
logic of computing tensors on demand is moved to the runner, so models
no longer have to worry about this. It also gives the runner visibility
into the multimodal tensors, which is important for memory management.

* panic if trying to pad 4d

* fix pixel values padding

Co-authored-by: Patrick Devine <patrick@infrahq.com>

Mistral is a popular research lab making open source models. This updates
the forward pass of llama architecture models to support both llama models
and mistral models by accounting for additional metadata present in mistral
models, and finding the correct dimensions for the output projection.

Rather than directly giving the input data to models, we can
pass a tensor instead. In the short term, this saves some duplicated
code.

Longer term, we will want to overlap setting up the next batch with
processing of the current one. In this case, we will only have the
shape of tensor but it will not be loaded with data at the time of
graph generation. By passing only a tensor to models now, we set up
this possibility and prevent them from relying on data that they won't
have in the future.

Although the same could be done for Positions and Outputs, in some
cases we either need the raw input data or don't use them at all.
Therefore, for now we leave them as they are and allow models to
convert them to tensors as needed.

Options is no longer very descriptive of this struct.

Looks like a merge conflict that broke the model.

Currently there is a single context per sequence, shared all by
all multimodal inputs. Since we build a vision encoder graph per
image, with a large number of inputs we can eventually hit the
maximum number of graph nodes per context.

This changes to use a separate context for each image, ensuring
that available resource limits are consistent.

Models may require that a set of inputs all be processed as part
of the same batch. For example, if an image has multiple patches
with fully connected attention between them, we should not split
the batch in the middle of an image.

Fixes #9697

Softcap isn't in the whitepaper/implementation for the language model so we should remove it. There is no discernible difference in output with it removed.

This reverts commit c7eae586b899083acebcd9b3847b89ea78c2850c.

This is useful for a few things:
 - Work around bugs, such as having 2 images in one batch
 - Keep the image in a single batch for fully connected attention
 - Improve performance by not evaluating embeddings multiple times