Skip to content

GitLab

Unverified Commit bb9fc6f6 authored by Stian Valle's avatar Stian Valle Committed by GitHub
Browse files

Update primer.md

parent 7abf99d9
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
Showing with 6 additions and 12 deletions
googletest/docs/primer.md
View file @ bb9fc6f6
......@@ -219,18 +219,12 @@ as `ASSERT_EQ(expected, actual)`, so lots of existing code uses this order. Now
The assertions in this group compare two **C strings**. If you want to compare
two `string` objects, use `EXPECT_EQ`, `EXPECT_NE`, and etc instead.
| Fatal assertion | Nonfatal assertion | Verifies |
| ------------------------ | ------------------------ | ---------------------- |
| `ASSERT_STREQ(str1,` | `EXPECT_STREQ(str1,` | the two C strings have |
| `str2);` | `str2);` | the same content |
| `ASSERT_STRNE(str1,` | `EXPECT_STRNE(str1,` | the two C strings have |
| `str2);` | `str2);` | different contents |
| `ASSERT_STRCASEEQ(str1,` | `EXPECT_STRCASEEQ(str1,` | the two C strings have |
| `str2);` | `str2);` | the same content, |
| | | ignoring case |
| `ASSERT_STRCASENE(str1,` | `EXPECT_STRCASENE(str1,` | the two C strings have |
| `str2);` | `str2);` | different contents, |
| | | ignoring case |
| Fatal assertion | Nonfatal assertion | Verifies |
| ------------------------------- | ------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- |
| `ASSERT_STREQ(str1, str2);` | `EXPECT_STREQ(str1, str2);` | the two C strings have the same content |
| `ASSERT_STRNE(str1, str2);` | `EXPECT_STRNE(str1, str2);` | the two C strings have different contents |
| `ASSERT_STRCASEEQ(str1, str2);` | `EXPECT_STRCASEEQ(str1, str2);` | the two C strings have the same content, ignoring case |
| `ASSERT_STRCASENE(str1, str2);` | `EXPECT_STRCASENE(str1, str2);` | the two C strings have different contents, ignoring case |
Note that "CASE" in an assertion name means that case is ignored. A `NULL`
pointer and an empty string are considered *different*.
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment