Commit b0568dcb authored by Krystian Kuzniarek's avatar Krystian Kuzniarek
Browse files

fix a broken link

ee3aa831 added a broken link
which results in 404. The broken part is reference to a
nonexistent file "CheatSheet.md" instead of "cheet_sheet.md".
parent ee3aa831
......@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ If a mock method has no `EXPECT_CALL` spec but is called, Google Mock
will print a warning about the "uninteresting call". The rationale is:
* New methods may be added to an interface after a test is written. We shouldn't fail a test just because a method it doesn't know about is called.
* However, this may also mean there's a bug in the test, so Google Mock shouldn't be silent either. (Note that the user should [*not* add an `EXPECT_CALL()`](https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md#knowing-when-to-expect) to suppress the warning, even if they think the call is harmless).
* However, this may also mean there's a bug in the test, so Google Mock shouldn't be silent either. (Note that the user should [*not* add an `EXPECT_CALL()`](https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/cook_book.md#knowing-when-to-expect) to suppress the warning, even if they think the call is harmless).
However, sometimes you may want to suppress all "uninteresting call"
warnings, while sometimes you may want the opposite, i.e. to treat all
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment