@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ If a mock method has no `EXPECT_CALL` spec but is called, Google Mock
will print a warning about the "uninteresting call". The rationale is:
* New methods may be added to an interface after a test is written. We shouldn't fail a test just because a method it doesn't know about is called.
* However, this may also mean there's a bug in the test, so Google Mock shouldn't be silent either. If the user believes these calls are harmless, he can add an `EXPECT_CALL()` to suppress the warning.
* However, this may also mean there's a bug in the test, so Google Mock shouldn't be silent either. If the user believes these calls are harmless, they can add an `EXPECT_CALL()` to suppress the warning.
However, sometimes you may want to suppress all "uninteresting call"
warnings, while sometimes you may want the opposite, i.e. to treat all
A list of built-in matchers can be found in the [CheatSheet](CheatSheet.md). For example, here's the `Ge` (greater than or equal) matcher:
```
using ::testing::Ge;...
using ::testing::Ge;
...
EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(Ge(100)));
```
...
...
@@ -280,7 +282,8 @@ First, if the return type of a mock function is a built-in type or a pointer, th
Second, if a mock function doesn't have a default action, or the default action doesn't suit you, you can specify the action to be taken each time the expectation matches using a series of `WillOnce()` clauses followed by an optional `WillRepeatedly()`. For example,
```
using ::testing::Return;...
using ::testing::Return;
...
EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX())
.WillOnce(Return(100))
.WillOnce(Return(200))
...
...
@@ -290,7 +293,8 @@ EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX())
This says that `turtle.GetX()` will be called _exactly three times_ (Google Mock inferred this from how many `WillOnce()` clauses we've written, since we didn't explicitly write `Times()`), and will return 100, 200, and 300 respectively.
```
using ::testing::Return;...
using ::testing::Return;
...
EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetY())
.WillOnce(Return(100))
.WillOnce(Return(200))
...
...
@@ -317,7 +321,8 @@ Instead of returning 100, 101, 102, ..., consecutively, this mock function will
Time for another quiz! What do you think the following means?
```
using ::testing::Return;...
using ::testing::Return;
...
EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetY())
.Times(4)
.WillOnce(Return(100));
...
...
@@ -331,7 +336,8 @@ So far we've only shown examples where you have a single expectation. More reali
By default, when a mock method is invoked, Google Mock will search the expectations in the **reverse order** they are defined, and stop when an active expectation that matches the arguments is found (you can think of it as "newer rules override older ones."). If the matching expectation cannot take any more calls, you will get an upper-bound-violated failure. Here's an example:
```
using ::testing::_;...
using ::testing::_;
...
EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(_)); // #1
EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(10)) // #2
.Times(2);
...
...
@@ -347,7 +353,8 @@ By default, an expectation can match a call even though an earlier expectation h
Sometimes, you may want all the expected calls to occur in a strict order. To say this in Google Mock is easy:
```
using ::testing::InSequence;...
using ::testing::InSequence;
...
TEST(FooTest, DrawsLineSegment) {
...
{
...
...
@@ -373,7 +380,8 @@ Now let's do a quick quiz to see how well you can use this mock stuff already. H
After you've come up with your answer, take a look at ours and compare notes (solve it yourself first - don't cheat!):
# The gtest/gtest_main targets carry header search path
# dependencies automatically when using CMake 2.8.11 or
...
...
@@ -182,6 +183,17 @@ technique is discussed in more detail in
which also contains a link to a fully generalized implementation
of the technique.
##### Visual Studio Dynamic vs Static Runtimes #####
By default, new Visual Studio projects link the C runtimes dynamically
but Google Test links them statically.
This will generate an error that looks something like the following:
gtest.lib(gtest-all.obj) : error LNK2038: mismatch detected for 'RuntimeLibrary': value 'MTd_StaticDebug' doesn't match value 'MDd_DynamicDebug' in main.obj
Google Test already has a CMake option for this: `gtest_force_shared_crt`
Enabling this option will make gtest link the runtimes dynamically too,
