Merge branch 'master' into fix_death_test_child_mingw_wer_issue1116

.travis.yml

@@ -37,13 +37,15 @@ matrix:
       group: deprecated-2017Q4
       compiler: clang
       env: BUILD_TYPE=Release VERBOSE=1 CXX_FLAGS=-std=c++11
+    - os: linux
+      compiler: clang
+      env: BUILD_TYPE=Release VERBOSE=1 CXX_FLAGS=-std=c++11 NO_EXCEPTION=ON NO_RTTI=ON COMPILER_IS_GNUCXX=ON
     - os: osx
       compiler: gcc
       env: BUILD_TYPE=Debug VERBOSE=1
     - os: osx
       compiler: gcc
       env: BUILD_TYPE=Release VERBOSE=1 CXX_FLAGS=-std=c++11
-      if: type != pull_request
     - os: osx
       compiler: clang
       env: BUILD_TYPE=Debug VERBOSE=1

ci/travis.sh

@@ -24,11 +24,19 @@ export MAKEFLAGS
 
 env | sort
 
+# Set default values to OFF for these variables if not specified.
+: "${NO_EXCEPTION:=OFF}"
+: "${NO_RTTI:=OFF}"
+: "${COMPILER_IS_GNUCXX:=OFF}"
+
 mkdir build || true
 cd build
 cmake -Dgtest_build_samples=ON \
       -Dgtest_build_tests=ON \
       -Dgmock_build_tests=ON \
+      -Dcxx_no_exception=$NO_EXCEPTION \
+      -Dcxx_no_rtti=$NO_RTTI \
+      -DCMAKE_COMPILER_IS_GNUCXX=$COMPILER_IS_GNUCXX \
       -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS=$CXX_FLAGS \
       -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=$BUILD_TYPE \
       ..

googlemock/docs/CookBook.md

@@ -2229,13 +2229,20 @@ versus
 
 ## Mocking Methods That Use Move-Only Types ##
 
-C++11 introduced <em>move-only types</em>.  A move-only-typed value can be moved from one object to another, but cannot be copied.  `std::unique_ptr<T>` is probably the most commonly used move-only type.
+C++11 introduced *move-only types*. A move-only-typed value can be moved from
+one object to another, but cannot be copied. `std::unique_ptr<T>` is
+probably the most commonly used move-only type.
 
-Mocking a method that takes and/or returns move-only types presents some challenges, but nothing insurmountable.  This recipe shows you how you can do it.
+Mocking a method that takes and/or returns move-only types presents some
+challenges, but nothing insurmountable. This recipe shows you how you can do it.
+Note that the support for move-only method arguments was only introduced to
+gMock in April 2017; in older code, you may find more complex
+[workarounds](#LegacyMoveOnly) for lack of this feature.
 
-Let’s say we are working on a fictional project that lets one post and share snippets called “buzzes”.  Your code uses these types:
+Let’s say we are working on a fictional project that lets one post and share
+snippets called “buzzes”. Your code uses these types:
 
-```
+```cpp
 enum class AccessLevel { kInternal, kPublic };
 
 class Buzz {
@@ -2247,59 +2254,46 @@ class Buzz {
 class Buzzer {
  public:
   virtual ~Buzzer() {}
-  virtual std::unique_ptr<Buzz> MakeBuzz(const std::string& text) = 0;
-  virtual bool ShareBuzz(std::unique_ptr<Buzz> buzz, Time timestamp) = 0;
+  virtual std::unique_ptr<Buzz> MakeBuzz(StringPiece text) = 0;
+  virtual bool ShareBuzz(std::unique_ptr<Buzz> buzz, int64_t timestamp) = 0;
   ...
 };
 ```
 
-A `Buzz` object represents a snippet being posted.  A class that implements the `Buzzer` interface is capable of creating and sharing `Buzz`.  Methods in `Buzzer` may return a `unique_ptr<Buzz>` or take a `unique_ptr<Buzz>`.  Now we need to mock `Buzzer` in our tests.
-
-To mock a method that returns a move-only type, you just use the familiar `MOCK_METHOD` syntax as usual:
-
-```
-class MockBuzzer : public Buzzer {
- public:
-  MOCK_METHOD1(MakeBuzz, std::unique_ptr<Buzz>(const std::string& text));
-  …
-};
-```
-
-However, if you attempt to use the same `MOCK_METHOD` pattern to mock a method that takes a move-only parameter, you’ll get a compiler error currently:
-
-```
-  // Does NOT compile!
-  MOCK_METHOD2(ShareBuzz, bool(std::unique_ptr<Buzz> buzz, Time timestamp));
-```
-
-While it’s highly desirable to make this syntax just work, it’s not trivial and the work hasn’t been done yet.  Fortunately, there is a trick you can apply today to get something that works nearly as well as this.
+A `Buzz` object represents a snippet being posted. A class that implements the
+`Buzzer` interface is capable of creating and sharing `Buzz`es. Methods in
+`Buzzer` may return a `unique_ptr<Buzz>` or take a
+`unique_ptr<Buzz>`. Now we need to mock `Buzzer` in our tests.
 
-The trick, is to delegate the `ShareBuzz()` method to a mock method (let’s call it `DoShareBuzz()`) that does not take move-only parameters:
+To mock a method that accepts or returns move-only types, you just use the
+familiar `MOCK_METHOD` syntax as usual:
 
-```
+```cpp
 class MockBuzzer : public Buzzer {
  public:
-  MOCK_METHOD1(MakeBuzz, std::unique_ptr<Buzz>(const std::string& text));
-  MOCK_METHOD2(DoShareBuzz, bool(Buzz* buzz, Time timestamp));
-  bool ShareBuzz(std::unique_ptr<Buzz> buzz, Time timestamp) {
-    return DoShareBuzz(buzz.get(), timestamp);
-  }
+  MOCK_METHOD1(MakeBuzz, std::unique_ptr<Buzz>(StringPiece text));
+  MOCK_METHOD2(ShareBuzz, bool(std::unique_ptr<Buzz> buzz, int64_t timestamp));
 };
 ```
 
-Note that there's no need to define or declare `DoShareBuzz()` in a base class.  You only need to define it as a `MOCK_METHOD` in the mock class.
-
-Now that we have the mock class defined, we can use it in tests.  In the following code examples, we assume that we have defined a `MockBuzzer` object named `mock_buzzer_`:
+Now that we have the mock class defined, we can use it in tests. In the
+following code examples, we assume that we have defined a `MockBuzzer` object
+named `mock_buzzer_`:
 
-```
+```cpp
   MockBuzzer mock_buzzer_;
 ```
 
-First let’s see how we can set expectations on the `MakeBuzz()` method, which returns a `unique_ptr<Buzz>`.
+First let’s see how we can set expectations on the `MakeBuzz()` method, which
+returns a `unique_ptr<Buzz>`.
 
-As usual, if you set an expectation without an action (i.e. the `.WillOnce()` or `.WillRepeated()` clause), when that expectation fires, the default action for that method will be taken.  Since `unique_ptr<>` has a default constructor that returns a null `unique_ptr`, that’s what you’ll get if you don’t specify an action:
+As usual, if you set an expectation without an action (i.e. the `.WillOnce()` or
+`.WillRepeated()` clause), when that expectation fires, the default action for
+that method will be taken. Since `unique_ptr<>` has a default constructor
+that returns a null `unique_ptr`, that’s what you’ll get if you don’t specify an
+action:
 
-```
+```cpp
   // Use the default action.
   EXPECT_CALL(mock_buzzer_, MakeBuzz("hello"));
 
@@ -2307,32 +2301,13 @@ As usual, if you set an expectation without an action (i.e. the `.WillOnce()` or
   EXPECT_EQ(nullptr, mock_buzzer_.MakeBuzz("hello"));
 ```
 
-If you are not happy with the default action, you can tweak it.  Depending on what you need, you may either tweak the default action for a specific (mock object, mock method) combination using `ON_CALL()`, or you may tweak the default action for all mock methods that return a specific type.  The usage of `ON_CALL()` is similar to `EXPECT_CALL()`, so we’ll skip it and just explain how to do the latter (tweaking the default action for a specific return type).  You do this via the `DefaultValue<>::SetFactory()` and `DefaultValue<>::Clear()` API:
-
-```
-  // Sets the default action for return type std::unique_ptr<Buzz> to
-  // creating a new Buzz every time.
-  DefaultValue<std::unique_ptr<Buzz>>::SetFactory(
-      [] { return MakeUnique<Buzz>(AccessLevel::kInternal); });
-
-  // When this fires, the default action of MakeBuzz() will run, which
-  // will return a new Buzz object.
-  EXPECT_CALL(mock_buzzer_, MakeBuzz("hello")).Times(AnyNumber());
+If you are not happy with the default action, you can tweak it as usual; see
+[Setting Default Actions](#OnCall).
 
-  auto buzz1 = mock_buzzer_.MakeBuzz("hello");
-  auto buzz2 = mock_buzzer_.MakeBuzz("hello");
-  EXPECT_NE(nullptr, buzz1);
-  EXPECT_NE(nullptr, buzz2);
-  EXPECT_NE(buzz1, buzz2);
+If you just need to return a pre-defined move-only value, you can use the
+`Return(ByMove(...))` action:
 
-  // Resets the default action for return type std::unique_ptr<Buzz>,
-  // to avoid interfere with other tests.
-  DefaultValue<std::unique_ptr<Buzz>>::Clear();
-```
-
-What if you want the method to do something other than the default action?  If you just need to return a pre-defined move-only value, you can use the `Return(ByMove(...))` action:
-
-```
+```cpp
   // When this fires, the unique_ptr<> specified by ByMove(...) will
   // be returned.
   EXPECT_CALL(mock_buzzer_, MakeBuzz("world"))
@@ -2343,81 +2318,87 @@ What if you want the method to do something other than the default action?  If y
 
 Note that `ByMove()` is essential here - if you drop it, the code won’t compile.
 
-Quiz time!  What do you think will happen if a `Return(ByMove(...))` action is performed more than once (e.g. you write `….WillRepeatedly(Return(ByMove(...)));`)?  Come think of it, after the first time the action runs, the source value will be consumed (since it’s a move-only value), so the next time around, there’s no value to move from -- you’ll get a run-time error that `Return(ByMove(...))` can only be run once.
+Quiz time! What do you think will happen if a `Return(ByMove(...))` action is
+performed more than once (e.g. you write
+`….WillRepeatedly(Return(ByMove(...)));`)? Come think of it, after the first
+time the action runs, the source value will be consumed (since it’s a move-only
+value), so the next time around, there’s no value to move from -- you’ll get a
+run-time error that `Return(ByMove(...))` can only be run once.
 
-If you need your mock method to do more than just moving a pre-defined value, remember that you can always use `Invoke()` to call a lambda or a callable object, which can do pretty much anything you want:
+If you need your mock method to do more than just moving a pre-defined value,
+remember that you can always use a lambda or a callable object, which can do
+pretty much anything you want:
 
-```
+```cpp
   EXPECT_CALL(mock_buzzer_, MakeBuzz("x"))
-      .WillRepeatedly(Invoke([](const std::string& text) {
-        return std::make_unique<Buzz>(AccessLevel::kInternal);
-      }));
+      .WillRepeatedly([](StringPiece text) {
+        return MakeUnique<Buzz>(AccessLevel::kInternal);
+      });
 
   EXPECT_NE(nullptr, mock_buzzer_.MakeBuzz("x"));
   EXPECT_NE(nullptr, mock_buzzer_.MakeBuzz("x"));
 ```
 
-Every time this `EXPECT_CALL` fires, a new `unique_ptr<Buzz>` will be created and returned.  You cannot do this with `Return(ByMove(...))`.
+Every time this `EXPECT_CALL` fires, a new `unique_ptr<Buzz>` will be
+created and returned. You cannot do this with `Return(ByMove(...))`.
 
-Now there’s one topic we haven’t covered: how do you set expectations on `ShareBuzz()`, which takes a move-only-typed parameter?  The answer is you don’t.  Instead, you set expectations on the `DoShareBuzz()` mock method (remember that we defined a `MOCK_METHOD` for `DoShareBuzz()`, not `ShareBuzz()`):
+That covers returning move-only values; but how do we work with methods
+accepting move-only arguments? The answer is that they work normally, although
+some actions will not compile when any of method's arguments are move-only. You
+can always use `Return`, or a [lambda or functor](#FunctionsAsActions):
 
-```
-  EXPECT_CALL(mock_buzzer_, DoShareBuzz(NotNull(), _));
+```cpp
+  using ::testing::Unused;
 
-  // When one calls ShareBuzz() on the MockBuzzer like this, the call is
-  // forwarded to DoShareBuzz(), which is mocked.  Therefore this statement
-  // will trigger the above EXPECT_CALL.
-  mock_buzzer_.ShareBuzz(MakeUnique<Buzz>(AccessLevel::kInternal),
-                         ::base::Now());
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_buzzer_, ShareBuzz(NotNull(), _)) .WillOnce(Return(true));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(mock_buzzer_.ShareBuzz(MakeUnique<Buzz>(AccessLevel::kInternal)),
+              0);
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_buzzer_, ShareBuzz(_, _)) .WillOnce(
+      [](std::unique_ptr<Buzz> buzz, Unused) { return buzz != nullptr; });
+  EXPECT_FALSE(mock_buzzer_.ShareBuzz(nullptr, 0));
 ```
 
-Some of you may have spotted one problem with this approach: the `DoShareBuzz()` mock method differs from the real `ShareBuzz()` method in that it cannot take ownership of the buzz parameter - `ShareBuzz()` will always delete buzz after `DoShareBuzz()` returns.  What if you need to save the buzz object somewhere for later use when `ShareBuzz()` is called?  Indeed, you'd be stuck.
+Many built-in actions (`WithArgs`, `WithoutArgs`,`DeleteArg`, `SaveArg`, ...)
+could in principle support move-only arguments, but the support for this is not
+implemented yet. If this is blocking you, please file a bug.
 
-Another problem with the `DoShareBuzz()` we had is that it can surprise people reading or maintaining the test, as one would expect that `DoShareBuzz()` has (logically) the same contract as `ShareBuzz()`.
+A few actions (e.g. `DoAll`) copy their arguments internally, so they can never
+work with non-copyable objects; you'll have to use functors instead.
 
-Fortunately, these problems can be fixed with a bit more code.  Let's try to get it right this time:
+##### Legacy workarounds for move-only types {#LegacyMoveOnly}
 
-```
+Support for move-only function arguments was only introduced to gMock in April
+2017. In older code, you may encounter the following workaround for the lack of
+this feature (it is no longer necessary - we're including it just for
+reference):
+
+```cpp
 class MockBuzzer : public Buzzer {
  public:
-  MockBuzzer() {
-    // Since DoShareBuzz(buzz, time) is supposed to take ownership of
-    // buzz, define a default behavior for DoShareBuzz(buzz, time) to
-    // delete buzz.
-    ON_CALL(*this, DoShareBuzz(_, _))
-        .WillByDefault(Invoke([](Buzz* buzz, Time timestamp) {
-          delete buzz;
-          return true;
-        }));
-  }
-
-  MOCK_METHOD1(MakeBuzz, std::unique_ptr<Buzz>(const std::string& text));
-
-  // Takes ownership of buzz.
   MOCK_METHOD2(DoShareBuzz, bool(Buzz* buzz, Time timestamp));
-  bool ShareBuzz(std::unique_ptr<Buzz> buzz, Time timestamp) {
-    return DoShareBuzz(buzz.release(), timestamp);
+  bool ShareBuzz(std::unique_ptr<Buzz> buzz, Time timestamp) override {
+    return DoShareBuzz(buzz.get(), timestamp);
   }
 };
 ```
 
-Now, the mock `DoShareBuzz()` method is free to save the buzz argument for later use if this is what you want:
+The trick is to delegate the `ShareBuzz()` method to a mock method (let’s call
+it `DoShareBuzz()`) that does not take move-only parameters. Then, instead of
+setting expectations on `ShareBuzz()`, you set them on the `DoShareBuzz()` mock
+method:
 
-```
-  std::unique_ptr<Buzz> intercepted_buzz;
-  EXPECT_CALL(mock_buzzer_, DoShareBuzz(NotNull(), _))
-      .WillOnce(Invoke([&intercepted_buzz](Buzz* buzz, Time timestamp) {
-        // Save buzz in intercepted_buzz for analysis later.
-        intercepted_buzz.reset(buzz);
-        return false;
-      }));
+```cpp
+  MockBuzzer mock_buzzer_;
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_buzzer_, DoShareBuzz(NotNull(), _));
 
-  mock_buzzer_.ShareBuzz(std::make_unique<Buzz>(AccessLevel::kInternal),
-                         Now());
-  EXPECT_NE(nullptr, intercepted_buzz);
+  // When one calls ShareBuzz() on the MockBuzzer like this, the call is
+  // forwarded to DoShareBuzz(), which is mocked.  Therefore this statement
+  // will trigger the above EXPECT_CALL.
+  mock_buzzer_.ShareBuzz(MakeUnique<Buzz>(AccessLevel::kInternal), 0);
 ```
 
-Using the tricks covered in this recipe, you are now able to mock methods that take and/or return move-only types.  Put your newly-acquired power to good use - when you design a new API, you can now feel comfortable using `unique_ptrs` as appropriate, without fearing that doing so will compromise your tests.
+
 
 ## Making the Compilation Faster ##
 

googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-actions.h

@@ -360,14 +360,20 @@ class Action {
 
   // Constructs a null Action.  Needed for storing Action objects in
   // STL containers.
-  Action() : impl_(NULL) {}
+  Action() {}
 
-  // Constructs an Action from its implementation.  A NULL impl is
-  // used to represent the "do-default" action.
-  explicit Action(ActionInterface<F>* impl) : impl_(impl) {}
+#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
+  // Construct an Action from a specified callable.
+  // This cannot take std::function directly, because then Action would not be
+  // directly constructible from lambda (it would require two conversions).
+  template <typename G,
+            typename = typename ::std::enable_if<
+                ::std::is_constructible<::std::function<F>, G>::value>::type>
+  Action(G&& fun) : fun_(::std::forward<G>(fun)) {}  // NOLINT
+#endif
 
-  // Copy constructor.
-  Action(const Action& action) : impl_(action.impl_) {}
+  // Constructs an Action from its implementation.
+  explicit Action(ActionInterface<F>* impl) : impl_(impl) {}
 
   // This constructor allows us to turn an Action<Func> object into an
   // Action<F>, as long as F's arguments can be implicitly converted
@@ -377,7 +383,13 @@ class Action {
   explicit Action(const Action<Func>& action);
 
   // Returns true iff this is the DoDefault() action.
-  bool IsDoDefault() const { return impl_.get() == NULL; }
+  bool IsDoDefault() const {
+#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
+    return impl_ == nullptr && fun_ == nullptr;
+#else
+    return impl_ == NULL;
+#endif
+  }
 
   // Performs the action.  Note that this method is const even though
   // the corresponding method in ActionInterface is not.  The reason
@@ -385,14 +397,15 @@ class Action {
   // another concrete action, not that the concrete action it binds to
   // cannot change state.  (Think of the difference between a const
   // pointer and a pointer to const.)
-  Result Perform(const ArgumentTuple& args) const {
-    internal::Assert(
-        !IsDoDefault(), __FILE__, __LINE__,
-        "You are using DoDefault() inside a composite action like "
-        "DoAll() or WithArgs().  This is not supported for technical "
-        "reasons.  Please instead spell out the default action, or "
-        "assign the default action to an Action variable and use "
-        "the variable in various places.");
+  Result Perform(ArgumentTuple args) const {
+    if (IsDoDefault()) {
+      internal::IllegalDoDefault(__FILE__, __LINE__);
+    }
+#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
+    if (fun_ != nullptr) {
+      return internal::Apply(fun_, ::std::move(args));
+    }
+#endif
     return impl_->Perform(args);
   }
 
@@ -400,6 +413,18 @@ class Action {
   template <typename F1, typename F2>
   friend class internal::ActionAdaptor;
 
+  template <typename G>
+  friend class Action;
+
+  // In C++11, Action can be implemented either as a generic functor (through
+  // std::function), or legacy ActionInterface. In C++98, only ActionInterface
+  // is available. The invariants are as follows:
+  // * in C++98, impl_ is null iff this is the default action
+  // * in C++11, at most one of fun_ & impl_ may be nonnull; both are null iff
+  //   this is the default action
+#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
+  ::std::function<F> fun_;
+#endif
   internal::linked_ptr<ActionInterface<F> > impl_;
 };
 
@@ -531,6 +556,9 @@ struct ByMoveWrapper {
 // statement, and conversion of the result of Return to Action<T(U)> is a
 // good place for that.
 //
+// The real life example of the above scenario happens when an invocation
+// of gtl::Container() is passed into Return.
+//
 template <typename R>
 class ReturnAction {
  public:
@@ -750,7 +778,7 @@ class DoDefaultAction {
   // This template type conversion operator allows DoDefault() to be
   // used in any function.
   template <typename F>
-  operator Action<F>() const { return Action<F>(NULL); }
+  operator Action<F>() const { return Action<F>(); }  // NOLINT
 };
 
 // Implements the Assign action to set a given pointer referent to a
@@ -886,6 +914,28 @@ class InvokeMethodWithoutArgsAction {
   GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(InvokeMethodWithoutArgsAction);
 };
 
+// Implements the InvokeWithoutArgs(callback) action.
+template <typename CallbackType>
+class InvokeCallbackWithoutArgsAction {
+ public:
+  // The c'tor takes ownership of the callback.
+  explicit InvokeCallbackWithoutArgsAction(CallbackType* callback)
+      : callback_(callback) {
+    callback->CheckIsRepeatable();  // Makes sure the callback is permanent.
+  }
+
+  // This type conversion operator template allows Invoke(callback) to
+  // be used wherever the callback's return type can be implicitly
+  // converted to that of the mock function.
+  template <typename Result, typename ArgumentTuple>
+  Result Perform(const ArgumentTuple&) const { return callback_->Run(); }
+
+ private:
+  const internal::linked_ptr<CallbackType> callback_;
+
+  GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(InvokeCallbackWithoutArgsAction);
+};
+
 // Implements the IgnoreResult(action) action.
 template <typename A>
 class IgnoreResultAction {
@@ -1053,7 +1103,13 @@ typedef internal::IgnoredValue Unused;
 template <typename To>
 template <typename From>
 Action<To>::Action(const Action<From>& from)
-    : impl_(new internal::ActionAdaptor<To, From>(from)) {}
+    :
+#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
+      fun_(from.fun_),
+#endif
+      impl_(from.impl_ == NULL ? NULL
+                               : new internal::ActionAdaptor<To, From>(from)) {
+}
 
 // Creates an action that returns 'value'.  'value' is passed by value
 // instead of const reference - otherwise Return("string literal")

googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-actions.h.pump

 $$ -*- mode: c++; -*-
-$$ This is a Pump source file.  Please use Pump to convert it to
+$$ This is a Pump source file. Please use Pump to convert it to
 $$ gmock-generated-actions.h.
 $$
 $var n = 10  $$ The maximum arity we support.
@@ -49,12 +49,13 @@ namespace testing {
 namespace internal {
 
 // InvokeHelper<F> knows how to unpack an N-tuple and invoke an N-ary
-// function or method with the unpacked values, where F is a function
-// type that takes N arguments.
+// function, method, or callback with the unpacked values, where F is
+// a function type that takes N arguments.
 template <typename Result, typename ArgumentTuple>
 class InvokeHelper;
 
 
+$var max_callback_arity = 5
 $range i 0..n
 $for i [[
 $range j 1..i
@@ -76,10 +77,48 @@ class InvokeHelper<R, ::testing::tuple<$as> > {
                         const ::testing::tuple<$as>&$args) {
            return (obj_ptr->*method_ptr)($gets);
   }
+
+
+$if i <= max_callback_arity [[
+  template <typename CallbackType>
+  static R InvokeCallback(CallbackType* callback,
+                          const ::testing::tuple<$as>&$args) {
+           return callback->Run($gets);
+  }
+]] $else [[
+  // There is no InvokeCallback() for $i-tuples, as google3 callbacks
+  // support $max_callback_arity arguments at most.
+]]
+
 };
 
 
 ]]
+// Implements the Invoke(callback) action.
+template <typename CallbackType>
+class InvokeCallbackAction {
+ public:
+  // The c'tor takes ownership of the callback.
+  explicit InvokeCallbackAction(CallbackType* callback)
+      : callback_(callback) {
+    callback->CheckIsRepeatable();  // Makes sure the callback is permanent.
+  }
+
+  // This type conversion operator template allows Invoke(callback) to
+  // be used wherever the callback's type is compatible with that of
+  // the mock function, i.e. if the mock function's arguments can be
+  // implicitly converted to the callback's arguments and the
+  // callback's result can be implicitly converted to the mock
+  // function's result.
+  template <typename Result, typename ArgumentTuple>
+  Result Perform(const ArgumentTuple& args) const {
+    return InvokeHelper<Result, ArgumentTuple>::InvokeCallback(
+        callback_.get(), args);
+  }
+ private:
+  const linked_ptr<CallbackType> callback_;
+};
+
 // An INTERNAL macro for extracting the type of a tuple field.  It's
 // subject to change without notice - DO NOT USE IN USER CODE!
 #define GMOCK_FIELD_(Tuple, N) \
@@ -486,7 +525,7 @@ _VALUE_PARAMS($for j, [[p$j]]) $for j [[, typename p$j##_type]]
 $for i [[
 $range j 0..i-1
 #define GMOCK_INTERNAL_INIT_AND_$i[[]]_VALUE_PARAMS($for j, [[p$j]])\
-    ($for j, [[p$j##_type gmock_p$j]])$if i>0 [[ : ]]$for j, [[p$j(gmock_p$j)]]
+    ($for j, [[p$j##_type gmock_p$j]])$if i>0 [[ : ]]$for j, [[p$j(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p$j))]]
 
 
 ]]
@@ -619,7 +658,7 @@ $var class_name = [[name##Action[[$if i==0 [[]] $elif i==1 [[P]]
 $range j 0..i-1
 $var ctor_param_list = [[$for j, [[p$j##_type gmock_p$j]]]]
 $var param_types_and_names = [[$for j, [[p$j##_type p$j]]]]
-$var inits = [[$if i==0 [[]] $else [[ : $for j, [[p$j(gmock_p$j)]]]]]]
+$var inits = [[$if i==0 [[]] $else [[ : $for j, [[p$j(::testing::internal::forward<p$j##_type>(gmock_p$j))]]]]]]
 $var param_field_decls = [[$for j
 [[
 

googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-function-mockers.h.pump

 $$ -*- mode: c++; -*-
-$$ This is a Pump source file.  Please use Pump to convert it to
-$$ gmock-generated-function-mockers.h.
+$$ This is a Pump source file.  Please use Pump to convert
+$$ it to gmock-generated-function-mockers.h.
 $$
 $var n = 10  $$ The maximum arity we support.
 // Copyright 2007, Google Inc.
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ $for i [[
 $range j 1..i
 $var typename_As = [[$for j [[, typename A$j]]]]
 $var As = [[$for j, [[A$j]]]]
-$var as = [[$for j, [[a$j]]]]
+$var as = [[$for j, [[internal::forward<A$j>(a$j)]]]]
 $var Aas = [[$for j, [[A$j a$j]]]]
 $var ms = [[$for j, [[m$j]]]]
 $var matchers = [[$for j, [[const Matcher<A$j>& m$j]]]]
@@ -79,13 +79,8 @@ class FunctionMocker<R($As)> : public
   typedef R F($As);
   typedef typename internal::Function<F>::ArgumentTuple ArgumentTuple;
 
-  MockSpec<F>& With($matchers) {
-
-$if i >= 1 [[
-    this->current_spec().SetMatchers(::testing::make_tuple($ms));
-
-]]
-    return this->current_spec();
+  MockSpec<F> With($matchers) {
+    return MockSpec<F>(this, ::testing::make_tuple($ms));
   }
 
   R Invoke($Aas) {
@@ -99,6 +94,58 @@ $if i >= 1 [[
 
 
 ]]
+// Removes the given pointer; this is a helper for the expectation setter method
+// for parameterless matchers.
+//
+// We want to make sure that the user cannot set a parameterless expectation on
+// overloaded methods, including methods which are overloaded on const. Example:
+//
+//   class MockClass {
+//     MOCK_METHOD0(GetName, string&());
+//     MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(GetName, const string&());
+//   };
+//
+//   TEST() {
+//     // This should be an error, as it's not clear which overload is expected.
+//     EXPECT_CALL(mock, GetName).WillOnce(ReturnRef(value));
+//   }
+//
+// Here are the generated expectation-setter methods:
+//
+//   class MockClass {
+//     // Overload 1
+//     MockSpec<string&()> gmock_GetName() { … }
+//     // Overload 2. Declared const so that the compiler will generate an
+//     // error when trying to resolve between this and overload 4 in
+//     // 'gmock_GetName(WithoutMatchers(), nullptr)'.
+//     MockSpec<string&()> gmock_GetName(
+//         const WithoutMatchers&, const Function<string&()>*) const {
+//       // Removes const from this, calls overload 1
+//       return AdjustConstness_(this)->gmock_GetName();
+//     }
+//
+//     // Overload 3
+//     const string& gmock_GetName() const { … }
+//     // Overload 4
+//     MockSpec<const string&()> gmock_GetName(
+//         const WithoutMatchers&, const Function<const string&()>*) const {
+//       // Does not remove const, calls overload 3
+//       return AdjustConstness_const(this)->gmock_GetName();
+//     }
+//   }
+//
+template <typename MockType>
+const MockType* AdjustConstness_const(const MockType* mock) {
+  return mock;
+}
+
+// Removes const from and returns the given pointer; this is a helper for the 
+// expectation setter method for parameterless matchers.
+template <typename MockType>
+MockType* AdjustConstness_(const MockType* mock) {
+  return const_cast<MockType*>(mock);
+}
+
 }  // namespace internal
 
 // The style guide prohibits "using" statements in a namespace scope
@@ -134,11 +181,14 @@ using internal::FunctionMocker;
 
 $for i [[
 $range j 1..i
-$var arg_as = [[$for j, \
-      [[GMOCK_ARG_(tn, $j, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a$j]]]]
-$var as = [[$for j, [[gmock_a$j]]]]
-$var matcher_as = [[$for j, \
+$var arg_as = [[$for j, [[GMOCK_ARG_(tn, $j, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a$j]]]]
+$var as = [[$for j, \
+  [[::testing::internal::forward<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, $j, __VA_ARGS__)>(gmock_a$j)]]]]
+$var matcher_arg_as = [[$for j, \
                      [[GMOCK_MATCHER_(tn, $j, __VA_ARGS__) gmock_a$j]]]]
+$var matcher_as = [[$for j, [[gmock_a$j]]]]
+$var anything_matchers = [[$for j, \
+                     [[::testing::A<GMOCK_ARG_(tn, $j, __VA_ARGS__)>()]]]]
 // INTERNAL IMPLEMENTATION - DON'T USE IN USER CODE!!!
 #define GMOCK_METHOD$i[[]]_(tn, constness, ct, Method, ...) \
   GMOCK_RESULT_(tn, __VA_ARGS__) ct Method( \
@@ -149,11 +199,17 @@ $var matcher_as = [[$for j, \
     GMOCK_MOCKER_($i, constness, Method).SetOwnerAndName(this, #Method); \
     return GMOCK_MOCKER_($i, constness, Method).Invoke($as); \
   } \
-  ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__>& \
-      gmock_##Method($matcher_as) constness { \
+  ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> \
+      gmock_##Method($matcher_arg_as) constness { \
     GMOCK_MOCKER_($i, constness, Method).RegisterOwner(this); \
-    return GMOCK_MOCKER_($i, constness, Method).With($as); \
+    return GMOCK_MOCKER_($i, constness, Method).With($matcher_as); \
   } \
+  ::testing::MockSpec<__VA_ARGS__> gmock_##Method( \
+      const ::testing::internal::WithoutMatchers&, \
+      constness ::testing::internal::Function<__VA_ARGS__>* ) const { \
+        return ::testing::internal::AdjustConstness_##constness(this)-> \
+            gmock_##Method($anything_matchers); \
+      } \
   mutable ::testing::FunctionMocker<__VA_ARGS__> GMOCK_MOCKER_($i, constness, Method)
 
 
@@ -263,7 +319,7 @@ class MockFunction;
 $for i [[
 $range j 0..i-1
 $var ArgTypes = [[$for j, [[A$j]]]]
-$var ArgNames = [[$for j, [[a$j]]]]
+$var ArgValues = [[$for j, [[::std::move(a$j)]]]]
 $var ArgDecls = [[$for j, [[A$j a$j]]]]
 template <typename R$for j [[, typename A$j]]>
 class MockFunction<R($ArgTypes)> {
@@ -273,9 +329,9 @@ class MockFunction<R($ArgTypes)> {
   MOCK_METHOD$i[[]]_T(Call, R($ArgTypes));
 
 #if GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_
-  std::function<R($ArgTypes)> AsStdFunction() {
+  ::std::function<R($ArgTypes)> AsStdFunction() {
     return [this]($ArgDecls) -> R {
-      return this->Call($ArgNames);
+      return this->Call($ArgValues);
     };
   }
 #endif  // GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_

googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-matchers.h.pump

 $$ -*- mode: c++; -*-
-$$ This is a Pump source file.  Please use Pump to convert it to
-$$ gmock-generated-actions.h.
+$$ This is a Pump source file. Please use Pump to convert
+$$ it to gmock-generated-matchers.h.
 $$
 $var n = 10  $$ The maximum arity we support.
 $$ }} This line fixes auto-indentation of the following code in Emacs.
@@ -303,6 +303,9 @@ $for j, [[
 
 // UnorderedElementsAre(e_1, e_2, ..., e_n) is an ElementsAre extension
 // that matches n elements in any order.  We support up to n=$n arguments.
+//
+// If you have >$n elements, consider UnorderedElementsAreArray() or
+// UnorderedPointwise() instead.
 
 $range i 0..n
 $for i [[
@@ -479,7 +482,7 @@ $$   // show up in the generated code.
 //   using testing::PrintToString;
 //
 //   MATCHER_P2(InClosedRange, low, hi,
-//       string(negation ? "is not" : "is") + " in range [" +
+//       std::string(negation ? "is not" : "is") + " in range [" +
 //       PrintToString(low) + ", " + PrintToString(hi) + "]") {
 //     return low <= arg && arg <= hi;
 //   }
@@ -604,32 +607,34 @@ $var template = [[$if i==0 [[]] $else [[
 ]]]]
 $var ctor_param_list = [[$for j, [[p$j##_type gmock_p$j]]]]
 $var impl_ctor_param_list = [[$for j, [[p$j##_type gmock_p$j]]]]
-$var impl_inits = [[$if i==0 [[]] $else [[ : $for j, [[p$j(gmock_p$j)]]]]]]
-$var inits = [[$if i==0 [[]] $else [[ : $for j, [[p$j(gmock_p$j)]]]]]]
+$var impl_inits = [[$if i==0 [[]] $else [[ : $for j, [[p$j(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p$j))]]]]]]
+$var inits = [[$if i==0 [[]] $else [[ : $for j, [[p$j(::testing::internal::move(gmock_p$j))]]]]]]
 $var params = [[$for j, [[p$j]]]]
 $var param_types = [[$if i==0 [[]] $else [[<$for j, [[p$j##_type]]>]]]]
 $var param_types_and_names = [[$for j, [[p$j##_type p$j]]]]
 $var param_field_decls = [[$for j
 [[
 
-      p$j##_type p$j;\
+      p$j##_type const p$j;\
 ]]]]
 $var param_field_decls2 = [[$for j
 [[
 
-    p$j##_type p$j;\
+    p$j##_type const p$j;\
 ]]]]
 
 #define $macro_name(name$for j [[, p$j]], description)\$template
   class $class_name {\
    public:\
     template <typename arg_type>\
-    class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<arg_type> {\
+    class gmock_Impl : public ::testing::MatcherInterface<\
+        GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type)> {\
      public:\
       [[$if i==1 [[explicit ]]]]gmock_Impl($impl_ctor_param_list)\
           $impl_inits {}\
       virtual bool MatchAndExplain(\
-          arg_type arg, ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\
+          GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\
+          ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener) const;\
       virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* gmock_os) const {\
         *gmock_os << FormatDescription(false);\
       }\
@@ -637,17 +642,15 @@ $var param_field_decls2 = [[$for j
         *gmock_os << FormatDescription(true);\
       }\$param_field_decls
      private:\
-      ::testing::internal::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\
-        const ::testing::internal::string gmock_description = (description);\
-        if (!gmock_description.empty()) {\
+      ::std::string FormatDescription(bool negation) const {\
+        ::std::string gmock_description = (description);\
+        if (!gmock_description.empty())\
           return gmock_description;\
-        }\
         return ::testing::internal::FormatMatcherDescription(\
             negation, #name, \
             ::testing::internal::UniversalTersePrintTupleFieldsToStrings(\
                 ::testing::tuple<$for j, [[p$j##_type]]>($for j, [[p$j]])));\
       }\
-      GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_(gmock_Impl);\
     };\
     template <typename arg_type>\
     operator ::testing::Matcher<arg_type>() const {\
@@ -657,14 +660,13 @@ $var param_field_decls2 = [[$for j
     [[$if i==1 [[explicit ]]]]$class_name($ctor_param_list)$inits {\
     }\$param_field_decls2
    private:\
-    GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_($class_name);\
   };\$template
   inline $class_name$param_types name($param_types_and_names) {\
     return $class_name$param_types($params);\
   }\$template
   template <typename arg_type>\
   bool $class_name$param_types::gmock_Impl<arg_type>::MatchAndExplain(\
-      arg_type arg, \
+      GTEST_REFERENCE_TO_CONST_(arg_type) arg,\
       ::testing::MatchResultListener* result_listener GTEST_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_)\
           const
 ]]

googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-nice-strict.h

@@ -51,10 +51,9 @@
 // NiceMock<MockFoo>.
 //
 // NiceMock, NaggyMock, and StrictMock "inherit" the constructors of
-// their respective base class, with up-to 10 arguments.  Therefore
-// you can write NiceMock<MockFoo>(5, "a") to construct a nice mock
-// where MockFoo has a constructor that accepts (int, const char*),
-// for example.
+// their respective base class.  Therefore you can write
+// NiceMock<MockFoo>(5, "a") to construct a nice mock where MockFoo
+// has a constructor that accepts (int, const char*), for example.
 //
 // A known limitation is that NiceMock<MockFoo>, NaggyMock<MockFoo>,
 // and StrictMock<MockFoo> only works for mock methods defined using
@@ -63,10 +62,6 @@
 // or "strict" modifier may not affect it, depending on the compiler.
 // In particular, nesting NiceMock, NaggyMock, and StrictMock is NOT
 // supported.
-//
-// Another known limitation is that the constructors of the base mock
-// cannot have arguments passed by non-const reference, which are
-// banned by the Google C++ style guide anyway.
 
 #ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_GENERATED_NICE_STRICT_H_
 #define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_GENERATED_NICE_STRICT_H_
@@ -79,15 +74,35 @@ namespace testing {
 template <class MockClass>
 class NiceMock : public MockClass {
  public:
-  // We don't factor out the constructor body to a common method, as
-  // we have to avoid a possible clash with members of MockClass.
-  NiceMock() {
+  NiceMock() : MockClass() {
     ::testing::Mock::AllowUninterestingCalls(
         internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
   }
 
-  // C++ doesn't (yet) allow inheritance of constructors, so we have
-  // to define it for each arity.
+#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
+  // Ideally, we would inherit base class's constructors through a using
+  // declaration, which would preserve their visibility. However, many existing
+  // tests rely on the fact that current implementation reexports protected
+  // constructors as public. These tests would need to be cleaned up first.
+
+  // Single argument constructor is special-cased so that it can be
+  // made explicit.
+  template <typename A>
+  explicit NiceMock(A&& arg) : MockClass(std::forward<A>(arg)) {
+    ::testing::Mock::AllowUninterestingCalls(
+        internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+  }
+
+  template <typename A1, typename A2, typename... An>
+  NiceMock(A1&& arg1, A2&& arg2, An&&... args)
+      : MockClass(std::forward<A1>(arg1), std::forward<A2>(arg2),
+                  std::forward<An>(args)...) {
+    ::testing::Mock::AllowUninterestingCalls(
+        internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+  }
+#else
+  // C++98 doesn't have variadic templates, so we have to define one
+  // for each arity.
   template <typename A1>
   explicit NiceMock(const A1& a1) : MockClass(a1) {
     ::testing::Mock::AllowUninterestingCalls(
@@ -163,7 +178,9 @@ class NiceMock : public MockClass {
         internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
   }
 
-  virtual ~NiceMock() {
+#endif  // GTEST_LANG_CXX11
+
+  ~NiceMock() {
     ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction(
         internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
   }
@@ -175,15 +192,35 @@ class NiceMock : public MockClass {
 template <class MockClass>
 class NaggyMock : public MockClass {
  public:
-  // We don't factor out the constructor body to a common method, as
-  // we have to avoid a possible clash with members of MockClass.
-  NaggyMock() {
+  NaggyMock() : MockClass() {
+    ::testing::Mock::WarnUninterestingCalls(
+        internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+  }
+
+#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
+  // Ideally, we would inherit base class's constructors through a using
+  // declaration, which would preserve their visibility. However, many existing
+  // tests rely on the fact that current implementation reexports protected
+  // constructors as public. These tests would need to be cleaned up first.
+
+  // Single argument constructor is special-cased so that it can be
+  // made explicit.
+  template <typename A>
+  explicit NaggyMock(A&& arg) : MockClass(std::forward<A>(arg)) {
     ::testing::Mock::WarnUninterestingCalls(
         internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
   }
 
-  // C++ doesn't (yet) allow inheritance of constructors, so we have
-  // to define it for each arity.
+  template <typename A1, typename A2, typename... An>
+  NaggyMock(A1&& arg1, A2&& arg2, An&&... args)
+      : MockClass(std::forward<A1>(arg1), std::forward<A2>(arg2),
+                  std::forward<An>(args)...) {
+    ::testing::Mock::WarnUninterestingCalls(
+        internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+  }
+#else
+  // C++98 doesn't have variadic templates, so we have to define one
+  // for each arity.
   template <typename A1>
   explicit NaggyMock(const A1& a1) : MockClass(a1) {
     ::testing::Mock::WarnUninterestingCalls(
@@ -259,7 +296,9 @@ class NaggyMock : public MockClass {
         internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
   }
 
-  virtual ~NaggyMock() {
+#endif  // GTEST_LANG_CXX11
+
+  ~NaggyMock() {
     ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction(
         internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
   }
@@ -271,15 +310,35 @@ class NaggyMock : public MockClass {
 template <class MockClass>
 class StrictMock : public MockClass {
  public:
-  // We don't factor out the constructor body to a common method, as
-  // we have to avoid a possible clash with members of MockClass.
-  StrictMock() {
+  StrictMock() : MockClass() {
+    ::testing::Mock::FailUninterestingCalls(
+        internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+  }
+
+#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
+  // Ideally, we would inherit base class's constructors through a using
+  // declaration, which would preserve their visibility. However, many existing
+  // tests rely on the fact that current implementation reexports protected
+  // constructors as public. These tests would need to be cleaned up first.
+
+  // Single argument constructor is special-cased so that it can be
+  // made explicit.
+  template <typename A>
+  explicit StrictMock(A&& arg) : MockClass(std::forward<A>(arg)) {
     ::testing::Mock::FailUninterestingCalls(
         internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
   }
 
-  // C++ doesn't (yet) allow inheritance of constructors, so we have
-  // to define it for each arity.
+  template <typename A1, typename A2, typename... An>
+  StrictMock(A1&& arg1, A2&& arg2, An&&... args)
+      : MockClass(std::forward<A1>(arg1), std::forward<A2>(arg2),
+                  std::forward<An>(args)...) {
+    ::testing::Mock::FailUninterestingCalls(
+        internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+  }
+#else
+  // C++98 doesn't have variadic templates, so we have to define one
+  // for each arity.
   template <typename A1>
   explicit StrictMock(const A1& a1) : MockClass(a1) {
     ::testing::Mock::FailUninterestingCalls(
@@ -355,7 +414,9 @@ class StrictMock : public MockClass {
         internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
   }
 
-  virtual ~StrictMock() {
+#endif  // GTEST_LANG_CXX11
+
+  ~StrictMock() {
     ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction(
         internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
   }

googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-nice-strict.h.pump

 $$ -*- mode: c++; -*-
-$$ This is a Pump source file.  Please use Pump to convert it to
-$$ gmock-generated-nice-strict.h.
+$$ This is a Pump source file. Please use Pump to convert
+$$ it to gmock-generated-nice-strict.h.
 $$
 $var n = 10  $$ The maximum arity we support.
 // Copyright 2008, Google Inc.
@@ -52,10 +52,9 @@ $var n = 10  $$ The maximum arity we support.
 // NiceMock<MockFoo>.
 //
 // NiceMock, NaggyMock, and StrictMock "inherit" the constructors of
-// their respective base class, with up-to $n arguments.  Therefore
-// you can write NiceMock<MockFoo>(5, "a") to construct a nice mock
-// where MockFoo has a constructor that accepts (int, const char*),
-// for example.
+// their respective base class.  Therefore you can write
+// NiceMock<MockFoo>(5, "a") to construct a nice mock where MockFoo
+// has a constructor that accepts (int, const char*), for example.
 //
 // A known limitation is that NiceMock<MockFoo>, NaggyMock<MockFoo>,
 // and StrictMock<MockFoo> only works for mock methods defined using
@@ -64,10 +63,6 @@ $var n = 10  $$ The maximum arity we support.
 // or "strict" modifier may not affect it, depending on the compiler.
 // In particular, nesting NiceMock, NaggyMock, and StrictMock is NOT
 // supported.
-//
-// Another known limitation is that the constructors of the base mock
-// cannot have arguments passed by non-const reference, which are
-// banned by the Google C++ style guide anyway.
 
 #ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_GENERATED_NICE_STRICT_H_
 #define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_GENERATED_NICE_STRICT_H_
@@ -91,15 +86,35 @@ $var method=[[$if kind==0 [[AllowUninterestingCalls]]
 template <class MockClass>
 class $clazz : public MockClass {
  public:
-  // We don't factor out the constructor body to a common method, as
-  // we have to avoid a possible clash with members of MockClass.
-  $clazz() {
+  $clazz() : MockClass() {
+    ::testing::Mock::$method(
+        internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+  }
+
+#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
+  // Ideally, we would inherit base class's constructors through a using
+  // declaration, which would preserve their visibility. However, many existing
+  // tests rely on the fact that current implementation reexports protected
+  // constructors as public. These tests would need to be cleaned up first.
+
+  // Single argument constructor is special-cased so that it can be
+  // made explicit.
+  template <typename A>
+  explicit $clazz(A&& arg) : MockClass(std::forward<A>(arg)) {
     ::testing::Mock::$method(
         internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
   }
 
-  // C++ doesn't (yet) allow inheritance of constructors, so we have
-  // to define it for each arity.
+  template <typename A1, typename A2, typename... An>
+  $clazz(A1&& arg1, A2&& arg2, An&&... args)
+      : MockClass(std::forward<A1>(arg1), std::forward<A2>(arg2),
+                  std::forward<An>(args)...) {
+    ::testing::Mock::$method(
+        internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+  }
+#else
+  // C++98 doesn't have variadic templates, so we have to define one
+  // for each arity.
   template <typename A1>
   explicit $clazz(const A1& a1) : MockClass(a1) {
     ::testing::Mock::$method(
@@ -117,7 +132,9 @@ $range j 1..i
 
 
 ]]
-  virtual ~$clazz() {
+#endif  // GTEST_LANG_CXX11
+
+  ~$clazz() {
     ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction(
         internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
   }

googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-more-matchers.h

@@ -43,6 +43,18 @@
 
 namespace testing {
 
+// Silence C4100 (unreferenced formal
+// parameter) for MSVC
+#ifdef _MSC_VER
+# pragma warning(push)
+# pragma warning(disable:4100)
+#if (_MSC_VER == 1900)
+// and silence C4800 (C4800: 'int *const ': forcing value
+// to bool 'true' or 'false') for MSVC 14
+# pragma warning(disable:4800)
+  #endif
+#endif
+
 // Defines a matcher that matches an empty container. The container must
 // support both size() and empty(), which all STL-like containers provide.
 MATCHER(IsEmpty, negation ? "isn't empty" : "is empty") {
@@ -69,6 +81,11 @@ MATCHER(IsFalse, negation ? "is true" : "is false") {
   return !static_cast<bool>(arg);
 }
 
+#ifdef _MSC_VER
+# pragma warning(pop)
+#endif
+
+
 }  // namespace testing
 
 #endif  // GMOCK_GMOCK_MORE_MATCHERS_H_

googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-spec-builders.h

@@ -147,14 +147,13 @@ class GTEST_API_ UntypedFunctionMockerBase {
   // action fails.
   // L = *
   virtual UntypedActionResultHolderBase* UntypedPerformDefaultAction(
-      const void* untyped_args, const std::string& call_description) const = 0;
+      void* untyped_args, const std::string& call_description) const = 0;
 
   // Performs the given action with the given arguments and returns
   // the action's result.
   // L = *
   virtual UntypedActionResultHolderBase* UntypedPerformAction(
-      const void* untyped_action,
-      const void* untyped_args) const = 0;
+      const void* untyped_action, void* untyped_args) const = 0;
 
   // Writes a message that the call is uninteresting (i.e. neither
   // explicitly expected nor explicitly unexpected) to the given
@@ -209,9 +208,8 @@ class GTEST_API_ UntypedFunctionMockerBase {
   // arguments.  This function can be safely called from multiple
   // threads concurrently.  The caller is responsible for deleting the
   // result.
-  UntypedActionResultHolderBase* UntypedInvokeWith(
-      const void* untyped_args)
-          GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(g_gmock_mutex);
+  UntypedActionResultHolderBase* UntypedInvokeWith(void* untyped_args)
+      GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(g_gmock_mutex);
 
  protected:
   typedef std::vector<const void*> UntypedOnCallSpecs;
@@ -236,6 +234,14 @@ class GTEST_API_ UntypedFunctionMockerBase {
   UntypedOnCallSpecs untyped_on_call_specs_;
 
   // All expectations for this function mocker.
+  //
+  // It's undefined behavior to interleave expectations (EXPECT_CALLs
+  // or ON_CALLs) and mock function calls.  Also, the order of
+  // expectations is important.  Therefore it's a logic race condition
+  // to read/write untyped_expectations_ concurrently.  In order for
+  // tools like tsan to catch concurrent read/write accesses to
+  // untyped_expectations, we deliberately leave accesses to it
+  // unprotected.
   UntypedExpectations untyped_expectations_;
 };  // class UntypedFunctionMockerBase
 
@@ -1252,8 +1258,9 @@ class MockSpec {
 
   // Constructs a MockSpec object, given the function mocker object
   // that the spec is associated with.
-  explicit MockSpec(internal::FunctionMockerBase<F>* function_mocker)
-      : function_mocker_(function_mocker) {}
+  MockSpec(internal::FunctionMockerBase<F>* function_mocker,
+           const ArgumentMatcherTuple& matchers)
+      : function_mocker_(function_mocker), matchers_(matchers) {}
 
   // Adds a new default action spec to the function mocker and returns
   // the newly created spec.
@@ -1275,14 +1282,17 @@ class MockSpec {
         file, line, source_text, matchers_);
   }
 
+  // This operator overload is used to swallow the superfluous parameter list
+  // introduced by the ON/EXPECT_CALL macros. See the macro comments for more
+  // explanation.
+  MockSpec<F>& operator()(const internal::WithoutMatchers&, void* const) {
+    return *this;
+  }
+
  private:
   template <typename Function>
   friend class internal::FunctionMocker;
 
-  void SetMatchers(const ArgumentMatcherTuple& matchers) {
-    matchers_ = matchers;
-  }
-
   // The function mocker that owns this spec.
   internal::FunctionMockerBase<F>* const function_mocker_;
   // The argument matchers specified in the spec.
@@ -1390,19 +1400,20 @@ class ActionResultHolder : public UntypedActionResultHolderBase {
   template <typename F>
   static ActionResultHolder* PerformDefaultAction(
       const FunctionMockerBase<F>* func_mocker,
-      const typename Function<F>::ArgumentTuple& args,
+      typename RvalueRef<typename Function<F>::ArgumentTuple>::type args,
       const std::string& call_description) {
-    return new ActionResultHolder(Wrapper(
-        func_mocker->PerformDefaultAction(args, call_description)));
+    return new ActionResultHolder(Wrapper(func_mocker->PerformDefaultAction(
+        internal::move(args), call_description)));
   }
 
   // Performs the given action and returns the result in a new-ed
   // ActionResultHolder.
   template <typename F>
-  static ActionResultHolder*
-  PerformAction(const Action<F>& action,
-                const typename Function<F>::ArgumentTuple& args) {
-    return new ActionResultHolder(Wrapper(action.Perform(args)));
+  static ActionResultHolder* PerformAction(
+      const Action<F>& action,
+      typename RvalueRef<typename Function<F>::ArgumentTuple>::type args) {
+    return new ActionResultHolder(
+        Wrapper(action.Perform(internal::move(args))));
   }
 
  private:
@@ -1430,9 +1441,9 @@ class ActionResultHolder<void> : public UntypedActionResultHolderBase {
   template <typename F>
   static ActionResultHolder* PerformDefaultAction(
       const FunctionMockerBase<F>* func_mocker,
-      const typename Function<F>::ArgumentTuple& args,
+      typename RvalueRef<typename Function<F>::ArgumentTuple>::type args,
       const std::string& call_description) {
-    func_mocker->PerformDefaultAction(args, call_description);
+    func_mocker->PerformDefaultAction(internal::move(args), call_description);
     return new ActionResultHolder;
   }
 
@@ -1441,8 +1452,8 @@ class ActionResultHolder<void> : public UntypedActionResultHolderBase {
   template <typename F>
   static ActionResultHolder* PerformAction(
       const Action<F>& action,
-      const typename Function<F>::ArgumentTuple& args) {
-    action.Perform(args);
+      typename RvalueRef<typename Function<F>::ArgumentTuple>::type args) {
+    action.Perform(internal::move(args));
     return new ActionResultHolder;
   }
 
@@ -1461,7 +1472,7 @@ class FunctionMockerBase : public UntypedFunctionMockerBase {
   typedef typename Function<F>::ArgumentTuple ArgumentTuple;
   typedef typename Function<F>::ArgumentMatcherTuple ArgumentMatcherTuple;
 
-  FunctionMockerBase() : current_spec_(this) {}
+  FunctionMockerBase() {}
 
   // The destructor verifies that all expectations on this mock
   // function have been satisfied.  If not, it will report Google Test
@@ -1497,12 +1508,13 @@ class FunctionMockerBase : public UntypedFunctionMockerBase {
   // mutable state of this object, and thus can be called concurrently
   // without locking.
   // L = *
-  Result PerformDefaultAction(const ArgumentTuple& args,
-                              const std::string& call_description) const {
+  Result PerformDefaultAction(
+      typename RvalueRef<typename Function<F>::ArgumentTuple>::type args,
+      const std::string& call_description) const {
     const OnCallSpec<F>* const spec =
         this->FindOnCallSpec(args);
     if (spec != NULL) {
-      return spec->GetAction().Perform(args);
+      return spec->GetAction().Perform(internal::move(args));
     }
     const std::string message =
         call_description +
@@ -1524,11 +1536,11 @@ class FunctionMockerBase : public UntypedFunctionMockerBase {
   // action fails.  The caller is responsible for deleting the result.
   // L = *
   virtual UntypedActionResultHolderBase* UntypedPerformDefaultAction(
-      const void* untyped_args,  // must point to an ArgumentTuple
+      void* untyped_args,  // must point to an ArgumentTuple
       const std::string& call_description) const {
-    const ArgumentTuple& args =
-        *static_cast<const ArgumentTuple*>(untyped_args);
-    return ResultHolder::PerformDefaultAction(this, args, call_description);
+    ArgumentTuple* args = static_cast<ArgumentTuple*>(untyped_args);
+    return ResultHolder::PerformDefaultAction(this, internal::move(*args),
+                                              call_description);
   }
 
   // Performs the given action with the given arguments and returns
@@ -1536,13 +1548,12 @@ class FunctionMockerBase : public UntypedFunctionMockerBase {
   // result.
   // L = *
   virtual UntypedActionResultHolderBase* UntypedPerformAction(
-      const void* untyped_action, const void* untyped_args) const {
+      const void* untyped_action, void* untyped_args) const {
     // Make a copy of the action before performing it, in case the
     // action deletes the mock object (and thus deletes itself).
     const Action<F> action = *static_cast<const Action<F>*>(untyped_action);
-    const ArgumentTuple& args =
-        *static_cast<const ArgumentTuple*>(untyped_args);
-    return ResultHolder::PerformAction(action, args);
+    ArgumentTuple* args = static_cast<ArgumentTuple*>(untyped_args);
+    return ResultHolder::PerformAction(action, internal::move(*args));
   }
 
   // Implements UntypedFunctionMockerBase::ClearDefaultActionsLocked():
@@ -1582,10 +1593,14 @@ class FunctionMockerBase : public UntypedFunctionMockerBase {
   // Returns the result of invoking this mock function with the given
   // arguments.  This function can be safely called from multiple
   // threads concurrently.
-  Result InvokeWith(const ArgumentTuple& args)
-        GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(g_gmock_mutex) {
+  Result InvokeWith(
+      typename RvalueRef<typename Function<F>::ArgumentTuple>::type args)
+      GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(g_gmock_mutex) {
+    // const_cast is required since in C++98 we still pass ArgumentTuple around
+    // by const& instead of rvalue reference.
+    void* untyped_args = const_cast<void*>(static_cast<const void*>(&args));
     scoped_ptr<ResultHolder> holder(
-        DownCast_<ResultHolder*>(this->UntypedInvokeWith(&args)));
+        DownCast_<ResultHolder*>(this->UntypedInvokeWith(untyped_args)));
     return holder->Unwrap();
   }
 
@@ -1609,6 +1624,8 @@ class FunctionMockerBase : public UntypedFunctionMockerBase {
     TypedExpectation<F>* const expectation =
         new TypedExpectation<F>(this, file, line, source_text, m);
     const linked_ptr<ExpectationBase> untyped_expectation(expectation);
+    // See the definition of untyped_expectations_ for why access to
+    // it is unprotected here.
     untyped_expectations_.push_back(untyped_expectation);
 
     // Adds this expectation into the implicit sequence if there is one.
@@ -1620,10 +1637,6 @@ class FunctionMockerBase : public UntypedFunctionMockerBase {
     return *expectation;
   }
 
-  // The current spec (either default action spec or expectation spec)
-  // being described on this function mocker.
-  MockSpec<F>& current_spec() { return current_spec_; }
-
  private:
   template <typename Func> friend class TypedExpectation;
 
@@ -1716,6 +1729,8 @@ class FunctionMockerBase : public UntypedFunctionMockerBase {
       const ArgumentTuple& args) const
           GTEST_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_REQUIRED_(g_gmock_mutex) {
     g_gmock_mutex.AssertHeld();
+    // See the definition of untyped_expectations_ for why access to
+    // it is unprotected here.
     for (typename UntypedExpectations::const_reverse_iterator it =
              untyped_expectations_.rbegin();
          it != untyped_expectations_.rend(); ++it) {
@@ -1766,10 +1781,6 @@ class FunctionMockerBase : public UntypedFunctionMockerBase {
     }
   }
 
-  // The current spec (either default action spec or expectation spec)
-  // being described on this function mocker.
-  MockSpec<F> current_spec_;
-
   // There is no generally useful and implementable semantics of
   // copying a mock object, so copying a mock is usually a user error.
   // Thus we disallow copying function mockers.  If the user really
@@ -1832,17 +1843,76 @@ inline Expectation::Expectation(internal::ExpectationBase& exp)  // NOLINT
 
 }  // namespace testing
 
-// A separate macro is required to avoid compile errors when the name
-// of the method used in call is a result of macro expansion.
-// See CompilesWithMethodNameExpandedFromMacro tests in
-// internal/gmock-spec-builders_test.cc for more details.
-#define GMOCK_ON_CALL_IMPL_(obj, call) \
-    ((obj).gmock_##call).InternalDefaultActionSetAt(__FILE__, __LINE__, \
-                                                    #obj, #call)
-#define ON_CALL(obj, call) GMOCK_ON_CALL_IMPL_(obj, call)
-
-#define GMOCK_EXPECT_CALL_IMPL_(obj, call) \
-    ((obj).gmock_##call).InternalExpectedAt(__FILE__, __LINE__, #obj, #call)
-#define EXPECT_CALL(obj, call) GMOCK_EXPECT_CALL_IMPL_(obj, call)
+// Implementation for ON_CALL and EXPECT_CALL macros. A separate macro is
+// required to avoid compile errors when the name of the method used in call is
+// a result of macro expansion. See CompilesWithMethodNameExpandedFromMacro
+// tests in internal/gmock-spec-builders_test.cc for more details.
+//
+// This macro supports statements both with and without parameter matchers. If
+// the parameter list is omitted, gMock will accept any parameters, which allows
+// tests to be written that don't need to encode the number of method
+// parameter. This technique may only be used for non-overloaded methods.
+//
+//   // These are the same:
+//   ON_CALL(mock, NoArgsMethod()).WillByDefault(…);
+//   ON_CALL(mock, NoArgsMethod).WillByDefault(…);
+//
+//   // As are these:
+//   ON_CALL(mock, TwoArgsMethod(_, _)).WillByDefault(…);
+//   ON_CALL(mock, TwoArgsMethod).WillByDefault(…);
+//
+//   // Can also specify args if you want, of course:
+//   ON_CALL(mock, TwoArgsMethod(_, 45)).WillByDefault(…);
+//
+//   // Overloads work as long as you specify parameters:
+//   ON_CALL(mock, OverloadedMethod(_)).WillByDefault(…);
+//   ON_CALL(mock, OverloadedMethod(_, _)).WillByDefault(…);
+//
+//   // Oops! Which overload did you want?
+//   ON_CALL(mock, OverloadedMethod).WillByDefault(…);
+//     => ERROR: call to member function 'gmock_OverloadedMethod' is ambiguous
+//
+// How this works: The mock class uses two overloads of the gmock_Method
+// expectation setter method plus an operator() overload on the MockSpec object.
+// In the matcher list form, the macro expands to:
+//
+//   // This statement:
+//   ON_CALL(mock, TwoArgsMethod(_, 45))…
+//
+//   // …expands to:
+//   mock.gmock_TwoArgsMethod(_, 45)(WithoutMatchers(), nullptr)…
+//   |-------------v---------------||------------v-------------|
+//       invokes first overload        swallowed by operator()
+//
+//   // …which is essentially:
+//   mock.gmock_TwoArgsMethod(_, 45)…
+//
+// Whereas the form without a matcher list:
+//
+//   // This statement:
+//   ON_CALL(mock, TwoArgsMethod)…
+//
+//   // …expands to:
+//   mock.gmock_TwoArgsMethod(WithoutMatchers(), nullptr)…
+//   |-----------------------v--------------------------|
+//                 invokes second overload
+//
+//   // …which is essentially:
+//   mock.gmock_TwoArgsMethod(_, _)…
+//
+// The WithoutMatchers() argument is used to disambiguate overloads and to
+// block the caller from accidentally invoking the second overload directly. The
+// second argument is an internal type derived from the method signature. The
+// failure to disambiguate two overloads of this method in the ON_CALL statement
+// is how we block callers from setting expectations on overloaded methods.
+#define GMOCK_ON_CALL_IMPL_(mock_expr, Setter, call)                          \
+  ((mock_expr).gmock_##call)(::testing::internal::GetWithoutMatchers(), NULL) \
+      .Setter(__FILE__, __LINE__, #mock_expr, #call)
+
+#define ON_CALL(obj, call) \
+  GMOCK_ON_CALL_IMPL_(obj, InternalDefaultActionSetAt, call)
+
+#define EXPECT_CALL(obj, call) \
+  GMOCK_ON_CALL_IMPL_(obj, InternalExpectedAt, call)
 
 #endif  // GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_SPEC_BUILDERS_H_

googlemock/include/gmock/internal/custom/gmock-generated-actions.h.pump

 $$ -*- mode: c++; -*-
-$$ This is a Pump source file (http://go/pump).  Please use Pump to convert
+$$ This is a Pump source file. Please use Pump to convert
 $$ it to callback-actions.h.
 $$
 $var max_callback_arity = 5

googlemock/include/gmock/internal/gmock-internal-utils.h

@@ -48,6 +48,14 @@
 namespace testing {
 namespace internal {
 
+// Silence MSVC C4100 (unreferenced formal parameter) and
+// C4805('==': unsafe mix of type 'const int' and type 'const bool')
+#ifdef _MSC_VER
+# pragma warning(push)
+# pragma warning(disable:4100)
+# pragma warning(disable:4805)
+#endif
+
 // Joins a vector of strings as if they are fields of a tuple; returns
 // the joined string.
 GTEST_API_ std::string JoinAsTuple(const Strings& fields);
@@ -336,6 +344,21 @@ GTEST_API_ bool LogIsVisible(LogSeverity severity);
 GTEST_API_ void Log(LogSeverity severity, const std::string& message,
                     int stack_frames_to_skip);
 
+// A marker class that is used to resolve parameterless expectations to the
+// correct overload. This must not be instantiable, to prevent client code from
+// accidentally resolving to the overload; for example:
+//
+//    ON_CALL(mock, Method({}, nullptr))…
+//
+class WithoutMatchers {
+ private:
+  WithoutMatchers() {}
+  friend GTEST_API_ WithoutMatchers GetWithoutMatchers();
+};
+
+// Internal use only: access the singleton instance of WithoutMatchers.
+GTEST_API_ WithoutMatchers GetWithoutMatchers();
+
 // TODO(wan@google.com): group all type utilities together.
 
 // Type traits.
@@ -510,7 +533,7 @@ struct BooleanConstant {};
 
 // Emit an assertion failure due to incorrect DoDefault() usage. Out-of-lined to
 // reduce code size.
-void IllegalDoDefault(const char* file, int line);
+GTEST_API_ void IllegalDoDefault(const char* file, int line);
 
 #if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
 // Helper types for Apply() below.
@@ -539,6 +562,12 @@ auto Apply(F&& f, Tuple&& args)
                    make_int_pack<std::tuple_size<Tuple>::value>());
 }
 #endif
+
+
+#ifdef _MSC_VER
+# pragma warning(pop)
+#endif
+
 }  // namespace internal
 }  // namespace testing
 

googlemock/src/gmock-internal-utils.cc

@@ -188,7 +188,9 @@ GTEST_API_ void Log(LogSeverity severity, const std::string& message,
   std::cout << ::std::flush;
 }
 
-void IllegalDoDefault(const char* file, int line) {
+GTEST_API_ WithoutMatchers GetWithoutMatchers() { return WithoutMatchers(); }
+
+GTEST_API_ void IllegalDoDefault(const char* file, int line) {
   internal::Assert(
       false, file, line,
       "You are using DoDefault() inside a composite action like "