1. 06 Oct, 2014 2 commits
  2. 18 Sep, 2014 1 commit
  3. 17 Sep, 2014 2 commits
  4. 08 Sep, 2014 1 commit
  5. 02 Sep, 2014 1 commit
  6. 26 Aug, 2014 1 commit
  7. 22 Aug, 2014 1 commit
  8. 20 Aug, 2014 1 commit
  9. 16 Aug, 2014 1 commit
  10. 10 Aug, 2014 1 commit
    • Jason Swails's avatar
      Redo the way CHARMM PSF files are parsed. This should be much more robust in · 4b9221e3
      Jason Swails authored
      terms of supporting PSF files that don't really conform to the "standard" way
      that CHARMM prints them.
      
      The downside is that it relies on ! comment tags which I think are comments for
      CHARMM.  However, the use of !NATOM and !NBOND and other tags seem to be _much_
      more conserved than the general format of the PSF file across different dialects
      of PSFs.  So the current approach should be more flexible.
      4b9221e3
  11. 09 Aug, 2014 1 commit
  12. 23 Jul, 2014 1 commit
  13. 21 Jul, 2014 2 commits
  14. 18 Jul, 2014 4 commits
  15. 17 Jul, 2014 1 commit
  16. 16 Jul, 2014 2 commits
  17. 15 Jul, 2014 2 commits
  18. 14 Jul, 2014 3 commits
  19. 11 Jul, 2014 5 commits
  20. 07 Jul, 2014 1 commit
  21. 03 Jul, 2014 1 commit
    • Jason Swails's avatar
      Small fixes: · f5cbd31e
      Jason Swails authored
          - Adjust CharmmPsfFile parser to accept multiple blank lines before the
            NATOM record (I saw 1 PSF file like this... not sure how common it really
            is)
          - Removed the shebang line from element.py and removed execute permissions--
            it should never be executed directly (evidenced by the fact that the
            original shebang line was wrong and would never work, anyway).
          - Fix a test to determine if a Bond is part of an Angle in the PSF data
            structures.
      f5cbd31e
  22. 02 Jul, 2014 2 commits
  23. 29 Jun, 2014 1 commit
  24. 24 Jun, 2014 1 commit
  25. 12 Jun, 2014 1 commit