GitLab

can't validate the that this object does anything more than simply write without
exceptions (i.e., we can't tell if the DCD file is actually _valid_)

Add a test for the various numpy attributes (and the arguments they take) for
the unit module.

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File ".../python/tests/TestNumpyCompatibility.py", line 87, in testNumpyAttributes
    d = self.data.reshape((100, 3))
  File ".../simtk/unit/quantity.py", line 575, in reshape
    return Quantity(self._value.reshape(shape, order=order))
  File ".../simtk/unit/quantity.py", line 142, in __init__
    if value == first_item:
ValueError: The truth value of an array with more than one element is ambiguous. Use a.any() or a.all()

Also add a test for new unit numpy capabilities.

underlying numpy array. This function would be used in instances where, for
instance, a certain API would send a flattened array of coordinates or
velocities with units attached, and you wanted to reshape the array into
(natom, 3) to be consistent with OpenMM's Context object.

arguments and pass them to the numpy function if applicable. That way, users get
the full flexibility of the numpy API on those particular methods AND get the
added benefit that the result has the correct units (and it all runs fast).

it.  Not only that, I got this FutureWarning:

/opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/simtk/unit/quantity.py:170:
FutureWarning: comparison to `None` will result in an elementwise object comparison in the future.
  if value == None:

sqrt of the variance), and average, returning a Quantity with the proper units.

This should be reasonably efficient, as it takes advantage of numpy-accelerated
methods if they're present.

parameter set.