GitLab

Related to #2124 
The current implementation is throwing a shape mismatch error. Which makes sense, as this line is obviously missing, comparing to XFormersCrossAttnProcessor and LoRACrossAttnProcessor.

I don't have formal tests, but I compared `LoRACrossAttnProcessor` and `LoRAXFormersCrossAttnProcessor` ad-hoc, and they produce the same results with this fix.

* [LoRA] All to use in inference with pipeline

* [LoRA] allow cross attention kwargs passed to pipeline

* finish

* fuse attention mask

* lint

* use 0 beta when no attention mask re: @Birch-san

* allow passing op to xFormers attention

original code by @patil-suraj
huggingface/diffusers@ae0cc0b71f28c0f2c5c27026b18f1bea98b505f1

* correct style by `make style`

* add attention_op arg documents

* add usage example to docstring
Co-authored-by: Patrick von Platen <patrick.v.platen@gmail.com>

* add usage example to docstring
Co-authored-by: Patrick von Platen <patrick.v.platen@gmail.com>

* code style correction by `make style`

* Update docstring code to a valid python example
Co-authored-by: Suraj Patil <surajp815@gmail.com>

* Update docstring code to a valid python example
Co-authored-by: Suraj Patil <surajp815@gmail.com>

* style correction by `make style`

* Update code exmaple to fully functional
Co-authored-by: Patrick von Platen <patrick.v.platen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Suraj Patil <surajp815@gmail.com>

* [Lora] first upload

* add first lora version

* upload

* more

* first training

* up

* correct

* improve

* finish loaders and inference

* up

* up

* fix more

* up

* finish more

* finish more

* up

* up

* change year

* revert year change

* Change lines

* Add cloneofsimo as co-author.
Co-authored-by: Simo Ryu <cloneofsimo@gmail.com>

* finish

* fix docs

* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Pedro Cuenca <pedro@huggingface.co>
Co-authored-by: Suraj Patil <surajp815@gmail.com>

* upload

* finish
Co-authored-by: Simo Ryu <cloneofsimo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pedro Cuenca <pedro@huggingface.co>
Co-authored-by: Suraj Patil <surajp815@gmail.com>

re: https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/issues/1857

We relax some of the checks to deal with unclip reproducibility issues. Mainly by checking the average pixel difference (measured w/in 0-255) instead of the max pixel difference (measured w/in 0-1).

- [x] add mixin to UnCLIPPipelineFastTests
- [x] add mixin to UnCLIPImageVariationPipelineFastTests
- [x] Move UnCLIPPipeline flags in mixin to base class
- [x] Small MPS fixes for F.pad and F.interpolate
- [x] Made test unCLIP model's dimensions smaller to run tests faster

* first proposal

* rename

* up

* Apply suggestions from code review

* better

* up

* finish

* up

* rename

* correct versatile

* up

* up

* up

* up

* fix

* Apply suggestions from code review

* make style

* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Pedro Cuenca <pedro@huggingface.co>

* add error message
Co-authored-by: Pedro Cuenca <pedro@huggingface.co>