- 14 Dec, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Jason Rhinelander authored
When compiling in C++17 mode the noexcept specifier is part of the function type. This causes a failure in pybind11 because, by omitting a noexcept specifier when deducing function return and argument types, we are implicitly making `noexcept(false)` part of the type. This means that functions with `noexcept` fail to match the function templates in cpp_function (and other places), and we get compilation failure (we end up trying to fit it into the lambda function version, which fails since a function pointer has no `operator()`). We can, however, deduce the true/false `B` in noexcept(B), so we don't need to add a whole other set of overloads, but need to deduce the extra argument when under C++17. That will *not* work under pre-C++17, however. This commit adds two macros to fix the problem: under C++17 (with the appropriate feature macro set) they provide an extra `bool NoExceptions` template argument and provide the `noexcept(NoExceptions)` deduced specifier. Under pre-C++17 they expand to nothing. This is needed to compile pybind11 with gcc7 under -std=c++17.
-
- 08 Dec, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Dean Moldovan authored
-
- 19 Aug, 2016 3 commits
-
-
Dean Moldovan authored
There are more enum tests than 'constants and functions'.
-
Dean Moldovan authored
The C++ part of the test code is modified to achieve this. As a result, this kind of test: ```python with capture: kw_func1(5, y=10) assert capture == "kw_func(x=5, y=10)" ``` can be replaced with a simple: `assert kw_func1(5, y=10) == "x=5, y=10"` -
Dean Moldovan authored
Use simple asserts and pytest's powerful introspection to make testing simpler. This merges the old .py/.ref file pairs into simple .py files where the expected values are right next to the code being tested. This commit does not touch the C++ part of the code and replicates the Python tests exactly like the old .ref-file-based approach.
-