- 25 Oct, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Jason Rhinelander authored
Currently pybind11 doesn't check when you define a new object (e.g. a class, function, or exception) that overwrites an existing one. If the thing being overwritten is a class, this leads to a segfault (because pybind still thinks the type is defined, even though Python no longer has the type). In other cases this is harmless (e.g. replacing a function with an exception), but even in that case it's most likely a bug. This code doesn't prevent you from actively doing something harmful, like deliberately overwriting a previous definition, but detects overwriting with a run-time error if it occurs in the standard class/function/exception/def registration interfaces. All of the additions are in non-template code; the result is actually a tiny decrease in .so size compared to master without the new test code (977304 to 977272 bytes), and about 4K higher with the new tests.
-
- 24 Oct, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Ivan Smirnov authored
This reduces direct access to internals.registered_types_cpp to just a few places.
-
- 23 Oct, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Ivan Smirnov authored
This avoid a hashmap lookup since the pointer to the list of direct converters is now cached in the typeinfo.
-
- 21 Oct, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Dean Moldovan authored
Making `cppfunction` explicit broke `def_property` and friends. The added tests would not compile without an implicit `cppfunction`.
-
- 16 Oct, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Jason Rhinelander authored
We have various classes that have non-explicit constructors that accept a single argument, which is implicitly making them implicitly convertible from the argument. In a few cases, this is desirable (e.g. implicit conversion of std::string to py::str, or conversion of double to py::float_); in many others, however, it is unintended (e.g. implicit conversion of size_t to some pre-declared py::array_t<T> type). This disables most of the unwanted implicit conversions by marking them `explicit`, and comments the ones that are deliberately left implicit.
-
- 13 Oct, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Dean Moldovan authored
-
Wenzel Jakob authored
-
- 11 Oct, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Dean Moldovan authored
-
- 23 Sep, 2016 3 commits
-
-
Dean Moldovan authored
`auto var = l[0]` has a strange quirk: `var` is actually an accessor and not an object, so any later assignment of `var = ...` would modify l[0] instead of `var`. This is surprising compared to the non-auto assignment `py::object var = l[0]; var = ...`. By overloading `operator=` on lvalue/rvalue, the expected behavior is restored even for `auto` variables.
-
Dean Moldovan authored
-
Dean Moldovan authored
-
- 22 Sep, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Dean Moldovan authored
This also adds the `hasattr` and `getattr` functions which are needed with the new attribute behavior. The new functions behave exactly like their Python counterparts. Similarly `object` gets a `contains` method which calls `__contains__`, i.e. it's the same as the `in` keyword in Python.
-
- 19 Sep, 2016 4 commits
-
-
Wenzel Jakob authored
-
Wenzel Jakob authored
-
Wenzel Jakob authored
-
Wenzel Jakob authored
-
- 16 Sep, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Jason Rhinelander authored
The custom exception handling added in PR #273 is robust, but is overly complex for declaring the most common simple C++ -> Python exception mapping that needs only to copy `what()`. This add a simpler `py::register_exception<CppExp>(module, "PyExp");` function that greatly simplifies the common basic case of translation of a simple CppException into a simple PythonException, while not removing the more advanced capabilities of defining custom exception handlers.
-
- 11 Sep, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Jason Rhinelander authored
-
Jason Rhinelander authored
This adds a static local variable (in dead code unless actually needed) in the overload code that is used for storage if the overload is for some convert-by-value type (such as numeric values or std::string). This has limitations (as written up in the advanced doc), but is better than simply not being able to overload reference or pointer methods.
-
- 10 Sep, 2016 4 commits
-
-
Dean Moldovan authored
This clears the Python error at the error_already_set throw site, thus allowing Python calls to be made in destructors which are triggered by the exception. This is preferable to the alternative, which would be guarding every Python API call with an error_scope. This effectively flips the behavior of error_already_set. Previously, it was assumed that the error stays in Python, so handling the exception in C++ would require explicitly calling PyErr_Clear(), but nothing was needed to propagate the error to Python. With this change, handling the error in C++ does not require a PyErr_Clear() call, but propagating the error to Python requires an explicit error_already_set::restore(). The change does not break old code which explicitly calls PyErr_Clear() for cleanup, which should be the majority of user code. The need for an explicit restore() call does break old code, but this should be mostly confined to the library and not user code.
-
Wenzel Jakob authored
-
Wenzel Jakob authored
-
Wenzel Jakob authored
-
- 09 Sep, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Jason Rhinelander authored
This commit adds support for forcing alias type initialization by defining constructors with `py::init_alias<arg1, arg2>()` instead of `py::init<arg1, arg2>()`. Currently py::init<> only results in Alias initialization if the type is extended in python, or the given arguments can't be used to construct the base type, but can be used to construct the alias. py::init_alias<>, in contrast, always invokes the constructor of the alias type. It looks like this was already the intention of `py::detail::init_alias`, which was forward-declared in 86d825f3, but was apparently never finished: despite the existance of a .def method accepting it, the `detail::init_alias` class isn't actually defined anywhere. This commit completes the feature (or possibly repurposes it), allowing declaration of classes that will always initialize the trampoline which is (as I argued in #397) sometimes useful.
-
- 08 Sep, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Jason Rhinelander authored
Type alias for alias classes with members didn't work properly: space was only allocated for sizeof(type), but if we want to be able to put a type_alias instance there, we need sizeof(type_alias), but sizeof(type_alias) > sizeof(type) whenever type_alias has members.
-
- 07 Sep, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Ivan Smirnov authored
-
Jason Rhinelander authored
This allows a slightly cleaner base type specification of: py::class_<Type, Base>("Type") as an alternative to py::class_<Type>("Type", py::base<Base>()) As with the other template parameters, the order relative to the holder or trampoline types doesn't matter. This also includes a compile-time assertion failure if attempting to specify more than one base class (but is easily extendible to support multiple inheritance, someday, by updating the class_selector::set_bases function to set multiple bases).
-
- 06 Sep, 2016 4 commits
-
-
Jason Rhinelander authored
The current pybind11::class_<Type, Holder, Trampoline> fixed template ordering results in a requirement to repeat the Holder with its default value (std::unique_ptr<Type>) argument, which is a little bit annoying: it needs to be specified not because we want to override the default, but rather because we need to specify the third argument. This commit removes this limitation by making the class_ template take the type name plus a parameter pack of options. It then extracts the first valid holder type and the first subclass type for holder_type and trampoline type_alias, respectively. (If unfound, both fall back to their current defaults, `std::unique_ptr<type>` and `type`, respectively). If any unmatched template arguments are provided, a static assertion fails. What this means is that you can specify or omit the arguments in any order: py::class_<A, PyA> c1(m, "A"); py::class_<B, PyB, std::shared_ptr<B>> c2(m, "B"); py::class_<C, std::shared_ptr<C>, PyB> c3(m, "C"); It also allows future class attributes (such as base types in the next commit) to be passed as class template types rather than needing to use a py::base<> wrapper. -
Dean Moldovan authored
Replicates Python API including keyword arguments.
-
Wenzel Jakob authored
-
Wenzel Jakob authored
-
- 05 Sep, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Wenzel Jakob authored
-
- 29 Aug, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Jason Rhinelander authored
Problem ======= The template trampoline pattern documented in PR #322 has a problem with virtual method overloads in intermediate classes in the inheritance chain between the trampoline class and the base class. For example, consider the following inheritance structure, where `B` is the actual class, `PyB<B>` is the trampoline class, and `PyA<B>` is an intermediate class adding A's methods into the trampoline: PyB<B> -> PyA<B> -> B -> A Suppose PyA<B> has a method `some_method()` with a PYBIND11_OVERLOAD in it to overload the virtual `A::some_method()`. If a Python class `C` is defined that inherits from the pybind11-registered `B` and tries to provide an overriding `some_method()`, the PYBIND11_OVERLOADs declared in PyA<B> fails to find this overloaded method, and thus never invoke it (or, if pure virtual and not overridden in PyB<B>, raises an exception). This happens because the base (internal) `PYBIND11_OVERLOAD_INT` macro simply calls `get_overload(this, name)`; `get_overload()` then uses the inferred type of `this` to do a type lookup in `registered_types_cpp`. This is where it fails: `this` will be a `PyA<B> *`, but `PyA<B>` is neither the base type (`B`) nor the trampoline type (`PyB<B>`). As a result, the overload fails and we get a failed overload lookup. The fix ======= The fix is relatively simple: we can cast `this` passed to `get_overload()` to a `const B *`, which lets get_overload look up the correct class. Since trampoline classes should be derived from `B` classes anyway, this cast should be perfectly safe. This does require adding the class name as an argument to the PYBIND11_OVERLOAD_INT macro, but leaves the public macro signatures unchanged.
-
- 24 Aug, 2016 3 commits
-
-
Wenzel Jakob authored
- ICPC can't handle the NCVirt trampoline which returns a non-copyable type, which is likely due to a constexpr/SFINAE issue. This disables the test on that compiler so that at least the rest can be tested.
-
Ivan Smirnov authored
-
Ivan Smirnov authored
-
- 17 Aug, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Glen Walker authored
For example keep_alive<0,1>() should work where the return value may sometimes be None. At present a "Could not allocate weak reference!" exception is thrown. Update documentation to clarify behaviour of keep_alive when nurse is None or does not support weak references.
-
- 12 Aug, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Jason Rhinelander authored
This allows exposing a dict-like interface to python code, allowing iteration over keys via: for k in custommapping: ... while still allowing iteration over pairs, so that you can also implement 'dict.items()' functionality which returns a pair iterator, allowing: for k, v in custommapping.items(): ... example-sequences-and-iterators is updated with a custom class providing both types of iteration.
-
- 10 Aug, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Jason Rhinelander authored
reference_internal requires an `instance` field to track the returned reference's parent, but that's just a duplication of what keep_alive<0,1> does, so use a keep alive to do this to eliminate the duplication.
-
- 09 Aug, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Jason Rhinelander authored
The pointer to the first member of a class instance is the same as the pointer to instance itself; pybind11 has some workarounds for this to not track registered instances that have a registered parent with the same address. This doesn't work everywhere, however: issue #328 is a failure of this for a mutator operator which resolves its argument to the parent rather than the child, as is needed in #328. This commit resolves the issue (and restores tracking of same-address instances) by changing registered_instances from an unordered_map to an unordered_multimap that allows duplicate instances for the same pointer to be recorded, then resolves these differences by checking the type of each matched instance when looking up an instance. (A unordered_multimap seems cleaner for this than a unordered_map<list> or similar because, the vast majority of the time, the instance will be unique).
-