- 30 May, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Jason Rhinelander authored
test_issues is deprecated, and the following commit adds other, related reference_wrapper tests.
-
- 16 Dec, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Wenzel Jakob authored
This commit includes modifications that are needed to get pybind11 to work with PyPy. The full test suite compiles and runs except for a last few functions that are commented out (due to problems in PyPy that were reported on the PyPy bugtracker). Two somewhat intrusive changes were needed to make it possible: two new tags ``py::buffer_protocol()`` and ``py::metaclass()`` must now be specified to the ``class_`` constructor if the class uses the buffer protocol and/or requires a metaclass (e.g. for static properties). Note that this is only for the PyPy version based on Python 2.7 for now. When the PyPy 3.x has caught up in terms of cpyext compliance, a PyPy 3.x patch will follow.
-
- 22 Nov, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Jason Rhinelander authored
This gives more informative output, often including the type (or at least some hint about the type).
-
- 20 Nov, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Dean Moldovan authored
A flake8 configuration is included in setup.cfg and the checks are executed automatically on Travis: * Ensures a consistent PEP8 code style * Does basic linting to prevent possible bugs
-
Wenzel Jakob authored
-
- 07 Nov, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Wenzel Jakob authored
-
- 06 Nov, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Jason Rhinelander authored
If we need to initialize a holder around an unowned instance, and the holder type is non-copyable (i.e. a unique_ptr), we currently construct the holder type around the value pointer, but then never actually destruct the holder: the holder destructor is called only for the instance that actually has `inst->owned = true` set. This seems no pointer, however, in creating such a holder around an unowned instance: we never actually intend to use anything that the unique_ptr gives us: and, in fact, do not want the unique_ptr (because if it ever actually got destroyed, it would cause destruction of the wrapped pointer, despite the fact that that wrapped pointer isn't owned). This commit changes the logic to only create a unique_ptr holder if we actually own the instance, and to destruct via the constructed holder whenever we have a constructed holder--which will now only be the case for owned-unique-holder or shared-holder types. Other changes include: * Added test for non-movable holder constructor/destructor counts The three alive assertions now pass, before #478 they fail with counts of 2/2/1 respectively, because of the unique_ptr that we don't want and don't destroy (because we don't *want* its destructor to run). * Return cstats reference; fix ConstructStats doc Small cleanup to the #478 test code, and fix to the ConstructStats documentation (the static method definition should use `reference` not `reference_internal`). * Rename inst->constructed to inst->holder_constructed This makes it clearer exactly what it's referring to.
-
- 03 Nov, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Wenzel Jakob authored
-
- 25 Oct, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Jason Rhinelander authored
Currently pybind11 doesn't check when you define a new object (e.g. a class, function, or exception) that overwrites an existing one. If the thing being overwritten is a class, this leads to a segfault (because pybind still thinks the type is defined, even though Python no longer has the type). In other cases this is harmless (e.g. replacing a function with an exception), but even in that case it's most likely a bug. This code doesn't prevent you from actively doing something harmful, like deliberately overwriting a previous definition, but detects overwriting with a run-time error if it occurs in the standard class/function/exception/def registration interfaces. All of the additions are in non-template code; the result is actually a tiny decrease in .so size compared to master without the new test code (977304 to 977272 bytes), and about 4K higher with the new tests.
-
- 19 Sep, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Wenzel Jakob authored
-
- 10 Sep, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Wenzel Jakob authored
-
Wenzel Jakob authored
-
- 09 Sep, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Jason Rhinelander authored
This commit adds support for forcing alias type initialization by defining constructors with `py::init_alias<arg1, arg2>()` instead of `py::init<arg1, arg2>()`. Currently py::init<> only results in Alias initialization if the type is extended in python, or the given arguments can't be used to construct the base type, but can be used to construct the alias. py::init_alias<>, in contrast, always invokes the constructor of the alias type. It looks like this was already the intention of `py::detail::init_alias`, which was forward-declared in 86d825f3, but was apparently never finished: despite the existance of a .def method accepting it, the `detail::init_alias` class isn't actually defined anywhere. This commit completes the feature (or possibly repurposes it), allowing declaration of classes that will always initialize the trampoline which is (as I argued in #397) sometimes useful.
-
- 08 Sep, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Jason Rhinelander authored
Type alias for alias classes with members didn't work properly: space was only allocated for sizeof(type), but if we want to be able to put a type_alias instance there, we need sizeof(type_alias), but sizeof(type_alias) > sizeof(type) whenever type_alias has members.
-
- 07 Sep, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Jason Rhinelander authored
The previous commit to address #392 triggers a compiler warning about returning a reference to a local variable, which is *not* a false alarm: the following: py::cast<int &>(o) (which happens internally in an overload declaration) really is returning a reference to a local, because the cast operators for the type_caster for numeric types returns a reference to its own member. This commit adds a static_assert to make that a compilation failure rather than returning a reference into about-to-be-freed memory. Incidentally, this is also a fix for #219, which is exactly the same issue: we can't reference numeric primitives that are cast from wrappers around python numeric types. -
Jason Rhinelander authored
Need to use the intrinsic type, not the raw type. Fixes #392.
-
- 06 Sep, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Wenzel Jakob authored
-
- 19 Aug, 2016 3 commits
-
-
Dean Moldovan authored
-
Dean Moldovan authored
The C++ part of the test code is modified to achieve this. As a result, this kind of test: ```python with capture: kw_func1(5, y=10) assert capture == "kw_func(x=5, y=10)" ``` can be replaced with a simple: `assert kw_func1(5, y=10) == "x=5, y=10"` -
Dean Moldovan authored
Use simple asserts and pytest's powerful introspection to make testing simpler. This merges the old .py/.ref file pairs into simple .py files where the expected values are right next to the code being tested. This commit does not touch the C++ part of the code and replicates the Python tests exactly like the old .ref-file-based approach.
-