1. 30 May, 2017 1 commit
  2. 16 Dec, 2016 1 commit
    • Wenzel Jakob's avatar
      WIP: PyPy support (#527) · 1d1f81b2
      Wenzel Jakob authored
      This commit includes modifications that are needed to get pybind11 to work with PyPy. The full test suite compiles and runs except for a last few functions that are commented out (due to problems in PyPy that were reported on the PyPy bugtracker).
      
      Two somewhat intrusive changes were needed to make it possible: two new tags ``py::buffer_protocol()`` and ``py::metaclass()`` must now be specified to the ``class_`` constructor if the class uses the buffer protocol and/or requires a metaclass (e.g. for static properties).
      
      Note that this is only for the PyPy version based on Python 2.7 for now. When the PyPy 3.x has caught up in terms of cpyext compliance, a PyPy 3.x patch will follow.
      1d1f81b2
  3. 22 Nov, 2016 1 commit
  4. 20 Nov, 2016 2 commits
  5. 07 Nov, 2016 1 commit
  6. 06 Nov, 2016 1 commit
    • Jason Rhinelander's avatar
      Don't construct unique_ptr around unowned pointers (#478) · c07ec31e
      Jason Rhinelander authored
      If we need to initialize a holder around an unowned instance, and the
      holder type is non-copyable (i.e. a unique_ptr), we currently construct
      the holder type around the value pointer, but then never actually
      destruct the holder: the holder destructor is called only for the
      instance that actually has `inst->owned = true` set.
      
      This seems no pointer, however, in creating such a holder around an
      unowned instance: we never actually intend to use anything that the
      unique_ptr gives us: and, in fact, do not want the unique_ptr (because
      if it ever actually got destroyed, it would cause destruction of the
      wrapped pointer, despite the fact that that wrapped pointer isn't
      owned).
      
      This commit changes the logic to only create a unique_ptr holder if we
      actually own the instance, and to destruct via the constructed holder
      whenever we have a constructed holder--which will now only be the case
      for owned-unique-holder or shared-holder types.
      
      Other changes include:
      
      * Added test for non-movable holder constructor/destructor counts
      
      The three alive assertions now pass, before #478 they fail with counts
      of 2/2/1 respectively, because of the unique_ptr that we don't want and
      don't destroy (because we don't *want* its destructor to run).
      
      * Return cstats reference; fix ConstructStats doc
      
      Small cleanup to the #478 test code, and fix to the ConstructStats
      documentation (the static method definition should use `reference` not
      `reference_internal`).
      
      * Rename inst->constructed to inst->holder_constructed
      
      This makes it clearer exactly what it's referring to.
      c07ec31e
  7. 03 Nov, 2016 1 commit
  8. 25 Oct, 2016 1 commit
    • Jason Rhinelander's avatar
      Prevent overwriting previous declarations · 6873c202
      Jason Rhinelander authored
      Currently pybind11 doesn't check when you define a new object (e.g. a
      class, function, or exception) that overwrites an existing one.  If the
      thing being overwritten is a class, this leads to a segfault (because
      pybind still thinks the type is defined, even though Python no longer
      has the type).  In other cases this is harmless (e.g. replacing a
      function with an exception), but even in that case it's most likely a
      bug.
      
      This code doesn't prevent you from actively doing something harmful,
      like deliberately overwriting a previous definition, but detects
      overwriting with a run-time error if it occurs in the standard
      class/function/exception/def registration interfaces.
      
      All of the additions are in non-template code; the result is actually a
      tiny decrease in .so size compared to master without the new test code
      (977304 to 977272 bytes), and about 4K higher with the new tests.
      6873c202
  9. 19 Sep, 2016 1 commit
  10. 10 Sep, 2016 2 commits
  11. 09 Sep, 2016 1 commit
    • Jason Rhinelander's avatar
      Implement py::init_alias<>() constructors · ec62d977
      Jason Rhinelander authored
      This commit adds support for forcing alias type initialization by
      defining constructors with `py::init_alias<arg1, arg2>()` instead of
      `py::init<arg1, arg2>()`.  Currently py::init<> only results in Alias
      initialization if the type is extended in python, or the given
      arguments can't be used to construct the base type, but can be used to
      construct the alias.  py::init_alias<>, in contrast, always invokes the
      constructor of the alias type.
      
      It looks like this was already the intention of
      `py::detail::init_alias`, which was forward-declared in
      86d825f3, but was apparently never
      finished: despite the existance of a .def method accepting it, the
      `detail::init_alias` class isn't actually defined anywhere.
      
      This commit completes the feature (or possibly repurposes it), allowing
      declaration of classes that will always initialize the trampoline which
      is (as I argued in #397) sometimes useful.
      ec62d977
  12. 08 Sep, 2016 1 commit
    • Jason Rhinelander's avatar
      Fix type alias initialization · 9c6859ee
      Jason Rhinelander authored
      Type alias for alias classes with members didn't work properly: space
      was only allocated for sizeof(type), but if we want to be able to put a
      type_alias instance there, we need sizeof(type_alias), but
      sizeof(type_alias) > sizeof(type) whenever type_alias has members.
      9c6859ee
  13. 07 Sep, 2016 2 commits
    • Jason Rhinelander's avatar
      Fail static_assert when trying to reference non-referencable types · c03db9ba
      Jason Rhinelander authored
      The previous commit to address #392 triggers a compiler warning about
      returning a reference to a local variable, which is *not* a false alarm:
      the following:
      
          py::cast<int &>(o)
      
      (which happens internally in an overload declaration) really is
      returning a reference to a local, because the cast operators for the
      type_caster for numeric types returns a reference to its own member.
      
      This commit adds a static_assert to make that a compilation failure
      rather than returning a reference into about-to-be-freed memory.
      
      Incidentally, this is also a fix for #219, which is exactly the same
      issue: we can't reference numeric primitives that are cast from
      wrappers around python numeric types.
      c03db9ba
    • Jason Rhinelander's avatar
      Fix type caster for heap reference types · 56f71775
      Jason Rhinelander authored
      Need to use the intrinsic type, not the raw type.
      
      Fixes #392.
      56f71775
  14. 06 Sep, 2016 1 commit
  15. 19 Aug, 2016 3 commits
    • Dean Moldovan's avatar
      99dbdc16
    • Dean Moldovan's avatar
      Simplify tests by replacing output capture with asserts where possible · 665e8804
      Dean Moldovan authored
      The C++ part of the test code is modified to achieve this. As a result,
      this kind of test:
      
      ```python
      with capture:
          kw_func1(5, y=10)
      assert capture == "kw_func(x=5, y=10)"
      ```
      
      can be replaced with a simple:
      
      `assert kw_func1(5, y=10) == "x=5, y=10"`
      665e8804
    • Dean Moldovan's avatar
      Port tests to pytest · a0c1ccf0
      Dean Moldovan authored
      Use simple asserts and pytest's powerful introspection to make testing
      simpler. This merges the old .py/.ref file pairs into simple .py files
      where the expected values are right next to the code being tested.
      
      This commit does not touch the C++ part of the code and replicates the
      Python tests exactly like the old .ref-file-based approach.
      a0c1ccf0