..mention in benchmark docs as well

docs/benchmark.rst

@@ -2,7 +2,10 @@ Benchmark
 =========
 
 The following is the result of a synthetic benchmark comparing both compilation
-time and module size of pybind11 against Boost.Python.
+time and module size of pybind11 against Boost.Python. A detailed report about a
+Boost.Python to pybind11 conversion of a real project is available here: [#f1]_.
+
+.. [#f1] http://graylab.jhu.edu/RosettaCon2016/PyRosetta-4.pdf
 
 Setup
 -----

docs/intro.rst

@@ -73,8 +73,6 @@ In addition to the core functionality, pybind11 provides some extra goodies:
   of `PyRosetta`_, an enourmous Boot.Python binding project, reported a binary
   size reduction of **5.4x** and compile time reduction by **5.8x**.
 
-.. _PyRosetta: http://graylab.jhu.edu/RosettaCon2016/PyRosetta-4.pdf
-
 - When supported by the compiler, two new C++14 features (relaxed constexpr and
   return value deduction) are used to precompute function signatures at compile
   time, leading to smaller binaries.
@@ -82,6 +80,8 @@ In addition to the core functionality, pybind11 provides some extra goodies:
 - With little extra effort, C++ types can be pickled and unpickled similar to
   regular Python objects.
 
+.. _PyRosetta: http://graylab.jhu.edu/RosettaCon2016/PyRosetta-4.pdf
+
 Supported compilers
 *******************