-
Jason Rhinelander authored
This allows a slightly cleaner base type specification of: py::class_<Type, Base>("Type") as an alternative to py::class_<Type>("Type", py::base<Base>()) As with the other template parameters, the order relative to the holder or trampoline types doesn't matter. This also includes a compile-time assertion failure if attempting to specify more than one base class (but is easily extendible to support multiple inheritance, someday, by updating the class_selector::set_bases function to set multiple bases).6b52c838