changed a scenario and fixed two test cases.

src/eliminate_contiguous.cpp

@@ -28,12 +28,11 @@ static bool try_compute_shape(instruction_ref ins, const std::vector<shape>& inp
 
         auto outputs = ins->outputs();
         // If the current instruction has no output, it means it is the last
-        // instruction and generates a non-standard output. But for unary
-        // and binary operators, we can still remove it and reshape the output
-        // to be standard since these operator can handle non-standard inputs
+        // instruction and generates a non-standard output shape, and the last
+        // output shape is different from the case with the contiguous operator
         if(outputs.empty())
         {
-            return true;
+            return false;
         }
 
         for(auto output : outputs)

test/eliminate_contiguous_test.cpp

@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ TEST_CASE(non_standard_op)
     p.add_instruction(pass_op{}, c);
     auto count = std::distance(p.begin(), p.end());
     p.compile(eliminate_contiguous_target{});
-    EXPECT(std::distance(p.begin(), p.end()) == (count - 1));
+    EXPECT(std::distance(p.begin(), p.end()) == count);
 }
 
 TEST_CASE(transpose_gemm)

test/gpu/adjust_allocation.cpp

@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ TEST_CASE(tanh_shape)
     }
     EXPECT(p1 != p2);
 
-    migraphx::run_passes(p2,
+    migraphx::run_passes(p1,
                          {migraphx::gpu::adjust_allocation{}, migraphx::dead_code_elimination{}});
     EXPECT(p1 == p2);
 }