Models that are loaded via both `transformers.AutoModelForCausalLM` (autoregressive, decoder-only GPT style models) and `transformers.AutoModelForSeq2SeqLM` (such as encoder-decoder models like T5) in Huggingface are supporteded.
Models that are loaded via both `transformers.AutoModelForCausalLM` (autoregressive, decoder-only GPT style models) and `transformers.AutoModelForSeq2SeqLM` (such as encoder-decoder models like T5) in Huggingface are supported.
Batch size selection can be automated by setting the ```--batch_size``` flag to ```auto```. This will perform automatic detection of the largest batch size that will fit on your device. On tasks where there is a large difference between the longest and shortest example, it can be helpful to periodically recompute the largest batch size, to gain a further speedup. To do this, append ```:N``` to above flag to automatically recompute the largest batch size ```N``` times. For example, to recompute the batch size 4 times, the command would be:
Batch size selection can be automated by setting the ```--batch_size``` flag to ```auto```. This will perform automatic detection of the largest batch size that will fit on your device. On tasks where there is a large difference between the longest and shortest example, it can be helpful to periodically recompute the largest batch size, to gain a further speedup. To do this, append ```:N``` to above flag to automatically recompute the largest batch size ```N``` times. For example, to recompute the batch size 4 times, the command would be:
...
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ Our library also supports the evaluation of models served via several commercial
...
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ Our library also supports the evaluation of models served via several commercial
Title: Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Models
Abstract: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.07911
One core capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) is to follow natural language instructions. However, the evaluation of such abilities is not standardized: Human evaluations are expensive, slow, and not objectively reproducible, while LLM-based auto-evaluation is potentially biased or limited by the ability of the evaluator LLM. To overcome these issues, we introduce Instruction-Following Eval (IFEval) for large language models. IFEval is a straightforward and easy-to-reproduce evaluation benchmark. It focuses on a set of "verifiable instructions" such as "write in more than 400 words" and "mention the keyword of AI at least 3 times". We identified 25 types of those verifiable instructions and constructed around 500 prompts, with each prompt containing one or more verifiable instructions. We show evaluation results of two widely available LLMs on the market. Our code and data can be found at https://github.com/google-research/google-research/tree/master/instruction_following_eval
title={Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Models},
author={Jeffrey Zhou and Tianjian Lu and Swaroop Mishra and Siddhartha Brahma and Sujoy Basu and Yi Luan and Denny Zhou and Le Hou},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.07911},
year={2023},
}
```
### Groups and Tasks
#### Groups
* Not part of a group yet
#### Tasks
*`ifeval`
### Checklist
For adding novel benchmarks/datasets to the library:
* [x] Is the task an existing benchmark in the literature?
* [x] Have you referenced the original paper that introduced the task?
* [x] If yes, does the original paper provide a reference implementation? If so, have you checked against the reference implementation and documented how to run such a test?
If other tasks on this dataset are already supported:
* [ ] Is the "Main" variant of this task clearly denoted?
* [ ] Have you provided a short sentence in a README on what each new variant adds / evaluates?
* [ ] Have you noted which, if any, published evaluation setups are matched by this variant?
# Remove None values from kwargs to avoid unexpected keyword argument errors in build_description method.
kwargs={k:vfork,vininp.kwargs[index].items()ifv}
instruction.build_description(**kwargs)
args=instruction.get_instruction_args()
ifargsand"prompt"inargs:
instruction.build_description(prompt=inp.prompt)
is_following=False
forrinall_responses:
ifr.strip()andinstruction.check_following(r):
is_following=True
break
is_following_list.append(is_following)
returnOutputExample(
instruction_id_list=inp.instruction_id_list,
prompt=inp.prompt,
response=response,
follow_all_instructions=all(is_following_list),
follow_instruction_list=is_following_list,
)
defprocess_results(doc,results):
eval_logger.warning(
"This task is meant for chat-finetuned models, and may not give meaningful results for models other than `openai` or `anthropic` if `doc_to_text` in its YAML is not wrapped in the appropriate chat template string. This warning will be removed when chat templating support is added natively to local models"