[["Passage: In the past, we had a lot of unrealistic high-profile in moral propaganda, so that a lot of the population said one thing and made one behind the other, and split personality. Through thinking about this phenomenon, some scholars have proposed that we should only ask ordinary people to abide by the \"bottom line ethics\".\nQuestion: Based on your understanding, which of the following options is most appropriate as the definition of \"bottom line ethics\"?\nChoices:\nA. The bottom line ethics is not to steal or kill.\nB. The bottom line ethics are some of the most basic and basic codes of conduct and rules that should be observed by ordinary people in a society.\nC. The bottom line ethics is not an ethics that requires selfless dedication.\nD. If one compares human morality to a building, the bottom line ethics is the fundamental part of that building.\nAnswer:"," The bottom line ethics is not to steal or kill."],["Passage: In the past, we had a lot of unrealistic high-profile in moral propaganda, so that a lot of the population said one thing and made one behind the other, and split personality. Through thinking about this phenomenon, some scholars have proposed that we should only ask ordinary people to abide by the \"bottom line ethics\".\nQuestion: Based on your understanding, which of the following options is most appropriate as the definition of \"bottom line ethics\"?\nChoices:\nA. The bottom line ethics is not to steal or kill.\nB. The bottom line ethics are some of the most basic and basic codes of conduct and rules that should be observed by ordinary people in a society.\nC. The bottom line ethics is not an ethics that requires selfless dedication.\nD. If one compares human morality to a building, the bottom line ethics is the fundamental part of that building.\nAnswer:"," The bottom line ethics are some of the most basic and basic codes of conduct and rules that should be observed by ordinary people in a society."],["Passage: In the past, we had a lot of unrealistic high-profile in moral propaganda, so that a lot of the population said one thing and made one behind the other, and split personality. Through thinking about this phenomenon, some scholars have proposed that we should only ask ordinary people to abide by the \"bottom line ethics\".\nQuestion: Based on your understanding, which of the following options is most appropriate as the definition of \"bottom line ethics\"?\nChoices:\nA. The bottom line ethics is not to steal or kill.\nB. The bottom line ethics are some of the most basic and basic codes of conduct and rules that should be observed by ordinary people in a society.\nC. The bottom line ethics is not an ethics that requires selfless dedication.\nD. If one compares human morality to a building, the bottom line ethics is the fundamental part of that building.\nAnswer:"," The bottom line ethics is not an ethics that requires selfless dedication."],["Passage: In the past, we had a lot of unrealistic high-profile in moral propaganda, so that a lot of the population said one thing and made one behind the other, and split personality. Through thinking about this phenomenon, some scholars have proposed that we should only ask ordinary people to abide by the \"bottom line ethics\".\nQuestion: Based on your understanding, which of the following options is most appropriate as the definition of \"bottom line ethics\"?\nChoices:\nA. The bottom line ethics is not to steal or kill.\nB. The bottom line ethics are some of the most basic and basic codes of conduct and rules that should be observed by ordinary people in a society.\nC. The bottom line ethics is not an ethics that requires selfless dedication.\nD. If one compares human morality to a building, the bottom line ethics is the fundamental part of that building.\nAnswer:"," If one compares human morality to a building, the bottom line ethics is the fundamental part of that building."],["Passage: Because the conclusion of quantum theory violates intuition, some scientists have different views on this theory. Although they try to strictly indicate that the assertion of quantum theory is inaccurate (that is, try to strictly falsify it), they find that the error lies in Usually within the acceptable statistical range. These results of quantum theory are different from those of competing theories, which makes it reasonable to accept quantum theory.\nQuestion: Which of the following principles is most helpful to show the rationality of the above reasoning?\nChoices:\nA. A theory should not be considered reasonable before it is tried to strictly falsify\nB. Only if the assertion of a theory has not been falsified by experiments can this theory be accepted.\nC. If a scientific theory violates intuitive conclusions less than competing theories, then it should be accepted\nD. If you try to strictly falsify a theory, but the theory has withstood all the tests, then you should accept it\nAnswer:"," A theory should not be considered reasonable before it is tried to strictly falsify"],["Passage: Because the conclusion of quantum theory violates intuition, some scientists have different views on this theory. Although they try to strictly indicate that the assertion of quantum theory is inaccurate (that is, try to strictly falsify it), they find that the error lies in Usually within the acceptable statistical range. These results of quantum theory are different from those of competing theories, which makes it reasonable to accept quantum theory.\nQuestion: Which of the following principles is most helpful to show the rationality of the above reasoning?\nChoices:\nA. A theory should not be considered reasonable before it is tried to strictly falsify\nB. Only if the assertion of a theory has not been falsified by experiments can this theory be accepted.\nC. If a scientific theory violates intuitive conclusions less than competing theories, then it should be accepted\nD. If you try to strictly falsify a theory, but the theory has withstood all the tests, then you should accept it\nAnswer:"," Only if the assertion of a theory has not been falsified by experiments can this theory be accepted."],["Passage: Because the conclusion of quantum theory violates intuition, some scientists have different views on this theory. Although they try to strictly indicate that the assertion of quantum theory is inaccurate (that is, try to strictly falsify it), they find that the error lies in Usually within the acceptable statistical range. These results of quantum theory are different from those of competing theories, which makes it reasonable to accept quantum theory.\nQuestion: Which of the following principles is most helpful to show the rationality of the above reasoning?\nChoices:\nA. A theory should not be considered reasonable before it is tried to strictly falsify\nB. Only if the assertion of a theory has not been falsified by experiments can this theory be accepted.\nC. If a scientific theory violates intuitive conclusions less than competing theories, then it should be accepted\nD. If you try to strictly falsify a theory, but the theory has withstood all the tests, then you should accept it\nAnswer:"," If a scientific theory violates intuitive conclusions less than competing theories, then it should be accepted"],["Passage: Because the conclusion of quantum theory violates intuition, some scientists have different views on this theory. Although they try to strictly indicate that the assertion of quantum theory is inaccurate (that is, try to strictly falsify it), they find that the error lies in Usually within the acceptable statistical range. These results of quantum theory are different from those of competing theories, which makes it reasonable to accept quantum theory.\nQuestion: Which of the following principles is most helpful to show the rationality of the above reasoning?\nChoices:\nA. A theory should not be considered reasonable before it is tried to strictly falsify\nB. Only if the assertion of a theory has not been falsified by experiments can this theory be accepted.\nC. If a scientific theory violates intuitive conclusions less than competing theories, then it should be accepted\nD. If you try to strictly falsify a theory, but the theory has withstood all the tests, then you should accept it\nAnswer:"," If you try to strictly falsify a theory, but the theory has withstood all the tests, then you should accept it"],["Passage: The members of the printing group and the binding group are mainly from the following seven employees-F, G, H, J, K, L and M. The members of each group must meet the following conditions? (1) Each group has at least 3 employees . (2) F and K cannot be in the same group. (3) If K is in a certain group, J must also be in this group. (4) M is at least one of the members of these two groups. (5) At least one of the same employees in both groups.\nQuestion: If both K and L are members of both groups, and the printing group has exactly three members, which of the following statements must be true?\nChoices:\nA. F in printing group\nB. F in the binding group\nC. G in the printing group\nD. M in the bookbinding group\nAnswer:"," F in printing group"],["Passage: The members of the printing group and the binding group are mainly from the following seven employees-F, G, H, J, K, L and M. The members of each group must meet the following conditions? (1) Each group has at least 3 employees . (2) F and K cannot be in the same group. (3) If K is in a certain group, J must also be in this group. (4) M is at least one of the members of these two groups. (5) At least one of the same employees in both groups.\nQuestion: If both K and L are members of both groups, and the printing group has exactly three members, which of the following statements must be true?\nChoices:\nA. F in printing group\nB. F in the binding group\nC. G in the printing group\nD. M in the bookbinding group\nAnswer:"," F in the binding group"],["Passage: The members of the printing group and the binding group are mainly from the following seven employees-F, G, H, J, K, L and M. The members of each group must meet the following conditions? (1) Each group has at least 3 employees . (2) F and K cannot be in the same group. (3) If K is in a certain group, J must also be in this group. (4) M is at least one of the members of these two groups. (5) At least one of the same employees in both groups.\nQuestion: If both K and L are members of both groups, and the printing group has exactly three members, which of the following statements must be true?\nChoices:\nA. F in printing group\nB. F in the binding group\nC. G in the printing group\nD. M in the bookbinding group\nAnswer:"," G in the printing group"],["Passage: The members of the printing group and the binding group are mainly from the following seven employees-F, G, H, J, K, L and M. The members of each group must meet the following conditions? (1) Each group has at least 3 employees . (2) F and K cannot be in the same group. (3) If K is in a certain group, J must also be in this group. (4) M is at least one of the members of these two groups. (5) At least one of the same employees in both groups.\nQuestion: If both K and L are members of both groups, and the printing group has exactly three members, which of the following statements must be true?\nChoices:\nA. F in printing group\nB. F in the binding group\nC. G in the printing group\nD. M in the bookbinding group\nAnswer:"," M in the bookbinding group"],["Passage: After all the cold dishes at the banquet at one table were served, there were 7 hot dishes. Among them, three Sichuan dishes? K, L, M? three Cantonese dishes? Q, N, P? one Shandong dish? X. Only one hot dish can be served at a time, and the order of serving must meet the following conditions? (1) Cannot serve Sichuan cuisine or Cantonese cuisine continuously. (2) Unless the second is on Q, P cannot be on before Q. (3) P must be on before X. (4) M must be on before K, and K must be on before N.\nQuestion: If the fourth is K, which of the following statements may be true?\nChoices:\nA. Fifth on P\nB. Sixth on X\nC. Fifth on L\nD. First on M\nAnswer:"," Fifth on P"],["Passage: After all the cold dishes at the banquet at one table were served, there were 7 hot dishes. Among them, three Sichuan dishes? K, L, M? three Cantonese dishes? Q, N, P? one Shandong dish? X. Only one hot dish can be served at a time, and the order of serving must meet the following conditions? (1) Cannot serve Sichuan cuisine or Cantonese cuisine continuously. (2) Unless the second is on Q, P cannot be on before Q. (3) P must be on before X. (4) M must be on before K, and K must be on before N.\nQuestion: If the fourth is K, which of the following statements may be true?\nChoices:\nA. Fifth on P\nB. Sixth on X\nC. Fifth on L\nD. First on M\nAnswer:"," Sixth on X"],["Passage: After all the cold dishes at the banquet at one table were served, there were 7 hot dishes. Among them, three Sichuan dishes? K, L, M? three Cantonese dishes? Q, N, P? one Shandong dish? X. Only one hot dish can be served at a time, and the order of serving must meet the following conditions? (1) Cannot serve Sichuan cuisine or Cantonese cuisine continuously. (2) Unless the second is on Q, P cannot be on before Q. (3) P must be on before X. (4) M must be on before K, and K must be on before N.\nQuestion: If the fourth is K, which of the following statements may be true?\nChoices:\nA. Fifth on P\nB. Sixth on X\nC. Fifth on L\nD. First on M\nAnswer:"," Fifth on L"],["Passage: After all the cold dishes at the banquet at one table were served, there were 7 hot dishes. Among them, three Sichuan dishes? K, L, M? three Cantonese dishes? Q, N, P? one Shandong dish? X. Only one hot dish can be served at a time, and the order of serving must meet the following conditions? (1) Cannot serve Sichuan cuisine or Cantonese cuisine continuously. (2) Unless the second is on Q, P cannot be on before Q. (3) P must be on before X. (4) M must be on before K, and K must be on before N.\nQuestion: If the fourth is K, which of the following statements may be true?\nChoices:\nA. Fifth on P\nB. Sixth on X\nC. Fifth on L\nD. First on M\nAnswer:"," First on M"],["Passage: Whether a person does good behavior or bad behavior depends on the length of his life. If he only lived one day, it would be best for him to steal other people \u2019s things because he would not suffer the fear of being caught. Stealing things from others is not the best for someone who can still live for 20 years, because he will suffer the fear of being caught.\nQuestion: If the following statements are true, except for which one can weaken the above argument?\nChoices:\nA. Only by suffering from the fear of being caught will you not steal things from others.\nB. For people who only live one day, the best course of action may be a meal of beef.\nC. The length of life is not a sufficient condition for a person to choose to do good or bad behavior.\nD. For some people who steal other people's things, conscience condemnation will cause greater pain than fear of seizing.\nAnswer:"," Only by suffering from the fear of being caught will you not steal things from others."],["Passage: Whether a person does good behavior or bad behavior depends on the length of his life. If he only lived one day, it would be best for him to steal other people \u2019s things because he would not suffer the fear of being caught. Stealing things from others is not the best for someone who can still live for 20 years, because he will suffer the fear of being caught.\nQuestion: If the following statements are true, except for which one can weaken the above argument?\nChoices:\nA. Only by suffering from the fear of being caught will you not steal things from others.\nB. For people who only live one day, the best course of action may be a meal of beef.\nC. The length of life is not a sufficient condition for a person to choose to do good or bad behavior.\nD. For some people who steal other people's things, conscience condemnation will cause greater pain than fear of seizing.\nAnswer:"," For people who only live one day, the best course of action may be a meal of beef."],["Passage: Whether a person does good behavior or bad behavior depends on the length of his life. If he only lived one day, it would be best for him to steal other people \u2019s things because he would not suffer the fear of being caught. Stealing things from others is not the best for someone who can still live for 20 years, because he will suffer the fear of being caught.\nQuestion: If the following statements are true, except for which one can weaken the above argument?\nChoices:\nA. Only by suffering from the fear of being caught will you not steal things from others.\nB. For people who only live one day, the best course of action may be a meal of beef.\nC. The length of life is not a sufficient condition for a person to choose to do good or bad behavior.\nD. For some people who steal other people's things, conscience condemnation will cause greater pain than fear of seizing.\nAnswer:"," The length of life is not a sufficient condition for a person to choose to do good or bad behavior."],["Passage: Whether a person does good behavior or bad behavior depends on the length of his life. If he only lived one day, it would be best for him to steal other people \u2019s things because he would not suffer the fear of being caught. Stealing things from others is not the best for someone who can still live for 20 years, because he will suffer the fear of being caught.\nQuestion: If the following statements are true, except for which one can weaken the above argument?\nChoices:\nA. Only by suffering from the fear of being caught will you not steal things from others.\nB. For people who only live one day, the best course of action may be a meal of beef.\nC. The length of life is not a sufficient condition for a person to choose to do good or bad behavior.\nD. For some people who steal other people's things, conscience condemnation will cause greater pain than fear of seizing.\nAnswer:"," For some people who steal other people's things, conscience condemnation will cause greater pain than fear of seizing."],["Passage: A solid wood flooring seller solemnly promised in his contract text? \"The flooring sold in this shop is definitely made of wood; it is responsible for free installation, except for the cost of materials required for installation; free warranty for one year, but not the fault of the company Except for the losses caused. If there is fraud, the company is willing to bear legal responsibility and pay more than 1,000 times the compensation. The company reserves the right to interpret this contract. \"\nQuestion: Which of the following options is a correct evaluation of the company and its contract?\nChoices:\nA. The company must be very honest because it promises to pay more than 1,000 times in compensation if fraud is discovered.\nB. The company's contract actually has no binding force on its behavior.\nC. The floors sold by the company must be real solid wood floors.\nD. From the customer's perspective, the company's contract terms are acceptable.\nAnswer:"," The company must be very honest because it promises to pay more than 1,000 times in compensation if fraud is discovered."],["Passage: A solid wood flooring seller solemnly promised in his contract text? \"The flooring sold in this shop is definitely made of wood; it is responsible for free installation, except for the cost of materials required for installation; free warranty for one year, but not the fault of the company Except for the losses caused. If there is fraud, the company is willing to bear legal responsibility and pay more than 1,000 times the compensation. The company reserves the right to interpret this contract. \"\nQuestion: Which of the following options is a correct evaluation of the company and its contract?\nChoices:\nA. The company must be very honest because it promises to pay more than 1,000 times in compensation if fraud is discovered.\nB. The company's contract actually has no binding force on its behavior.\nC. The floors sold by the company must be real solid wood floors.\nD. From the customer's perspective, the company's contract terms are acceptable.\nAnswer:"," The company's contract actually has no binding force on its behavior."],["Passage: A solid wood flooring seller solemnly promised in his contract text? \"The flooring sold in this shop is definitely made of wood; it is responsible for free installation, except for the cost of materials required for installation; free warranty for one year, but not the fault of the company Except for the losses caused. If there is fraud, the company is willing to bear legal responsibility and pay more than 1,000 times the compensation. The company reserves the right to interpret this contract. \"\nQuestion: Which of the following options is a correct evaluation of the company and its contract?\nChoices:\nA. The company must be very honest because it promises to pay more than 1,000 times in compensation if fraud is discovered.\nB. The company's contract actually has no binding force on its behavior.\nC. The floors sold by the company must be real solid wood floors.\nD. From the customer's perspective, the company's contract terms are acceptable.\nAnswer:"," The floors sold by the company must be real solid wood floors."],["Passage: A solid wood flooring seller solemnly promised in his contract text? \"The flooring sold in this shop is definitely made of wood; it is responsible for free installation, except for the cost of materials required for installation; free warranty for one year, but not the fault of the company Except for the losses caused. If there is fraud, the company is willing to bear legal responsibility and pay more than 1,000 times the compensation. The company reserves the right to interpret this contract. \"\nQuestion: Which of the following options is a correct evaluation of the company and its contract?\nChoices:\nA. The company must be very honest because it promises to pay more than 1,000 times in compensation if fraud is discovered.\nB. The company's contract actually has no binding force on its behavior.\nC. The floors sold by the company must be real solid wood floors.\nD. From the customer's perspective, the company's contract terms are acceptable.\nAnswer:"," From the customer's perspective, the company's contract terms are acceptable."],["Passage: A provincial Go team coach selects 4 of the 7 players from E, F, G, H, J, K and M to participate in the professional league. The selection must meet the following conditions? E or F has one person to participate, but not both . One of J or K will participate, but not both. If J participates, then G participates. Unless F participates, M does not participate.\nQuestion: Which of the following four players can participate in the game together?\nChoices:\nA. E, F, H, K\nB. E, H, J, M\nC. E, G, J, M\nD. F, H, K, M\nAnswer:"," E, F, H, K"],["Passage: A provincial Go team coach selects 4 of the 7 players from E, F, G, H, J, K and M to participate in the professional league. The selection must meet the following conditions? E or F has one person to participate, but not both . One of J or K will participate, but not both. If J participates, then G participates. Unless F participates, M does not participate.\nQuestion: Which of the following four players can participate in the game together?\nChoices:\nA. E, F, H, K\nB. E, H, J, M\nC. E, G, J, M\nD. F, H, K, M\nAnswer:"," E, H, J, M"],["Passage: A provincial Go team coach selects 4 of the 7 players from E, F, G, H, J, K and M to participate in the professional league. The selection must meet the following conditions? E or F has one person to participate, but not both . One of J or K will participate, but not both. If J participates, then G participates. Unless F participates, M does not participate.\nQuestion: Which of the following four players can participate in the game together?\nChoices:\nA. E, F, H, K\nB. E, H, J, M\nC. E, G, J, M\nD. F, H, K, M\nAnswer:"," E, G, J, M"],["Passage: A provincial Go team coach selects 4 of the 7 players from E, F, G, H, J, K and M to participate in the professional league. The selection must meet the following conditions? E or F has one person to participate, but not both . One of J or K will participate, but not both. If J participates, then G participates. Unless F participates, M does not participate.\nQuestion: Which of the following four players can participate in the game together?\nChoices:\nA. E, F, H, K\nB. E, H, J, M\nC. E, G, J, M\nD. F, H, K, M\nAnswer:"," F, H, K, M"],["Passage: There is a psychological theory that to be happy, one must maintain an intimate relationship with another. However, the greatest philosophers in the world spent most of their lives in isolation, and had no intimate relationships. Therefore, this psychological theory must be wrong.\nQuestion: Which of the following must be assumed in the above conclusion?\nChoices:\nA. The greatest philosophers in the world prefer to avoid intimate relationships.\nB. People with intimate relationships rarely spend their time alone.\nC. Loneliness is necessary for philosophers to meditate.\nD. The greatest philosophers in the world are happy.\nAnswer:"," The greatest philosophers in the world prefer to avoid intimate relationships."],["Passage: There is a psychological theory that to be happy, one must maintain an intimate relationship with another. However, the greatest philosophers in the world spent most of their lives in isolation, and had no intimate relationships. Therefore, this psychological theory must be wrong.\nQuestion: Which of the following must be assumed in the above conclusion?\nChoices:\nA. The greatest philosophers in the world prefer to avoid intimate relationships.\nB. People with intimate relationships rarely spend their time alone.\nC. Loneliness is necessary for philosophers to meditate.\nD. The greatest philosophers in the world are happy.\nAnswer:"," People with intimate relationships rarely spend their time alone."],["Passage: There is a psychological theory that to be happy, one must maintain an intimate relationship with another. However, the greatest philosophers in the world spent most of their lives in isolation, and had no intimate relationships. Therefore, this psychological theory must be wrong.\nQuestion: Which of the following must be assumed in the above conclusion?\nChoices:\nA. The greatest philosophers in the world prefer to avoid intimate relationships.\nB. People with intimate relationships rarely spend their time alone.\nC. Loneliness is necessary for philosophers to meditate.\nD. The greatest philosophers in the world are happy.\nAnswer:"," Loneliness is necessary for philosophers to meditate."],["Passage: There is a psychological theory that to be happy, one must maintain an intimate relationship with another. However, the greatest philosophers in the world spent most of their lives in isolation, and had no intimate relationships. Therefore, this psychological theory must be wrong.\nQuestion: Which of the following must be assumed in the above conclusion?\nChoices:\nA. The greatest philosophers in the world prefer to avoid intimate relationships.\nB. People with intimate relationships rarely spend their time alone.\nC. Loneliness is necessary for philosophers to meditate.\nD. The greatest philosophers in the world are happy.\nAnswer:"," The greatest philosophers in the world are happy."],["Passage: The modern French thinker Pascal argued this way? either there is a Christian God, or not. Assuming you believe in the existence of God and live in a Christian way, then if God does exist, you will receive endless well-being? if God does not exist, you will lose very little. However, suppose you do not believe in the existence of God and do not live in a Christian way. If God does not exist, you will not lose anything? if God does exist, you will be endlessly punished. So, don't hesitate anymore, choose to believe in the existence of God and live in a Christian way.\nQuestion: Which of the following best illustrates the logical loophole of this argument?\nChoices:\nA. The argument incorrectly presupposes that a person can choose whether to believe or not to believe in God at will.\nB. Pascal changed the faith and turned it into a question about self-interest calculation.\nC. If God does not exist, we choose to believe in God, which will lead us to misunderstand the world and spend our lives in a confusing way.\nD. There are many religions in this world, and each religion has a god with unlimited power (God). They will impose unlimited punishment on those who do not believe in themselves.\nAnswer:"," The argument incorrectly presupposes that a person can choose whether to believe or not to believe in God at will."],["Passage: The modern French thinker Pascal argued this way? either there is a Christian God, or not. Assuming you believe in the existence of God and live in a Christian way, then if God does exist, you will receive endless well-being? if God does not exist, you will lose very little. However, suppose you do not believe in the existence of God and do not live in a Christian way. If God does not exist, you will not lose anything? if God does exist, you will be endlessly punished. So, don't hesitate anymore, choose to believe in the existence of God and live in a Christian way.\nQuestion: Which of the following best illustrates the logical loophole of this argument?\nChoices:\nA. The argument incorrectly presupposes that a person can choose whether to believe or not to believe in God at will.\nB. Pascal changed the faith and turned it into a question about self-interest calculation.\nC. If God does not exist, we choose to believe in God, which will lead us to misunderstand the world and spend our lives in a confusing way.\nD. There are many religions in this world, and each religion has a god with unlimited power (God). They will impose unlimited punishment on those who do not believe in themselves.\nAnswer:"," Pascal changed the faith and turned it into a question about self-interest calculation."],["Passage: The modern French thinker Pascal argued this way? either there is a Christian God, or not. Assuming you believe in the existence of God and live in a Christian way, then if God does exist, you will receive endless well-being? if God does not exist, you will lose very little. However, suppose you do not believe in the existence of God and do not live in a Christian way. If God does not exist, you will not lose anything? if God does exist, you will be endlessly punished. So, don't hesitate anymore, choose to believe in the existence of God and live in a Christian way.\nQuestion: Which of the following best illustrates the logical loophole of this argument?\nChoices:\nA. The argument incorrectly presupposes that a person can choose whether to believe or not to believe in God at will.\nB. Pascal changed the faith and turned it into a question about self-interest calculation.\nC. If God does not exist, we choose to believe in God, which will lead us to misunderstand the world and spend our lives in a confusing way.\nD. There are many religions in this world, and each religion has a god with unlimited power (God). They will impose unlimited punishment on those who do not believe in themselves.\nAnswer:"," If God does not exist, we choose to believe in God, which will lead us to misunderstand the world and spend our lives in a confusing way."],["Passage: The modern French thinker Pascal argued this way? either there is a Christian God, or not. Assuming you believe in the existence of God and live in a Christian way, then if God does exist, you will receive endless well-being? if God does not exist, you will lose very little. However, suppose you do not believe in the existence of God and do not live in a Christian way. If God does not exist, you will not lose anything? if God does exist, you will be endlessly punished. So, don't hesitate anymore, choose to believe in the existence of God and live in a Christian way.\nQuestion: Which of the following best illustrates the logical loophole of this argument?\nChoices:\nA. The argument incorrectly presupposes that a person can choose whether to believe or not to believe in God at will.\nB. Pascal changed the faith and turned it into a question about self-interest calculation.\nC. If God does not exist, we choose to believe in God, which will lead us to misunderstand the world and spend our lives in a confusing way.\nD. There are many religions in this world, and each religion has a god with unlimited power (God). They will impose unlimited punishment on those who do not believe in themselves.\nAnswer:"," There are many religions in this world, and each religion has a god with unlimited power (God). They will impose unlimited punishment on those who do not believe in themselves."],["Passage: On the eve of the Minsk talks of the Ukrainian authorities \u2019coordination group, the speakers of\u201c Donetsk People \u2019s Republic \u201dand\u201c Lugansk People \u2019s Republic \u201dannounced their negotiating positions? if the Ukrainian authorities do not recognize their territories and the special status of Russian, And without stopping its military operations in the southeast, the conflict cannot be resolved. In addition, the two \u201cRepublics\u201d insisted on pardoning all militia armed participants and political prisoners. Some Ukrainian observers commented? Do we recognize the special status of these two so-called \"Republics\" and can we resolve the conflict by pardoning the militia?\nQuestion: The comments of Ukrainian observers are best used to refute which of the following?\nChoices:\nA. Even if the Ukrainian authorities recognize the special status of the two \"Republic\" territories and Russian language, and pardon all militia armed participants and political prisoners, the conflict may still not be resolved.\nB. Even if the conflict is resolved, it is not necessarily because the Ukrainian authorities recognize the \"Republic\" territory and the special status of Russian.\nC. If the conflict is to be resolved, the Ukrainian authorities must recognize the special status of the two \"Republic\" territories and the Russian language, and pardon all militia armed participants and political prisoners.\nD. As long as the Ukrainian authorities recognize the special status of the two \"Republic\" territories and the Russian language, and pardon all militia armed participants and political prisoners, the conflict can be resolved.\nAnswer:"," Even if the Ukrainian authorities recognize the special status of the two \"Republic\" territories and Russian language, and pardon all militia armed participants and political prisoners, the conflict may still not be resolved."],["Passage: On the eve of the Minsk talks of the Ukrainian authorities \u2019coordination group, the speakers of\u201c Donetsk People \u2019s Republic \u201dand\u201c Lugansk People \u2019s Republic \u201dannounced their negotiating positions? if the Ukrainian authorities do not recognize their territories and the special status of Russian, And without stopping its military operations in the southeast, the conflict cannot be resolved. In addition, the two \u201cRepublics\u201d insisted on pardoning all militia armed participants and political prisoners. Some Ukrainian observers commented? Do we recognize the special status of these two so-called \"Republics\" and can we resolve the conflict by pardoning the militia?\nQuestion: The comments of Ukrainian observers are best used to refute which of the following?\nChoices:\nA. Even if the Ukrainian authorities recognize the special status of the two \"Republic\" territories and Russian language, and pardon all militia armed participants and political prisoners, the conflict may still not be resolved.\nB. Even if the conflict is resolved, it is not necessarily because the Ukrainian authorities recognize the \"Republic\" territory and the special status of Russian.\nC. If the conflict is to be resolved, the Ukrainian authorities must recognize the special status of the two \"Republic\" territories and the Russian language, and pardon all militia armed participants and political prisoners.\nD. As long as the Ukrainian authorities recognize the special status of the two \"Republic\" territories and the Russian language, and pardon all militia armed participants and political prisoners, the conflict can be resolved.\nAnswer:"," Even if the conflict is resolved, it is not necessarily because the Ukrainian authorities recognize the \"Republic\" territory and the special status of Russian."],["Passage: On the eve of the Minsk talks of the Ukrainian authorities \u2019coordination group, the speakers of\u201c Donetsk People \u2019s Republic \u201dand\u201c Lugansk People \u2019s Republic \u201dannounced their negotiating positions? if the Ukrainian authorities do not recognize their territories and the special status of Russian, And without stopping its military operations in the southeast, the conflict cannot be resolved. In addition, the two \u201cRepublics\u201d insisted on pardoning all militia armed participants and political prisoners. Some Ukrainian observers commented? Do we recognize the special status of these two so-called \"Republics\" and can we resolve the conflict by pardoning the militia?\nQuestion: The comments of Ukrainian observers are best used to refute which of the following?\nChoices:\nA. Even if the Ukrainian authorities recognize the special status of the two \"Republic\" territories and Russian language, and pardon all militia armed participants and political prisoners, the conflict may still not be resolved.\nB. Even if the conflict is resolved, it is not necessarily because the Ukrainian authorities recognize the \"Republic\" territory and the special status of Russian.\nC. If the conflict is to be resolved, the Ukrainian authorities must recognize the special status of the two \"Republic\" territories and the Russian language, and pardon all militia armed participants and political prisoners.\nD. As long as the Ukrainian authorities recognize the special status of the two \"Republic\" territories and the Russian language, and pardon all militia armed participants and political prisoners, the conflict can be resolved.\nAnswer:"," If the conflict is to be resolved, the Ukrainian authorities must recognize the special status of the two \"Republic\" territories and the Russian language, and pardon all militia armed participants and political prisoners."],["Passage: On the eve of the Minsk talks of the Ukrainian authorities \u2019coordination group, the speakers of\u201c Donetsk People \u2019s Republic \u201dand\u201c Lugansk People \u2019s Republic \u201dannounced their negotiating positions? if the Ukrainian authorities do not recognize their territories and the special status of Russian, And without stopping its military operations in the southeast, the conflict cannot be resolved. In addition, the two \u201cRepublics\u201d insisted on pardoning all militia armed participants and political prisoners. Some Ukrainian observers commented? Do we recognize the special status of these two so-called \"Republics\" and can we resolve the conflict by pardoning the militia?\nQuestion: The comments of Ukrainian observers are best used to refute which of the following?\nChoices:\nA. Even if the Ukrainian authorities recognize the special status of the two \"Republic\" territories and Russian language, and pardon all militia armed participants and political prisoners, the conflict may still not be resolved.\nB. Even if the conflict is resolved, it is not necessarily because the Ukrainian authorities recognize the \"Republic\" territory and the special status of Russian.\nC. If the conflict is to be resolved, the Ukrainian authorities must recognize the special status of the two \"Republic\" territories and the Russian language, and pardon all militia armed participants and political prisoners.\nD. As long as the Ukrainian authorities recognize the special status of the two \"Republic\" territories and the Russian language, and pardon all militia armed participants and political prisoners, the conflict can be resolved.\nAnswer:"," As long as the Ukrainian authorities recognize the special status of the two \"Republic\" territories and the Russian language, and pardon all militia armed participants and political prisoners, the conflict can be resolved."]]
