structured_outputs.md 11.7 KB
Newer Older
1
# Structured Outputs
2

3
4
5
6
7
vLLM supports the generation of structured outputs using
[xgrammar](https://github.com/mlc-ai/xgrammar) or
[guidance](https://github.com/guidance-ai/llguidance) as backends.
This document shows you some examples of the different options that are
available to generate structured outputs.
8

9
## Online Serving (OpenAI API)
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

You can generate structured outputs using the OpenAI's [Completions](https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/completions) and [Chat](https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat) API.

The following parameters are supported, which must be added as extra parameters:

- `guided_choice`: the output will be exactly one of the choices.
- `guided_regex`: the output will follow the regex pattern.
- `guided_json`: the output will follow the JSON schema.
- `guided_grammar`: the output will follow the context free grammar.
19
- `structural_tag`: Follow a JSON schema within a set of specified tags within the generated text.
20

21
You can see the complete list of supported parameters on the [OpenAI-Compatible Server](../serving/openai_compatible_server.md) page.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29

Structured outputs are supported by default in the OpenAI-Compatible Server. You
may choose to specify the backend to use by setting the
`--guided-decoding-backend` flag to `vllm serve`. The default backend is `auto`,
which will try to choose an appropriate backend based on the details of the
request. You may also choose a specific backend, along with
some options. A full set of options is available in the `vllm serve --help`
text.
30
31
32

Now let´s see an example for each of the cases, starting with the `guided_choice`, as it´s the easiest one:

33
??? code
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51

    ```python
    from openai import OpenAI
    client = OpenAI(
        base_url="http://localhost:8000/v1",
        api_key="-",
    )
    model = client.models.list().data[0].id

    completion = client.chat.completions.create(
        model=model,
        messages=[
            {"role": "user", "content": "Classify this sentiment: vLLM is wonderful!"}
        ],
        extra_body={"guided_choice": ["positive", "negative"]},
    )
    print(completion.choices[0].message.content)
    ```
52
53
54

The next example shows how to use the `guided_regex`. The idea is to generate an email address, given a simple regex template:

55
??? code
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69

    ```python
    completion = client.chat.completions.create(
        model=model,
        messages=[
            {
                "role": "user",
                "content": "Generate an example email address for Alan Turing, who works in Enigma. End in .com and new line. Example result: alan.turing@enigma.com\n",
            }
        ],
        extra_body={"guided_regex": r"\w+@\w+\.com\n", "stop": ["\n"]},
    )
    print(completion.choices[0].message.content)
    ```
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78

One of the most relevant features in structured text generation is the option to generate a valid JSON with pre-defined fields and formats.
For this we can use the `guided_json` parameter in two different ways:

- Using directly a [JSON Schema](https://json-schema.org/)
- Defining a [Pydantic model](https://docs.pydantic.dev/latest/) and then extracting the JSON Schema from it (which is normally an easier option).

The next example shows how to use the `guided_json` parameter with a Pydantic model:

79
??? code
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105

    ```python
    from pydantic import BaseModel
    from enum import Enum

    class CarType(str, Enum):
        sedan = "sedan"
        suv = "SUV"
        truck = "Truck"
        coupe = "Coupe"

    class CarDescription(BaseModel):
        brand: str
        model: str
        car_type: CarType

    json_schema = CarDescription.model_json_schema()

    completion = client.chat.completions.create(
        model=model,
        messages=[
            {
                "role": "user",
                "content": "Generate a JSON with the brand, model and car_type of the most iconic car from the 90's",
            }
        ],
106
        response_format={
107
108
109
110
111
            "type": "json_schema",
            "json_schema": {
                "name": "car-description",
                "schema": CarDescription.model_json_schema()
            },
112
        },
113
114
115
    )
    print(completion.choices[0].message.content)
    ```
116

117
118
!!! tip
    While not strictly necessary, normally it´s better to indicate in the prompt the
119
    JSON schema and how the fields should be populated. This can improve the
120
    results notably in most cases.
121

122
123
Finally we have the `guided_grammar` option, which is probably the most
difficult to use, but it´s really powerful. It allows us to define complete
124
languages like SQL queries. It works by using a context free EBNF grammar.
125
As an example, we can use to define a specific format of simplified SQL queries:
126

127
??? code
128

129
130
131
    ```python
    simplified_sql_grammar = """
        root ::= select_statement
132

133
        select_statement ::= "SELECT " column " from " table " where " condition
134

135
        column ::= "col_1 " | "col_2 "
136

137
        table ::= "table_1 " | "table_2 "
138

139
        condition ::= column "= " number
140

141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
        number ::= "1 " | "2 "
    """

    completion = client.chat.completions.create(
        model=model,
        messages=[
            {
                "role": "user",
                "content": "Generate an SQL query to show the 'username' and 'email' from the 'users' table.",
            }
        ],
        extra_body={"guided_grammar": simplified_sql_grammar},
    )
    print(completion.choices[0].message.content)
    ```
156

157
See also: [full example](../examples/online_serving/structured_outputs.md)
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168

## Reasoning Outputs

You can also use structured outputs with <project:#reasoning-outputs> for reasoning models.

```bash
vllm serve deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B --reasoning-parser deepseek_r1
```

Note that you can use reasoning with any provided structured outputs feature. The following uses one with JSON schema:

169
??? code
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198

    ```python
    from pydantic import BaseModel


    class People(BaseModel):
        name: str
        age: int


    completion = client.chat.completions.create(
        model=model,
        messages=[
            {
                "role": "user",
                "content": "Generate a JSON with the name and age of one random person.",
            }
        ],
        response_format={
            "type": "json_schema",
            "json_schema": {
                "name": "people",
                "schema": People.model_json_schema()
            }
        },
    )
    print("reasoning_content: ", completion.choices[0].message.reasoning_content)
    print("content: ", completion.choices[0].message.content)
    ```
199

200
See also: [full example](../examples/online_serving/structured_outputs.md)
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211

## Experimental Automatic Parsing (OpenAI API)

This section covers the OpenAI beta wrapper over the `client.chat.completions.create()` method that provides richer integrations with Python specific types.

At the time of writing (`openai==1.54.4`), this is a "beta" feature in the OpenAI client library. Code reference can be found [here](https://github.com/openai/openai-python/blob/52357cff50bee57ef442e94d78a0de38b4173fc2/src/openai/resources/beta/chat/completions.py#L100-L104).

For the following examples, vLLM was setup using `vllm serve meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct`

Here is a simple example demonstrating how to get structured output using Pydantic models:

212
??? code
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238

    ```python
    from pydantic import BaseModel
    from openai import OpenAI

    class Info(BaseModel):
        name: str
        age: int

    client = OpenAI(base_url="http://0.0.0.0:8000/v1", api_key="dummy")
    model = client.models.list().data[0].id
    completion = client.beta.chat.completions.parse(
        model=model,
        messages=[
            {"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."},
            {"role": "user", "content": "My name is Cameron, I'm 28. What's my name and age?"},
        ],
        response_format=Info,
    )

    message = completion.choices[0].message
    print(message)
    assert message.parsed
    print("Name:", message.parsed.name)
    print("Age:", message.parsed.age)
    ```
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247

```console
ParsedChatCompletionMessage[Testing](content='{"name": "Cameron", "age": 28}', refusal=None, role='assistant', audio=None, function_call=None, tool_calls=[], parsed=Testing(name='Cameron', age=28))
Name: Cameron
Age: 28
```

Here is a more complex example using nested Pydantic models to handle a step-by-step math solution:

248
??? code
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278

    ```python
    from typing import List
    from pydantic import BaseModel
    from openai import OpenAI

    class Step(BaseModel):
        explanation: str
        output: str

    class MathResponse(BaseModel):
        steps: list[Step]
        final_answer: str

    completion = client.beta.chat.completions.parse(
        model=model,
        messages=[
            {"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful expert math tutor."},
            {"role": "user", "content": "Solve 8x + 31 = 2."},
        ],
        response_format=MathResponse,
    )

    message = completion.choices[0].message
    print(message)
    assert message.parsed
    for i, step in enumerate(message.parsed.steps):
        print(f"Step #{i}:", step)
    print("Answer:", message.parsed.final_answer)
    ```
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289

Output:

```console
ParsedChatCompletionMessage[MathResponse](content='{ "steps": [{ "explanation": "First, let\'s isolate the term with the variable \'x\'. To do this, we\'ll subtract 31 from both sides of the equation.", "output": "8x + 31 - 31 = 2 - 31"}, { "explanation": "By subtracting 31 from both sides, we simplify the equation to 8x = -29.", "output": "8x = -29"}, { "explanation": "Next, let\'s isolate \'x\' by dividing both sides of the equation by 8.", "output": "8x / 8 = -29 / 8"}], "final_answer": "x = -29/8" }', refusal=None, role='assistant', audio=None, function_call=None, tool_calls=[], parsed=MathResponse(steps=[Step(explanation="First, let's isolate the term with the variable 'x'. To do this, we'll subtract 31 from both sides of the equation.", output='8x + 31 - 31 = 2 - 31'), Step(explanation='By subtracting 31 from both sides, we simplify the equation to 8x = -29.', output='8x = -29'), Step(explanation="Next, let's isolate 'x' by dividing both sides of the equation by 8.", output='8x / 8 = -29 / 8')], final_answer='x = -29/8'))
Step #0: explanation="First, let's isolate the term with the variable 'x'. To do this, we'll subtract 31 from both sides of the equation." output='8x + 31 - 31 = 2 - 31'
Step #1: explanation='By subtracting 31 from both sides, we simplify the equation to 8x = -29.' output='8x = -29'
Step #2: explanation="Next, let's isolate 'x' by dividing both sides of the equation by 8." output='8x / 8 = -29 / 8'
Answer: x = -29/8
```

290
An example of using `structural_tag` can be found here: <gh-file:examples/online_serving/structured_outputs>
291

292
293
## Offline Inference

294
Offline inference allows for the same types of structured outputs.
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
To use it, we´ll need to configure the guided decoding using the class `GuidedDecodingParams` inside `SamplingParams`.
The main available options inside `GuidedDecodingParams` are:

- `json`
- `regex`
- `choice`
- `grammar`
302
- `structural_tag`
303

304
These parameters can be used in the same way as the parameters from the Online
305
Serving examples above. One example for the usage of the `choice` parameter is
306
shown below:
307

308
??? code
309

310
311
312
    ```python
    from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams
    from vllm.sampling_params import GuidedDecodingParams
313

314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
    llm = LLM(model="HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-1.7B-Instruct")

    guided_decoding_params = GuidedDecodingParams(choice=["Positive", "Negative"])
    sampling_params = SamplingParams(guided_decoding=guided_decoding_params)
    outputs = llm.generate(
        prompts="Classify this sentiment: vLLM is wonderful!",
        sampling_params=sampling_params,
    )
    print(outputs[0].outputs[0].text)
    ```
324

325
See also: [full example](../examples/online_serving/structured_outputs.md)