multimodal.md 36 KB
Newer Older
1
# Multi-Modal Support
2

3
This document walks you through the steps to extend a basic model so that it accepts [multi-modal inputs](../../features/multimodal_inputs.md).
4
5
6

## 1. Update the base vLLM model

7
It is assumed that you have already implemented the model in vLLM according to [these steps](basic.md).
8
9
Further update the model as follows:

10
11
- Implement [get_placeholder_str][vllm.model_executor.models.interfaces.SupportsMultiModal.get_placeholder_str] to define the placeholder string which is used to represent the multi-modal item in the text prompt. This should be consistent with the chat template of the model.

12
    ??? code
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

        ```python
        class YourModelForImage2Seq(nn.Module):
            ...

            @classmethod
            def get_placeholder_str(cls, modality: str, i: int) -> Optional[str]:
                if modality.startswith("image"):
                    return "<image>"

                raise ValueError("Only image modality is supported")
        ```

26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
- Reserve a keyword parameter in [forward][torch.nn.Module.forward] for each input tensor that corresponds to a multi-modal input, as shown in the following example:

  ```diff
    def forward(
        self,
        input_ids: torch.Tensor,
        positions: torch.Tensor,
  +     pixel_values: torch.Tensor,
    ) -> SamplerOutput:
  ```
  
  More conveniently, you can simply pass `**kwargs` to the [forward][torch.nn.Module.forward] method and retrieve the keyword parameters for multimodal inputs from it.

- Implement [get_multimodal_embeddings][vllm.model_executor.models.interfaces.SupportsMultiModal.get_multimodal_embeddings] that returns the embeddings from running the multimodal inputs through the multimodal tokenizer of the model. Below we provide a boilerplate of a typical implementation pattern, but feel free to adjust it to your own needs.

41
    ??? code
42

43
44
45
        ```python
        class YourModelForImage2Seq(nn.Module):
            ...
46

47
            def _process_image_input(self, image_input: YourModelImageInputs) -> torch.Tensor:
48

49
50
51
                assert self.vision_encoder is not None
                image_features = self.vision_encoder(image_input)
                return self.multi_modal_projector(image_features)
52

53
54
            def get_multimodal_embeddings(
                    self, **kwargs: object) -> Optional[MultiModalEmbeddings]:
55

56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
                # Validate the multimodal input keyword arguments
                image_input = self._parse_and_validate_image_input(**kwargs)
                if image_input is None:
                    return None

                # Run multimodal inputs through encoder and projector
                vision_embeddings = self._process_image_input(image_input)
                return vision_embeddings
        ```
65

66
67
!!! important
    The returned `multimodal_embeddings` must be either a **3D [torch.Tensor][]** of shape `(num_items, feature_size, hidden_size)`, or a **list / tuple of 2D [torch.Tensor][]'s** of shape `(feature_size, hidden_size)`, so that `multimodal_embeddings[i]` retrieves the embeddings generated from the `i`-th multimodal data item (e.g, image) of the request.
68
69
70

- Implement [get_input_embeddings][vllm.model_executor.models.interfaces.SupportsMultiModal.get_input_embeddings] to merge `multimodal_embeddings` with text embeddings from the `input_ids`. If input processing for the model is implemented correctly (see sections below), then you can leverage the utility function we provide to easily merge the embeddings.

71
    ??? code
72

73
74
        ```python
        from .utils import merge_multimodal_embeddings
75

76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
        class YourModelForImage2Seq(nn.Module):
            ...

            def get_input_embeddings(
                self,
                input_ids: torch.Tensor,
                multimodal_embeddings: Optional[MultiModalEmbeddings] = None,
            ) -> torch.Tensor:

                # `get_input_embeddings` should already be implemented for the language 
                # model as one of the requirements of basic vLLM model implementation.
                inputs_embeds = self.language_model.get_input_embeddings(input_ids)

                if multimodal_embeddings is not None:
                    inputs_embeds = merge_multimodal_embeddings(
                        input_ids=input_ids, 
                        inputs_embeds=inputs_embeds, 
                        multimodal_embeddings=multimodal_embeddings,
                        placeholder_token_id=self.config.image_token_index)

                return inputs_embeds
        ```
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119

- Implement [get_language_model][vllm.model_executor.models.interfaces.SupportsMultiModal.get_language_model] getter to provide stable access to the underlying language model.

    ```python
    class YourModelForImage2Seq(nn.Module):
        ...

        def get_language_model(self) -> torch.nn.Module:
            # Change `language_model` according to your implementation.
            return self.language_model
    ```

- Once the above steps are done, update the model class with the [SupportsMultiModal][vllm.model_executor.models.interfaces.SupportsMultiModal] interface.

  ```diff
  + from vllm.model_executor.models.interfaces import SupportsMultiModal

  - class YourModelForImage2Seq(nn.Module):
  + class YourModelForImage2Seq(nn.Module, SupportsMultiModal):
  ```

!!! note
120
121
    The model class does not have to be named `*ForCausalLM`.
    Check out [the HuggingFace Transformers documentation](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/model_doc/auto#multimodal) for some examples.
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154

## 2. Specify processing information

Next, create a subclass of [BaseProcessingInfo][vllm.multimodal.processing.BaseProcessingInfo]
to provide basic information related to HF processing.

### Maximum number of input items

You need to override the abstract method [get_supported_mm_limits][vllm.multimodal.processing.BaseProcessingInfo.get_supported_mm_limits]
to return the maximum number of input items for each modality supported by the model.

For example, if the model supports any number of images but only one video per prompt:

```python
def get_supported_mm_limits(self) -> Mapping[str, Optional[int]]:
    return {"image": None, "video": 1}
```

## 3. Specify dummy inputs

Then, inherit [BaseDummyInputsBuilder][vllm.multimodal.profiling.BaseDummyInputsBuilder] to construct dummy inputs for
HF processing as well as memory profiling.

### For memory profiling

Override the abstract methods [get_dummy_text][vllm.multimodal.profiling.BaseDummyInputsBuilder.get_dummy_text] and [get_dummy_mm_data][vllm.multimodal.profiling.BaseDummyInputsBuilder.get_dummy_mm_data] to construct dummy inputs for memory profiling. These dummy inputs should result in the worst-case memory usage of the model so that vLLM can reserve the correct amount of memory for it.

Assuming that the memory usage increases with the number of tokens, the dummy inputs can be constructed to maximize the number of output embeddings, which is the same number as placeholder feature tokens.

=== "Basic example: LLaVA"

    Looking at the code of HF's `LlavaForConditionalGeneration`:

155
    ??? code
156

157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
        ```python
        # https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/v4.47.1/src/transformers/models/llava/modeling_llava.py#L530-L544
        n_image_tokens = (input_ids == self.config.image_token_index).sum().item()
        n_image_features = image_features.shape[0] * image_features.shape[1]

        if n_image_tokens != n_image_features:
            raise ValueError(
                f"Image features and image tokens do not match: tokens: {n_image_tokens}, features {n_image_features}"
            )
        special_image_mask = (
            (input_ids == self.config.image_token_index)
            .unsqueeze(-1)
            .expand_as(inputs_embeds)
            .to(inputs_embeds.device)
171
        )
172
173
174
        image_features = image_features.to(inputs_embeds.device, inputs_embeds.dtype)
        inputs_embeds = inputs_embeds.masked_scatter(special_image_mask, image_features)
        ```
175
176
177
178

    The number of placeholder feature tokens per image is `image_features.shape[1]`.
    `image_features` is calculated inside the `get_image_features` method:

179
    ??? code
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194

        ```python
        # https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/v4.47.1/src/transformers/models/llava/modeling_llava.py#L290-L300
        image_outputs = self.vision_tower(pixel_values, output_hidden_states=True)

        selected_image_feature = image_outputs.hidden_states[vision_feature_layer]
        if vision_feature_select_strategy == "default":
            selected_image_feature = selected_image_feature[:, 1:]
        elif vision_feature_select_strategy == "full":
            selected_image_feature = selected_image_feature
        else:
            raise ValueError(f"Unexpected select feature strategy: {self.config.vision_feature_select_strategy}")
        image_features = self.multi_modal_projector(selected_image_feature)
        return image_features
        ```
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216

    We can infer that `image_features.shape[1]` is based on `image_outputs.hidden_states.shape[1]` from the vision tower
    (`CLIPVisionModel` for the [`llava-hf/llava-1.5-7b-hf`](https://huggingface.co/llava-hf/llava-1.5-7b-hf) model).
    Moreover, we only need the sequence length (the second dimension of the tensor) to get `image_features.shape[1]`.
    The sequence length is determined by the initial hidden states in `CLIPVisionTransformer` since the attention
    mechanism doesn't change the sequence length of the output hidden states.

    ```python
    # https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/v4.47.1/src/transformers/models/clip/modeling_clip.py#L1094-L1102
    hidden_states = self.embeddings(pixel_values, interpolate_pos_encoding=interpolate_pos_encoding)
    hidden_states = self.pre_layrnorm(hidden_states)

    encoder_outputs = self.encoder(
        inputs_embeds=hidden_states,
        output_attentions=output_attentions,
        output_hidden_states=output_hidden_states,
        return_dict=return_dict,
    )
    ```

    To find the sequence length, we turn to the code of `CLIPVisionEmbeddings`:

217
    ??? code
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232

        ```python
        # https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/v4.47.1/src/transformers/models/clip/modeling_clip.py#L247-L257
        target_dtype = self.patch_embedding.weight.dtype
        patch_embeds = self.patch_embedding(pixel_values.to(dtype=target_dtype))  # shape = [*, width, grid, grid]
        patch_embeds = patch_embeds.flatten(2).transpose(1, 2)

        class_embeds = self.class_embedding.expand(batch_size, 1, -1)
        embeddings = torch.cat([class_embeds, patch_embeds], dim=1)
        if interpolate_pos_encoding:
            embeddings = embeddings + self.interpolate_pos_encoding(embeddings, height, width)
        else:
            embeddings = embeddings + self.position_embedding(self.position_ids)
        return embeddings
        ```
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243

    We can infer that `embeddings.shape[1] == self.num_positions`, where

    ```python
    # https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/v4.47.1/src/transformers/models/clip/modeling_clip.py#L195-L196
    self.num_patches = (self.image_size // self.patch_size) ** 2
    self.num_positions = self.num_patches + 1
    ```

    Overall, the number of placeholder feature tokens for an image can be calculated as:

244
    ??? code
245

246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
        ```python
        def get_num_image_tokens(
            self,
            *,
            image_width: int,
            image_height: int,
        ) -> int:
            hf_config = self.get_hf_config()
            hf_processor = self.get_hf_processor()
255

256
257
            image_size = hf_config.vision_config.image_size
            patch_size = hf_config.vision_config.patch_size
258

259
260
261
262
263
264
            num_image_tokens = (image_size // patch_size) ** 2 + 1
            if hf_processor.vision_feature_select_strategy == "default":
                num_image_tokens -= 1

            return num_image_tokens
        ```
265
266
267
268

    Notice that the number of image tokens doesn't depend on the image width and height.
    We can simply use a dummy `image_size` to calculate the multimodal profiling data:

269
    ??? code
270

271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
        ```python
        # NOTE: In actuality, this is usually implemented as part of the
        # model's subclass of `BaseProcessingInfo`, but we show it as is
        # here for simplicity.
        def get_image_size_with_most_features(self) -> ImageSize:
            hf_config = self.get_hf_config()
            width = height = hf_config.image_size
            return ImageSize(width=width, height=height)
279

280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
        def get_dummy_mm_data(
            self,
            seq_len: int,
            mm_counts: Mapping[str, int],
        ) -> MultiModalDataDict:
            num_images = mm_counts.get("image", 0)

            target_width, target_height = \
                self.info.get_image_size_with_most_features()

            return {
                "image":
                self._get_dummy_images(width=target_width,
                                    height=target_height,
                                    num_images=num_images)
            }
        ```
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313

    For the text, we simply expand the multimodal image token from the model config to match the desired number of images.

    ```python
    def get_dummy_text(self, mm_counts: Mapping[str, int]) -> str:
        num_images = mm_counts.get("image", 0)

        processor = self.info.get_hf_processor()
        image_token = processor.image_token

        return image_token * num_images
    ```

=== "No input placeholders: Fuyu"

    Looking at the code of HF's `FuyuForCausalLM`:

314
    ??? code
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330

        ```python
        # https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/v4.48.3/src/transformers/models/fuyu/modeling_fuyu.py#L311-L322
        if image_patches is not None and past_key_values is None:
            patch_embeddings = [
                self.vision_embed_tokens(patch.to(self.vision_embed_tokens.weight.dtype))
                .squeeze(0)
                .to(inputs_embeds.device)
                for patch in image_patches
            ]
            inputs_embeds = self.gather_continuous_embeddings(
                word_embeddings=inputs_embeds,
                continuous_embeddings=patch_embeddings,
                image_patch_input_indices=image_patches_indices,
            )
        ```
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343

    The number of placeholder feature tokens for the `i`th item in the batch is `patch_embeddings[i].shape[0]`,
    which is the same as `image_patches[i].shape[0]`, i.e. `num_total_patches`.

    Unlike LLaVA, Fuyu does not define the number of patches inside the modeling file. Where can we get more information?
    Considering that the model input comes from the output of `FuyuProcessor`, let's **look at the preprocessing files**.

    The image outputs are obtained by calling `FuyuImageProcessor.preprocess` and then
    `FuyuImageProcessor.preprocess_with_tokenizer_info` inside `FuyuProcessor`.

    In `FuyuImageProcessor.preprocess`, the images are resized and padded to the target `FuyuImageProcessor.size`,
    returning the dimensions after resizing (but before padding) as metadata.

344
    ??? code
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357

        ```python
        # https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/v4.48.3/src/transformers/models/fuyu/processing_fuyu.py#L541-L544
        image_encoding = self.image_processor.preprocess(images, **output_kwargs["images_kwargs"])
        batch_images = image_encoding["images"]
        image_unpadded_heights = image_encoding["image_unpadded_heights"]
        image_unpadded_widths = image_encoding["image_unpadded_widths"]

        # https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/v4.48.3/src/transformers/models/fuyu/image_processing_fuyu.py#L480-L
        if do_resize:
            batch_images = [
                [self.resize(image, size=size, input_data_format=input_data_format) for image in images]
                for images in batch_images
358
359
            ]

360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
        image_sizes = [get_image_size(images[0], channel_dim=input_data_format) for images in batch_images]
        image_unpadded_heights = [[image_size[0]] for image_size in image_sizes]
        image_unpadded_widths = [[image_size[1]] for image_size in image_sizes]

        if do_pad:
            batch_images = [
                [
                    self.pad_image(
                        image,
                        size=size,
                        mode=padding_mode,
                        constant_values=padding_value,
                        input_data_format=input_data_format,
                    )
                    for image in images
                ]
                for images in batch_images
            ]
        ```
379

380
    In `FuyuImageProcessor.preprocess_with_tokenizer_info`, the images are split into patches based on this metadata:
381

382
    ??? code
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393

        ```python
        # https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/v4.48.3/src/transformers/models/fuyu/processing_fuyu.py#L417-L425
        model_image_input = self.image_processor.preprocess_with_tokenizer_info(
            image_input=tensor_batch_images,
            image_present=image_present,
            image_unpadded_h=image_unpadded_heights,
            image_unpadded_w=image_unpadded_widths,
            image_placeholder_id=image_placeholder_id,
            image_newline_id=image_newline_id,
            variable_sized=True,
394
395
        )

396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
        # https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/v4.48.3/src/transformers/models/fuyu/image_processing_fuyu.py#L638-L658
        image_height, image_width = image.shape[1], image.shape[2]
        if variable_sized:  # variable_sized=True
            new_h = min(
                image_height,
                math.ceil(image_unpadded_h[batch_index, subseq_index] / patch_height) * patch_height,
            )
            new_w = min(
                image_width,
                math.ceil(image_unpadded_w[batch_index, subseq_index] / patch_width) * patch_width,
            )
            image = image[:, :new_h, :new_w]
            image_height, image_width = new_h, new_w

        num_patches = self.get_num_patches(image_height=image_height, image_width=image_width)
        tensor_of_image_ids = torch.full(
            [num_patches], image_placeholder_id, dtype=torch.int32, device=image_input.device
        )
        patches = self.patchify_image(image=image.unsqueeze(0)).squeeze(0)
        assert num_patches == patches.shape[0]
        ```
417
418
419

    The number of patches is in turn defined by `FuyuImageProcessor.get_num_patches`:

420
    ??? code
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435

        ```python
        # https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/v4.48.3/src/transformers/models/fuyu/image_processing_fuyu.py#L552-L562
        patch_size = patch_size if patch_size is not None else self.patch_size
        patch_height, patch_width = self.patch_size["height"], self.patch_size["width"]

        if image_height % patch_height != 0:
            raise ValueError(f"{image_height=} must be divisible by {patch_height}")
        if image_width % patch_width != 0:
            raise ValueError(f"{image_width=} must be divisible by {patch_width}")

        num_patches_per_dim_h = image_height // patch_height
        num_patches_per_dim_w = image_width // patch_width
        num_patches = num_patches_per_dim_h * num_patches_per_dim_w
        ```
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456

    These image patches correspond to placeholder tokens (`|SPEAKER|`). So, we just need to maximize the number of image patches. Since input images are first resized
    to fit within `image_processor.size`, we can maximize the number of image patches by inputting an image with size equal to `image_processor.size`.

    ```python
    def get_image_size_with_most_features(self) -> ImageSize:
        image_processor = self.get_image_processor()
        return ImageSize(width=image_processor.size["width"],
                            height=image_processor.size["height"])
    ```

    Fuyu does not expect image placeholders in the inputs to HF processor, so
    the dummy prompt text is empty regardless of the number of images.

    ```python
    def get_dummy_text(self, mm_counts: Mapping[str, int]) -> str:
        return ""
    ```

    For the multimodal image profiling data, the logic is very similar to LLaVA:

457
    ??? code
458

459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
        ```python
        def get_dummy_mm_data(
            self,
            seq_len: int,
            mm_counts: Mapping[str, int],
        ) -> MultiModalDataDict:
            target_width, target_height = \
                self.info.get_image_size_with_most_features()
            num_images = mm_counts.get("image", 0)

            return {
                "image":
                self._get_dummy_images(width=target_width,
                                    height=target_height,
                                    num_images=num_images)
            }
        ```
476
477
478
479
480
481
482

## 4. Specify processing details

Afterwards, create a subclass of [BaseMultiModalProcessor][vllm.multimodal.processing.BaseMultiModalProcessor]
to fill in the missing details about HF processing.

!!! info
483
    [Multi-Modal Data Processing](../../design/mm_processing.md)
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494

### Multi-modal fields

Override [_get_mm_fields_config][vllm.multimodal.processing.BaseMultiModalProcessor._get_mm_fields_config] to
return a schema of the tensors outputted by the HF processor that are related to the input multi-modal items.

=== "Basic example: LLaVA"

    The output of `CLIPImageProcessor` is a simple tensor with shape
    `(num_images, num_channels, image_height, image_width)`:

495

496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
    ```python
    # https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/v4.47.1/src/transformers/models/clip/image_processing_clip.py#L339-L345
    images = [
        to_channel_dimension_format(image, data_format, input_channel_dim=input_data_format)
        for image in all_images
    ]

    data = {"pixel_values": images}
    return BatchFeature(data=data, tensor_type=return_tensors)
    ```

    So, we override [_get_mm_fields_config][vllm.multimodal.processing.BaseMultiModalProcessor._get_mm_fields_config] as follows:

    ```python
    def _get_mm_fields_config(
        self,
        hf_inputs: BatchFeature,
        hf_processor_mm_kwargs: Mapping[str, object],
    ) -> Mapping[str, MultiModalFieldConfig]:
        return dict(
            pixel_values=MultiModalFieldConfig.batched("image"),
        )
    ```

    !!! note
        Our [actual code](gh-file:vllm/model_executor/models/llava.py) additionally supports
        pre-computed image embeddings, which can be passed to be model via the `image_embeds` argument.

=== "With postprocessing: Fuyu"

    The `image_patches` output of `FuyuImageProcessor.preprocess_with_tokenizer_info` concatenates
    the patches from each image belonging to an item in the batch:

    ```python
    # https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/v4.48.3/src/transformers/models/fuyu/image_processing_fuyu.py#L673-L679
            image_input_ids.append(tensor_of_image_ids)
            image_patches.append(patches)
        else:
            image_input_ids.append(torch.tensor([], dtype=torch.int32, device=image_input.device))

    batch_image_input_ids.append(image_input_ids)
    batch_image_patches.append(image_patches)
    ```

    The shape of `image_patches` outputted by `FuyuImageProcessor` is therefore
    `(1, num_images, num_patches, patch_width * patch_height * num_channels)`.

543
544
545
546
    In order to support the use of
    [MultiModalFieldConfig.batched][vllm.multimodal.inputs.MultiModalFieldConfig.batched]
    like in LLaVA, we remove the extra batch dimension by overriding
    [BaseMultiModalProcessor._call_hf_processor][vllm.multimodal.processing.BaseMultiModalProcessor._call_hf_processor]:
547

548
    ??? code
549

550
551
552
553
554
555
        ```python
        def _call_hf_processor(
            self,
            prompt: str,
            mm_data: Mapping[str, object],
            mm_kwargs: Mapping[str, object],
556
            tok_kwargs: Mapping[str, object],
557
558
559
560
561
        ) -> BatchFeature:
            processed_outputs = super()._call_hf_processor(
                prompt=prompt,
                mm_data=mm_data,
                mm_kwargs=mm_kwargs,
562
                tok_kwargs=tok_kwargs,
563
            )
564

565
566
567
568
            image_patches = processed_outputs.get("image_patches")
            if image_patches is not None:
                images = mm_data["images"]
                assert isinstance(images, list)
569

570
571
572
573
574
575
                # Original output: (1, num_images, Pn, Px * Py * C)
                # New output: (num_images, Pn, Px * Py * C)
                assert (isinstance(image_patches, list)
                        and len(image_patches) == 1)
                assert (isinstance(image_patches[0], torch.Tensor)
                        and len(image_patches[0]) == len(images))
576

577
578
579
580
                processed_outputs["image_patches"] = image_patches[0]

            return processed_outputs
        ```
581
582
583
584
585

    !!! note
        Our [actual code](gh-file:vllm/model_executor/models/fuyu.py) has special handling
        for text-only inputs to prevent unnecessary warnings from HF processor.

586
587
588
589
590
    !!! note
        The `_call_hf_processor` method specifies both `mm_kwargs` and `tok_kwargs` for
        processing. `mm_kwargs` is used to both initialize and call the huggingface
        processor, whereas `tok_kwargs` is only used to call the huggingface processor.

591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
    This lets us override [_get_mm_fields_config][vllm.multimodal.processing.BaseMultiModalProcessor._get_mm_fields_config] as follows:

    ```python
    def _get_mm_fields_config(
        self,
        hf_inputs: BatchFeature,
        hf_processor_mm_kwargs: Mapping[str, object],
    ) -> Mapping[str, MultiModalFieldConfig]:
        return dict(image_patches=MultiModalFieldConfig.batched("image"))
    ```

### Prompt updates

Override [_get_prompt_updates][vllm.multimodal.processing.BaseMultiModalProcessor._get_prompt_updates] to
return a list of [PromptUpdate][vllm.multimodal.processing.PromptUpdate] instances.

Each [PromptUpdate][vllm.multimodal.processing.PromptUpdate] instance specifies an update operation
(e.g.: insertion, replacement) performed by the HF processor.

=== "Basic example: LLaVA"

    Looking at HF's `LlavaProcessor`:

    ```python
    # https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/v4.47.1/src/transformers/models/llava/processing_llava.py#L167-L170
    prompt_strings = []
    for sample in text:
        sample = sample.replace(self.image_token, self.image_token * num_image_tokens)
        prompt_strings.append(sample)
    ```

    It simply repeats each input `image_token` a number of times equal to the number of placeholder feature tokens (`num_image_tokens`).
    Based on this, we override [_get_prompt_updates][vllm.multimodal.processing.BaseMultiModalProcessor._get_prompt_updates] as follows:

625
    ??? code
626

627
628
629
630
631
        ```python
        def _get_prompt_updates(
            self,
            mm_items: MultiModalDataItems,
            hf_processor_mm_kwargs: Mapping[str, object],
632
            out_mm_kwargs: MultiModalKwargsItems,
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
        ) -> Sequence[PromptUpdate]:
            hf_config = self.info.get_hf_config()
            image_token_id = hf_config.image_token_index

            def get_replacement(item_idx: int):
                images = mm_items.get_items("image", ImageProcessorItems)

                image_size = images.get_image_size(item_idx)
                num_image_tokens = self.info.get_num_image_tokens(
                    image_width=image_size.width,
                    image_height=image_size.height,
                )
645

646
                return [image_token_id] * num_image_tokens
647

648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
            return [
                PromptReplacement(
                    modality="image",
                    target=[image_token_id],
                    replacement=get_replacement,
                ),
            ]
        ```
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669

=== "Handling additional tokens: Fuyu"

    Recall the layout of feature tokens from Step 2:

    ```
    |SPEAKER||SPEAKER|...|SPEAKER||NEWLINE|
    |SPEAKER||SPEAKER|...|SPEAKER||NEWLINE|
    ...
    |SPEAKER||SPEAKER|...|SPEAKER||NEWLINE|
    ```

    We define a helper function to return `ncols` and `nrows` directly:

670
    ??? code
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696

        ```python
        def get_image_feature_grid_size(
            self,
            *,
            image_width: int,
            image_height: int,
        ) -> tuple[int, int]:
            image_processor = self.get_image_processor()
            target_width = image_processor.size["width"]
            target_height = image_processor.size["height"]
            patch_width = image_processor.patch_size["width"]
            patch_height = image_processor.patch_size["height"]

            if not (image_width <= target_width and image_height <= target_height):
                height_scale_factor = target_height / image_height
                width_scale_factor = target_width / image_width
                optimal_scale_factor = min(height_scale_factor, width_scale_factor)

                image_height = int(image_height * optimal_scale_factor)
                image_width = int(image_width * optimal_scale_factor)

            ncols = math.ceil(image_width / patch_width)
            nrows = math.ceil(image_height / patch_height)
            return ncols, nrows
        ```
697
698
699

    Based on this, we can initially define our replacement tokens as:

700
    ??? code
701

702
703
704
705
        ```python
        def get_replacement(item_idx: int):
            images = mm_items.get_items("image", ImageProcessorItems)
            image_size = images.get_image_size(item_idx)
706

707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
            ncols, nrows = self.info.get_image_feature_grid_size(
                image_width=image_size.width,
                image_height=image_size.height,
            )

            # `_IMAGE_TOKEN_ID` corresponds to `|SPEAKER|`
            # `_NEWLINE_TOKEN_ID` corresponds to `|NEWLINE|`
            return ([_IMAGE_TOKEN_ID] * ncols + [_NEWLINE_TOKEN_ID]) * nrows
        ```
716
717
718
719

    However, this is not entirely correct. After `FuyuImageProcessor.preprocess_with_tokenizer_info` is called,
    a BOS token (`<s>`) is also added to the promopt:

720
    ??? code
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742

        ```python
        # https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/v4.48.3/src/transformers/models/fuyu/processing_fuyu.py#L417-L435
        model_image_input = self.image_processor.preprocess_with_tokenizer_info(
            image_input=tensor_batch_images,
            image_present=image_present,
            image_unpadded_h=image_unpadded_heights,
            image_unpadded_w=image_unpadded_widths,
            image_placeholder_id=image_placeholder_id,
            image_newline_id=image_newline_id,
            variable_sized=True,
        )
        prompt_tokens, prompts_length = _tokenize_prompts_with_image_and_batch(
            tokenizer=self.tokenizer,
            prompts=prompts,
            scale_factors=scale_factors,
            max_tokens_to_generate=self.max_tokens_to_generate,
            max_position_embeddings=self.max_position_embeddings,
            add_BOS=True,
            add_beginning_of_answer_token=True,
        )
        ```
743
744
745
746

    To assign the vision embeddings to only the image tokens, instead of a string
    you can return an instance of [PromptUpdateDetails][vllm.multimodal.processing.PromptUpdateDetails]:

747
    ??? code
748

749
        ```python
750
        hf_config = self.info.get_hf_config()
751
        bos_token_id = hf_config.bos_token_id  # `<s>`
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
        assert isinstance(bos_token_id, int)

        def get_replacement_fuyu(item_idx: int):
            images = mm_items.get_items("image", ImageProcessorItems)
            image_size = images.get_image_size(item_idx)

            ncols, nrows = self.info.get_image_feature_grid_size(
                image_width=image_size.width,
                image_height=image_size.height,
            )
            image_tokens = ([_IMAGE_TOKEN_ID] * ncols +
                            [_NEWLINE_TOKEN_ID]) * nrows

            return PromptUpdateDetails.select_token_id(
                image_tokens + [bos_token_id],
                embed_token_id=_IMAGE_TOKEN_ID,
            )
769
        ```
770

771
772
773
    Finally, noticing that the HF processor removes the `|ENDOFTEXT|` token from the tokenized prompt,
    we can search for it to conduct the replacement at the start of the string:

774
    ??? code
775
776
777
778
779
780

        ```python
        def _get_prompt_updates(
            self,
            mm_items: MultiModalDataItems,
            hf_processor_mm_kwargs: Mapping[str, object],
781
            out_mm_kwargs: MultiModalKwargsItems,
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
        ) -> Sequence[PromptUpdate]:
            hf_config = self.info.get_hf_config()
            bos_token_id = hf_config.bos_token_id
            assert isinstance(bos_token_id, int)

            tokenizer = self.info.get_tokenizer()
            eot_token_id = tokenizer.bos_token_id
            assert isinstance(eot_token_id, int)

            def get_replacement_fuyu(item_idx: int):
                images = mm_items.get_items("image", ImageProcessorItems)
                image_size = images.get_image_size(item_idx)

                ncols, nrows = self.info.get_image_feature_grid_size(
                    image_width=image_size.width,
                    image_height=image_size.height,
                )
                image_tokens = ([_IMAGE_TOKEN_ID] * ncols +
                                [_NEWLINE_TOKEN_ID]) * nrows

                return PromptUpdateDetails.select_token_id(
                    image_tokens + [bos_token_id],
                    embed_token_id=_IMAGE_TOKEN_ID,
                )

            return [
                PromptReplacement(
                    modality="image",
                    target=[eot_token_id],
                    replacement=get_replacement_fuyu,
                )
            ]
        ```
815
816
817
818
819
820

## 5. Register processor-related classes

After you have defined [BaseProcessingInfo][vllm.multimodal.processing.BaseProcessingInfo] (Step 2),
[BaseDummyInputsBuilder][vllm.multimodal.profiling.BaseDummyInputsBuilder] (Step 3),
and [BaseMultiModalProcessor][vllm.multimodal.processing.BaseMultiModalProcessor] (Step 4),
821
decorate the model class with [MULTIMODAL_REGISTRY.register_processor][vllm.multimodal.registry.MultiModalRegistry.register_processor]
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
to register them to the multi-modal registry:

```diff
  from vllm.model_executor.models.interfaces import SupportsMultiModal
+ from vllm.multimodal import MULTIMODAL_REGISTRY

+ @MULTIMODAL_REGISTRY.register_processor(YourMultiModalProcessor,
+                                         info=YourProcessingInfo,
+                                         dummy_inputs=YourDummyInputsBuilder)
  class YourModelForImage2Seq(nn.Module, SupportsMultiModal):
```

## Notes

### Inserting feature tokens without replacement

Some HF processors directly insert feature tokens without replacing anything in the original prompt. In that case, you can use [PromptInsertion][vllm.multimodal.processing.PromptInsertion] instead of [PromptReplacement][vllm.multimodal.processing.PromptReplacement] inside [_get_prompt_updates][vllm.multimodal.processing.BaseMultiModalProcessor._get_prompt_updates].

Examples:

- BLIP-2 (insert at start of prompt): <gh-file:vllm/model_executor/models/blip2.py>
- Florence2 (insert at start of prompt): <gh-file:vllm/model_executor/models/florence2.py>
- Molmo (insert after `<|endoftext|>` token): <gh-file:vllm/model_executor/models/molmo.py>

### Handling prompt updates unrelated to multi-modal data

848
[_get_prompt_updates][vllm.multimodal.processing.BaseMultiModalProcessor._get_prompt_updates] assumes that each application of prompt update corresponds to one multi-modal item. If the HF processor performs additional processing regardless of how many multi-modal items there are, you should override [_apply_hf_processor_tokens_only][vllm.multimodal.processing.BaseMultiModalProcessor._apply_hf_processor_tokens_only] so that the processed token inputs are consistent with the result of applying the HF processor on text inputs. This is because token inputs bypass the HF processor according to [our design](../../design/mm_processing.md).
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864

Examples:

- Chameleon (appends `sep_token`): <gh-file:vllm/model_executor/models/chameleon.py>
- Fuyu (appends `boa_token`): <gh-file:vllm/model_executor/models/fuyu.py>
- Molmo (applies chat template which is not defined elsewhere): <gh-file:vllm/model_executor/models/molmo.py>

### Custom HF processor

Some models don't define a HF processor class on HF Hub. In that case, you can define a custom HF processor that has the same call signature as HF processors and pass it to [_call_hf_processor][vllm.multimodal.processing.BaseMultiModalProcessor._call_hf_processor].

Examples:

- DeepSeek-VL2: <gh-file:vllm/model_executor/models/deepseek_vl2.py>
- InternVL: <gh-file:vllm/model_executor/models/internvl.py>
- Qwen-VL: <gh-file:vllm/model_executor/models/qwen_vl.py>