GitLab

Co-authored-by: LeiWang1999 <leiwang1999@outlook.com>

* Update README.md for deepseek_mla: Refine performance comparison details and add acknowledgment section. Adjusted performance metrics for TileLang, highlighting its efficiency over Triton and assembly kernels. Included gratitude to the AMD ROCm team for their contributions.

* Update README.md for deepseek_mla: Clarify performance metrics for TileLang, specifying the range of performance parity with hand-optimized assembly kernels. This adjustment enhances the accuracy of the comparative analysis against Triton implementations.

* [Add] Introduce deepseek_mla documentation for high-performance FlashMLA with TileLang

- Added a comprehensive guide on writing high-performance kernels using TileLang, focusing on the Multi-Head Latent Attention (MLA) mechanism.
- Included benchmark results comparing FlashMLA, TileLang, Torch, Triton, and FlashInfer, highlighting TileLang's efficiency and ease of use.
- Detailed implementation strategies, including layout inference, threadblock swizzling, shared memory swizzling, and warp specialization.
- Provided examples and explanations of optimization techniques to enhance performance in GPU kernel programming.

* doc update

* [Add] Enhance AMD FlashMLA implementation and documentation

- Refactored variable names in `benchmark_mla_decode_amd_tilelang.py` for clarity, changing `Q_shared` and `Q_pe_shared` to `Q_local` and `Q_pe_local` to reflect their usage in register allocation.
- Added a new `README.md` detailing the high-performance FlashMLA implementation on AMD MI300X accelerators, including architectural considerations, optimization strategies, and performance evaluation.
- Introduced a performance comparison figure to illustrate the efficiency of the TileLang implementation against other frameworks.

* lint fix

* [Add] Expand deepseek_mla documentation for AMD MI300X optimization strategies

- Introduced a new section detailing architectural differences and optimization strategies for implementing FlashMLA on AMD MI300X accelerators.
- Highlighted key considerations such as instruction set variations, shared memory constraints, tile size flexibility, and memory bank conflict swizzling.
- Included performance evaluation results demonstrating TileLang's efficiency compared to other frameworks.
- Discussed future optimization opportunities for memory bank conflict mitigation and dimension parallelization.