GitLab

* [feat] add an example mma atom

* [fix] fix typo naming

* [feat] add a template to enable compilation

* [feat] add print util

* [WIP] pass on single block tile

* [feat] add sm80 metadata layout

* [chore] clean codebase

* [CI] format.sh

* [feat] add sm80 compress utils

* [bugfix] fix C fragment layout

* [refactor] use nvcc version instead of str

* [test] add test cases

* [chore] add a param check

* [chore] format a bit

* [chore] rename func to satisfy PEP 8 and appease gemini

* [chore] add check

* [feat] support sm75 layout && add assertion && chore

* [bug] fix illegal memory access when using two warps over N=32

This could be a missing check related to cutlass 2.x implementation.
Using the cutlass example can't trigger this cause it's bypassed by
padding the input.

For now I think it might be safe to increase the atom size and inve-
sgate in the future.

* [chore] add example

* [chore] format

* [example] update benchmark

* [bugfix] fix namespace and format

* [bugfix] fix incorrect param passing

* [refactor] update variable declaration for clarity in gemm_layouts and gemm_sp

* [Cleanup] Remove unnecessary blank lines in metadata layout functions in gemm_sp.py

* [CI] fix arch

* [example] add torch sparse benchmark

* [misc] polish && add reference && apply review suggestionsi && format

* [CI] format with clang-tidy

* [Cleanup] Format and align template struct definitions in half.hpp, common.h, and gemm_sp_sm80.h

* [Update] Modify CUDA version requirements in test_gemm_sp_sm80 and mark cutlass subproject as dirty

---------
Co-authored-by: LeiWang1999 <leiwang1999@outlook.com>