- 31 Jul, 2024 1 commit
-
-
Daniël de Kok authored
The `GPTWeightLoader` was structured like this in pseudocode: if marlin: Set up tensors in a way that GPTQ-Marlin expects else: Set up tensors in a way that ExLlama/GPTQ/AWQ expect However, the GPT-Marlin implementation details should really be in the `marlin` module. So move the former part out to a separate `GPTQMarlinWeightsLoader`.
-
- 26 Jul, 2024 1 commit
-
-
drbh authored
* feat: add ruff and resolve issue * fix: update client exports and adjust after rebase * fix: adjust syntax to avoid circular import * fix: adjust client ruff settings * fix: lint and refactor import check and avoid model enum as global names * fix: improve fbgemm_gpu check and lints * fix: update lints * fix: prefer comparing model enum over str * fix: adjust lints and ignore specific rules * fix: avoid unneeded quantize check
-
- 23 Jul, 2024 1 commit
-
-
Daniël de Kok authored
* Add support for repacking AWQ weights for GPTQ-Marlin So far we couldn't support AWQ because virtually all AWQ models use symmetric quantization, which GPTQ-Marlin did not suppors. GPTQ-Marlin has recently added support AWQ repacking and AWQ asymmetric quantization (zero_point=True). This change updates all GPTQ-Marlin kernels from upstream and wires up AWQ support. For now enabling AWQ using Marlin requires running TGI with `--quantize gptq`. * Enable Marlin for supported AWQ configurations by default This makes the AWQ -> GPTQ repack test redundant, since we are now testing this with the regular AWQ test.
-
- 20 Jul, 2024 1 commit
-
-
OlivierDehaene authored
* feat(fp8): add support for fbgemm * allow loading fp8 weights directly * update outlines * fix makefile * build fbgemm * avoid circular import and fix dockerfile * add default dtype * refactored weights loader * fix auto conversion * fix quantization config parsing * force new nccl on install * missing get_weights implementation * increase timeout
-
- 19 Jul, 2024 1 commit
-
-
Daniël de Kok authored
* Improve the handling of quantized weights Handling of quantized weights was split between two mechanisms: - For quantized checkpoints, we used the new weight loader infrastructure. - For quantization while loading (EETQ, FP8, bitsandbytes) we instead relied on conditional in `get_linear`. Weight loaders support context managers to selectively load particular layers with different weight loaders, which is useful for models like Idefics2 AWQ, which uses a quantized text model, but unquantized vision and connector models. However, the context manager would be overrided by `get_linear`, which string-checks `quantizer`. Also, the context manager would not work with EETQ, FP8, and bitsandbytes. This change migrates all quantizers to the weight loader infrastructure. This has several benefits: - We can use context managers with all quantizers. - All the implementation details move down to the quantizer layers, `get_linear` does not need to know how to handle quantizer linear layers. - All quantizer weights are strongly typed, we don't pass around raw tensors. - We don't have to pass around the `quantizer` string everywhere. * Exclude non-MLP layers when using FP8 quantization with Llama
-
- 09 Jul, 2024 1 commit
-
-
Daniël de Kok authored
Quantized weights were loaded in the `Weights` class, but this was getting quite unwieldy, where every higher level method to load weights was a long conditional to cover all the different quantizers. This change moves loading of quantized weights out of the `Weights` class. This is done by defining a simple `WeightsLoader` interface that is implemented by `Exl2WeightsLoader`, `GPTQWeightsLoader`, and `MarlinWeightsLoader`. These implementations are in the quantizers' respective modules. The `Weights` class provides the low-level load operations (such as loading tensors or sharded tensors), but delegates loads that need quantizer-specific weight processing to a loader. The loaders still use the low-level functionality provided by `Weights`. I initially tried making a hierarchy where a class like `GPTQWeights` would inherit from `Weights`. But it is not very flexible (e.g. does not work well with the new weight storage mock used in tests) and the implicit indirections made the code harder to follow.
-