GitLab

Rather than directly giving the input data to models, we can
pass a tensor instead. In the short term, this saves some duplicated
code.

Longer term, we will want to overlap setting up the next batch with
processing of the current one. In this case, we will only have the
shape of tensor but it will not be loaded with data at the time of
graph generation. By passing only a tensor to models now, we set up
this possibility and prevent them from relying on data that they won't
have in the future.

Although the same could be done for Positions and Outputs, in some
cases we either need the raw input data or don't use them at all.
Therefore, for now we leave them as they are and allow models to
convert them to tensors as needed.

Options is no longer very descriptive of this struct.

Looks like a merge conflict that broke the model.

Currently there is a single context per sequence, shared all by
all multimodal inputs. Since we build a vision encoder graph per
image, with a large number of inputs we can eventually hit the
maximum number of graph nodes per context.

This changes to use a separate context for each image, ensuring
that available resource limits are consistent.

Models may require that a set of inputs all be processed as part
of the same batch. For example, if an image has multiple patches
with fully connected attention between them, we should not split
the batch in the middle of an image.

Fixes #9697

Softcap isn't in the whitepaper/implementation for the language model so we should remove it. There is no discernible difference in output with it removed.

This reverts commit c7eae586b899083acebcd9b3847b89ea78c2850c.

This is useful for a few things:
 - Work around bugs, such as having 2 images in one batch
 - Keep the image in a single batch for fully connected attention
 - Improve performance by not evaluating embeddings multiple times

Currently we are using positions, which are relative to a
sequence and may not be unique.

The encoder cache needs to know the position of images in the input
stream so that it knows when to delete them. Previously images didn't
have a position, so we implied one by breaking batches before an
image and then assuming the image was in the first position. However,
multimodal objects are now given explicit positions in the input
stream, so we can use that instead.

Breaking batches was also a way to simulate a cross attention mask
for mllama. However, given that it only supports a single sequence
and a single image, this mask doesn't serve any real purpose.
Removing the batch break does not appear to affect the quality of
the output.

Most of this is simply moving the input data structures to a new
package to avoid import cycles.

some tensors should be created on specific backends to reduce number of
copies and improve performance

use a similar strategy as llama.cpp for deciding where tensors should be
allocated. this will be improved later to be aware of usable memory
before assigning the tensor

Various vision models have different requirements for how they
receive their inputs. For example:
 - Mllama wants images together with text and the image embeddings
   don't themselves have positions or get stored in the main KV cache
 - Llava-style models feed in embeddings similar to tokens and
   images correspond to a varying number of tokens in the cache.

In addition, the strategy for providing inputs must support batching
and multiple sequences, which are managed by the runner. At the same
time, we want to keep data handling fully in the model so that new
architectures are not bottlenecked by runner code which does not
understand their particular requirements.

This provides a method for models to edit the input stream so that
it meets their needs while still being in a format that the runner
understands. This allows the runner to avoid special processing
for different models.

In addition, this fixes a regression where non-vision models may
try to incorrectly interpret images.

* Include unified vision layers in memory prediction

For newer vision models with a single gguf, include
the projection estimates.

* Adjust CLI to handle both styles of vision model metadata

* Wire up new tokenizers for new engine

If we're loading the new engine, utilize the new model
text processor instead of calling into cgo wrappers for
llama.cpp.  This also cleans up some tech debt from the
older tokenization flow for the C++ server which was
no longer used.

This also adjusts the grammar handling logic to pass
through to the new engine instead of utilizing the cgo
schema to grammar call.

* Lay foundation for auto selection of new engine

Prior to performing attention, we need to permute query, key
and value. Currently we call Contiguous after each of these
permutations, which is correct but expensive. Avoiding the
3 calls to Contiguous increases performance by over 20%.

The permutations of query and key do not violate the continuity
rules for mulmat and the Contiguous call can be simply removed.

Value requires a different permutation and does require Contiguous.
However, we can use the copy into the cache as a way to perform this
without further overhead.

To support this and avoid unexpected tensor shapes that are seen by
models, we need tighter integration between attention, cache
and backend. Future optimization will also likely need this structure
 - for example, flash attention has special padding requirements in
the cache and other backends may have their own needs.

This further contains the operations that go into attention so that
these and other optimizations can be handled transparently. Models
that have special requirements for attention can still implement
their own version of it.

There are two benefits to doing this:
 - Provide a library function that models can use, reducing code for
   each model implementation
 - Enables a single place to drop in optimized implementations of
   attention based on the backend or other factors. One is provided for
   GGML.

On CUDA this improves token generation rate by about 3%. It does not
have a significant effect on Metal.
Co-authored-by: Daniel Hiltgen <daniel@ollama.com>