| [PointNet2SAMSG](./3dssd_kitti-3d-car.py)| Car |72e|4.7||78.69(81.27)<sup>1</sup>|[model](https://download.openmmlab.com/mmdetection3d/v0.1.0_models/3dssd/3dssd_kitti-3d-car_20210602_124438-b4276f56.pth)|[log](https://download.openmmlab.com/mmdetection3d/v0.1.0_models/3dssd/3dssd_kitti-3d-car_20210602_124438.log.json)|
| [PointNet2SAMSG](./3dssd_4x4_kitti-3d-car.py)| Car |72e|4.7||78.69(81.27)<sup>1</sup>|[model](https://download.openmmlab.com/mmdetection3d/v0.1.0_models/3dssd/3dssd_kitti-3d-car_20210602_124438-b4276f56.pth)|[log](https://download.openmmlab.com/mmdetection3d/v0.1.0_models/3dssd/3dssd_kitti-3d-car_20210602_124438.log.json)|
[1]:We report two different 3D object detection performance here. 78.69mAP is evaluated by our evaluation code and 81.27mAP is evaluated by the official development kit (so as that used in the paper and official code of 3DSSD ). We found that the commonly used Python implementation of [`rotate_iou`](https://github.com/traveller59/second.pytorch/blob/e42e4a0e17262ab7d180ee96a0a36427f2c20a44/second/core/non_max_suppression/nms_gpu.py#L605) which is used in our KITTI dataset evaluation, is different from the official implemention in [KITTI benchmark](http://www.cvlibs.net/datasets/kitti/eval_object.php?obj_benchmark=3d).
[1]:We report two different 3D object detection performance here. 78.69mAP is evaluated by our evaluation code and 81.27mAP is evaluated by the official development kit (so as that used in the paper and official code of 3DSSD ). We found that the commonly used Python implementation of [`rotate_iou`](https://github.com/traveller59/second.pytorch/blob/e42e4a0e17262ab7d180ee96a0a36427f2c20a44/second/core/non_max_suppression/nms_gpu.py#L605) which is used in our KITTI dataset evaluation, is different from the official implemention in [KITTI benchmark](http://www.cvlibs.net/datasets/kitti/eval_object.php?obj_benchmark=3d).