GitLab

Summary:
1) So far getting `78%`  on winogrande validation dataset comapred to `63.5%` in the paper.
2) Will upgrade readme once everything is finalized.

Questions:

1) Should I just call `binary_wsc_task` instead of `winogrande` to be less specific to dataset and be generic?
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/fairinternal/fairseq-py/pull/825

Differential Revision: D16810159

fbshipit-source-id: cfde73561fa4caaaa63a4773c0aecd12ce1fa518