- 15 May, 2025 1 commit
-
-
Graham King authored
The Python bindings use the default value for RouterMode. Previously that was Random (good), but now it became None (bad). Remove the option and clean up the duplicate RouterMode. I was trying to avoid putting the `KV` enum in dynamo-runtime. Turns out adding those two characters gives us a healthy simplification, and restores the old default router value. Also clean up two noisy log messages when waiting for KV routing metrics to start in worker.
-
- 14 May, 2025 1 commit
-
-
Graham King authored
Router: ``` dynamo-run in=http out=dyn://dynamo.endpoint.generate --router-mode kv ``` Worker (* N): ``` dynamo-run in=dyn://dynamo.endpoint.generate out=vllm /data/llms/Qwen/Qwen3-4B ``` You need patched vllm and the C bindings `.so`. Full docs in the updated guide: `docs/guides/dynamo_run.md`. This gives us a pure-Rust ingress node: OpenAI compliant HTTP server + Pre-processor + KV-aware router.
-
- 01 May, 2025 1 commit
-
-
Graham King authored
Part of https://github.com/ai-dynamo/dynamo/issues/743
-
- 29 Apr, 2025 2 commits
-
-
Graham King authored
-
Graham King authored
In a distributed system we don't know if the remote workers need pre-processing done ingress-side or not. Previously Client required us to decide this before discovering the remote endpoints, which was fine because pre-processing was worker-side. As part of moving pre-processing back to ingress-side we need to split this into two steps: - Client discovers the endpoints, and (later PR) will fetch their Model Deployment Card. - PushRouter will use the Model Deployment Card to decide if they need pre-processing or not, which affects the types of the generic parameters. Part of #743
-
- 07 Apr, 2025 1 commit
-
-
Graham King authored
As a first step towards KV routing: - introduce a `--router-mode` in dynamo-run that only does random and round-robin right now. Not that interesting yet. - Make the vllm engine publish the KV events received from our patched vllm. Now we "just" need to connect the two. Easy right?
-
- 14 Mar, 2025 1 commit
-
-
Ryan McCormick authored
-
- 08 Mar, 2025 1 commit
-
-
Neelay Shah authored
Co-authored-by:Biswa Panda <biswa.panda@gmail.com>
-
- 07 Mar, 2025 1 commit
-
-
Graham King authored
There are two etcd keys: - The service - The model The second one is the interesting one for us. Previously we confused the two.
-
- 05 Mar, 2025 1 commit
-
-
Neelay Shah authored
Co-authored-by:Graham King <grahamk@nvidia.com>
-
- 27 Feb, 2025 2 commits
-
-
Paul Hendricks authored
-
Paul Hendricks authored
-
- 25 Feb, 2025 2 commits
-
-
Alec authored
Co-authored-by:aflowers <aflowers@nvidia.com>
-
Neelay Shah authored
Signed-off-by:
Neelay Shah <neelays@nvidia.com> Co-authored-by:
Ryan McCormick <rmccormick@nvidia.com>
-
- 21 Feb, 2025 1 commit
-
-
Graham King authored
Add support in tio for distributed components and discovery. Node 1: ``` tio in=http out=tdr://ns/backend/mistralrs ``` Node 2: ``` tio in=tdr://ns/backend/mistralrs out=mistralrs ~/llm_models/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct ``` This will use etcd to auto-discover the model and NATS to talk to it. You can run multiple workers on the same endpoint and it will pick one at random each time. The `ns/backend/mistralrs` are purely symbolic, pick anything as long as it has three parts, and it matches the other node.
-
- 18 Feb, 2025 1 commit
-
-
Ryan Olson authored
Co-authored-by:Ryan McCormick <rmccormick@nvidia.com>
-
- 12 Feb, 2025 1 commit
-
-
Ryan Olson authored
Signed-off-by:
Ryan Olson <ryanolson@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by:
Ryan McCormick <rmccormick@nvidia.com>
-
- 05 Feb, 2025 1 commit
-
-
J Wyman authored
-
- 04 Feb, 2025 1 commit
-
-
Ryan Olson authored
the journey begins
-