GitLab

Move much of what was in the `dynamo-run` crate into `dynamo-llm` so that everyone can use it.

Example usage:

1. Create a `LocalModel`:

```
    let local_model = LocalModelBuilder::default()
	.model_path("Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B")
	.http_port(8080)
	.build().await?;
```

2. Make an engine:

```
    let engine_config = EngineConfig::StaticFull {
	engine: dynamo_engine_mistralrs::make_engine(&local_model).await?,
	model: Box::new(local_model),
    };
```

3. Connect it to an input and run it

```
    dynamo_llm::entrypoint::input::run_input(Input::Http, runtime, engine_config).await?;
```

For https://github.com/ai-dynamo/dynamo/issues/1647

Code Rabbit summary, thanks:
  * Introduced a flexible builder pattern for local model configuration, allowing advanced customization and easier initialization.
  * Added new input modes and unified input handling, supporting interactive chat, HTTP server, batch file, and distributed endpoint modes.
  * Centralized engine configuration and routing, enabling more extensible and maintainable engine management.
  * Simplified and modularized the codebase by moving input and engine logic into dedicated modules.
  * Replaced direct model construction with an asynchronous builder for improved clarity and extensibility.
  * Streamlined configuration and validation for flags and router settings.
  * Added validation to prevent incompatible input and output combinations in endpoint and dynamic modes.

- Stop advertising a model when it's last instance stops. Previously was when any instance stops.
- Faster locks on model manager.
- Move discovery code out of http, as it is used by all inputs.

We can now do this:

- Node 1:

```
dynamo-run in=http out=dyn
```

- Node 2 and 3, two instances of component 'backend' in the nemotron_ultra pipeline:

```
dynamo-run in=dyn://nemotron_ultra.backend.generate out=vllm /data/models/NemotronUltra
```

- Node 4 and 5, two instances of the 'backend' component in nemotron_super pipeline:

```
dynamo-run in=dyn://nemotron_super.backend.generate out=vllm /data/models/NemotronSuper
```

The ingress node will discover all four instances and route correctly. We have been planning for this for a long time now.

As part of this auto-discovery is now always `out=dyn`, with no extra URL parts. Previously it could only route to a single pipeline.

Also:
- Refactor endpoint / instance naming now that I understand them
- Fix removing models when their instance stops.

The Python bindings use the default value for RouterMode. Previously that was Random (good), but now it became None (bad).

Remove the option and clean up the duplicate RouterMode. I was trying to avoid putting the `KV` enum in dynamo-runtime. Turns out adding those two characters gives us a healthy simplification, and restores the old default router value.

Also clean up two noisy log messages when waiting for KV routing metrics to start in worker.

Router:
```
dynamo-run in=http out=dyn://dynamo.endpoint.generate --router-mode kv
```

Worker (* N):
```
dynamo-run in=dyn://dynamo.endpoint.generate out=vllm /data/llms/Qwen/Qwen3-4B
```

You need patched vllm and the C bindings `.so`. Full docs in the updated guide: `docs/guides/dynamo_run.md`.

This gives us a pure-Rust ingress node: OpenAI compliant HTTP server + Pre-processor + KV-aware router.

For #1006

Prints this on startup:
```
2025-05-09T13:06:34.529Z DEBUG dynamo_run::input::http: Supported routes: ["GET /metrics", "GET /dynamo/alpha/list-models", "GET /v1/models", "POST /v1/chat/completions", "POST /v1/completions"]
```

vllm and sglang are now the sub-process engines from #954

Also updated docs on doing vllm and sglang multi-gpu (tensor parallel) and multi-node (pipeline parallel).

New vllm and sglang engines that run in a sub-process. Will hopefully replace the existing embedded python engines.
    
Why?
    
  - Pure Python, does not require knowing Rust to work on it. Much simpler to maintain.
  - No embedded Python interpreter which avoids linking libpython and avoids the MacOS virtualenv issues.
  - Should have better performance as it's "native" vllm / sglang.
  - Works with any version of vllm (including v1!) and sglang. Less upgrade struggle.

Adding this to a Python script makes it register on the network so that `dynamo-run` can discover it and send it requests:
```
from dynamo.llm import register_llm

MODEL = "Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct"
await register_llm(endpoint, MODEL, 3)
```

Full vllm example, with pre-processing in dynamo:
- `dynamo-run in=text out=dyn://dynamo.backend.generate`
- `cd lib/bindings/python/examples/hello_world`
- `python server_vllm.py`

This builds on top of the work to move pre-processor to ingress side. It means we can decouple Rust and Python using NATS as the bus.

The `register_llm` call does this:

- Download the model from HF if necessary
- Load the model deployment card from the HF folder or extract from GGUF
- Push the tokenizer config etc into NATS object store so ingress can access it from a different machine
- Publish the model deployment card to ETCD

Part of https://github.com/ai-dynamo/dynamo/issues/743

Adds support for specifying default request parameters through a json template file that can be applied across all inference requests. This enables consistent parameter settings while still allowing per-request overrides.

Changes:
- Add --request-template CLI flag to specify template file path
- Integrate template support in HTTP, batch and text input modes
- Template values can be overridden by individual request parameters
- Example template.json:
```
{
    "model": "Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct",
    "temperature": 0.7,
    "max_completion_tokens": 4096
}
```

Signed-off-by: Olga Andreeva <124622579+oandreeva-nv@users.noreply.github.com>

As a first step towards KV routing:
- introduce a `--router-mode` in dynamo-run that only does random and round-robin right now. Not that interesting yet.
- Make the vllm engine publish the KV events received from our patched vllm.

Now we "just" need to connect the two. Easy right?

Adds `@dynamo_worker(static = True)` to create a static worker which has a predictable name and hence does not require discovery or `etcd` to be running. There can only be a single static worker per namespace / component / endpoint trio.

This contrasts with the default dynamic `dynamo_worker` endpoints we have now, which get a unique random name (based on namespace/component/endpoint), and are discovered by ingress components using etcd.

Also change the hello_world example to use `dynamo_worker(static = True)` so that it is exercised and demonstrated somewhere.

For NIM.

Co-authored-by: Biswa Panda <biswa.panda@gmail.com>

There are two etcd keys:
- The service
- The model

The second one is the interesting one for us. Previously we confused the two.

Co-authored-by: Graham King <grahamk@nvidia.com>

Needs more testing but good enough for now. I get the same results with this as with `vllm serve`.

Co-authored-by: aflowers <aflowers@nvidia.com>

Add backend type `EngineConfig::StaticCore` that wraps the engine in a preprocessor (prompt templating and tokenization).

Add example engine `echo_core` (`out=echo_core`) which takes and returns tokens. A nice side effect is that it echos the full prompt template with system prompt, whereas `echo_full` echos only user prompt.

![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/27ec0a7b-a27d-4e69-96ea-1ffa0822ea90)

Signed-off-by: Ryan McCormick <rmccormick@nvidia.com>

Signed-off-by: Neelay Shah <neelays@nvidia.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryan McCormick <rmccormick@nvidia.com>

Add support in tio for distributed components and discovery.

Node 1:
```
tio in=http out=tdr://ns/backend/mistralrs
```

Node 2:
```
tio in=tdr://ns/backend/mistralrs out=mistralrs ~/llm_models/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct
```

This will use etcd to auto-discover the model and NATS to talk to it. You can run multiple workers on the same endpoint and it will pick one at random each time.

The `ns/backend/mistralrs` are purely symbolic, pick anything as long as it has three parts, and it matches the other node.

Signed-off-by: Ryan Olson <ryanolson@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryan McCormick <rmccormick@nvidia.com>