1. 29 May, 2025 5 commits
  2. 28 May, 2025 3 commits
  3. 23 May, 2025 1 commit
  4. 22 May, 2025 2 commits
  5. 21 May, 2025 2 commits
  6. 20 May, 2025 1 commit
  7. 19 May, 2025 5 commits
  8. 16 May, 2025 1 commit
  9. 14 May, 2025 1 commit
  10. 09 May, 2025 6 commits
  11. 08 May, 2025 2 commits
  12. 07 May, 2025 2 commits
  13. 06 May, 2025 3 commits
    • jthomson04's avatar
      c4213899
    • Graham King's avatar
      feat(dynamo-run): vllm and sglang subprocess engines (#954) · 28fd481c
      Graham King authored
      New vllm and sglang engines that run in a sub-process. Will hopefully replace the existing embedded python engines.
          
      Why?
          
        - Pure Python, does not require knowing Rust to work on it. Much simpler to maintain.
        - No embedded Python interpreter which avoids linking libpython and avoids the MacOS virtualenv issues.
        - Should have better performance as it's "native" vllm / sglang.
        - Works with any version of vllm (including v1!) and sglang. Less upgrade struggle.
      28fd481c
    • Graham King's avatar
      feat: dynamo-run <-> python interop (#934) · 99cd9d85
      Graham King authored
      Adding this to a Python script makes it register on the network so that `dynamo-run` can discover it and send it requests:
      ```
      from dynamo.llm import register_llm
      
      MODEL = "Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct"
      await register_llm(endpoint, MODEL, 3)
      ```
      
      Full vllm example, with pre-processing in dynamo:
      - `dynamo-run in=text out=dyn://dynamo.backend.generate`
      - `cd lib/bindings/python/examples/hello_world`
      - `python server_vllm.py`
      
      This builds on top of the work to move pre-processor to ingress side. It means we can decouple Rust and Python using NATS as the bus.
      
      The `register_llm` call does this:
      
      - Download the model from HF if necessary
      - Load the model deployment card from the HF folder or extract from GGUF
      - Push the tokenizer config etc into NATS object store so ingress can access it from a different machine
      - Publish the model deployment card to ETCD
      99cd9d85
  14. 05 May, 2025 1 commit
  15. 01 May, 2025 1 commit
  16. 29 Apr, 2025 1 commit
    • Graham King's avatar
      chore: Split PushRouter from Client (#817) · a1a10365
      Graham King authored
      In a distributed system we don't know if the remote workers need pre-processing done ingress-side or not. Previously Client required us to decide this before discovering the remote endpoints, which was fine because pre-processing was worker-side.
      
      As part of moving pre-processing back to ingress-side we need to split this into two steps:
      - Client discovers the endpoints, and (later PR) will fetch their Model Deployment Card.
      - PushRouter will use the Model Deployment Card to decide if they need pre-processing or not, which affects the types of the generic parameters.
      
      Part of #743
      a1a10365
  17. 28 Apr, 2025 1 commit
  18. 26 Apr, 2025 1 commit
  19. 25 Apr, 2025 1 commit