1. 22 May, 2025 1 commit
  2. 19 May, 2025 1 commit
    • Graham King's avatar
      feat: Support multiple models on single ingress node (#1127) · aeb79e62
      Graham King authored
      We can now do this:
      
      - Node 1:
      
      ```
      dynamo-run in=http out=dyn
      ```
      
      - Node 2 and 3, two instances of component 'backend' in the nemotron_ultra pipeline:
      
      ```
      dynamo-run in=dyn://nemotron_ultra.backend.generate out=vllm /data/models/NemotronUltra
      ```
      
      - Node 4 and 5, two instances of the 'backend' component in nemotron_super pipeline:
      
      ```
      dynamo-run in=dyn://nemotron_super.backend.generate out=vllm /data/models/NemotronSuper
      ```
      
      The ingress node will discover all four instances and route correctly. We have been planning for this for a long time now.
      
      As part of this auto-discovery is now always `out=dyn`, with no extra URL parts. Previously it could only route to a single pipeline.
      
      Also:
      - Refactor endpoint / instance naming now that I understand them
      - Fix removing models when their instance stops.
      aeb79e62
  3. 15 May, 2025 2 commits
    • Ryan McCormick's avatar
    • Graham King's avatar
      fix: Fix default RouterMode value (#1092) · 889ab67e
      Graham King authored
      The Python bindings use the default value for RouterMode. Previously that was Random (good), but now it became None (bad).
      
      Remove the option and clean up the duplicate RouterMode. I was trying to avoid putting the `KV` enum in dynamo-runtime. Turns out adding those two characters gives us a healthy simplification, and restores the old default router value.
      
      Also clean up two noisy log messages when waiting for KV routing metrics to start in worker.
      889ab67e
  4. 14 May, 2025 1 commit
  5. 29 Apr, 2025 1 commit
    • Graham King's avatar
      chore: Split PushRouter from Client (#817) · a1a10365
      Graham King authored
      In a distributed system we don't know if the remote workers need pre-processing done ingress-side or not. Previously Client required us to decide this before discovering the remote endpoints, which was fine because pre-processing was worker-side.
      
      As part of moving pre-processing back to ingress-side we need to split this into two steps:
      - Client discovers the endpoints, and (later PR) will fetch their Model Deployment Card.
      - PushRouter will use the Model Deployment Card to decide if they need pre-processing or not, which affects the types of the generic parameters.
      
      Part of #743
      a1a10365
  6. 18 Apr, 2025 1 commit
  7. 06 Mar, 2025 1 commit
  8. 25 Feb, 2025 1 commit