Commit a743249a authored by Gennadiy Civil's avatar Gennadiy Civil
Browse files

Manual docs tweaks still in preparation for including docs with code pushes

parent 15756aa0
...@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ using ::testing::StartsWith; ...@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ using ::testing::StartsWith;
``` ```
Read this Read this
[recipe](https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/cook_book.md#using-matchers-in-googletest-assertions) [recipe](../../googlemock/docs/cook_book.md#using-matchers-in-googletest-assertions)
in the gMock Cookbook for more details. in the gMock Cookbook for more details.
gMock has a rich set of matchers. You can do many things googletest cannot do gMock has a rich set of matchers. You can do many things googletest cannot do
......
...@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ you'll get a compiler error. We used to require the arguments to support the ...@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ you'll get a compiler error. We used to require the arguments to support the
`<<` is supported, it will be called to print the arguments when the assertion `<<` is supported, it will be called to print the arguments when the assertion
fails; otherwise googletest will attempt to print them in the best way it can. fails; otherwise googletest will attempt to print them in the best way it can.
For more details and how to customize the printing of the arguments, see For more details and how to customize the printing of the arguments, see
[documentation](https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/cook_book.md#teaching-gmock-how-to-print-your-values) [documentation](../../googlemock/docs/cook_book.md#teaching-gmock-how-to-print-your-values)
These assertions can work with a user-defined type, but only if you define the These assertions can work with a user-defined type, but only if you define the
corresponding comparison operator (e.g. `==`, `<`, etc). Since this is corresponding comparison operator (e.g. `==`, `<`, etc). Since this is
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment