Redo the way CHARMM PSF files are parsed. This should be much more robust in
terms of supporting PSF files that don't really conform to the "standard" way that CHARMM prints them. The downside is that it relies on ! comment tags which I think are comments for CHARMM. However, the use of !NATOM and !NBOND and other tags seem to be _much_ more conserved than the general format of the PSF file across different dialects of PSFs. So the current approach should be more flexible.
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment