Commit bbe325d8 authored by wanglch's avatar wanglch
Browse files

Initial commit

parents
Pipeline #2485 canceled with stages
P1 1090 Source code Granite P2 <sup>80</sup> code <sup>20</sup> language Code Data Recipe staceder <sup>1</sup> Order by Repo 2 call Heristic filters <sup>3</sup> Group by Reporting minhash 4 Pack into Repo level does Δ 5 Select PL's Δ i <sup>D</sup> Pack into FIM tokens X Eng Done not critical Eng definitively NOT done D so so easy use Preprocessed codetext web text
\ No newline at end of file
ARCH TRAINING Pick Arch like OLMO 18 or replicate <sup>a</sup> 30 model Follow standard LR flow Eval Hacky nonsense for now
\ No newline at end of file
Advocacy in Action 447
stakeholders has occurred in other nations, with groups and individuals refusing to risk being appropriated into the industry's public relations ambitions. It now looks like that with vigilance, tobacco control advocates can easily foment similar distaste in many areas of the business community. Our actions sought to denormalise the tobacco industry by disrupting its efforts to take its place alongside other industries—often with considerable social credit—in the hope that it might gain by association.
Tobacco industry posturing about its corporate responsibility can never hide the ugly consequences of its ongoing efforts to ''work with all relevant stakeholders for the preservation of opportunities for informed adults to consume tobacco products''1 (translation: ''we will build alliances with others who want to profit from tobacco use, to do all we can to counteract effective tobacco control''). BAT has 15.4% and Philip Morris 16.4% of the global cigarette market.6 With 4.9 million smokers currently dying from tobacco use each year, and the industry unblinkingly concurring that its products are addictive, this leaves BAT to argue why it should not be held to be largely accountable for the annual deaths of some 754 600 smokers, and Philip Morris some 803 600 smokers.
## REFERENCES
1 British American Tobacco. Social Report. http://www.bat.com/204pp.
- 2 Wroe D. Tobacco ad campaign angers MPs. The Age (Melbourne) 2004; May 17 http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/05/16/ 1084646069771.html?oneclick = true.
- 3 Hirschhorn N. Corporate social responsibility and the tobacco industry: hope or hype? Tobacco Control 2004;13:447–53.
- 4 Ethical Corporation Asia 2004. Conference website. http:// www.ethicalcorp.com/asia2004/.
- 5 Chapman S, Shatenstein S. Extreme corporate makeover: tobacco companies, corporate responsibility and the corruption of ''ethics''. Globalink petition. http://petition.globalink.org/view.php?code = extreme.
- 6 Mackay J, Eriksen M. The tobacco atlas. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002.
## INDUSTRY WATCH
Corporate social responsibility and the tobacco industry: hope or hype?
## N Hirschhorn
...............................................................................................................................
Tobacco Control 2004;13:447–453. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.006676
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) emerged from a realisation among transnational corporations of the need to account for and redress their adverse impact on society: specifically, on human rights, labour practices, and the environment. Two transnational tobacco companies have recently adopted CSR: Philip Morris, and British American Tobacco. This report explains the origins and theory behind CSR; examines internal company documents from Philip Morris showing the company's deliberations on the matter, and the company's perspective on its own behaviour; and reflects on whether marketing tobacco is antithetical to social responsibility.
...........................................................................
Correspondence to: Dr Norbert Hirschhorn, Nastolantie 6, A3 00600 Helsinki, Finland; bertzpoet@yahoo.com
.......................
Received 13 November 2003 Accepted 15 July 2004 ....................... Over the past three decades increasing pressure from non-governmental organisations (NGOs), governments and the United Nations, has required transnational corporations (TNCs) to examine and redress the adverse impact their businesses have on society and the environment. Many have responded by taking up what is known as ''corporate social responsibility'' (CSR); only recently have two major cigarette companies followed suit: Philip Morris (PM) and British American Tobacco (BAT). This report first provides the context and development of CSR; then, from internal company documents, examines how PM came to its own version. This paper examines whether a tobacco company espousing CSR should be judged simply as a corporate entity along standards of business ethics, or as an irretrievably negative force in the realm of public health, thereby rendering CSR an oxymoron.
## CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: THE CONTEXT
The term ''corporate social responsibility'' is in vogue at the moment but as a concept it is vague and means different things to different people.1
Some writers on CSR trace its American roots to the 19th century when large industries engaged in philanthropy and established great public institutions, a form of ''noblesse oblige''. But the notion that corporations should be required to return more to society because of their impact on society was driven by pressures from the civil rights, peace, and environmental movements of the last half century.2 3 The unprecedented expansion of power and influence of TNCs over the past three decades has accelerated global trade and development, but also environmental damage and abuses of
Abbreviations: ASH, Action on Smoking and Health; BAT, British American Tobacco; CERES, Coalition for Environmentally Responsible Economies; CSR, corporate social responsibility; DJSI, Dow Jones Sustainability Index; GCAC, Global Corporate Affairs Council; GRI, Global Reporting Initiative; MSA, Master Settlement Agreement; NGOs, non-governmental organisations; PM, Philip Morris; TNCs, transnational corporations; UNEP, United Nations Environment Program
\ No newline at end of file
| Source | Type | Tokens | Words | Bytes | Docs |
|-------------------------------------------------|------------------|--------|-------|--------|-------|
| Pretraining ✦<br>OLMo 2 1124 Mix | | | | | |
| DCLM-Baseline | Web pages | 3.71T | 3.32T | 21.32T | 2.95B |
| StarCoder<br>filtered version<br>from OLMoE Mix | Code | 83.0B | 70.0B | 459B | 78.7M |
| peS2o<br>from Dolma 1.7 | Academic papers | 58.6B | 51.1B | 413B | 38.8M |
| arXiv | STEM papers | 20.8B | 19.3B | 77.2B | 3.95M |
| OpenWebMath | Math web pages | 12.2B | 11.1B | 47.2B | 2.89M |
| Algebraic Stack | Math proofs code | 11.8B | 10.8B | 44.0B | 2.83M |
| Wikipedia & Wikibooks<br>from Dolma 1.7 | Encyclopedic | 3.7B | 3.16B | 16.2B | 6.17M |
| Total | | 3.90T | 3.48T | 22.38T | 3.08B |
**Table 1 Composition of the pretraining data for OLMo 2**. The OLMo 2 1124 Mix is composed of StarCoder (Li et al., 2023b; Kocetkov et al., 2022), peS2o (Soldaini and Lo, 2023), web text from DCLM (Li et al., 2024) and Wiki come from Dolma 1.7 (Soldaini et al., 2024). arXiv comes from Red-Pajama (Together AI, 2023), while OpenWebMath (Paster et al., 2023) and Algebraic Stack come from ProofPile II (Azerbayev et al., 2023).
## **2.1.1 Pretraining data: OLMo 2 Mix 1124**
The mix used for this stage is shown in Table 1. It consists of approximately 3.9 trillion tokens, with over 95% derived from web data. We refer to this set as OLMo 2 Mix 1124. This is the same pretraining data used in OLMoE (Muennighoff et al., 2024).
We combine data from DCLM (Li et al., 2024) and Dolma 1.7 (Soldaini et al., 2024). From DCLM, we use the "baseline 1.0 " mix.<sup>4</sup> From Dolma, we use the arXiv (Together AI, 2023), OpenWebMath (Paster et al., 2023), Algebraic Stack, peS2o (Soldaini and Lo, 2023), and Wikipedia subsets. arXiv, OpenWebMath, and Algebraic Stack were originally part of ProofPile II (Azerbayev et al., 2023).
Finally, we include code from StarCoder (Li et al., 2023b), which is derived from permissively-licensed repositories from GitHub (Kocetkov et al., 2022). In an attempt to include higher quality code, we remove any document from a repository with fewer than 2 stars on GitHub. Further, through manual inspection of this source, we found it to contain documents encoded in binary format or containing mostly numerical content; to remove them, we discarded documents whose most frequent word constitutes over 30% of the document, or whose top-2 most frequent words constitute over 50% of the document. To mitigate possible training loss spikes, we remove documents with repeated sequences of 32 or more n-grams. We report details and show effectiveness of this intervention in Section §3.1.
## **2.1.2 Mid-training data: Dolmino Mix 1124**
After the initial pretraining stage on mostly web data, we further train with a mixture of web data that has been more restrictively filtered for quality and a collection of domain-specific high quality data, much of which is synthetic. The purpose of this mixture is to imbue the model with math-centric skills and provide focused exposure to STEM references and high quality text. We generate several variants of this mixture, with varying sizes, but generally refer to this mixture as Dolmino Mix 1124. The base sources from which Dolmino Mix 1124 is subsampled are described in Table 2. We refer the reader to Section §4 for a deep dive detailing our processes for experimenting and curating data for this mix.
\ No newline at end of file
## **3.4 EXERCISES**
For the following exercises, the given functions represent the position of a particle traveling along a horizontal line.
- a. Find the velocity and acceleration functions.
- b. Determine the time intervals when the object is slowing down or speeding up.
$$150. \quad s(t) = 2t^3 - 3t^2 - 12t + 8$$
$$151. \quad s(t) = 2t^3 - 15t^2 + 36t - 10t$$
$$152. \quad s(t) = \frac{t}{1+t^2}$$
153. A rocket is fired vertically upward from the ground. The distance *s* in feet that the rocket travels from the $\text{ground after } t \text{ seconds is given by } s(t) = -16t^2 + 560t. $
- a. Find the velocity of the rocket 3 seconds after being fired.
- b. Find the acceleration of the rocket 3 seconds after being fired.
154. A ball is thrown downward with a speed of 8 ft/ s from the top of a 64-foot-tall building. After *t* seconds, its height above the ground is given by $s(t) = -16t^2 - 8t + 64.5 $
- a. Determine how long it takes for the ball to hit the ground.
- b. Determine the velocity of the ball when it hits the ground.
$\text{155. The position function } \operatorname{s}(t) = t^2 - 3t - 4 \text{ represents} $ the position of the back of a car backing out of a driveway and then driving in a straight line, where *s* is in feet and $t \text{ is in seconds.} \text{ In this case, } s(t) = 0 \text{ represents the time} $ at which the back of the car is at the garage door, so $s(0) = -4$ is the starting position of the car, 4 feet inside. the garage.
- $\text{a. } \quad \text{Determine the velocity of the car when } \ s(t) = 0. $
- $\text{b.} \quad \text{Determine the velocity of the car when } s(t) = 14. $
156. The position of a hummingbird flying along a straight $\text{line in }\ t\text{ seconds is given by }s(t) = 3t^3 - 7t\text{ meters.} $
- $\text{a. } \quad \text{Determine the velocity of the bird at } t = 1 \text{ sec.} $
- $\text{b.} \quad \text{Determine the acceleration of the bird at } t = 1 \text{ sec.} $
- c. Determine the acceleration of the bird when the velocity equals 0.
157. A potato is launched vertically upward with an initial velocity of 100 ft/s from a potato gun at the top of an 85-foot-tall building. The distance in feet that the potato travels from the ground after *t* seconds is given by
$s(t) = -16t^2 + 100t + 85. $
- $\text{a. } \begin{array}{c} \text{Find the velocity of the potato after } \ 0.5 \text{ s} \end{array} \text{ and } $ 5.75 s.
- $\text{b.}\quad\text{Find the speed of the potato at 0.5 s and 5.75 s.} $
- c. Determine when the potato reaches its maximum height.
- $\text{d.}\quad \text{Find the acceleration of the potato at 0.5 s and 1.5} $ s.
- e. Determine how long the potato is in the air.
- f. Determine the velocity of the potato upon hitting the ground.
$\text{158.} \quad \text{The position function} \quad s(t) = t^3 - 8t \quad \text{gives} \quad \text{the} $ position in miles of a freight train where east is the positive direction and *t* is measured in hours.
- a. Determine the direction the train is traveling when $s(t) = 0. $
- b. Determine the direction the train is traveling when $a(t) = 0. $
- c. Determine the time intervals when the train is slowing down or speeding up.
$\text{159. The following graph shows the position } \mathbf{y} = \mathbf{s}(t) \text{ of} $ an object moving along a straight line.
![](_page_0_Figure_34.jpeg)
- negative, or zero. b. Sketch the graph of the velocity function.
- c. Use the graph of the velocity function to determine the time intervals when the acceleration is positive, negative, or zero.
- d. Determine the time intervals when the object is speeding up or slowing down.
\ No newline at end of file
![img-0.jpeg](img-0.jpeg)
\ No newline at end of file
Table 4: Baseline model performance on each of the three scoring metrics (task completion, task process, explanatory knowledge discovery) across all 24 DiscoveryWorld tasks. Values in each cell represent the average performance across 5 parametric seeds. Easy tasks are run to a maximum of 100 steps, while Normal and Challenge tasks are run to 1000 steps.
| | | ReACT | | | Plan+Execute | | | Hypothesizer | | |
| :--: | :--: | :--: | :--: | :--: | :--: | :--: | :--: | :--: | :--: | :--: |
| | Topic | Task | | | | | | | | |
| Proteomics | | Clustering | | | | | | | | |
| 1 | Easy | Simplified Clustering | 0.87 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.40 | 0.20 |
| 2 | Normal | Clustering (2D) | 0.88 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.68 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.93 | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| 3 | Challenge | Clustering (3D) | 0.88 | 0.40 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.93 | 0.40 | 0.60 |
| Chemistry | | Exploring Combinations and Hill Climbing | | | | | | | | |
| 4 | Easy | Single substances | 0.87 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.70 | 0.60 | 0.40 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.40 |
| 5 | Normal | Mix of 3 substances | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.87 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.93 | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| 6 | Challenge | Mix of 4 substances | 0.90 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Archaeology | | Correlations | | | | | | | | |
| 7 | Easy | Simple instrument | 0.27 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.33 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.60 | 0.20 | 0.50 |
| 8 | Normal | Instrument Use | 0.72 | 0.40 | 0.30 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.64 | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| 9 | Challenge | Correlation | 0.46 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.55 | 0.20 | 0.05 |
| Reactor Lab | | Regression | | | | | | | | |
| 10 | Easy | Slope only | 0.42 | 0.00 | 0.40 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.20 |
| 11 | Normal | Linear regression | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.49 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 12 | Challenge | Quadratic regression | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Plant Nutrients | | Uncovering systems of rules | | | | | | | | |
| 13 | Easy | Simplified rules | 0.80 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.70 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 14 | Normal | Presence rules | 0.91 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.84 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 15 | Challenge | Logical Rules | 0.89 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.73 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Space Sick | | Open-ended discovery | | | | | | | | |
| 16 | Easy | Single instrument | 0.78 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 0.40 | 0.10 | 0.80 | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| 17 | Normal | Multiple instruments | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.45 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.33 |
| 18 | Challenge | Novel instruments | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.26 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Rocket Science | | Multi-step measurements and applying formulas | | | | | | | | |
| 19 | Easy | Look-up variables | 0.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.40 | 0.00 |
| 20 | Normal | Measure 2 variables | 0.51 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.34 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 21 | Challenge | Measure 5 variables | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.03 |
| Translation | | Rosetta-stone style linguistic discovery of alien language | | | | | | | | |
| 22 | Easy | Single noun | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.20 | 0.30 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.00 |
| 23 | Normal | Noun and verb | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.88 | 0.40 | 0.00 |
| 24 | Challenge | Noun, adj., and verb | 0.49 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.55 | 0.20 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Average (Easy) | | | 0.59 | 0.38 | 0.25 | 0.56 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.56 | 0.28 | 0.34 |
| Average (Normal) | | | 0.63 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.64 | 0.18 | 0.02 | 0.58 | 0.23 | 0.19 |
| Average (Challenge) | | | 0.63 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.50 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.49 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
Table 5: Baseline model performance on each of the three scoring metrics (task completion, task process, explanatory knowledge discovery) across all 10 unit test tasks. Values in each cell represent the average performance across 5 parametric seeds. Unit tests tasks are run to a maximum of 100 steps.
| | | ReACT | | Plan+Execute | | Hypothesizer |
| :--: | :--: | :--: | :--: | :--: | :--: | :--: |
| | Unit Test Topic | | | | | |
| 25 | Multi-turn dialog with an agent | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 26 | Measure an object with an instrument | 0.87 | 0.60 | 0.73 | 0.40 | 1.00 |
| 27 | Pick-and-place object | 0.90 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| 28 | Pick-and-give object | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 29 | Read DiscoveryFeed posts | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| 30 | Move through doors | 0.58 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| 31 | Using keys with doors | 0.69 | 0.20 | 0.54 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
| 32 | Navigate to a specific room in a house | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.20 |
| 33 | Search an environment for an object | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| 34 | Interact with a moving agent | 0.60 | 0.20 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
| Average (Unit Tests) | | 0.76 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.44 | 0.77 |
# 4.2 Baseline Agent Models
The baseline agents are described below, with model performance on Discovery tasks shown in Table 4, and performance on Unit Tests shown in Table 5. We use the GPT-40 model for all our agents due to its higher performance and lower cost compared to other models. For space we provide
\ No newline at end of file
Table of Contents
# NVIDIA Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
## Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncement
## Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncement
In November 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued a new accounting standard requiring disclosures of significant expenses in operating segments. We adopted this standard in our fiscal year 2025 annual report. Refer to Note 16 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.
## Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In December 2023, the FASB issued a new accounting standard which includes new and updated income tax disclosures, including disaggregation of information in the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid. We expect to adopt this standard in our fiscal year 2026 annual report. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements other than additional disclosures.
In November 2024, the FASB issued a new accounting standard requiring disclosures of certain additional expense information on an annual and interim basis, including, among other items, the amounts of purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation and intangible asset amortization included within each income statement expense caption, as applicable. We expect to adopt this standard in our fiscal year 2028 annual report. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements other than additional disclosures.
## Note 2 - Business Combination
## Termination of the Arm Share Purchase Agreement
In February 2022, NVIDIA and SoftBank Group Corp, or SoftBank, announced the termination of the Share Purchase Agreement whereby NVIDIA would have acquired Arm from SoftBank. The parties agreed to terminate it due to significant regulatory challenges preventing the completion of the transaction. We recorded an acquisition termination cost of $\$ 1.4$ billion in fiscal year 2023 reflecting the write-off of the prepayment provided at signing.
## Note 3 - Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation expense is associated with RSUs, PSUs, market-based PSUs, and our ESPP.
Consolidated Statements of Income include stock-based compensation expense, net of amounts capitalized into inventory and subsequently recognized to cost of revenue, as follows:
| | Year Ended | | | |
| :--: | :--: | :--: | :--: | :--: |
| | Jan 26, 2025 | Jan 28, 2024 | Jan 29, 2023 | |
| | (In millions) | | | |
| Cost of revenue | \$ 178 | \$ 141 | \$ 138 | |
| Research and development | 3,423 | 2,532 | 1,892 | |
| Sales, general and administrative | 1,136 | 876 | 680 | |
| Total | \$ 4,737 | \$ 3,549 | \$ 2,710 | |
Stock-based compensation capitalized in inventories was not significant during fiscal years 2025, 2024, and 2023.
\ No newline at end of file
Executive Manajard,
Washington City,
Samantha 1801,
Major Seneral Metcticec, Commissionary of Sithanges is authorized and dricited to offed Englander Seneral Sromble, now a forienc of over in Port Dettemng, in exchange for Mayo lotite, who is held as a foriemer at Richmond). He is aler dricited to vend forward the offor of exchange by Stony in. Warfell, Sg. of Saltmone, under affap of truce, and ywe benn a fase to Cely bint. Abraham Sircotis
\ No newline at end of file
Proof. Let $S$ be the generating set associated with $D$ as described in Proposition 2.5. By the circulant diagonalization theorem, the spectrum of $G_{R}(D)=\Gamma(R, S)$ is the multiset $\left\{\lambda_{g}\right\}_{g \in R}$ where
$$
\lambda_{g}=\sum_{s \in S} \zeta_{n}^{\varphi(g s)}=\sum_{i=1}^{k}\left[\sum_{s, R s=\mathcal{I}_{i}} \zeta_{n}^{\varphi(g s)}\right]
$$
We remark that by Corollary 2.7, if $s \in R$ such that $R s=\mathcal{I}_{i}=R x_{i}$ then $s$ has a unique representation of the form $s=\hat{u} x_{i}$ where $u \in\left(R / \operatorname{Ann}_{R}\left(x_{i}\right)\right)^{\times}$and $\hat{u}$ is a fixed lift of $u$ to $R^{\times}$. With this presentation, we can write
$$
\sum_{s, R s=\mathcal{I}_{i}} \zeta_{n}^{\varphi(g s)}=\sum_{u \in\left(R / \operatorname{Ann}_{R}\left(x_{i}\right)\right)^{\times}} \zeta_{n}^{\varphi\left(g u x_{i}\right)}=\sum_{u \in\left(R / \operatorname{Ann}_{R}\left(x_{i}\right)\right)^{\times}} \zeta_{n}^{\psi_{x_{i}}(g u)}=c\left(g, R / \operatorname{Ann}_{R}\left(x_{i}\right)\right)
$$
Here we recall that $\psi_{x_{i}}$ is the induced linear functional on $R / \operatorname{Ann}_{R}\left(x_{i}\right)$. We conclude that $\lambda_{g}=\sum_{i=1}^{k} c\left(g, R / \operatorname{Ann}_{R}\left(x_{i}\right)\right)$.
The following corollary is simple yet important for our future work on perfect state transfers on gcd-graphs.
Corollary 4.17. Suppose that $g^{\prime}=u g$ for some $u \in R^{\times}$. Then $\lambda_{g}=\lambda_{g^{\prime}}$.
# ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank the Department of Mathematics and Computer Science at Lake Forest College for their generous financial support through an Overleaf subscription. We also thank Ján Mináč for his constant encouragement and support.
## REFERENCES
1. Reza Akhtar, Megan Boggess, Tiffany Jackson-Henderson, Isidora Jiménez, Rachel Karpman, Amanda Kinzel, and Dan Pritikin, On the unitary Cayley graph of a finite ring, Electron. J. Combin. 16 (2009), no. 1, Research Paper 117, 13 pages.
2. Milan Bašić, Aleksandar Ilić, and Aleksandar Stamenković, Maximal diameter of integral circulant graphs, Information and Computation 301 (2024), 105208.
3. Maria Chudnovsky, Michal Cizek, Logan Crew, Ján Mináč, Tung T. Nguyen, Sophie Spirkl, and Nguyễn Duy Tân, On prime Cayley graphs, arXiv:2401.06062, to appear in Journal of Combinatorics (2024).
4. Thomas Honold, Characterization of finite frobenius rings, Archiv der Mathematik 76 (2001), no. 6, 406415 .
5. Irving Kaplansky, Elementary divisors and modules, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 66 (1949), no. 2, 464-491.
6. Walter Klotz and Torsten Sander, Some properties of unitary Cayley graphs, The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics 14 (2007), no. 1, R45, 12 pages.
7. Erich Lamprecht, Allgemeine theorie der Gaußschen Summen in endlichen kommutativen Ringen, Mathematische Nachrichten 9 (1953), no. 3, 149-196.
8. Ján Mináč, Tung T Nguyen, and Nguyen Duy Tân, Isomorphic gcd-graphs over polynomial rings, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.01768 (2024).
9. , On the gcd graphs over polynomial rings, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.01929 (2024).
\ No newline at end of file
# The 20 Most Important Mathematical Equations
A journey through the most elegant and influential formulas in mathematics
## 1. Euler's Identity
$$
e^{i \pi}+1=0
$$
Connects five fundamental constants ( $\mathrm{e}, \mathrm{i}, \mathrm{n}, 1,0$ ), revealing the profound relationship between exponential functions and trigonometry.
## 2. Pythagorean Theorem
$$
a^{2}+b^{2}=c^{2}
$$
In right triangles, the hypotenuse squared equals the sum of the squares of the other sides. Cornerstone of geometry with applications in navigation and architecture.
## 3. The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
$$
\int_{a}^{b} f(x) d x=F(b)-F(a)
$$
Establishes that differentiation and integration are inverse operations. If $F$ is an antiderivative of $f$, the definite integral equals $F(b)-F(a)$. Revolutionized mathematical problem-solving.
## 4. Maxwell's Equations
$$
\begin{gathered}
\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}=\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_{0}} \\
\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B}=0 \\
\nabla \times \mathbf{E}=-\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} \\
\nabla \times \mathbf{B}=\mu_{0} \mathbf{J}+\mu_{0} \varepsilon_{0} \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}
\end{gathered}
$$
Unified electricity and magnetism as manifestations of the same force. Describes electromagnetic field behavior, predicting waves traveling at light speed. Enabled technologies from radio to smartphones.
\ No newline at end of file
# The 20 Most Important Mathematical Equations
A journey through the most elegant and influential formulas in mathematics
## 1. Euler's Identity
$$
e^{i \pi}+1=0
$$
Connects five fundamental constants ( $\mathrm{e}, \mathrm{i}, \mathrm{n}, 1,0$ ), revealing the profound relationship between exponential functions and trigonometry.
## 3. The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
$$
\int_{a}^{b} f(x) d x=F(b)-F(a)
$$
Establishes that differentiation and integration are inverse operations. If $F$ is an antiderivative of $f$, the definite integral equals $F(b)-F(a)$. Revolutionized mathematical problemsolving.
## 2. Pythagorean Theorem
$$
a^{2}+b^{2}=c^{2}
$$
In right triangles, the hypotenuse squared equals the sum of the squares of the other sides. Cornerstone of geometry with applications in navigation and architecture.
## 4. Maxwell's Equations
$$
\begin{gathered}
\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}=\frac{\varrho}{\varepsilon_{0}} \\
\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B}=0 \\
\nabla \times \mathbf{E}=-\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} \\
\nabla \times \mathbf{B}=\mu_{0} \mathbf{J}+\mu_{0} \varepsilon_{0} \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}
\end{gathered}
$$
Unified electricity and magnetism as manifestations of the same force. Describes electromagnetic field behavior, predicting waves traveling at light speed. Enabled technologies from radio to smartphones.
\ No newline at end of file
V-February Flow
Data Compenents:
Code:
The-stuck-v2
CodeText:
SE, whatever we're scraped
WebText:
H\& DCLn
DATA MEXES
$\left.\begin{array}{l}\text { N } 85 \% \text { Source Code } \\ \text { N } 10 \% \text { CodeText }\end{array}\right\}$ Deepseek
$\sim 5 \%$ Webster
$\sim 85 \%$ The-stuck-v2
$\sim 15 \%$ CodeText
$\sim 0 \%$ Webtext
Staroder
2
$\sim 100 \%$ Source Code JArctic
\ No newline at end of file
![img-0.jpeg](img-0.jpeg)
![img-1.jpeg](img-1.jpeg)
Code Data Reuse Estagader
1) Orda by Repo
2) Call Heuristic Silters X
3) Group by Rep, long $\rightarrow$ mishash V
4) Pick into Repo-level docs $\triangle$
S) Select PL's $\triangle$
$\Rightarrow$ Pick into FIM tokens X
V. Exg Done
X: Exg definitely NOT done
D: So So easy
Use Preprocessed codetext, webtext
\ No newline at end of file
ARCH + TRASTNIN 6
-Pick Arch like OLMO-18
$\sim O R \sim$ replicate a 3D model
-Follow standard LR Show
# Eval:
Hacky nonsense for now
\ No newline at end of file
stakeholders has occurred in other nations, with groups and individuals refusing to risk being appropriated into the industry's public relations ambitions. It now looks like that with vigilance, tobacco control advocates can easily foment similar distaste in many areas of the business community. Our actions sought to denormalise the tobacco industry by disrupting its efforts to take its place alongside other industries-often with considerable social credit-in the hope that it might gain by association.
Tobacco industry posturing about its corporate responsibility can never hide the ugly consequences of its ongoing efforts to "work with all relevant stakeholders for the preservation of opportunities for informed adults to consume tobacco products"1 (translation: "we will build alliances with others who want to profit from tobacco use, to do all we can to counteract effective tobacco control"). BAT has $15.4 \%$ and Philip Morris $16.4 \%$ of the global cigarette market. ${ }^{8}$ With 4.9 million smokers currently dying from tobacco use each year,
and the industry unblinkingly concurring that its products are addictive, this leaves BAT to argue why it should not be held to be largely accountable for the annual deaths of some 754600 smokers, and Philip Morris some 803600 smokers.
## REFERENCES
1 British American Tobacco. Social Report. http://www.bat.com/204pp.
2. Wroe D. Tobacco ad campaign angers. M Ps. The Age (H allbourne) 2004, May 17 http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/05/16/ 1084646069771.html?oneclid=true.
3. Hirschhorn N. Corporate social responsibility and the tobacco industry: hope or hype? Tobacco Control 2004;13:447-53.
4. Ethical Corporation Axio 2004. Conference website. http:// www.ethicalcorp.com/azio2004/.
5 Chapman S, Shatenstein S. Extreme corporate makeover: tobacco companies, corporate responsibility and the corruption of "ethics". Globalink petition. http://petition.globalink.org/view.php?code=extreme.
6 Mackey J, Eriksen M. The tobacco oflas. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002.
# INDUSTRY WATCH
## Corporate social responsibility and the tobacco industry: hope or hype?
N Hirschhorn
Tobacco Control 2004;13:447-453. doi: 10.1136/te.2003.006676
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) emerged from a realisation among transnational corporations of the need to account for and redress their adverse impact on society: specifically, on human rights, labour practices, and the environment. Two transnational tobacco companies have recently adopted CSR: Philip Morris, and British American Tobacco. This report explains the origins and theory behind CSR; examines internal company documents from Philip Morris showing the company's deliberations on the matter, and the company's perspective on its own behaviour; and reflects on whether marketing tobacco is antithetical to social responsibility.
Correspondence to: Dr Norbert Hirschhorn, N oatalanhe 6, A3 00600 Helsinki, Finland; bertzpoet@yahoo.com
Received
13 November 2003
Accepted 15 July 2004
Over the past three decades increasing pressure from non-governmental organisations (NGOs), governments and the United Nations, has required transnational corporations (TNCs) to examine and redress the adverse impact their businesses have on society and the environment. Many have responded by taking up what is known as "corporate social responsibility" (CSR); only recently have two major cigarette companies followed suit: Philip Morris (PM) and British American Tobacco (BAT). This report first provides the context and development of CSR; then, from internal company documents, examines how PM came to its own version. This paper examines whether a
tobacco company espousing CSR should be judged simply as a corporate entity along standards of business ethics, or as an irretrievably negative force in the realm of public health, thereby rendering CSR an oxymoron.
## CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: THE CONTEXT
The term "corporate social responsibility" is in vogue at the moment but as a concept it is vague and means different things to different people. ${ }^{1}$
Some writers on CSR trace its American roots to the 19th century when large industries engaged in philanthropy and established great public institutions, a form of "noblesse oblige". But the notion that corporations should be required to return more to society because of their impact on society was driven by pressures from the civil rights, peace, and environmental movements of the last half century. ${ }^{25}$ The unprecedented expansion of power and influence of TNCs over the past three decades has accelerated global trade and development, but also environmental damage and abuses of
Abbreviations: ASH, Action on Smoking and Health; BAT, British American Tobacco; CERES, Coalition for Environmentally Responsible Economies; CSR, corporate social responsibility; DISI, Dow Jones Sustainability Index; GCAC, Global Corporate Affairs Council; GRI, Global Reporting Initiative; MSA, Master Settlement Agreement; NGOs, non-governmental organisations; PM, Philip Morris; TNCs, transnational corporations; UNEP, United Nations Environment Program
\ No newline at end of file
| Source | Type | Tokens | Words | Bytes | Docs |
| :--: | :--: | :--: | :--: | :--: | :--: |
| Pretraining + OLMo 21124 Mix | | | | | |
| DCLM-Baseline | Web pages | 3.71 T | 3.32 T | 21.32 T | 2.95 B |
| StarCoder filtered version from OLMoE Mix | Code | 83.0B | 70.0B | 459B | 78.7 M |
| peS2o <br> from Dolma 1.7 | Academic papers | 58.6 B | 51.1 B | 413B | 38.8 M |
| arXiv | STEM papers | 20.8 B | 19.3 B | 77.2 B | 3.95 M |
| OpenWebMath | Math web pages | 12.2 B | 11.1 B | 47.2 B | 2.89 M |
| Algebraic Stack | Math proofs code | 11.8 B | 10.8 B | 44.0 B | 2.83 M |
| Wikipedia \& Wikibooks from Dolma 1.7 | Encyclopedic | 3.7 B | 3.16 B | 16.2 B | 6.17 M |
| Total | | 3.90 T | 3.48 T | 22.38 T | 3.08 B |
Table 1 Composition of the pretraining data for OLMo 2. The OLMo 21124 Mix is composed of StarCoder (Li et al., 2023b; Kocetkov et al., 2022), peS2o (Soldaini and Lo, 2023), web text from DCLM (Li et al., 2024) and Wiki come from Dolma 1.7 (Soldaini et al., 2024). arXiv comes from Red-Pajama (Together AI, 2023), while OpenWebMath (Paster et al., 2023) and Algebraic Stack come from ProofPile II (Azerbayev et al., 2023).
# 2.1.1 Pretraining data: OLMo 2 Mix 1124
The mix used for this stage is shown in Table 1. It consists of approximately 3.9 trillion tokens, with over $95 \%$ derived from web data. We refer to this set as OLMo 2 Mix 1124. This is the same pretraining data used in OLMoE (Muennighoff et al., 2024).
We combine data from DCLM (Li et al., 2024) and Dolma 1.7 (Soldaini et al., 2024). From DCLM, we use the "baseline 1.0 " mix. From Dolma, we use the arXiv (Together AI, 2023), OpenWebMath (Paster et al., 2023), Algebraic Stack, peS2o (Soldaini and Lo, 2023), and Wikipedia subsets. arXiv, OpenWebMath, and Algebraic Stack were originally part of ProofPile II (Azerbayev et al., 2023).
Finally, we include code from StarCoder (Li et al., 2023b), which is derived from permissively-licensed repositories from GitHub (Kocetkov et al., 2022). In an attempt to include higher quality code, we remove any document from a repository with fewer than 2 stars on GitHub. Further, through manual inspection of this source, we found it to contain documents encoded in binary format or containing mostly numerical content; to remove them, we discarded documents whose most frequent word constitutes over $30 \%$ of the document, or whose top- 2 most frequent words constitute over $50 \%$ of the document. To mitigate possible training loss spikes, we remove documents with repeated sequences of 32 or more n-grams. We report details and show effectiveness of this intervention in Section $\S 3.1$.
### 2.1.2 Mid-training data: Dolmino Mix 1124
After the initial pretraining stage on mostly web data, we further train with a mixture of web data that has been more restrictively filtered for quality and a collection of domain-specific high quality data, much of which is synthetic. The purpose of this mixture is to imbue the model with math-centric skills and provide focused exposure to STEM references and high quality text. We generate several variants of this mixture, with varying sizes, but generally refer to this mixture as Dolmino Mix 1124. The base sources from which Dolmino Mix 1124 is subsampled are described in Table 2. We refer the reader to Section $\S 4$ for a deep dive detailing our processes for experimenting and curating data for this mix.
\ No newline at end of file
### 3.4 EXERCISES
For the following exercises, the given functions represent the position of a particle traveling along a horizontal line.
a. Find the velocity and acceleration functions.
b. Determine the time intervals when the object is slowing down or speeding up.
150. $s(t)=2 t^{3}-3 t^{2}-12 t+8$
151. $s(t)=2 t^{3}-15 t^{2}+36 t-10$
152. $s(t)=\frac{t}{1+t^{2}}$
153. A rocket is fired vertically upward from the ground. The distance $s$ in feet that the rocket travels from the ground after $t$ seconds is given by $s(t)=-16 t^{2}+560 t$.
a. Find the velocity of the rocket 3 seconds after being fired.
b. Find the acceleration of the rocket 3 seconds after being fired.
154. A ball is thrown downward with a speed of $8 \mathrm{ft} /$ $s$ from the top of a 64 -foot-tall building. After $t$ seconds, its height above the ground is given by $s(t)=-16 t^{2}-8 t+64$.
a. Determine how long it takes for the ball to hit the ground.
b. Determine the velocity of the ball when it hits the ground.
155. The position function $s(t)=t^{2}-3 t-4$ represents the position of the back of a car backing out of a driveway and then driving in a straight line, where $s$ is in feet and $t$ is in seconds. In this case, $s(t)=0$ represents the time at which the back of the car is at the garage door, so $s(0)=-4$ is the starting position of the car, 4 feet inside the garage.
a. Determine the velocity of the car when $s(t)=0$.
b. Determine the velocity of the car when $s(t)=14$.
156. The position of a hummingbird flying along a straight line in $t$ seconds is given by $s(t)=3 t^{3}-7 t$ meters.
a. Determine the velocity of the bird at $t=1 \mathrm{sec}$.
b. Determine the acceleration of the bird at $t=1 \mathrm{sec}$.
c. Determine the acceleration of the bird when the velocity equals 0 .
157. A potato is launched vertically upward with an initial velocity of $100 \mathrm{ft} / \mathrm{s}$ from a potato gun at the top of an 85 -foot-tall building. The distance in feet that the potato travels from the ground after $t$ seconds is given by $s(t)=-16 t^{2}+100 t+85$.
a. Find the velocity of the potato after 0.5 s and 5.75 s .
b. Find the speed of the potato at 0.5 s and 5.75 s .
c. Determine when the potato reaches its maximum height.
d. Find the acceleration of the potato at 0.5 s and 1.5 s.
e. Determine how long the potato is in the air.
f. Determine the velocity of the potato upon hitting the ground.
158. The position function $s(t)=t^{3}-8 t$ gives the position in miles of a freight train where east is the positive direction and $t$ is measured in hours.
a. Determine the direction the train is traveling when $s(t)=0$.
b. Determine the direction the train is traveling when $a(t)=0$.
c. Determine the time intervals when the train is slowing down or speeding up.
159. The following graph shows the position $y=s(t)$ of an object moving along a straight line.
![img-0.jpeg](img-0.jpeg)
a. Use the graph of the position function to determine the time intervals when the velocity is positive, negative, or zero.
b. Sketch the graph of the velocity function.
c. Use the graph of the velocity function to determine the time intervals when the acceleration is positive, negative, or zero.
d. Determine the time intervals when the object is speeding up or slowing down.
\ No newline at end of file
Master - 7 1/4 - 36"
Master Bath - 7 1/4 - 30"
Laundry - 4 3/4 - 36"
Bath - 7 1/4 - 24"
MUD - 7 - 36"
UTIL - 8 1/4 - 36"
DOWN BATH - 7 1/4 - 32"
BUT KIT - 6 3/4 - 30
PANTRY - 4 3/4 - 24
6 WEST - 32 9/8 - 32
6 WEST BATH 5" - 24"
\ No newline at end of file
Master - 7 1/4 - 36"
Master Bath - 7 1/4 - 30"
Laundry - 4 3/4 - 36"
Bath - 7 1/4 - 24"
MUD - 7 - 36"
UTIL - 8 1/4 - 36"
DOWN BATH - 7 1/4 - 32"
BUT KIT - 6 3/4 - 30
PANTRY - 4 3/4 - 24
6 WEST - 32 9/8 - 32
6 WEST BATH 5" - 24"
\ No newline at end of file
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment