Commit 89e60e48 authored by wanglch's avatar wanglch
Browse files

Initial commit

parents
Pipeline #2484 canceled with stages
Table of Contents
NVIDIA Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncement
In November 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued a new accounting standard requiring disclosures of significant expenses in operating segments. We adopted this standard in our fiscal year 2025 annual report. Refer to Note 16 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In December 2023, the FASB issued a new accounting standard which includes new and updated income tax disclosures, including disaggregation of information in the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid. We expect to adopt this standard in our fiscal year 2026 annual report. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements other than additional disclosures.
In November 2024, the FASB issued a new accounting standard requiring disclosures of certain additional expense information on an annual and interim basis, including, among other items, the amounts of purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation and intangible asset amortization included within each income statement expense caption, as applicable. We expect to adopt this standard in our fiscal year 2028 annual report. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements other than additional disclosures.
Note 2 - Business Combination
Termination of the Arm Share Purchase Agreement
In February 2022, NVIDIA and SoftBank Group Corp, or SoftBank, announced the termination of the Share Purchase Agreement whereby NVIDIA would have acquired Arm from SoftBank. The parties agreed to terminate it due to significant regulatory challenges preventing the completion of the transaction. We recorded an acquisition termination cost of $1.4 billion in fiscal year 2023 reflecting the write-off of the prepayment provided at signing.
Note 3 - Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation expense is associated with RSUS, PSUs, market-based PSUs, and our ESPP.
Consolidated Statements of Income include stock-based compensation expense, net of amounts capitalized into inventory and subsequently recognized to cost of revenue, as follows:
| | Jan 26, 2025 | Jan 28, 2024 | Jan 29, 2023 |
| :---------------------- | :----------- | :----------- | :----------- |
| | | (In millions) | |
| Cost of revenue | $ 178 | $ 141 | $ 138 |
| Research and development | 3,423 | 2,532 | 1,892 |
| Sales, general and administrative | 1,136 | 876 | 680 |
| Total | $ 4,737 | $ 3,549 | $ 2,710 |
Stock-based compensation capitalized in inventories was not significant during fiscal years 2025, 2024, and 2023.
Proof. Let S be the generating set associated with D as described in Proposition 2.5. By
the circulant diagonalization theorem, the spectrum of \(G_R(D) = \Gamma(R, S)\) is the multiset
\(\{\lambda_g\}_{g \in R}\) where
\[
\lambda_g = \sum_{s \in S} \zeta_n^{\psi(gs)} = \sum_{i=1}^k \left[ \sum_{s, R_s = \mathcal{I}_i} \zeta_n^{\psi(gs)} \right].
\]
We remark that by Corollary 2.7, if \(s \in R\) such that \(R_s = \mathcal{I}_i = Rx_i\) then s has a unique
representation of the form \(s = \hat{u}x_i\) where \(u \in (R/Ann_R(x_i))^{\times}\) and \(\hat{u}\) is a fixed lift of u
to \(R^{\times}\). With this presentation, we can write
\[
\sum_{s, R_s = \mathcal{I}_i} \zeta_n^{\psi(gs)} = \sum_{u \in (R/Ann_R(x_i))^{\times}} \zeta_n^{\psi(gux_i)} = \sum_{u \in (R/Ann_R(x_i))^{\times}} \zeta_n^{\psi_{x_i}(gu)} = c(g, R/Ann_R(x_i)).
\]
Here we recall that \(\psi_{x_i}\) is the induced linear functional on \(R/Ann_R(x_i)\). We conclude
that \(\lambda_g = \sum_{i=1}^k c(g, R/Ann_R(x_i))\).
The following corollary is simple yet important for our future work on perfect state
transfers on gcd-graphs.
Corollary 4.17. Suppose that \(g' = ug\) for some \(u \in R^{\times}\). Then \(\lambda_g = \lambda_{g'}\).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank the Department of Mathematics and Computer Science at Lake Forest Col-
lege for their generous financial support through an Overleaf subscription. We also
thank Ján Mináč for his constant encouragement and support.
REFERENCES
1. Reza Akhtar, Megan Boggess, Tiffany Jackson-Henderson, Isidora Jiménez, Rachel Karpman,
Amanda Kinzel, and Dan Pritikin, *On the unitary Cayley graph of a finite ring*, Electron. J. Combin.
16 (2009), no. 1, Research Paper 117, 13 pages.
2. Milan Bašić, Aleksandar Ilić, and Aleksandar Stamenković, *Maximal diameter of integral circulant
graphs*, Information and Computation **301** (2024), 105208.
3. Maria Chudnovsky, Michal Cizek, Logan Crew, Ján Mináč, Tung T. Nguyen, Sophie Spirkl, and
Nguyên Duy Tân, *On prime Cayley graphs*, arXiv:2401.06062, to appear in Journal of Combinatorics
(2024).
4. Thomas Honold, *Characterization of finite frobenius rings*, Archiv der Mathematik **76** (2001), no. 6, 406–
415.
5. Irving Kaplansky, *Elementary divisors and modules*, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society
**66** (1949), no. 2, 464–491.
6. Walter Klotz and Torsten Sander, *Some properties of unitary Cayley graphs*, The Electronic Journal of
Combinatorics **14** (2007), no. 1, R45, 12 pages.
7. Erich Lamprecht, *Allgemeine theorie der Gaußschen Summen in endlichen kommutativen Ringen*, Mathe-
matische Nachrichten **9** (1953), no. 3, 149–196.
8. Ján Mináč, Tung T Nguyen, and Nguyen Duy Tân, *Isomorphic gcd-graphs over polynomial rings*, arXiv
preprint arXiv:2411.01768 (2024).
9. \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\
The 20 Most Important Mathematical Equations
A journey through the most elegant and influential formulas in mathematics
1. Euler's Identity
$e^{i\pi} + 1 = 0$
Connects five fundamental constants (e, i, π, 1, 0), revealing the
profound relationship between exponential functions and
trigonometry.
3. The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
$\int_a^b f(x)dx = F(b) – F(a)$
Establishes that differentiation and integration are inverse
operations. If F is an antiderivative of f, the definite integral
equals F(b) - F(a). Revolutionized mathematical problem-solving.
2. Pythagorean Theorem
$a^2 + b^2 = c^2$
In right triangles, the hypotenuse squared equals the sum of the
squares of the other sides. Cornerstone of geometry with
applications in navigation and architecture.
4. Maxwell's Equations
$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = \frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}$
$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0$
$\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}$
$\nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \mu_0 \mathbf{J} + \mu_0 \varepsilon_0 \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}$
Unified electricity and magnetism as manifestations of the same
force. Describes electromagnetic field behavior, predicting waves
traveling at light speed. Enabled technologies from radio to
smartphones.
The 20 Most Important Mathematical Equations
A journey through the most elegant and influential formulas in mathematics
1. Euler's Identity
$e^{i\pi} + 1 = 0$
Connects five fundamental constants (e, i, π, 1, 0), revealing
the profound relationship between exponential functions and
trigonometry.
2. Pythagorean Theorem
$a^2 + b^2 = c^2$
In right triangles, the hypotenuse squared equals the sum of
the squares of the other sides. Cornerstone of geometry with
applications in navigation and architecture.
3. The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
$\int_a^b f(x)dx = F(b) – F(a)$
Establishes that differentiation and integration are inverse
operations. If F is an antiderivative of f, the definite integral
equals F(b) - F(a). Revolutionized mathematical problem-
solving.
4. Maxwell's Equations
$\nabla \cdot E = \frac{ρ}{ε_0}$
$\nabla \cdot B = 0$
$\nabla \times E = -\frac{\partial B}{\partial t}$
$\nabla \times B = μ_0J + μ_0ε_0 \frac{\partial E}{\partial t}$
Unified electricity and magnetism as manifestations of the
same force. Describes electromagnetic field behavior, predicting
waves traveling at light speed. Enabled technologies from radio
to smartphones.
V-February Flow
Data Components
Code:
The-Stack-V2
CodeText:
SE, whatever we've scraped
WebText:
HQ OCLM
DATA MIXES
~85% Source code ] Deepseek
~10% CodeText Coder
~5% Webtext
~85% The-stack-V2 ] Starcoder
~15% CodeText 2
~ 0% webtext
~100% Source code ] Arctic
V-February Flow
Data Components
Code:
The-Stack-V2
CodeText:
SE, whatever we've scraped
WebText:
HQ OCLM
DATA MIXES
~85% Source code ] Deepseek
~10% CodeText Coder
~5% Webtext
~85% The-stack-V2 ] Starcoder
~15% CodeText 2
~ 0% webtext
~100% Source code ] Arctic
V-February Flow
Data Components
Code:
The-Stack-V2
CodeText:
SE, whatever we've scraped
WebText:
HQ OCLM
DATA MIXES
~85% Source code ] Deepseek
~10% CodeText Coder
~5% Webtext
~85% The-stack-V2 ] Starcoder
~15% CodeText 2
~ 0% webtext
~100% Source code ] Arctic
Advocacy in Action 447
stakeholders has occurred in other nations, with groups and
individuals refusing to risk being appropriated into the
industry's public relations ambitions. It now looks like that
with vigilance, tobacco control advocates can easily foment
similar distaste in many areas of the business community.
Our actions sought to denormalise the tobacco industry by
disrupting its efforts to take its place alongside other
industries—often with considerable social credit—in the
hope that it might gain by association.
Tobacco industry posturing about its corporate responsi-
bility can never hide the ugly consequences of its ongoing
efforts to "work with all relevant stakeholders for the
preservation of opportunities for informed adults to consume
tobacco products"¹ (translation: "we will build alliances with
others who want to profit from tobacco use, to do all we can
to counteract effective tobacco control"). BAT has 15.4% and
Philip Morris 16.4% of the global cigarette market. With 4.9
million smokers currently dying from tobacco use each year,
and the industry unblinkingly concurring that its products
are addictive, this leaves BAT to argue why it should not
be held to be largely accountable for the annual deaths of
some 754 600 smokers, and Philip Morris some 803 600
smokers.
REFERENCES
1 British American Tobacco. Social Report. http://www.bat.com/204pp.
2 Wroe D. Tobacco ad campaign angers MPs. The Age (Melbourne) 2004; May
17 http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/05/16/
1084646069771.html?oneclick = true.
3 Hirschhorn N. Corporate social responsibility and the tobacco industry: hope
or hype? Tobacco Control 2004;13:447–53.
4 Ethical Corporation Asia 2004. Conference website. http://
www.ethicalcorp.com/asia2004/.
5 Chapman S, Shatenstein S. Extreme corporate makeover: tobacco companies,
corporate responsibility and the corruption of "ethics". Globalink petition.
http://petition.globalink.org/view.php?code = extreme.
6 Mackay J, Eriksen M. The tobacco atlas. Geneva: World Health
Organization, 2002.
INDUSTRY WATCH
Corporate social responsibility and the tobacco industry:
hope or hype?
N Hirschhorn
Tobacco Control 2004;13:447-453. doi: 10.1136/tc. 2003.006676
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) emerged from a
realisation among transnational corporations of the need
to account for and redress their adverse impact on society:
specifically, on human rights, labour practices, and the
environment. Two transnational tobacco companies have
recently adopted CSR: Philip Morris, and British American
Tobacco. This report explains the origins and theory
behind CSR; examines internal company documents from
Philip Morris showing the company's deliberations on the
matter, and the company's perspective on its own
behaviour; and reflects on whether marketing tobacco is
antithetical to social responsibility.
Correspondence to:
Dr Norbert Hirschhorn,
Nastolantie 6, A3 00600
Helsinki, Finland;
bertzpoet@yahoo.com
Received
13 November 2003
Accepted 15 July 2004
Over the past three decades increasing
pressure from non-governmental organi-
sations (NGOs), governments and the
United Nations, has required transnational cor-
porations (TNCs) to examine and redress the
adverse impact their businesses have on society
and the environment. Many have responded by
taking up what is known as "corporate social
responsibility" (CSR); only recently have two
major cigarette companies followed suit: Philip
Morris (PM) and British American Tobacco
(BAT). This report first provides the context
and development of CSR; then, from internal
company documents, examines how PM came to
its own version. This paper examines whether a
tobacco company espousing CSR should be
judged simply as a corporate entity along
standards of business ethics, or as an irretrie-
vably negative force in the realm of public health,
thereby rendering CSR an oxymoron.
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY:
THE CONTEXT
The term "corporate social responsibility" is in
vogue at the moment but as a concept it is vague
and means different things to different people.¹
Some writers on CSR trace its American roots
to the 19th century when large industries
engaged in philanthropy and established great
public institutions, a form of "noblesse oblige".
But the notion that corporations should be
required to return more to society because of
their impact on society was driven by pressures
from the civil rights, peace, and environmental
movements of the last half century.23 The
unprecedented expansion of power and influ-
ence of TNCs over the past three decades has
accelerated global trade and development, but
also environmental damage and abuses of
Abbreviations: ASH, Action on Smoking and Health;
BAT, British American Tobacco; CERES, Coalition for
Environmentally Responsible Economies; CSR, corporate
social responsibility; DJSI, Dow Jones Sustainability Index;
GCAC, Global Corporate Affairs Council; GRI, Global
Reporting Initiative; MSA, Master Settlement Agreement;
NGOs, non-governmental organisations; PM, Philip
Morris; TNCs, transnational corporations; UNEP, United
Nations Environment Program
www.tobaccocontrol.com
Source | Type | Tokens | Words | Bytes | Docs
:---|:---|:---|:---|:---|:---
DCLM-Baseline | Web pages | 3.71T | 3.32T | 21.32T | 2.95B
StarCoder | Code | 83.0B | 70.0B | 459B | 78.7M
peS2o | Academic papers | 58.6B | 51.1B | 413B | 38.8M
arXiv | STEM papers | 20.8B | 19.3B | 77.2B | 3.95M
OpenWebMath | Math web pages | 12.2B | 11.1B | 47.2B | 2.89M
Algebraic Stack | Math proofs code | 11.8B | 10.8B | 44.0B | 2.83M
Wikipedia & Wikibooks | Encyclopedic | 3.7B | 3.16B | 16.2B | 6.17M
Total | | 3.90T | 3.48T | 22.38T | 3.08B
Table 1 Composition of the pretraining data for OLMo 2. The OLMo 2 1124 Mix is composed of StarCoder (Li et al., 2023b; Kocetkov et al., 2022), peS2o (Soldaini and Lo, 2023), web text from DCLM (Li et al., 2024) and Wiki come from Dolma 1.7 (Soldaini et al., 2024). arXiv comes from Red-Pajama (Together AI, 2023), while OpenWebMath (Paster et al., 2023) and Algebraic Stack come from ProofPile II (Azerbayev et al., 2023).
## 2.1.1 Pretraining data: OLMo 2 Mix 1124
The mix used for this stage is shown in Table 1. It consists of approximately 3.9 trillion tokens, with over 95% derived from web data. We refer to this set as OLMo 2 Mix 1124. This is the same pretraining data used in OLMoE (Muennighoff et al., 2024).
We combine data from DCLM (Li et al., 2024) and Dolma 1.7 (Soldaini et al., 2024). From DCLM, we use the “baseline 1.0" mix. From Dolma, we use the arXiv (Together AI, 2023), OpenWebMath (Paster et al., 2023), Algebraic Stack, peS2o (Soldaini and Lo, 2023), and Wikipedia subsets. arXiv, OpenWebMath, and Algebraic Stack were originally part of ProofPile II (Azerbayev et al., 2023).
Finally, we include code from StarCoder (Li et al., 2023b), which is derived from permissively-licensed repositories from GitHub (Kocetkov et al., 2022). In an attempt to include higher quality code, we remove any document from a repository with fewer than 2 stars on GitHub. Further, through manual inspection of this source, we found it to contain documents encoded in binary format or containing mostly numerical content; to remove them, we discarded documents whose most frequent word constitutes over 30% of the document, or whose top-2 most frequent words constitute over 50% of the document. To mitigate possible training loss spikes, we remove documents with repeated sequences of 32 or more n-grams. We report details and show effectiveness of this intervention in Section §3.1.
## 2.1.2 Mid-training data: Dolmino Mix 1124
After the initial pretraining stage on mostly web data, we further train with a mixture of web data that has been more restrictively filtered for quality and a collection of domain-specific high quality data, much of which is synthetic. The purpose of this mixture is to imbue the model with math-centric skills and provide focused exposure to STEM references and high quality text. We generate several variants of this mixture, with varying sizes, but generally refer to this mixture as Dolmino Mix 1124. The base sources from which Dolmino Mix 1124 is subsampled are described in Table 2. We refer the reader to Section §4 for a deep dive detailing our processes for experimenting and curating data for this mix.
3.4 EXERCISES
For the following exercises, the given functions represent
the position of a particle traveling along a horizontal line.
a. Find the velocity and acceleration functions.
b. Determine the time intervals when the object is
slowing down or speeding up.
150. $s(t) = 2t^3 – 3t^2 – 12t + 8$
151. $s(t) = 2t^3 – 15t^2 + 36t – 10$
152. $s(t) = \frac{t}{1+t^2}$
153. A rocket is fired vertically upward from the ground.
The distance $s$ in feet that the rocket travels from the
ground after $t$ seconds is given by $s(t) = -16t^2 + 560t$.
a. Find the velocity of the rocket 3 seconds after being
fired.
b. Find the acceleration of the rocket 3 seconds after
being fired.
154. A ball is thrown downward with a speed of 8 ft/
s from the top of a 64-foot-tall building. After $t$ seconds,
its height above the ground is given by
$s(t) = -16t^2 - 8t + 64$.
a. Determine how long it takes for the ball to hit the
ground.
b. Determine the velocity of the ball when it hits the
ground.
155. The position function $s(t) = t^2 – 3t – 4$ represents
the position of the back of a car backing out of a driveway
and then driving in a straight line, where $s$ is in feet and
$t$ is in seconds. In this case, $s(t) = 0$ represents the time
at which the back of the car is at the garage door, so
$s(0) = -4$ is the starting position of the car, 4 feet inside
the garage.
a. Determine the velocity of the car when $s(t) = 0$.
b. Determine the velocity of the car when $s(t) = 14$.
156. The position of a hummingbird flying along a straight
line in $t$ seconds is given by $s(t) = 3t^3 – 7t$ meters.
a. Determine the velocity of the bird at $t = 1$ sec.
b. Determine the acceleration of the bird at $t = 1$ sec.
c. Determine the acceleration of the bird when the
velocity equals 0.
157. A potato is launched vertically upward with an initial
velocity of 100 ft/s from a potato gun at the top of an
85-foot-tall building. The distance in feet that the potato
travels from the ground after $t$ seconds is given by
$s(t) = -16t^2 + 100t + 85$.
a. Find the velocity of the potato after 0.5 s and
5.75 s.
b. Find the speed of the potato at 0.5 s and 5.75 s.
c. Determine when the potato reaches its maximum
height.
d. Find the acceleration of the potato at 0.5 s and 1.5
s.
e. Determine how long the potato is in the air.
f. Determine the velocity of the potato upon hitting
the ground.
158. The position function $s(t) = t^3 - 8t$ gives the
position in miles of a freight train where east is the positive
direction and $t$ is measured in hours.
a. Determine the direction the train is traveling when
$s(t) = 0$.
b. Determine the direction the train is traveling when
$a(t) = 0$.
c. Determine the time intervals when the train is
slowing down or speeding up.
159. The following graph shows the position $y = s(t)$ of
an object moving along a straight line.
a. Use the graph of the position function to determine
the time intervals when the velocity is positive,
negative, or zero.
b. Sketch the graph of the velocity function.
c. Use the graph of the velocity function to determine
the time intervals when the acceleration is positive,
negative, or zero.
d. Determine the time intervals when the object is
speeding up or slowing down.
Master Bata - 7 Vall 30 Caus day -474 -864 bath --7 % - 24 " MUD F -7 - 36 4116 T - 8/y - 36 -DON BATH - 199 - 223 PANTRY - 439 24 2 6 4657 - 24956 22 S CHET Un 50 Ly .
\ No newline at end of file
Table 4: Baseline model performance on each of the three scoring metrics *(task completion, task process, explanatory knowledge discovery)* across all 24 DISCOVERYWORLD tasks. Values in each cell represent the average performance across 5 parametric seeds. *Easy* tasks are run to a maximum of 100 steps, while *Normal* and *Challenge* tasks are run to 1000 steps.
| | | | ReACT | | | | Plan+Execute | | | Hypothesizer | | | |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|------|-----------|-------------------------|--------------|-------------------------|------|--------------|-----------|--|--|
| | | | Completion<br>Procedure | | | Completion<br>Procedure | | Completion<br>Procedure | | | | | |
| # | Topic | Task | | | Knowledge | | | Knowledge | | | Knowledge | | |
| | Proteomics | Clustering | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 1 | Easy | Simplified Clustering | 0.87 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 0.40 | 1.00 | | |
| 2 | Normal | Clustering (2D) | 0.88 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.68 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.93 | 0.40 | 0.40 | | |
| 3 | Challenge | Clustering (3D) | 0.88 | 0.40 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.93 | 0.40 | 0.60 | | |
| Chemistry | | Exploring Combinations and Hill Climbing | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 4 | Easy | Single substances | 0.87 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.60 | 0.40 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.40 | | |
| 5 | Normal | Mix of 3 substances | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.87 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.93 | 0.60 | 0.40 | | |
| 6 | Challenge | Mix of 4 substances | 0.90 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 0.00 | | |
| Archaeology<br>Correlations | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 7 | Easy | Simple instrument | 0.27 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.33 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.60 | 0.20 | 0.50 | | |
| 8 | Normal | Instrument Use | 0.72 | 0.40 | 0.30 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.64 | 0.40 | 0.40 | | |
| 9 | Challenge | Correlation | 0.46 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.55 | 0.20 | 0.05 | | |
| | Reactor Lab | Regression | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 10 | Easy | Slope only | 0.42 | 0.00 | 0.40 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.20 | | |
| 11 | Normal | Linear regression | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.49 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 0.00 | | |
| 12 | Challenge | Quadratic regression | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 0.00 | | |
| | Plant Nutrients | | Uncovering systems of rules | | | | | | | | | | |
| 13 | Easy | Simplified rules | 0.80 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.70 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | | |
| 14 | Normal | Presence rules | 0.91 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.84 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.00 | | |
| 15 | Challenge | Logical Rules | 0.89 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.73 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.00 | | |
| | Space Sick | Open-ended discovery | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 16 | Easy | Single instrument | 0.78 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 0.40 | 0.10 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.60 | | |
| 17 | Normal | Multiple instruments | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.45 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.33 | | |
| 18 | Challenge | Novel instruments | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.26 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | | |
| | Rocket Science | Multi-step measurements and applying formulas | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 19 | Easy | Look-up variables | 0.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.40 | 0.00 | | |
| 20 | Normal | Measure 2 variables | 0.51 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.34 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | | |
| 21 | Challenge | Measure 5 variables | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.03 | | |
| Translation<br>Rosetta-stone style linguistic discovery of alien language | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 22 | Easy | Single noun | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.20 | 0.30 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.00 | | |
| 23 | Normal | Noun and verb | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.84 | 0.40 | 0.00 | | |
| 24 | Challenge | Noun, adj., and verb | 0.49 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.55 | 0.20 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | | |
| | Average (Easy) | | | 0.38 | 0.25 | 0.56 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.56 | 0.28 | 0.34 | | |
| Average (Normal) | | | 0.59<br>0.63 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.64 | 0.18 | 0.02 | 0.58 | 0.23 | 0.19 | | |
| Average (Challenge) | | | 0.63 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.50 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.49 | 0.08 | 0.08 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Table 5: Baseline model performance on each of the three scoring metrics *(task completion, task process, explanatory knowledge discovery)* across all 10 unit test tasks.Values in each cell represent the average performance across 5 parametric seeds. Unit tests tasks are run to a maximum of 100 steps.
| | | | ReACT | | Plan+Execute | Hypothesizer | | |
|----|----------------------------------------|-----------|------------|-----------|--------------|--------------|------------|--|
| # | Unit Test Topic | Procedure | Completion | Procedure | Completion | Procedure | Completion | |
| 25 | Multi-turn dialog with an agent | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 26 | Measure an object with an instrument | 0.87 | 0.60 | 0.73 | 0.40 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 27 | Pick-and-place object | 0.90 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 28 | Pick-and-give object | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 29 | Read DiscoveryFeed posts | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 30 | Move through doors | 0.58 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.30 | 0.00 | |
| 31 | Using keys with doors | 0.69 | 0.20 | 0.54 | 0.00 | 0.69 | 0.00 | |
| 32 | Navigate to a specific room in a house | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.20 | |
| 33 | Search an environment for an object | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 34 | Interact with a moving agent | 0.60 | 0.20 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.53 | 0.20 | |
| | Average (Unit Tests) | | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.44 | 0.77 | 0.64 | |
## 4.2 Baseline Agent Models
The baseline agents are described below, with model performance on Discovery tasks shown in Table 4, and performance on Unit Tests shown in Table 5. We use the GPT-4O model for all our agents due to its higher performance and lower cost compared to other models. For space we provide
\ No newline at end of file
### **Table of Contents**
**NVIDIA Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements** (Continued)
**Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements**
#### **Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncement**
In November 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued a new accounting standard requiring disclosures of significant expenses in operating segments. We adopted this standard in our fiscal year 2025 annual report. Refer to Note 16 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.
#### **Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted**
In December 2023, the FASB issued a new accounting standard which includes new and updated income tax disclosures, including disaggregation of information in the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid. We expect to adopt this standard in our fiscal year 2026 annual report. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements other than additional disclosures.
In November 2024, the FASB issued a new accounting standard requiring disclosures of certain additional expense information on an annual and interim basis, including, among other items, the amounts of purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation and intangible asset amortization included within each income statement expense caption, as applicable. We expect to adopt this standard in our fiscal year 2028 annual report. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements other than additional disclosures.
# **Note 2 - Business Combination**
#### **Termination of the Arm Share Purchase Agreement**
In February 2022, NVIDIA and SoftBank Group Corp, or SoftBank, announced the termination of the Share Purchase Agreement whereby NVIDIA would have acquired Arm from SoftBank. The parties agreed to terminate it due to significant regulatory challenges preventing the completion of the transaction. We recorded an acquisition termination cost of \$1.4 billion in fiscal year 2023 reflecting the write-off of the prepayment provided at signing.
# **Note 3 - Stock-Based Compensation**
Stock-based compensation expense is associated with RSUs, PSUs, market-based PSUs, and our ESPP.
Consolidated Statements of Income include stock-based compensation expense, net of amounts capitalized into inventory and subsequently recognized to cost of revenue, as follows:
| | Year Ended | | | | | |
|-----------------------------------|--------------|----|---------------|----|--------------|--|
| | Jan 26, 2025 | | Jan 28, 2024 | | Jan 29, 2023 | |
| | | | (In millions) | | | |
| Cost of revenue | \$<br>178 | \$ | 141 | \$ | 138 | |
| Research and development | 3,423 | | 2,532 | | 1,892 | |
| Sales, general and administrative | 1,136 | | 876 | | 680 | |
| Total | \$<br>4,737 | \$ | 3,549 | \$ | 2,710 | |
Stock-based compensation capitalized in inventories was not significant during fiscal years 2025, 2024, and 2023.
## 62
\ No newline at end of file
Crecutive Mansion, Mashington City, January 100 1864. Major General Hitcherts Commissioner of Cachanges, is anthorized and directed to offer Brigadier General Trimble), now a prisoner of war in Dort Inchienny, in exchange for Major lithite, whi is held as a presences at Richmond). Ite is also directed to vend forward the offer of exchange by Stenny in. Warfreld, Eag. of ISaltimore, under aflag of mice, and give him apass to tity Birt. Abraham Sincoln
![](_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg)
\ No newline at end of file
$\text{Proof. Let } \mathcal{S} \text{ be the generating set associated with } D \text{ as described in Proposition 2.5. By} $ $\text{the circulant diagonalization theorem, the spectrum of } G\_\mathbb{R}(D) = \Gamma(\mathbb{R}, \mathbb{S}) \text{ is the multiset} $ $\{\lambda\_{\mathcal{S}}\}\_{\mathcal{S}\in\mathcal{R}}\text{ where} $
$$\lambda\_{\mathcal{S}} = \sum\_{\mathbf{s} \in \mathcal{S}} \mathfrak{J}\_n^{\psi(\mathcal{gs})} = \sum\_{i=1}^k \left[ \sum\_{\mathbf{s}, \mathbf{R} \mathbf{s} = \mathcal{Z}\_i} \mathfrak{J}\_n^{\psi(\mathcal{gs})} \right].$$
$\text{We remark that by Corollary 2.7, if } \mathbf{s} \in \mathbb{R} \text{ such that } \mathbf{R}\mathbf{s} = \mathbb{Z}\_{\mathbf{i}} = \mathbf{R}\mathbf{x}\_{\mathbf{i}} \text{ then } \mathbf{s} \text{ has a unique} $ $\text{representation of the form } s = \mathfrak{l}x\_{\mathbb{I}} \text{ where } u \in (\mathbb{R}/\text{Ann}\_{\mathbb{R}}(x\_{\mathbb{I}}))^{\times} \text{ and } \mathfrak{l} \text{ is a fixed lift of } u $ $\text{to } \mathbb{R}^\times. \text{ With this presentation, we can write} $
$$\sum\_{s, \mathbf{R} = \mathbb{Z}\_i} \zeta\_n^{\psi(\mathbf{g}s)} = \sum\_{u \in (\mathbb{R}/\mathbf{Ann}\_\mathbb{R}(\mathbf{x}\_l))^\times} \zeta\_n^{\psi(\mathbf{gux}\_l)} = \sum\_{u \in (\mathbb{R}/\mathbf{Ann}\_\mathbb{R}(\mathbf{x}\_l))^\times} \zeta\_n^{\psi\_{\mathbf{x}\_l}(\mathbf{g}u)} = c(\mathbf{g}, \mathbb{R}/\mathbf{Ann}\_\mathbb{R}(\mathbf{x}\_l)).$$
$\text{Here we recall that } \psi\_{\mathbf{x}\_i} \text{ is the induced linear functional on } \mathbb{R}/\text{Ann}\_{\mathbb{R}}(\mathbf{x}\_i). \text{ We conclude} $ $\text{that } \lambda\_{\mathcal{S}} = \sum\_{i=1}^{k} $ *c*(*g*, *R*/Ann*R*(*xi*)). □
The following corollary is simple yet important for our future work on perfect state transfers on gcd-graphs.
$\textbf{Corollary 4.17.}\text{ Suppose that }\mathsf{g'} = \mathsf{ug}\text{ for some }\mathsf{u}\in\mathsf{R}^\times.\text{ Then }\lambda\_{\mathcal{S}} = \lambda\_{\mathcal{g'}}. $
## ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank the Department of Mathematics and Computer Science at Lake Forest College for their generous financial support through an Overleaf subscription. We also thank Jan Min ´ a´c for his constant encouragement and support. ˇ
## REFERENCES
- 1. Reza Akhtar, Megan Boggess, Tiffany Jackson-Henderson, Isidora Jimenez, Rachel Karpman, ´ Amanda Kinzel, and Dan Pritikin, *On the unitary Cayley graph of a finite ring*, Electron. J. Combin. **16** (2009), no. 1, Research Paper 117, 13 pages.
- 2. Milan Basiˇ c, Aleksandar Ili ´ c, and Aleksandar Stamenkovi ´ c,´ *Maximal diameter of integral circulant graphs*, Information and Computation **301** (2024), 105208.
- 3. Maria Chudnovsky, Michal Cizek, Logan Crew, Jan Min ´ a´c, Tung T. Nguyen, Sophie Spirkl, and ˇ Nguyen Duy T ˆ an, ˆ *On prime Cayley graphs*, arXiv:2401.06062, to appear in Journal of Combinatorics (2024).
- 4. Thomas Honold, *Characterization of finite frobenius rings*, Archiv der Mathematik **76** (2001), no. 6, 406– 415.
- 5. Irving Kaplansky, *Elementary divisors and modules*, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society **66** (1949), no. 2, 464–491.
- 6. Walter Klotz and Torsten Sander, *Some properties of unitary Cayley graphs*, The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics **14** (2007), no. 1, R45, 12 pages.
- 7. Erich Lamprecht, *Allgemeine theorie der Gaußschen Summen in endlichen kommutativen Ringen*, Mathematische Nachrichten **9** (1953), no. 3, 149–196.
- 8. Jan Min ´ a´c, Tung T Nguyen, and Nguyen Duy T ˇ an, ˆ *Isomorphic gcd-graphs over polynomial rings*, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.01768 (2024).
- 9. , *On the gcd graphs over polynomial rings*, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.01929 (2024).
\ No newline at end of file
## **The 20 Most Important Mathematical Equations**
A journey through the most elegant and influential formulas in mathematics
**1. Euler's Identity** $\text{Contextsts } \text{five } \text{fundamental} \text{ constraints (e, i, n, 1, 0), } \text{revezling the} $ profound relationship between exponential functions and trigonometry. **3. The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus** Establishes that differentiation and integration are inverse operations. If F is an antiderivative of f, the definite integral $\text{еquals } \mathsf{F}(\mathsf{b}) \text{ - } \mathsf{F}(\mathsf{a}). \text{ Веvolutionized паўнепайсаl то problem-so/wing.} $ **2. Pythagorean Theorem 4. Maxwell's Equations** *e* + *iπ* 1 = 0 ∫ *f*(*x*) *dx* = *a b F*(*b*) − *F*(*a*) $a^2 + b^2 = c^2 $ <sup>2</sup> <sup></sup> <sup></sup> **<sup>E</sup>** <sup>=</sup> *ρ*
In right triangles, the hypotenuse squared equals the sum of the squares of the other sides. Cornerstone of geometry with applications in navigation and architecture.
$$
\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = \frac{\rho}{\varepsilon\_0}
$$
$$
\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0
$$
$$
\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}
$$
$$
\nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \mu\_0 \mathbf{J} + \mu\_0 \varepsilon\_0 \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}
$$
Unified electricity and magnetism as manifestations of the same force. Describes electromagnetic field behavior, predicting waves traveling at light speed. Enabled technologies from radio to smartphones.
\ No newline at end of file
## **The 20 Most Important Mathematical Equations**
A journey through the most elegant and influential formulas in mathematics
**1. Euler's Identity** $\text{Contextsts five fundamental constraints (e., i., 7, 0), reveziling} $ the profound relationship between exponential functions and trigonometry. **2. Pythagorean Theorem** In right triangles, the hypotenuse squared equals the sum of the squares of the other sides. Cornerstone of geometry with applications in navigation and architecture. *e* + *iπ* 1 = 0 *a* + $c^2 + b^2 = c^2 $
## **3. The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus**
## **4. Maxwell's Equations**
$$\int\_{a}^{b} f(\mathbf{x}) \, d\mathbf{x} = F(b) - F(a)$$
Establishes that differentiation and integration are inverse $\text{Operations. If } \mathbb{F} \text{ is an antiderivative of } \mathfrak{f} \text{, the definite integral.} $ $\mathsf{esquals} \text{ } \mathsf{F}\langle \mathsf{b} \rangle \text{ - } \mathsf{F}\langle \mathsf{a} \rangle$ . $\mathsf{Revoluctionized}$ $\mathsf{matthematical problem} $ solving.
∇ ⋅ **E** = *ε*0 *ρ* ∇ ⋅ **B** = 0 ∇ × **E** = − ∂*t***B** ∇ × **B** = *μ*0**J** + *μ*0*ε*<sup>0</sup>*t***E**
Unified electricity and magnetism as manifestations of the same force. Describes electromagnetic field behavior, predicting waves traveling at light speed. Enabled technologies from radio to smartphones.
\ No newline at end of file
February Flow Data Components Code The stack V2 Codetext SE whatever we've scraped Webtext HQOCLM DATA MIXES 85 Source code Deepseek <sup>0</sup> Codetext cider 5 Webtext 85 The stack V2 1590 Cedetext Jstaceder <sup>2</sup> <sup>n</sup> 0 webtext loose source code Arctic
\ No newline at end of file
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment