# Task-name ### Paper Title: `Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding` Abstract: `https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.03300` `The test covers 57 tasks including elementary mathematics, US history, computer science, law, and more.` Homepage: `https://github.com/hendrycks/test` Note: The `Flan` variants are derived from [here](https://github.com/jasonwei20/flan-2), and as described in Appendix D.1 of [Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models](https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.11416). ### Citation ``` @article{hendryckstest2021, title={Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding}, author={Dan Hendrycks and Collin Burns and Steven Basart and Andy Zou and Mantas Mazeika and Dawn Song and Jacob Steinhardt}, journal={Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)}, year={2021} } @article{hendrycks2021ethics, title={Aligning AI With Shared Human Values}, author={Dan Hendrycks and Collin Burns and Steven Basart and Andrew Critch and Jerry Li and Dawn Song and Jacob Steinhardt}, journal={Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)}, year={2021} } ``` ### Groups, Tags, and Tasks #### Groups * `mmlu`: `Original multiple-choice MMLU benchmark` * `mmlu_continuation`: `MMLU but with continuation prompts` * `mmlu_generative`: `MMLU generation` MMLU is the original benchmark as implemented by Hendrycks et al. with the choices in context and the answer letters (e.g `A`, `B`, `C`, `D`) in the continuation. `mmlu_continuation` is a cloze-style variant without the choices in context and the full answer choice in the continuation. `mmlu_generative` is a generation variant, similar to the original but the LLM is asked to generate the correct answer letter. #### Subgroups * `mmlu_stem' * `mmlu_humanities' * `mmlu_social_sciences' * `mmlu_other' Subgroup variants are prefixed with the subgroup name, e.g. `mmlu_stem_continuation`. ### Checklist For adding novel benchmarks/datasets to the library: * [x] Is the task an existing benchmark in the literature? * [x] Have you referenced the original paper that introduced the task? * [x] If yes, does the original paper provide a reference implementation? If so, have you checked against the reference implementation and documented how to run such a test? If other tasks on this dataset are already supported: * [x] Is the "Main" variant of this task clearly denoted? * [x] Have you provided a short sentence in a README on what each new variant adds / evaluates? * [x] Have you noted which, if any, published evaluation setups are matched by this variant? # changelog ver 1: PR #497 switch to original implementation ver 2: PR #2116 add missing newline in description.