[["Question: Why might the 'Philadelphian System' be linked to the idea of American exceptionalism?\nChoices:\nA. It encouraged greater involvement in European politics\nB. It was designed as the antithesis of European politics\nC. It created a large standing army\nD. It encouraged the centralization of political power in the US\nAnswer:", " It encouraged greater involvement in European politics"], ["Question: Why might the 'Philadelphian System' be linked to the idea of American exceptionalism?\nChoices:\nA. It encouraged greater involvement in European politics\nB. It was designed as the antithesis of European politics\nC. It created a large standing army\nD. It encouraged the centralization of political power in the US\nAnswer:", " It was designed as the antithesis of European politics"], ["Question: Why might the 'Philadelphian System' be linked to the idea of American exceptionalism?\nChoices:\nA. It encouraged greater involvement in European politics\nB. It was designed as the antithesis of European politics\nC. It created a large standing army\nD. It encouraged the centralization of political power in the US\nAnswer:", " It created a large standing army"], ["Question: Why might the 'Philadelphian System' be linked to the idea of American exceptionalism?\nChoices:\nA. It encouraged greater involvement in European politics\nB. It was designed as the antithesis of European politics\nC. It created a large standing army\nD. It encouraged the centralization of political power in the US\nAnswer:", " It encouraged the centralization of political power in the US"], ["Question: Which is NOT a reason for why intergovernmental organizations are ineffective at promoting human rights?\nChoices:\nA. These organizations merely identify those states who already support human rights\nB. They cannot get enough information about which leaders will abuse their citizens\nC. These organizations have little ability to constrain abusive leaders\nD. None of the above\nAnswer:", " These organizations merely identify those states who already support human rights"], ["Question: Which is NOT a reason for why intergovernmental organizations are ineffective at promoting human rights?\nChoices:\nA. These organizations merely identify those states who already support human rights\nB. They cannot get enough information about which leaders will abuse their citizens\nC. These organizations have little ability to constrain abusive leaders\nD. None of the above\nAnswer:", " They cannot get enough information about which leaders will abuse their citizens"], ["Question: Which is NOT a reason for why intergovernmental organizations are ineffective at promoting human rights?\nChoices:\nA. These organizations merely identify those states who already support human rights\nB. They cannot get enough information about which leaders will abuse their citizens\nC. These organizations have little ability to constrain abusive leaders\nD. None of the above\nAnswer:", " These organizations have little ability to constrain abusive leaders"], ["Question: Which is NOT a reason for why intergovernmental organizations are ineffective at promoting human rights?\nChoices:\nA. These organizations merely identify those states who already support human rights\nB. They cannot get enough information about which leaders will abuse their citizens\nC. These organizations have little ability to constrain abusive leaders\nD. None of the above\nAnswer:", " None of the above"], ["Question: International development may be tied to the security of the state, why?\nChoices:\nA. Threats to the state centralize political and economic power, threatening state development\nB. Too many casualties drain the productive power of the state\nC. Threats to the state encourage socialism\nD. The two are correlated, but there is no causal effect\nAnswer:", " Threats to the state centralize political and economic power, threatening state development"], ["Question: International development may be tied to the security of the state, why?\nChoices:\nA. Threats to the state centralize political and economic power, threatening state development\nB. Too many casualties drain the productive power of the state\nC. Threats to the state encourage socialism\nD. The two are correlated, but there is no causal effect\nAnswer:", " Too many casualties drain the productive power of the state"], ["Question: International development may be tied to the security of the state, why?\nChoices:\nA. Threats to the state centralize political and economic power, threatening state development\nB. Too many casualties drain the productive power of the state\nC. Threats to the state encourage socialism\nD. The two are correlated, but there is no causal effect\nAnswer:", " Threats to the state encourage socialism"], ["Question: International development may be tied to the security of the state, why?\nChoices:\nA. Threats to the state centralize political and economic power, threatening state development\nB. Too many casualties drain the productive power of the state\nC. Threats to the state encourage socialism\nD. The two are correlated, but there is no causal effect\nAnswer:", " The two are correlated, but there is no causal effect"], ["Question: In American government, the power to declare war rests with\nChoices:\nA. the president of the United States.\nB. the secretary of defense.\nC. the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.\nD. Congress.\nAnswer:", " the president of the United States."], ["Question: In American government, the power to declare war rests with\nChoices:\nA. the president of the United States.\nB. the secretary of defense.\nC. the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.\nD. Congress.\nAnswer:", " the secretary of defense."], ["Question: In American government, the power to declare war rests with\nChoices:\nA. the president of the United States.\nB. the secretary of defense.\nC. the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.\nD. Congress.\nAnswer:", " the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff."], ["Question: In American government, the power to declare war rests with\nChoices:\nA. the president of the United States.\nB. the secretary of defense.\nC. the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.\nD. Congress.\nAnswer:", " Congress."], ["Question: Why is NSC 68 seen as a turning point in US Cold War Foreign policy?\nChoices:\nA. It indicated the primacy of economic containment\nB. It indicated a desire to engage with the Soviet Union\nC. It indicated a shift towards military containment\nD. It dispensed with the idea of containment\nAnswer:", " It indicated the primacy of economic containment"], ["Question: Why is NSC 68 seen as a turning point in US Cold War Foreign policy?\nChoices:\nA. It indicated the primacy of economic containment\nB. It indicated a desire to engage with the Soviet Union\nC. It indicated a shift towards military containment\nD. It dispensed with the idea of containment\nAnswer:", " It indicated a desire to engage with the Soviet Union"], ["Question: Why is NSC 68 seen as a turning point in US Cold War Foreign policy?\nChoices:\nA. It indicated the primacy of economic containment\nB. It indicated a desire to engage with the Soviet Union\nC. It indicated a shift towards military containment\nD. It dispensed with the idea of containment\nAnswer:", " It indicated a shift towards military containment"], ["Question: Why is NSC 68 seen as a turning point in US Cold War Foreign policy?\nChoices:\nA. It indicated the primacy of economic containment\nB. It indicated a desire to engage with the Soviet Union\nC. It indicated a shift towards military containment\nD. It dispensed with the idea of containment\nAnswer:", " It dispensed with the idea of containment"], ["Question: What caused a public uproar involving the National Security Agency in 2005?\nChoices:\nA. Revelations that the NSA was monitoring the communications of American citizens without obtaining warrants\nB. A leaked memo that linked the events of September 11, 2001, with the Democratic National Committee\nC. Revelations that the NSA had tortured prisoners at Guantanamo, Cuba\nD. A scathing report condemning the George W. Bush administration for \"building a case for the war in Iraq on a quicksand foundation\"\nAnswer:", " Revelations that the NSA was monitoring the communications of American citizens without obtaining warrants"], ["Question: What caused a public uproar involving the National Security Agency in 2005?\nChoices:\nA. Revelations that the NSA was monitoring the communications of American citizens without obtaining warrants\nB. A leaked memo that linked the events of September 11, 2001, with the Democratic National Committee\nC. Revelations that the NSA had tortured prisoners at Guantanamo, Cuba\nD. A scathing report condemning the George W. Bush administration for \"building a case for the war in Iraq on a quicksand foundation\"\nAnswer:", " A leaked memo that linked the events of September 11, 2001, with the Democratic National Committee"], ["Question: What caused a public uproar involving the National Security Agency in 2005?\nChoices:\nA. Revelations that the NSA was monitoring the communications of American citizens without obtaining warrants\nB. A leaked memo that linked the events of September 11, 2001, with the Democratic National Committee\nC. Revelations that the NSA had tortured prisoners at Guantanamo, Cuba\nD. A scathing report condemning the George W. Bush administration for \"building a case for the war in Iraq on a quicksand foundation\"\nAnswer:", " Revelations that the NSA had tortured prisoners at Guantanamo, Cuba"], ["Question: What caused a public uproar involving the National Security Agency in 2005?\nChoices:\nA. Revelations that the NSA was monitoring the communications of American citizens without obtaining warrants\nB. A leaked memo that linked the events of September 11, 2001, with the Democratic National Committee\nC. Revelations that the NSA had tortured prisoners at Guantanamo, Cuba\nD. A scathing report condemning the George W. Bush administration for \"building a case for the war in Iraq on a quicksand foundation\"\nAnswer:", " A scathing report condemning the George W. Bush administration for \"building a case for the war in Iraq on a quicksand foundation\""], ["Question: What was the significance of the Gulf of Tonkin resolution?\nChoices:\nA. It allowed the US to intensify its involvement in Vietnam\nB. It illustrated the influence of public opinion on US foreign policy\nC. It enhanced Congressional control over the Vietnam War\nD. It curtailed US involvement in Vietnam\nAnswer:", " It allowed the US to intensify its involvement in Vietnam"], ["Question: What was the significance of the Gulf of Tonkin resolution?\nChoices:\nA. It allowed the US to intensify its involvement in Vietnam\nB. It illustrated the influence of public opinion on US foreign policy\nC. It enhanced Congressional control over the Vietnam War\nD. It curtailed US involvement in Vietnam\nAnswer:", " It illustrated the influence of public opinion on US foreign policy"], ["Question: What was the significance of the Gulf of Tonkin resolution?\nChoices:\nA. It allowed the US to intensify its involvement in Vietnam\nB. It illustrated the influence of public opinion on US foreign policy\nC. It enhanced Congressional control over the Vietnam War\nD. It curtailed US involvement in Vietnam\nAnswer:", " It enhanced Congressional control over the Vietnam War"], ["Question: What was the significance of the Gulf of Tonkin resolution?\nChoices:\nA. It allowed the US to intensify its involvement in Vietnam\nB. It illustrated the influence of public opinion on US foreign policy\nC. It enhanced Congressional control over the Vietnam War\nD. It curtailed US involvement in Vietnam\nAnswer:", " It curtailed US involvement in Vietnam"], ["Question: Why do realists tend to object to the influence of exceptionalism on American foreign policy?\nChoices:\nA. It leads to a diminished focus on collective security\nB. It diminishes the prospects for world government\nC. It enhances the prospects for world government\nD. It leads to a diminished focus on security, power and interest\nAnswer:", " It leads to a diminished focus on collective security"], ["Question: Why do realists tend to object to the influence of exceptionalism on American foreign policy?\nChoices:\nA. It leads to a diminished focus on collective security\nB. It diminishes the prospects for world government\nC. It enhances the prospects for world government\nD. It leads to a diminished focus on security, power and interest\nAnswer:", " It diminishes the prospects for world government"], ["Question: Why do realists tend to object to the influence of exceptionalism on American foreign policy?\nChoices:\nA. It leads to a diminished focus on collective security\nB. It diminishes the prospects for world government\nC. It enhances the prospects for world government\nD. It leads to a diminished focus on security, power and interest\nAnswer:", " It enhances the prospects for world government"], ["Question: Why do realists tend to object to the influence of exceptionalism on American foreign policy?\nChoices:\nA. It leads to a diminished focus on collective security\nB. It diminishes the prospects for world government\nC. It enhances the prospects for world government\nD. It leads to a diminished focus on security, power and interest\nAnswer:", " It leads to a diminished focus on security, power and interest"], ["Question: What did the Moscow Treaty on Strategic Offensive Reductions do?\nChoices:\nA. Required the United States and Russia to demobilize their armies\nB. Required the United States and Russia to dismantle a significant number of their nuclear weapons\nC. Prohibited the acquisition of new military bases\nD. Prohibited short-range nuclear weapons\nAnswer:", " Required the United States and Russia to demobilize their armies"], ["Question: What did the Moscow Treaty on Strategic Offensive Reductions do?\nChoices:\nA. Required the United States and Russia to demobilize their armies\nB. Required the United States and Russia to dismantle a significant number of their nuclear weapons\nC. Prohibited the acquisition of new military bases\nD. Prohibited short-range nuclear weapons\nAnswer:", " Required the United States and Russia to dismantle a significant number of their nuclear weapons"], ["Question: What did the Moscow Treaty on Strategic Offensive Reductions do?\nChoices:\nA. Required the United States and Russia to demobilize their armies\nB. Required the United States and Russia to dismantle a significant number of their nuclear weapons\nC. Prohibited the acquisition of new military bases\nD. Prohibited short-range nuclear weapons\nAnswer:", " Prohibited the acquisition of new military bases"], ["Question: What did the Moscow Treaty on Strategic Offensive Reductions do?\nChoices:\nA. Required the United States and Russia to demobilize their armies\nB. Required the United States and Russia to dismantle a significant number of their nuclear weapons\nC. Prohibited the acquisition of new military bases\nD. Prohibited short-range nuclear weapons\nAnswer:", " Prohibited short-range nuclear weapons"], ["Question: What was the Marshall plan?\nChoices:\nA. A plan designed to aid the economy recovery of Europe\nB. An attempt to diminish the potential attraction of the Soviet system to Europeans\nC. An aid programme that embedded US influence in Europe\nD. All of the above\nAnswer:", " A plan designed to aid the economy recovery of Europe"], ["Question: What was the Marshall plan?\nChoices:\nA. A plan designed to aid the economy recovery of Europe\nB. An attempt to diminish the potential attraction of the Soviet system to Europeans\nC. An aid programme that embedded US influence in Europe\nD. All of the above\nAnswer:", " An attempt to diminish the potential attraction of the Soviet system to Europeans"], ["Question: What was the Marshall plan?\nChoices:\nA. A plan designed to aid the economy recovery of Europe\nB. An attempt to diminish the potential attraction of the Soviet system to Europeans\nC. An aid programme that embedded US influence in Europe\nD. All of the above\nAnswer:", " An aid programme that embedded US influence in Europe"], ["Question: What was the Marshall plan?\nChoices:\nA. A plan designed to aid the economy recovery of Europe\nB. An attempt to diminish the potential attraction of the Soviet system to Europeans\nC. An aid programme that embedded US influence in Europe\nD. All of the above\nAnswer:", " All of the above"]]