[["Question: Which of the following is another name for evading the issue?\nChoices:\nA. \"you too\" fallacy\nB. irrelevant conclusion\nC. appeal to fear\nD. argument against the person\nAnswer:", " \"you too\" fallacy"], ["Question: Which of the following is another name for evading the issue?\nChoices:\nA. \"you too\" fallacy\nB. irrelevant conclusion\nC. appeal to fear\nD. argument against the person\nAnswer:", " irrelevant conclusion"], ["Question: Which of the following is another name for evading the issue?\nChoices:\nA. \"you too\" fallacy\nB. irrelevant conclusion\nC. appeal to fear\nD. argument against the person\nAnswer:", " appeal to fear"], ["Question: Which of the following is another name for evading the issue?\nChoices:\nA. \"you too\" fallacy\nB. irrelevant conclusion\nC. appeal to fear\nD. argument against the person\nAnswer:", " argument against the person"], ["Question: Arguing that someone couldn't have done something good because she holds a particular position commits the fallacy of\nChoices:\nA. Guilt by association\nB. False dilemma\nC. Reprehensible personality\nD. False dichotomy\nAnswer:", " Guilt by association"], ["Question: Arguing that someone couldn't have done something good because she holds a particular position commits the fallacy of\nChoices:\nA. Guilt by association\nB. False dilemma\nC. Reprehensible personality\nD. False dichotomy\nAnswer:", " False dilemma"], ["Question: Arguing that someone couldn't have done something good because she holds a particular position commits the fallacy of\nChoices:\nA. Guilt by association\nB. False dilemma\nC. Reprehensible personality\nD. False dichotomy\nAnswer:", " Reprehensible personality"], ["Question: Arguing that someone couldn't have done something good because she holds a particular position commits the fallacy of\nChoices:\nA. Guilt by association\nB. False dilemma\nC. Reprehensible personality\nD. False dichotomy\nAnswer:", " False dichotomy"], ["Question: \" _Ad antiquitatem_ \" is a specific kind of\nChoices:\nA. False cause\nB. False sign\nC. False analogy\nD. Hasty Generalization\nAnswer:", " False cause"], ["Question: \" _Ad antiquitatem_ \" is a specific kind of\nChoices:\nA. False cause\nB. False sign\nC. False analogy\nD. Hasty Generalization\nAnswer:", " False sign"], ["Question: \" _Ad antiquitatem_ \" is a specific kind of\nChoices:\nA. False cause\nB. False sign\nC. False analogy\nD. Hasty Generalization\nAnswer:", " False analogy"], ["Question: \" _Ad antiquitatem_ \" is a specific kind of\nChoices:\nA. False cause\nB. False sign\nC. False analogy\nD. Hasty Generalization\nAnswer:", " Hasty Generalization"], ["Question: Referring to an act committed by an opponent in negative terms while referring to the same act committed by the arguer or supporters in favorable terms describes which of the following fallacies?\nChoices:\nA. Ambiguity\nB. Special pleading\nC. Reification\nD. Hypostatization\nAnswer:", " Ambiguity"], ["Question: Referring to an act committed by an opponent in negative terms while referring to the same act committed by the arguer or supporters in favorable terms describes which of the following fallacies?\nChoices:\nA. Ambiguity\nB. Special pleading\nC. Reification\nD. Hypostatization\nAnswer:", " Special pleading"], ["Question: Referring to an act committed by an opponent in negative terms while referring to the same act committed by the arguer or supporters in favorable terms describes which of the following fallacies?\nChoices:\nA. Ambiguity\nB. Special pleading\nC. Reification\nD. Hypostatization\nAnswer:", " Reification"], ["Question: Referring to an act committed by an opponent in negative terms while referring to the same act committed by the arguer or supporters in favorable terms describes which of the following fallacies?\nChoices:\nA. Ambiguity\nB. Special pleading\nC. Reification\nD. Hypostatization\nAnswer:", " Hypostatization"], ["Question: Which of the following describes the fallacy of false consolation?\nChoices:\nA. arguing against a position based only on negative personal feelings toward the position\nB. responding to charges of wrongdoing by saying others do things as bad or worse\nC. arguing that someone is not really harmed because things could be worse or by pointing out what they have to be thankful for\nD. using threats of harm instead of reasoning to get agreement\nAnswer:", " arguing against a position based only on negative personal feelings toward the position"], ["Question: Which of the following describes the fallacy of false consolation?\nChoices:\nA. arguing against a position based only on negative personal feelings toward the position\nB. responding to charges of wrongdoing by saying others do things as bad or worse\nC. arguing that someone is not really harmed because things could be worse or by pointing out what they have to be thankful for\nD. using threats of harm instead of reasoning to get agreement\nAnswer:", " responding to charges of wrongdoing by saying others do things as bad or worse"], ["Question: Which of the following describes the fallacy of false consolation?\nChoices:\nA. arguing against a position based only on negative personal feelings toward the position\nB. responding to charges of wrongdoing by saying others do things as bad or worse\nC. arguing that someone is not really harmed because things could be worse or by pointing out what they have to be thankful for\nD. using threats of harm instead of reasoning to get agreement\nAnswer:", " arguing that someone is not really harmed because things could be worse or by pointing out what they have to be thankful for"], ["Question: Which of the following describes the fallacy of false consolation?\nChoices:\nA. arguing against a position based only on negative personal feelings toward the position\nB. responding to charges of wrongdoing by saying others do things as bad or worse\nC. arguing that someone is not really harmed because things could be worse or by pointing out what they have to be thankful for\nD. using threats of harm instead of reasoning to get agreement\nAnswer:", " using threats of harm instead of reasoning to get agreement"], ["Question: Which of the following fallacies happen if someone argues that you are a reasonable and intelligent person, so of course you understand his claim is true?\nChoices:\nA. significance\nB. argument from authority\nC. appeal to pride\nD. slippery slope\nAnswer:", " significance"], ["Question: Which of the following fallacies happen if someone argues that you are a reasonable and intelligent person, so of course you understand his claim is true?\nChoices:\nA. significance\nB. argument from authority\nC. appeal to pride\nD. slippery slope\nAnswer:", " argument from authority"], ["Question: Which of the following fallacies happen if someone argues that you are a reasonable and intelligent person, so of course you understand his claim is true?\nChoices:\nA. significance\nB. argument from authority\nC. appeal to pride\nD. slippery slope\nAnswer:", " appeal to pride"], ["Question: Which of the following fallacies happen if someone argues that you are a reasonable and intelligent person, so of course you understand his claim is true?\nChoices:\nA. significance\nB. argument from authority\nC. appeal to pride\nD. slippery slope\nAnswer:", " slippery slope"], ["Question: When someone tries to support a proposition with information that really has nothing to do with the claim being made, that person has probably committed which of the following fallacies?\nChoices:\nA. straw person\nB. genetic fallacy\nC. irrelevant conclusion\nD. ignoratio elenchi\nAnswer:", " straw person"], ["Question: When someone tries to support a proposition with information that really has nothing to do with the claim being made, that person has probably committed which of the following fallacies?\nChoices:\nA. straw person\nB. genetic fallacy\nC. irrelevant conclusion\nD. ignoratio elenchi\nAnswer:", " genetic fallacy"], ["Question: When someone tries to support a proposition with information that really has nothing to do with the claim being made, that person has probably committed which of the following fallacies?\nChoices:\nA. straw person\nB. genetic fallacy\nC. irrelevant conclusion\nD. ignoratio elenchi\nAnswer:", " irrelevant conclusion"], ["Question: When someone tries to support a proposition with information that really has nothing to do with the claim being made, that person has probably committed which of the following fallacies?\nChoices:\nA. straw person\nB. genetic fallacy\nC. irrelevant conclusion\nD. ignoratio elenchi\nAnswer:", " ignoratio elenchi"], ["Question: Polonius in William Shakespeare's Hamlet: \"Your noble son is mad: Mad call I it, for to define true madness, What is't but to be nothing else but mad?\"\nChoices:\nA. Attacking the Person (ad hominem)\nB. Equivocation\nC. Begging the Question\nD. Appeal to Pity\nAnswer:", " Attacking the Person (ad hominem)"], ["Question: Polonius in William Shakespeare's Hamlet: \"Your noble son is mad: Mad call I it, for to define true madness, What is't but to be nothing else but mad?\"\nChoices:\nA. Attacking the Person (ad hominem)\nB. Equivocation\nC. Begging the Question\nD. Appeal to Pity\nAnswer:", " Equivocation"], ["Question: Polonius in William Shakespeare's Hamlet: \"Your noble son is mad: Mad call I it, for to define true madness, What is't but to be nothing else but mad?\"\nChoices:\nA. Attacking the Person (ad hominem)\nB. Equivocation\nC. Begging the Question\nD. Appeal to Pity\nAnswer:", " Begging the Question"], ["Question: Polonius in William Shakespeare's Hamlet: \"Your noble son is mad: Mad call I it, for to define true madness, What is't but to be nothing else but mad?\"\nChoices:\nA. Attacking the Person (ad hominem)\nB. Equivocation\nC. Begging the Question\nD. Appeal to Pity\nAnswer:", " Appeal to Pity"], ["Question: \" _Ad lazarum_ \" is a specific kind of\nChoices:\nA. Anecdotal evidence\nB. Complex cause\nC. False criteria\nD. False sign\nAnswer:", " Anecdotal evidence"], ["Question: \" _Ad lazarum_ \" is a specific kind of\nChoices:\nA. Anecdotal evidence\nB. Complex cause\nC. False criteria\nD. False sign\nAnswer:", " Complex cause"], ["Question: \" _Ad lazarum_ \" is a specific kind of\nChoices:\nA. Anecdotal evidence\nB. Complex cause\nC. False criteria\nD. False sign\nAnswer:", " False criteria"], ["Question: \" _Ad lazarum_ \" is a specific kind of\nChoices:\nA. Anecdotal evidence\nB. Complex cause\nC. False criteria\nD. False sign\nAnswer:", " False sign"], ["Question: Which type of syllogism's major premise takes the form, \"All A's are B\"?\nChoices:\nA. categorical\nB. disjunctive\nC. conditional\nD. hypothetical\nAnswer:", " categorical"], ["Question: Which type of syllogism's major premise takes the form, \"All A's are B\"?\nChoices:\nA. categorical\nB. disjunctive\nC. conditional\nD. hypothetical\nAnswer:", " disjunctive"], ["Question: Which type of syllogism's major premise takes the form, \"All A's are B\"?\nChoices:\nA. categorical\nB. disjunctive\nC. conditional\nD. hypothetical\nAnswer:", " conditional"], ["Question: Which type of syllogism's major premise takes the form, \"All A's are B\"?\nChoices:\nA. categorical\nB. disjunctive\nC. conditional\nD. hypothetical\nAnswer:", " hypothetical"]]