[["Question: Bill purchased a can of Sipep from the Ajax Minimart. After he finished drinking the Sipep, Bill noticed that the can contained dead insects stuck on the inside bottom of the can. In a strict product liability tort action against Ajax, Bill must prove, among other things, that:\nChoices:\nA. Ajax is a merchant selling Sipep.\nB. Ajax knew or should have known of the defective condition\nC. Ajax had prior notice of other similar problems with Sipep products.\nD. Ajax actually placed the dead insects into the can.\nAnswer:", " Ajax is a merchant selling Sipep."], ["Question: Bill purchased a can of Sipep from the Ajax Minimart. After he finished drinking the Sipep, Bill noticed that the can contained dead insects stuck on the inside bottom of the can. In a strict product liability tort action against Ajax, Bill must prove, among other things, that:\nChoices:\nA. Ajax is a merchant selling Sipep.\nB. Ajax knew or should have known of the defective condition\nC. Ajax had prior notice of other similar problems with Sipep products.\nD. Ajax actually placed the dead insects into the can.\nAnswer:", " Ajax knew or should have known of the defective condition"], ["Question: Bill purchased a can of Sipep from the Ajax Minimart. After he finished drinking the Sipep, Bill noticed that the can contained dead insects stuck on the inside bottom of the can. In a strict product liability tort action against Ajax, Bill must prove, among other things, that:\nChoices:\nA. Ajax is a merchant selling Sipep.\nB. Ajax knew or should have known of the defective condition\nC. Ajax had prior notice of other similar problems with Sipep products.\nD. Ajax actually placed the dead insects into the can.\nAnswer:", " Ajax had prior notice of other similar problems with Sipep products."], ["Question: Bill purchased a can of Sipep from the Ajax Minimart. After he finished drinking the Sipep, Bill noticed that the can contained dead insects stuck on the inside bottom of the can. In a strict product liability tort action against Ajax, Bill must prove, among other things, that:\nChoices:\nA. Ajax is a merchant selling Sipep.\nB. Ajax knew or should have known of the defective condition\nC. Ajax had prior notice of other similar problems with Sipep products.\nD. Ajax actually placed the dead insects into the can.\nAnswer:", " Ajax actually placed the dead insects into the can."], ["Question: Catharine MacKinnon argues that since men dominate women, the question is ultimately one of power. Which proposition below is the most inconsistent with this argument?\nChoices:\nA. Women can achieve equality through political pressure.\nB. Equality is impossible because men define women as different.\nC. The idea of 'woman' needs to be redefined.\nD. The world is phallocentric and oppressive.\nAnswer:", " Women can achieve equality through political pressure."], ["Question: Catharine MacKinnon argues that since men dominate women, the question is ultimately one of power. Which proposition below is the most inconsistent with this argument?\nChoices:\nA. Women can achieve equality through political pressure.\nB. Equality is impossible because men define women as different.\nC. The idea of 'woman' needs to be redefined.\nD. The world is phallocentric and oppressive.\nAnswer:", " Equality is impossible because men define women as different."], ["Question: Catharine MacKinnon argues that since men dominate women, the question is ultimately one of power. Which proposition below is the most inconsistent with this argument?\nChoices:\nA. Women can achieve equality through political pressure.\nB. Equality is impossible because men define women as different.\nC. The idea of 'woman' needs to be redefined.\nD. The world is phallocentric and oppressive.\nAnswer:", " The idea of 'woman' needs to be redefined."], ["Question: Catharine MacKinnon argues that since men dominate women, the question is ultimately one of power. Which proposition below is the most inconsistent with this argument?\nChoices:\nA. Women can achieve equality through political pressure.\nB. Equality is impossible because men define women as different.\nC. The idea of 'woman' needs to be redefined.\nD. The world is phallocentric and oppressive.\nAnswer:", " The world is phallocentric and oppressive."], ["Question: Maine's famous aphorism that 'the movement of progressive societies has hitherto been a movement from Status to Contract' is often misunderstood. In what way?\nChoices:\nA. It is misinterpreted as a prediction.\nB. His concept of status is misrepresented.\nC. It is taken literally.\nD. His idea is considered inapplicable to Western legal systems.\nAnswer:", " It is misinterpreted as a prediction."], ["Question: Maine's famous aphorism that 'the movement of progressive societies has hitherto been a movement from Status to Contract' is often misunderstood. In what way?\nChoices:\nA. It is misinterpreted as a prediction.\nB. His concept of status is misrepresented.\nC. It is taken literally.\nD. His idea is considered inapplicable to Western legal systems.\nAnswer:", " His concept of status is misrepresented."], ["Question: Maine's famous aphorism that 'the movement of progressive societies has hitherto been a movement from Status to Contract' is often misunderstood. In what way?\nChoices:\nA. It is misinterpreted as a prediction.\nB. His concept of status is misrepresented.\nC. It is taken literally.\nD. His idea is considered inapplicable to Western legal systems.\nAnswer:", " It is taken literally."], ["Question: Maine's famous aphorism that 'the movement of progressive societies has hitherto been a movement from Status to Contract' is often misunderstood. In what way?\nChoices:\nA. It is misinterpreted as a prediction.\nB. His concept of status is misrepresented.\nC. It is taken literally.\nD. His idea is considered inapplicable to Western legal systems.\nAnswer:", " His idea is considered inapplicable to Western legal systems."], ["Question: Which of the following statements best describes the postmodernist project?\nChoices:\nA. It attempts to demonstrate the relationship between law and literature.\nB. It seeks to defend Enlightenment values.\nC. It is preoccupied with the rise of bureaucratic government.\nD. It rejects the Kantian concern with individual rights, equality, and justice.\nAnswer:", " It attempts to demonstrate the relationship between law and literature."], ["Question: Which of the following statements best describes the postmodernist project?\nChoices:\nA. It attempts to demonstrate the relationship between law and literature.\nB. It seeks to defend Enlightenment values.\nC. It is preoccupied with the rise of bureaucratic government.\nD. It rejects the Kantian concern with individual rights, equality, and justice.\nAnswer:", " It seeks to defend Enlightenment values."], ["Question: Which of the following statements best describes the postmodernist project?\nChoices:\nA. It attempts to demonstrate the relationship between law and literature.\nB. It seeks to defend Enlightenment values.\nC. It is preoccupied with the rise of bureaucratic government.\nD. It rejects the Kantian concern with individual rights, equality, and justice.\nAnswer:", " It is preoccupied with the rise of bureaucratic government."], ["Question: Which of the following statements best describes the postmodernist project?\nChoices:\nA. It attempts to demonstrate the relationship between law and literature.\nB. It seeks to defend Enlightenment values.\nC. It is preoccupied with the rise of bureaucratic government.\nD. It rejects the Kantian concern with individual rights, equality, and justice.\nAnswer:", " It rejects the Kantian concern with individual rights, equality, and justice."], ["Question: Which of the following statements is correct concerning the \"reasonable person\" standard in tort law?\nChoices:\nA. The reasonable person standard varies from person to person.\nB. The reasonable person standard focuses on the defendant's subjective mental state rather than on the defendant's behavior\nC. A person with a physical disability must act as would a reasonable person with the same disability.\nD. A person with a mental disability must act as would a person with the same mental disability.\nAnswer:", " The reasonable person standard varies from person to person."], ["Question: Which of the following statements is correct concerning the \"reasonable person\" standard in tort law?\nChoices:\nA. The reasonable person standard varies from person to person.\nB. The reasonable person standard focuses on the defendant's subjective mental state rather than on the defendant's behavior\nC. A person with a physical disability must act as would a reasonable person with the same disability.\nD. A person with a mental disability must act as would a person with the same mental disability.\nAnswer:", " The reasonable person standard focuses on the defendant's subjective mental state rather than on the defendant's behavior"], ["Question: Which of the following statements is correct concerning the \"reasonable person\" standard in tort law?\nChoices:\nA. The reasonable person standard varies from person to person.\nB. The reasonable person standard focuses on the defendant's subjective mental state rather than on the defendant's behavior\nC. A person with a physical disability must act as would a reasonable person with the same disability.\nD. A person with a mental disability must act as would a person with the same mental disability.\nAnswer:", " A person with a physical disability must act as would a reasonable person with the same disability."], ["Question: Which of the following statements is correct concerning the \"reasonable person\" standard in tort law?\nChoices:\nA. The reasonable person standard varies from person to person.\nB. The reasonable person standard focuses on the defendant's subjective mental state rather than on the defendant's behavior\nC. A person with a physical disability must act as would a reasonable person with the same disability.\nD. A person with a mental disability must act as would a person with the same mental disability.\nAnswer:", " A person with a mental disability must act as would a person with the same mental disability."], ["Question: Habermas distinguishes between 'law as medium' and 'law as institution'. Which statement below most accurately describes this distinction?\nChoices:\nA. Law as medium' describes law as a body of formal, general rules that control the state and the economy; 'law as institution' inhabits the 'lifeworld' and expresses its shared values and norms in institutional form.\nB. Law as medium' consists of the manner in which law is presented by the media; 'law as institution' describes the courts.\nC. Law as medium' concerns the manner in which the law expresses its rules in simplified terms; 'law as institution' refers to the formal declaration of laws by legislative bodies.\nD. Law as medium' is defined as the intermediate stage of legal development; 'law as institution' is the advanced stage.\nAnswer:", " Law as medium' describes law as a body of formal, general rules that control the state and the economy; 'law as institution' inhabits the 'lifeworld' and expresses its shared values and norms in institutional form."], ["Question: Habermas distinguishes between 'law as medium' and 'law as institution'. Which statement below most accurately describes this distinction?\nChoices:\nA. Law as medium' describes law as a body of formal, general rules that control the state and the economy; 'law as institution' inhabits the 'lifeworld' and expresses its shared values and norms in institutional form.\nB. Law as medium' consists of the manner in which law is presented by the media; 'law as institution' describes the courts.\nC. Law as medium' concerns the manner in which the law expresses its rules in simplified terms; 'law as institution' refers to the formal declaration of laws by legislative bodies.\nD. Law as medium' is defined as the intermediate stage of legal development; 'law as institution' is the advanced stage.\nAnswer:", " Law as medium' consists of the manner in which law is presented by the media; 'law as institution' describes the courts."], ["Question: Habermas distinguishes between 'law as medium' and 'law as institution'. Which statement below most accurately describes this distinction?\nChoices:\nA. Law as medium' describes law as a body of formal, general rules that control the state and the economy; 'law as institution' inhabits the 'lifeworld' and expresses its shared values and norms in institutional form.\nB. Law as medium' consists of the manner in which law is presented by the media; 'law as institution' describes the courts.\nC. Law as medium' concerns the manner in which the law expresses its rules in simplified terms; 'law as institution' refers to the formal declaration of laws by legislative bodies.\nD. Law as medium' is defined as the intermediate stage of legal development; 'law as institution' is the advanced stage.\nAnswer:", " Law as medium' concerns the manner in which the law expresses its rules in simplified terms; 'law as institution' refers to the formal declaration of laws by legislative bodies."], ["Question: Habermas distinguishes between 'law as medium' and 'law as institution'. Which statement below most accurately describes this distinction?\nChoices:\nA. Law as medium' describes law as a body of formal, general rules that control the state and the economy; 'law as institution' inhabits the 'lifeworld' and expresses its shared values and norms in institutional form.\nB. Law as medium' consists of the manner in which law is presented by the media; 'law as institution' describes the courts.\nC. Law as medium' concerns the manner in which the law expresses its rules in simplified terms; 'law as institution' refers to the formal declaration of laws by legislative bodies.\nD. Law as medium' is defined as the intermediate stage of legal development; 'law as institution' is the advanced stage.\nAnswer:", " Law as medium' is defined as the intermediate stage of legal development; 'law as institution' is the advanced stage."], ["Question: Which one of the following schools supports the view that a custom becomes law when it receives the stamp of judicial recognition by courts\nChoices:\nA. Analytical School\nB. Natural Law School\nC. Historical School\nD. Sociological School\nAnswer:", " Analytical School"], ["Question: Which one of the following schools supports the view that a custom becomes law when it receives the stamp of judicial recognition by courts\nChoices:\nA. Analytical School\nB. Natural Law School\nC. Historical School\nD. Sociological School\nAnswer:", " Natural Law School"], ["Question: Which one of the following schools supports the view that a custom becomes law when it receives the stamp of judicial recognition by courts\nChoices:\nA. Analytical School\nB. Natural Law School\nC. Historical School\nD. Sociological School\nAnswer:", " Historical School"], ["Question: Which one of the following schools supports the view that a custom becomes law when it receives the stamp of judicial recognition by courts\nChoices:\nA. Analytical School\nB. Natural Law School\nC. Historical School\nD. Sociological School\nAnswer:", " Sociological School"], ["Question: Which of the following arguments against the 'fair play' argument in support of a duty to obey the law is the most persuasive?\nChoices:\nA. Fairness is a relative term.\nB. The legal system is, in fact, unfair.\nC. It sets a bad example.\nD. The law is irrational and ambiguous.\nAnswer:", " Fairness is a relative term."], ["Question: Which of the following arguments against the 'fair play' argument in support of a duty to obey the law is the most persuasive?\nChoices:\nA. Fairness is a relative term.\nB. The legal system is, in fact, unfair.\nC. It sets a bad example.\nD. The law is irrational and ambiguous.\nAnswer:", " The legal system is, in fact, unfair."], ["Question: Which of the following arguments against the 'fair play' argument in support of a duty to obey the law is the most persuasive?\nChoices:\nA. Fairness is a relative term.\nB. The legal system is, in fact, unfair.\nC. It sets a bad example.\nD. The law is irrational and ambiguous.\nAnswer:", " It sets a bad example."], ["Question: Which of the following arguments against the 'fair play' argument in support of a duty to obey the law is the most persuasive?\nChoices:\nA. Fairness is a relative term.\nB. The legal system is, in fact, unfair.\nC. It sets a bad example.\nD. The law is irrational and ambiguous.\nAnswer:", " The law is irrational and ambiguous."], ["Question: The United States Supreme Court's decision in Roe v Wade is highly controversial because:\nChoices:\nA. It failed to consider the rights of fathers.\nB. It overlooked the common law relating to abortion.\nC. The majority held that the abortion law of Texas was unconstitutional because it violated a woman's right to privacy.\nD. The court failed to consider the medical evidence.\nAnswer:", " It failed to consider the rights of fathers."], ["Question: The United States Supreme Court's decision in Roe v Wade is highly controversial because:\nChoices:\nA. It failed to consider the rights of fathers.\nB. It overlooked the common law relating to abortion.\nC. The majority held that the abortion law of Texas was unconstitutional because it violated a woman's right to privacy.\nD. The court failed to consider the medical evidence.\nAnswer:", " It overlooked the common law relating to abortion."], ["Question: The United States Supreme Court's decision in Roe v Wade is highly controversial because:\nChoices:\nA. It failed to consider the rights of fathers.\nB. It overlooked the common law relating to abortion.\nC. The majority held that the abortion law of Texas was unconstitutional because it violated a woman's right to privacy.\nD. The court failed to consider the medical evidence.\nAnswer:", " The majority held that the abortion law of Texas was unconstitutional because it violated a woman's right to privacy."], ["Question: The United States Supreme Court's decision in Roe v Wade is highly controversial because:\nChoices:\nA. It failed to consider the rights of fathers.\nB. It overlooked the common law relating to abortion.\nC. The majority held that the abortion law of Texas was unconstitutional because it violated a woman's right to privacy.\nD. The court failed to consider the medical evidence.\nAnswer:", " The court failed to consider the medical evidence."], ["Question: Which statement below is the least likely to follow logically from Dworkin's notion of law as integrity?\nChoices:\nA. It is likely to generate more individual rights and greater liberty.\nB. It renders a community more genuine.\nC. It opens the door to authoritarianism.\nD. It improves the moral justification for the exercise of political power.\nAnswer:", " It is likely to generate more individual rights and greater liberty."], ["Question: Which statement below is the least likely to follow logically from Dworkin's notion of law as integrity?\nChoices:\nA. It is likely to generate more individual rights and greater liberty.\nB. It renders a community more genuine.\nC. It opens the door to authoritarianism.\nD. It improves the moral justification for the exercise of political power.\nAnswer:", " It renders a community more genuine."], ["Question: Which statement below is the least likely to follow logically from Dworkin's notion of law as integrity?\nChoices:\nA. It is likely to generate more individual rights and greater liberty.\nB. It renders a community more genuine.\nC. It opens the door to authoritarianism.\nD. It improves the moral justification for the exercise of political power.\nAnswer:", " It opens the door to authoritarianism."], ["Question: Which statement below is the least likely to follow logically from Dworkin's notion of law as integrity?\nChoices:\nA. It is likely to generate more individual rights and greater liberty.\nB. It renders a community more genuine.\nC. It opens the door to authoritarianism.\nD. It improves the moral justification for the exercise of political power.\nAnswer:", " It improves the moral justification for the exercise of political power."]]