transfer zeroshot improvements on bbh to fewshot

lm_eval/tasks/bbh/cot_fewshot/snarks.yaml

 "dataset_name": "snarks"
 "description": "Determine which of two sentences is sarcastic.\n\nAccording to Cambridge University Dictionary, sarcasm is \"the use of remarks that clearly mean the opposite of what they say, made in order to hurt someone's feelings or to criticize something in a humorous way.\" Sarcastic sentences often contain satirical or ironic utterances, hyperboles, ambivalent or witty remarks.\n\n"
-"doc_to_text": "Q: Which statement is sarcastic?\nOptions:\n(A) Yes, because having interests and actively researching them is a huge waste\n(B) Yes, because having interests and actively researching them is a huge deal\nA: Let's think step by step.\nIf we look at (A), it says that having interests and actively researching them is a huge waste, implying that it is a useless effort. However, we know that having interests and actively researching them is typically not a waste but rather is beneficial to the individual. The presence of such a juxtaposition in (A) suggests that it contains a taste of irony and sarcasm.\nIf we look at (B), it says that having interests and actively researching them is a huge deal, implying that it is an important and consequential effort. This is arguably a neutral and correct statement.\nAbove the above, the sarcastic option is (A). So the answer is (A).\n\nQ: Which statement is sarcastic?\nOptions:\n(A) No one is going to disagree with you on this. Avoiding ad hominem attacks really help your case\n(B) No one is going to disagree with you on this. Ad hominem attacks really help your case\nA: Let's think step by step.\nIf we look at (A), it says that avoiding ad hominem attacks really help your case, implying that ad hominem attacks are adverse and injurious. Because ad hominem attacks are adressed at a person rather than an idea, it is indeed true that avoiding them is often useful and helpful; so, (A) is a neutral (valid and agreeable) statement.\nIf we look at (B), it says that ad hominem attacks really help your case, implying that ad hominem attacks are a positive thing. However, we stated previously that ad hominem attacks are often not useful or constructive. The speaker in this sentence therefore seems to mean the opposite of what they are saying; so, there appears to have a taste of irony and sarcasm in (B).\nAbove the above, the sarcastic option is (B). So the answer is (B).\n\nQ: Which statement is sarcastic?\nOptions:\n(A) Consistency in the league's punishments? What do you think this is supposed to be, politics?\n(B) Consistency in the league's punishments? What do you think this is supposed to be, moral?\nA: Let's think step by step.\nIf we look at (A), it likens the consistency in the league's punishments with that in politics. Because politics or political affairs are often not considered to be consistent or dependable, this sentence appears to be satirical.\nIf we look at (B), it likens the consistency in the league's punishments with that in morality. Discussing the consistency of the league's punishments in the context of morality, ethics, or law makes sense and does not appear to make a satirical point about anything.\nAbove the above, the sarcastic option is (A). So the answer is (A).\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA: Let's think step by step.\n"
+"doc_to_text": "Q: Which statement is sarcastic?\nOptions:\n(A) Yes, because having interests and actively researching them is a huge waste\n(B) Yes, because having interests and actively researching them is a huge deal\nA: Let's think step by step.\nIf we look at (A), it says that having interests and actively researching them is a huge waste, implying that it is a useless effort. However, we know that having interests and actively researching them is typically not a waste but rather is beneficial to the individual. The presence of such a juxtaposition in (A) suggests that it contains a taste of irony and sarcasm.\nIf we look at (B), it says that having interests and actively researching them is a huge deal, implying that it is an important and consequential effort. This is arguably a neutral and correct statement.\nAbove the above, the sarcastic option is (A). So the answer is (A).\n\nQ: Which statement is sarcastic?\nOptions:\n(A) No one is going to disagree with you on this. Avoiding ad hominem attacks really help your case\n(B) No one is going to disagree with you on this. Ad hominem attacks really help your case\nA: Let's think step by step.\nIf we look at (A), it says that avoiding ad hominem attacks really help your case, implying that ad hominem attacks are adverse and injurious. Because ad hominem attacks are adressed at a person rather than an idea, it is indeed true that avoiding them is often useful and helpful; so, (A) is a neutral (valid and agreeable) statement.\nIf we look at (B), it says that ad hominem attacks really help your case, implying that ad hominem attacks are a positive thing. However, we stated previously that ad hominem attacks are often not useful or constructive. The speaker in this sentence therefore seems to mean the opposite of what they are saying; so, there appears to have a taste of irony and sarcasm in (B).\nAbove the above, the sarcastic option is (B). So the answer is (B).\n\nQ: Which statement is sarcastic?\nOptions:\n(A) Consistency in the league's punishments? What do you think this is supposed to be, politics?\n(B) Consistency in the league's punishments? What do you think this is supposed to be, moral?\nA: Let's think step by step.\nIf we look at (A), it likens the consistency in the league's punishments with that in politics. Because politics or political affairs are often not considered to be consistent or dependable, this sentence appears to be satirical.\nIf we look at (B), it likens the consistency in the league's punishments with that in morality. Discussing the consistency of the league's punishments in the context of morality, ethics, or law makes sense and does not appear to make a satirical point about anything.\nAbove the above, the sarcastic option is (A). So the answer is (A).\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA: Let's think step by step."
 "include": "_cot_fewshot_template_yaml"
 "task": "bbh_cot_fewshot_snarks"
+filter_list:
+  - name: "flexible-extract"
+    filter:
+      - function: !function utils.MultiChoiceRegexFilter
+        group_select: -1
+        ignore_case: true
+        ignore_punctuation: true
+        regex_pattern: "(\\([A-Z]\\))"
+      - function: "take_first"
+  - name: "strict-match"
+    filter:
+      - function: "regex"
+        regex_pattern: "((?<=The answer is )(.*)(?=.)|(?<=the answer is )(.*)(?=.)|(?<=The answer: )(.*)(?=.)|(?<=The final answer: )(.*)(?=.))"
+      - function: "take_first"

lm_eval/tasks/bbh/cot_fewshot/sports_understanding.yaml

 "dataset_name": "sports_understanding"
 "description": "Determine whether an artificially constructed sentence relating to sports is plausible or not.\n\n"
-"doc_to_text": "Q: Is the following sentence plausible? \"Bam Adebayo scored a reverse layup in the Western Conference Finals.\"\nA: Let's think step by step. Bam Adebayo is an American basketball player. Scoring a reverse layup in the Western Conference Finals is part of the NBA Finals. So the answer is yes.\n\nQ: Is the following sentence plausible? \"Santi Cazorla scored a touchdown.\"\nA: Let's think step by step. Santi Cazorla is a soccer player. Touchdown is part of American football and rugby. So the answer is no.\n\nQ: Is the following sentence plausible? \"DeMar DeRozan was called for the goal tend.\"\nA: Let's think step by step. DeMar DeRozan is an American basketball player. Goal tending is part of basketball. So the answer is yes.\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA: Let's think step by step.\n"
+"doc_to_text": "Q: Is the following sentence plausible? \"Bam Adebayo scored a reverse layup in the Western Conference Finals.\"\nA: Let's think step by step. Bam Adebayo is an American basketball player. Scoring a reverse layup in the Western Conference Finals is part of the NBA Finals. So the answer is yes.\n\nQ: Is the following sentence plausible? \"Santi Cazorla scored a touchdown.\"\nA: Let's think step by step. Santi Cazorla is a soccer player. Touchdown is part of American football and rugby. So the answer is no.\n\nQ: Is the following sentence plausible? \"DeMar DeRozan was called for the goal tend.\"\nA: Let's think step by step. DeMar DeRozan is an American basketball player. Goal tending is part of basketball. So the answer is yes.\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA: Let's think step by step."
 "include": "_cot_fewshot_template_yaml"
 "task": "bbh_cot_fewshot_sports_understanding"
+filter_list:
+  - name: "flexible-extract"
+    filter:
+      - function: !function utils.MapRegexFilter
+        group_select: -1
+        ignore_case: true
+        regex_pattern_to_value:
+          \b(no|not plausible)\b: "no"
+          \b(yes|plausible)\b: "yes"
+      - function: "take_first"
+  - name: "strict-match"
+    filter:
+      - function: "regex"
+        regex_pattern: "((?<=The answer is )(.*)(?=.)|(?<=the answer is )(.*)(?=.)|(?<=The answer: )(.*)(?=.)|(?<=The final answer: )(.*)(?=.))"
+      - function: "take_first"

lm_eval/tasks/bbh/cot_fewshot/temporal_sequences.yaml

 "dataset_name": "temporal_sequences"
 "description": "Task description: Answer questions about which times certain events could have occurred.\n\n"
-"doc_to_text": "Q: Today, Emily went to the museum. Between what times could they have gone?\nWe know that:\nEmily woke up at 1pm.\nElizabeth saw Emily reading at the library from 2pm to 4pm.\nJessica saw Emily watching a movie at the theater from 4pm to 5pm.\nLeslie saw Emily waiting at the airport from 5pm to 6pm.\nWilliam saw Emily buying clothes at the mall from 6pm to 7pm.\nThe museum was closed after 7pm.\nBetween what times could Emily have gone to the museum?\nOptions:\n(A) 1pm to 2pm\n(B) 6pm to 7pm\n(C) 5pm to 6pm\n(D) 2pm to 4pm\nA: Let's think step by step.\nWake-up time: 1pm.\n1pm-2pm: free.\n2pm-4pm: reading at the library.\n4pm-5pm: watching a movie at the theater.\n5pm-6pm: waiting at the airport.\n6pm-7pm: buying clothes at the mall.\nThe museum closure time: 7pm.\nThe only time when Emily could have gone to the museum was 1pm to 2pm. So the answer is (A).\n\nQ: Today, Elizabeth went to the amusement park. Between what times could they have gone?\nWe know that:\nElizabeth woke up at 7am.\nDavid saw Elizabeth fixing their computer at the electronic store from 1pm to 2pm.\nSarah saw Elizabeth playing tennis at the tennis court from 2pm to 3pm.\nSusan saw Elizabeth walking towards the Statue of Liberty from 3pm to 6pm.\nAndrew saw Elizabeth taking photos near the Eiffel Tower from 6pm to 9pm.\nEmily saw Elizabeth getting a coffee at the cafe from 9pm to 10pm.\nThe amusement park was closed after 10pm.\nBetween what times could Elizabeth have gone to the amusement park?\nOptions:\n(A) 7am to 1pm\n(B) 9pm to 10pm\n(C) 1pm to 2pm\n(D) 3pm to 6pm\nA: Let's think step by step.\nWake-up time: 7am.\n7am-1pm: free.\n1pm-2pm: fixing their computer at the electronic store.\n2pm-3pm: playing tennis at the tennis court.\n3pm-6pm: walking towards the Statue of Liberty.\n6pm-9pm: taking photos near the Eiffel Tower.\n9pm-10pm: getting a coffee at the cafe.\nThe amusement park closure time: 10pm.\nThe only time when Elizabeth could have gone to the amusement park was 7am to 1pm. So the answer is (A).\n\nQ: Today, Tiffany went to the beach. Between what times could they have gone?\nWe know that:\nTiffany woke up at 5am.\nBetty saw Tiffany getting a coffee at the cafe from 5am to 6am.\nJessica saw Tiffany working at the office from 6am to 9am.\nJohn saw Tiffany stretching at a yoga studio from 9am to 12pm.\nSean saw Tiffany sitting on a rooftop from 12pm to 2pm.\nSarah saw Tiffany playing tennis at the tennis court from 2pm to 3pm.\nThe beach was closed after 4pm.\nBetween what times could Tiffany have gone to the beach?\nOptions:\n(A) 9am to 12pm\n(B) 12pm to 2pm\n(C) 5am to 6am\n(D) 3pm to 4pm\nA: Let's think step by step.\nWake-up time: 5am.\n5am-6am: getting a coffee at the cafe.\n6am-9am: working at the office.\n9am-12pm: stretching at a yoga studio.\n12pm-2pm: sitting on a rooftop.\n2pm-3pm: playing tennis at the tennis court.\n3pm-4pm: free.\nThe beach closure time: 4pm.\nThe only time when Tiffany could have gone to the beach was 3pm to 4pm. So the answer is (D).\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA: Let's think step by step.\n"
+"doc_to_text": "Q: Today, Emily went to the museum. Between what times could they have gone?\nWe know that:\nEmily woke up at 1pm.\nElizabeth saw Emily reading at the library from 2pm to 4pm.\nJessica saw Emily watching a movie at the theater from 4pm to 5pm.\nLeslie saw Emily waiting at the airport from 5pm to 6pm.\nWilliam saw Emily buying clothes at the mall from 6pm to 7pm.\nThe museum was closed after 7pm.\nBetween what times could Emily have gone to the museum?\nOptions:\n(A) 1pm to 2pm\n(B) 6pm to 7pm\n(C) 5pm to 6pm\n(D) 2pm to 4pm\nA: Let's think step by step.\nWake-up time: 1pm.\n1pm-2pm: free.\n2pm-4pm: reading at the library.\n4pm-5pm: watching a movie at the theater.\n5pm-6pm: waiting at the airport.\n6pm-7pm: buying clothes at the mall.\nThe museum closure time: 7pm.\nThe only time when Emily could have gone to the museum was 1pm to 2pm. So the answer is (A).\n\nQ: Today, Elizabeth went to the amusement park. Between what times could they have gone?\nWe know that:\nElizabeth woke up at 7am.\nDavid saw Elizabeth fixing their computer at the electronic store from 1pm to 2pm.\nSarah saw Elizabeth playing tennis at the tennis court from 2pm to 3pm.\nSusan saw Elizabeth walking towards the Statue of Liberty from 3pm to 6pm.\nAndrew saw Elizabeth taking photos near the Eiffel Tower from 6pm to 9pm.\nEmily saw Elizabeth getting a coffee at the cafe from 9pm to 10pm.\nThe amusement park was closed after 10pm.\nBetween what times could Elizabeth have gone to the amusement park?\nOptions:\n(A) 7am to 1pm\n(B) 9pm to 10pm\n(C) 1pm to 2pm\n(D) 3pm to 6pm\nA: Let's think step by step.\nWake-up time: 7am.\n7am-1pm: free.\n1pm-2pm: fixing their computer at the electronic store.\n2pm-3pm: playing tennis at the tennis court.\n3pm-6pm: walking towards the Statue of Liberty.\n6pm-9pm: taking photos near the Eiffel Tower.\n9pm-10pm: getting a coffee at the cafe.\nThe amusement park closure time: 10pm.\nThe only time when Elizabeth could have gone to the amusement park was 7am to 1pm. So the answer is (A).\n\nQ: Today, Tiffany went to the beach. Between what times could they have gone?\nWe know that:\nTiffany woke up at 5am.\nBetty saw Tiffany getting a coffee at the cafe from 5am to 6am.\nJessica saw Tiffany working at the office from 6am to 9am.\nJohn saw Tiffany stretching at a yoga studio from 9am to 12pm.\nSean saw Tiffany sitting on a rooftop from 12pm to 2pm.\nSarah saw Tiffany playing tennis at the tennis court from 2pm to 3pm.\nThe beach was closed after 4pm.\nBetween what times could Tiffany have gone to the beach?\nOptions:\n(A) 9am to 12pm\n(B) 12pm to 2pm\n(C) 5am to 6am\n(D) 3pm to 4pm\nA: Let's think step by step.\nWake-up time: 5am.\n5am-6am: getting a coffee at the cafe.\n6am-9am: working at the office.\n9am-12pm: stretching at a yoga studio.\n12pm-2pm: sitting on a rooftop.\n2pm-3pm: playing tennis at the tennis court.\n3pm-4pm: free.\nThe beach closure time: 4pm.\nThe only time when Tiffany could have gone to the beach was 3pm to 4pm. So the answer is (D).\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA: Let's think step by step."
 "include": "_cot_fewshot_template_yaml"
 "task": "bbh_cot_fewshot_temporal_sequences"
+filter_list:
+  - name: "flexible-extract"
+    filter:
+      - function: !function utils.MultiChoiceRegexFilter
+        group_select: -1
+        ignore_case: true
+        ignore_punctuation: true
+        regex_pattern: "(\\([A-Z]\\))"
+      - function: "take_first"
+  - name: "strict-match"
+    filter:
+      - function: "regex"
+        regex_pattern: "((?<=The answer is )(.*)(?=.)|(?<=the answer is )(.*)(?=.)|(?<=The answer: )(.*)(?=.)|(?<=The final answer: )(.*)(?=.))"
+      - function: "take_first"

lm_eval/tasks/bbh/cot_fewshot/tracking_shuffled_objects_five_objects.yaml

 "dataset_name": "tracking_shuffled_objects_five_objects"
 "description": "A task requiring determining the final positions of a set of objects given their initial positions and a description of a sequence of swaps.\n\n"
-"doc_to_text": "Q: Alice, Bob, and Claire are playing a game. At the start of the game, they are each holding a ball: Alice has a yellow ball, Bob has a blue ball, and Claire has a pink ball.\nAs the game progresses, pairs of players trade balls. First, Claire and Alice swap balls. Then, Alice and Bob swap balls. Finally, Claire and Bob swap balls. At the end of the game, Bob has the\nOptions:\n(A) yellow ball\n(B) blue ball\n(C) pink ball\nA: Let's think step by step.\n(0) At the start: Alice: yellow, Bob: blue, Claire: pink.\n(1) Claire and Alice swap balls: Alice: pink, Bob: blue, Claire: yellow.\n(2)  Alice and Bob swap balls: Alice: blue, Bob: pink, Claire: yellow.\n(3) Claire and Bob swap balls: Alice: blue, Bob: yellow, Claire: pink.\nAt the end of the game, Bob has the yellow ball. So the answer is (A).\n\nQ: Alice, Bob, and Claire are playing a game. At the start of the game, they are each holding a ball: Alice has a white ball, Bob has a purple ball, and Claire has a pink ball.\nAs the game progresses, pairs of players trade balls. First, Bob and Alice swap balls. Then, Bob and Claire swap balls. Finally, Bob and Alice swap balls. At the end of the game, Alice has the\nOptions:\n(A) white ball\n(B) purple ball\n(C) pink ball\nA: Let's think step by step.\n(0) At the start: Alice: white, Bob: purple, Claire: pink.\n(1) Bob and Alice swap balls: Alice: purple, Bob: white, Claire: pink.\n(2) Bob and Claire swap balls: Alice: purple, Bob: pink, Claire: white.\n(3) Bob and Alice swap balls: Alice: pink, Bob: purple, Claire: white.\nAt the end of the game, Alice has the pink ball. So the answer is (C).\n\nQ: Alice, Bob, and Claire are dancers at a square dance. At the start of a song, they each have a partner: Alice is dancing with Lola, Bob is dancing with Rodrigo, and Claire is dancing with Patrick.\nThroughout the song, the dancers often trade partners. First, Alice and Bob switch partners. Then, Claire and Bob switch partners. Finally, Bob and Alice switch partners. At the end of the dance, Alice is dancing with\nOptions:\n(A) Lola\n(B) Rodrigo\n(C) Patrick\nA: Let's think step by step.\n(0) At the start: Alice: Lola, Bob: Rodrigo, Claire: Patrick.\n(1) Alice and Bob switch partners: Alice: Rodrigo, Bob: Lola, Claire: Patrick.\n(2) Claire and Bob switch partners: Alice: Rodrigo, Bob: Patrick, Claire: Lola.\n(3) Bob and Alice switch partners: Alice: Patrick, Bob: Rodrigo, Claire: Lola.\nAt the end of the dance, Alice is dancing with Patrick. So the answer is (C).\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA: Let's think step by step.\n"
+"doc_to_text": "Q: Alice, Bob, and Claire are playing a game. At the start of the game, they are each holding a ball: Alice has a yellow ball, Bob has a blue ball, and Claire has a pink ball.\nAs the game progresses, pairs of players trade balls. First, Claire and Alice swap balls. Then, Alice and Bob swap balls. Finally, Claire and Bob swap balls. At the end of the game, Bob has the\nOptions:\n(A) yellow ball\n(B) blue ball\n(C) pink ball\nA: Let's think step by step.\n(0) At the start: Alice: yellow, Bob: blue, Claire: pink.\n(1) Claire and Alice swap balls: Alice: pink, Bob: blue, Claire: yellow.\n(2)  Alice and Bob swap balls: Alice: blue, Bob: pink, Claire: yellow.\n(3) Claire and Bob swap balls: Alice: blue, Bob: yellow, Claire: pink.\nAt the end of the game, Bob has the yellow ball. So the answer is (A).\n\nQ: Alice, Bob, and Claire are playing a game. At the start of the game, they are each holding a ball: Alice has a white ball, Bob has a purple ball, and Claire has a pink ball.\nAs the game progresses, pairs of players trade balls. First, Bob and Alice swap balls. Then, Bob and Claire swap balls. Finally, Bob and Alice swap balls. At the end of the game, Alice has the\nOptions:\n(A) white ball\n(B) purple ball\n(C) pink ball\nA: Let's think step by step.\n(0) At the start: Alice: white, Bob: purple, Claire: pink.\n(1) Bob and Alice swap balls: Alice: purple, Bob: white, Claire: pink.\n(2) Bob and Claire swap balls: Alice: purple, Bob: pink, Claire: white.\n(3) Bob and Alice swap balls: Alice: pink, Bob: purple, Claire: white.\nAt the end of the game, Alice has the pink ball. So the answer is (C).\n\nQ: Alice, Bob, and Claire are dancers at a square dance. At the start of a song, they each have a partner: Alice is dancing with Lola, Bob is dancing with Rodrigo, and Claire is dancing with Patrick.\nThroughout the song, the dancers often trade partners. First, Alice and Bob switch partners. Then, Claire and Bob switch partners. Finally, Bob and Alice switch partners. At the end of the dance, Alice is dancing with\nOptions:\n(A) Lola\n(B) Rodrigo\n(C) Patrick\nA: Let's think step by step.\n(0) At the start: Alice: Lola, Bob: Rodrigo, Claire: Patrick.\n(1) Alice and Bob switch partners: Alice: Rodrigo, Bob: Lola, Claire: Patrick.\n(2) Claire and Bob switch partners: Alice: Rodrigo, Bob: Patrick, Claire: Lola.\n(3) Bob and Alice switch partners: Alice: Patrick, Bob: Rodrigo, Claire: Lola.\nAt the end of the dance, Alice is dancing with Patrick. So the answer is (C).\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA: Let's think step by step."
 "include": "_cot_fewshot_template_yaml"
 "task": "bbh_cot_fewshot_tracking_shuffled_objects_five_objects"
+filter_list:
+  - name: "flexible-extract"
+    filter:
+      - function: !function utils.MultiChoiceRegexFilter
+        group_select: -1
+        ignore_case: true
+        ignore_punctuation: true
+        regex_pattern: "(\\([A-Z]\\))"
+      - function: "take_first"
+  - name: "strict-match"
+    filter:
+      - function: "regex"
+        regex_pattern: "((?<=The answer is )(.*)(?=.)|(?<=the answer is )(.*)(?=.)|(?<=The answer: )(.*)(?=.)|(?<=The final answer: )(.*)(?=.))"
+      - function: "take_first"

lm_eval/tasks/bbh/cot_fewshot/tracking_shuffled_objects_seven_objects.yaml

 "dataset_name": "tracking_shuffled_objects_seven_objects"
 "description": "A task requiring determining the final positions of a set of objects given their initial positions and a description of a sequence of swaps.\n\n"
-"doc_to_text": "Q: Alice, Bob, and Claire are playing a game. At the start of the game, they are each holding a ball: Alice has a yellow ball, Bob has a blue ball, and Claire has a pink ball.\nAs the game progresses, pairs of players trade balls. First, Claire and Alice swap balls. Then, Alice and Bob swap balls. Finally, Claire and Bob swap balls. At the end of the game, Bob has the\nOptions:\n(A) yellow ball\n(B) blue ball\n(C) pink ball\nA: Let's think step by step.\n(0) At the start: Alice: yellow, Bob: blue, Claire: pink.\n(1) Claire and Alice swap balls: Alice: pink, Bob: blue, Claire: yellow.\n(2)  Alice and Bob swap balls: Alice: blue, Bob: pink, Claire: yellow.\n(3) Claire and Bob swap balls: Alice: blue, Bob: yellow, Claire: pink.\nAt the end of the game, Bob has the yellow ball. So the answer is (A).\n\nQ: Alice, Bob, and Claire are playing a game. At the start of the game, they are each holding a ball: Alice has a white ball, Bob has a purple ball, and Claire has a pink ball.\nAs the game progresses, pairs of players trade balls. First, Bob and Alice swap balls. Then, Bob and Claire swap balls. Finally, Bob and Alice swap balls. At the end of the game, Alice has the\nOptions:\n(A) white ball\n(B) purple ball\n(C) pink ball\nA: Let's think step by step.\n(0) At the start: Alice: white, Bob: purple, Claire: pink.\n(1) Bob and Alice swap balls: Alice: purple, Bob: white, Claire: pink.\n(2) Bob and Claire swap balls: Alice: purple, Bob: pink, Claire: white.\n(3) Bob and Alice swap balls: Alice: pink, Bob: purple, Claire: white.\nAt the end of the game, Alice has the pink ball. So the answer is (C).\n\nQ: Alice, Bob, and Claire are dancers at a square dance. At the start of a song, they each have a partner: Alice is dancing with Lola, Bob is dancing with Rodrigo, and Claire is dancing with Patrick.\nThroughout the song, the dancers often trade partners. First, Alice and Bob switch partners. Then, Claire and Bob switch partners. Finally, Bob and Alice switch partners. At the end of the dance, Alice is dancing with\nOptions:\n(A) Lola\n(B) Rodrigo\n(C) Patrick\nA: Let's think step by step.\n(0) At the start: Alice: Lola, Bob: Rodrigo, Claire: Patrick.\n(1) Alice and Bob switch partners: Alice: Rodrigo, Bob: Lola, Claire: Patrick.\n(2) Claire and Bob switch partners: Alice: Rodrigo, Bob: Patrick, Claire: Lola.\n(3) Bob and Alice switch partners: Alice: Patrick, Bob: Rodrigo, Claire: Lola.\nAt the end of the dance, Alice is dancing with Patrick. So the answer is (C).\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA: Let's think step by step.\n"
+"doc_to_text": "Q: Alice, Bob, and Claire are playing a game. At the start of the game, they are each holding a ball: Alice has a yellow ball, Bob has a blue ball, and Claire has a pink ball.\nAs the game progresses, pairs of players trade balls. First, Claire and Alice swap balls. Then, Alice and Bob swap balls. Finally, Claire and Bob swap balls. At the end of the game, Bob has the\nOptions:\n(A) yellow ball\n(B) blue ball\n(C) pink ball\nA: Let's think step by step.\n(0) At the start: Alice: yellow, Bob: blue, Claire: pink.\n(1) Claire and Alice swap balls: Alice: pink, Bob: blue, Claire: yellow.\n(2)  Alice and Bob swap balls: Alice: blue, Bob: pink, Claire: yellow.\n(3) Claire and Bob swap balls: Alice: blue, Bob: yellow, Claire: pink.\nAt the end of the game, Bob has the yellow ball. So the answer is (A).\n\nQ: Alice, Bob, and Claire are playing a game. At the start of the game, they are each holding a ball: Alice has a white ball, Bob has a purple ball, and Claire has a pink ball.\nAs the game progresses, pairs of players trade balls. First, Bob and Alice swap balls. Then, Bob and Claire swap balls. Finally, Bob and Alice swap balls. At the end of the game, Alice has the\nOptions:\n(A) white ball\n(B) purple ball\n(C) pink ball\nA: Let's think step by step.\n(0) At the start: Alice: white, Bob: purple, Claire: pink.\n(1) Bob and Alice swap balls: Alice: purple, Bob: white, Claire: pink.\n(2) Bob and Claire swap balls: Alice: purple, Bob: pink, Claire: white.\n(3) Bob and Alice swap balls: Alice: pink, Bob: purple, Claire: white.\nAt the end of the game, Alice has the pink ball. So the answer is (C).\n\nQ: Alice, Bob, and Claire are dancers at a square dance. At the start of a song, they each have a partner: Alice is dancing with Lola, Bob is dancing with Rodrigo, and Claire is dancing with Patrick.\nThroughout the song, the dancers often trade partners. First, Alice and Bob switch partners. Then, Claire and Bob switch partners. Finally, Bob and Alice switch partners. At the end of the dance, Alice is dancing with\nOptions:\n(A) Lola\n(B) Rodrigo\n(C) Patrick\nA: Let's think step by step.\n(0) At the start: Alice: Lola, Bob: Rodrigo, Claire: Patrick.\n(1) Alice and Bob switch partners: Alice: Rodrigo, Bob: Lola, Claire: Patrick.\n(2) Claire and Bob switch partners: Alice: Rodrigo, Bob: Patrick, Claire: Lola.\n(3) Bob and Alice switch partners: Alice: Patrick, Bob: Rodrigo, Claire: Lola.\nAt the end of the dance, Alice is dancing with Patrick. So the answer is (C).\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA: Let's think step by step."
 "include": "_cot_fewshot_template_yaml"
 "task": "bbh_cot_fewshot_tracking_shuffled_objects_seven_objects"
+filter_list:
+  - name: "flexible-extract"
+    filter:
+      - function: !function utils.MultiChoiceRegexFilter
+        group_select: -1
+        ignore_case: true
+        ignore_punctuation: true
+        regex_pattern: "(\\([A-Z]\\))"
+      - function: "take_first"
+  - name: "strict-match"
+    filter:
+      - function: "regex"
+        regex_pattern: "((?<=The answer is )(.*)(?=.)|(?<=the answer is )(.*)(?=.)|(?<=The answer: )(.*)(?=.)|(?<=The final answer: )(.*)(?=.))"
+      - function: "take_first"

lm_eval/tasks/bbh/cot_fewshot/tracking_shuffled_objects_three_objects.yaml

 "dataset_name": "tracking_shuffled_objects_three_objects"
 "description": "A task requiring determining the final positions of a set of objects given their initial positions and a description of a sequence of swaps.\n\n"
-"doc_to_text": "Q: Alice, Bob, and Claire are playing a game. At the start of the game, they are each holding a ball: Alice has a yellow ball, Bob has a blue ball, and Claire has a pink ball.\nAs the game progresses, pairs of players trade balls. First, Claire and Alice swap balls. Then, Alice and Bob swap balls. Finally, Claire and Bob swap balls. At the end of the game, Bob has the\nOptions:\n(A) yellow ball\n(B) blue ball\n(C) pink ball\nA: Let's think step by step.\n(0) At the start: Alice: yellow, Bob: blue, Claire: pink.\n(1) Claire and Alice swap balls: Alice: pink, Bob: blue, Claire: yellow.\n(2)  Alice and Bob swap balls: Alice: blue, Bob: pink, Claire: yellow.\n(3) Claire and Bob swap balls: Alice: blue, Bob: yellow, Claire: pink.\nAt the end of the game, Bob has the yellow ball. So the answer is (A).\n\nQ: Alice, Bob, and Claire are playing a game. At the start of the game, they are each holding a ball: Alice has a white ball, Bob has a purple ball, and Claire has a pink ball.\nAs the game progresses, pairs of players trade balls. First, Bob and Alice swap balls. Then, Bob and Claire swap balls. Finally, Bob and Alice swap balls. At the end of the game, Alice has the\nOptions:\n(A) white ball\n(B) purple ball\n(C) pink ball\nA: Let's think step by step.\n(0) At the start: Alice: white, Bob: purple, Claire: pink.\n(1) Bob and Alice swap balls: Alice: purple, Bob: white, Claire: pink.\n(2) Bob and Claire swap balls: Alice: purple, Bob: pink, Claire: white.\n(3) Bob and Alice swap balls: Alice: pink, Bob: purple, Claire: white.\nAt the end of the game, Alice has the pink ball. So the answer is (C).\n\nQ: Alice, Bob, and Claire are dancers at a square dance. At the start of a song, they each have a partner: Alice is dancing with Lola, Bob is dancing with Rodrigo, and Claire is dancing with Patrick.\nThroughout the song, the dancers often trade partners. First, Alice and Bob switch partners. Then, Claire and Bob switch partners. Finally, Bob and Alice switch partners. At the end of the dance, Alice is dancing with\nOptions:\n(A) Lola\n(B) Rodrigo\n(C) Patrick\nA: Let's think step by step.\n(0) At the start: Alice: Lola, Bob: Rodrigo, Claire: Patrick.\n(1) Alice and Bob switch partners: Alice: Rodrigo, Bob: Lola, Claire: Patrick.\n(2) Claire and Bob switch partners: Alice: Rodrigo, Bob: Patrick, Claire: Lola.\n(3) Bob and Alice switch partners: Alice: Patrick, Bob: Rodrigo, Claire: Lola.\nAt the end of the dance, Alice is dancing with Patrick. So the answer is (C).\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA: Let's think step by step.\n"
+"doc_to_text": "Q: Alice, Bob, and Claire are playing a game. At the start of the game, they are each holding a ball: Alice has a yellow ball, Bob has a blue ball, and Claire has a pink ball.\nAs the game progresses, pairs of players trade balls. First, Claire and Alice swap balls. Then, Alice and Bob swap balls. Finally, Claire and Bob swap balls. At the end of the game, Bob has the\nOptions:\n(A) yellow ball\n(B) blue ball\n(C) pink ball\nA: Let's think step by step.\n(0) At the start: Alice: yellow, Bob: blue, Claire: pink.\n(1) Claire and Alice swap balls: Alice: pink, Bob: blue, Claire: yellow.\n(2)  Alice and Bob swap balls: Alice: blue, Bob: pink, Claire: yellow.\n(3) Claire and Bob swap balls: Alice: blue, Bob: yellow, Claire: pink.\nAt the end of the game, Bob has the yellow ball. So the answer is (A).\n\nQ: Alice, Bob, and Claire are playing a game. At the start of the game, they are each holding a ball: Alice has a white ball, Bob has a purple ball, and Claire has a pink ball.\nAs the game progresses, pairs of players trade balls. First, Bob and Alice swap balls. Then, Bob and Claire swap balls. Finally, Bob and Alice swap balls. At the end of the game, Alice has the\nOptions:\n(A) white ball\n(B) purple ball\n(C) pink ball\nA: Let's think step by step.\n(0) At the start: Alice: white, Bob: purple, Claire: pink.\n(1) Bob and Alice swap balls: Alice: purple, Bob: white, Claire: pink.\n(2) Bob and Claire swap balls: Alice: purple, Bob: pink, Claire: white.\n(3) Bob and Alice swap balls: Alice: pink, Bob: purple, Claire: white.\nAt the end of the game, Alice has the pink ball. So the answer is (C).\n\nQ: Alice, Bob, and Claire are dancers at a square dance. At the start of a song, they each have a partner: Alice is dancing with Lola, Bob is dancing with Rodrigo, and Claire is dancing with Patrick.\nThroughout the song, the dancers often trade partners. First, Alice and Bob switch partners. Then, Claire and Bob switch partners. Finally, Bob and Alice switch partners. At the end of the dance, Alice is dancing with\nOptions:\n(A) Lola\n(B) Rodrigo\n(C) Patrick\nA: Let's think step by step.\n(0) At the start: Alice: Lola, Bob: Rodrigo, Claire: Patrick.\n(1) Alice and Bob switch partners: Alice: Rodrigo, Bob: Lola, Claire: Patrick.\n(2) Claire and Bob switch partners: Alice: Rodrigo, Bob: Patrick, Claire: Lola.\n(3) Bob and Alice switch partners: Alice: Patrick, Bob: Rodrigo, Claire: Lola.\nAt the end of the dance, Alice is dancing with Patrick. So the answer is (C).\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA: Let's think step by step."
 "include": "_cot_fewshot_template_yaml"
 "task": "bbh_cot_fewshot_tracking_shuffled_objects_three_objects"
+filter_list:
+  - name: "flexible-extract"
+    filter:
+      - function: !function utils.MultiChoiceRegexFilter
+        group_select: -1
+        ignore_case: true
+        ignore_punctuation: true
+        regex_pattern: "(\\([A-Z]\\))"
+      - function: "take_first"
+  - name: "strict-match"
+    filter:
+      - function: "regex"
+        regex_pattern: "((?<=The answer is )(.*)(?=.)|(?<=the answer is )(.*)(?=.)|(?<=The answer: )(.*)(?=.)|(?<=The final answer: )(.*)(?=.))"
+      - function: "take_first"

lm_eval/tasks/bbh/cot_fewshot/utils.py

+import collections
+import re
+import sys
+import unicodedata
+
+from lm_eval.filters.extraction import Filter, RegexFilter
+
+
+class ExtendedRegexFilter(RegexFilter):
+    punct_tbl = dict.fromkeys(
+        i for i in range(sys.maxunicode) if unicodedata.category(chr(i)).startswith("P")
+    )
+
+    def __init__(
+        self,
+        regex_pattern: str = r"#### (\-?[0-9\.\,]+)",
+        group_select=0,
+        fallback: str = "[invalid]",
+        ignore_case=False,
+        ignore_punctuation=False,
+        regexes_to_ignore=None,
+    ) -> None:
+        super().__init__(regex_pattern, group_select, fallback)
+        self.ignore_case = ignore_case
+        self.ignore_punctuation = ignore_punctuation
+        self.regexes_to_ignore = regexes_to_ignore
+
+    def filter_ignores(self, st):
+        if self.regexes_to_ignore is not None:
+            for s in self.regexes_to_ignore:
+                st = re.sub(s, "", st)
+
+        if self.ignore_case:
+            st = st.lower()
+
+        if self.ignore_punctuation:
+            # https://stackoverflow.com/a/266162
+            st = st.translate(self.punct_tbl)
+        return st
+
+    def find_match(self, regex, resp, convert_dict={}):
+        match = regex.findall(resp)
+        if match:
+            match = match[self.group_select]
+            if isinstance(match, tuple):
+                match = [m for m in match if m][0]
+            match = match.strip()
+            if match and match in convert_dict:
+                match = convert_dict[match]
+        return match
+
+
+class MapRegexFilter(ExtendedRegexFilter):
+    def __init__(
+        self,
+        regex_pattern_to_value: dict = {},
+        group_select=0,
+        fallback: str = "[invalid]",
+        ignore_case=False,
+        ignore_punctuation=False,
+        regexes_to_ignore=None,
+    ) -> None:
+        """
+        regex_pattern_to_value: Match the regex pattern and change the result into the value
+        group_select: Selects the (group_select)th match from the findall result. We use the whole regex_patterns, concatenated by |
+        ignore_case: Lowers the case of response before matching with the given regex
+        ignore_punctuation: Remove the punctuation before matching with the given regex
+        regexes_to_ignore: Remove these regexes before matching with the given regex
+        """
+        super().__init__(
+            "|".join(list(regex_pattern_to_value.keys())),
+            group_select,
+            fallback,
+            ignore_case,
+            ignore_punctuation,
+            regexes_to_ignore,
+        )
+        self.regex_to_value = {
+            re.compile(r): v for r, v in regex_pattern_to_value.items()
+        }
+
+    def apply(self, resps, docs):
+        filtered_resps = []
+
+        for r in resps:
+            filtered = []
+            for resp in r:
+                whole_match_considering_group_select = self.find_match(
+                    self.regex, self.filter_ignores(resp)
+                )
+                if whole_match_considering_group_select:
+                    for regex, mapped_value in self.regex_to_value.items():
+                        match = self.find_match(
+                            regex,
+                            self.filter_ignores(whole_match_considering_group_select),
+                        )
+                        if match:
+                            match = mapped_value
+                            break
+                if not whole_match_considering_group_select or not match:
+                    match = self.fallback
+
+                filtered.append(match)
+            filtered_resps.append(filtered)
+
+        return filtered_resps
+
+
+class NumberParseRegexFilter(ExtendedRegexFilter):
+    def apply(self, resps, docs):
+        # here, we assume we have a list, in which each element is
+        # a list of model responses for some particular input/target pair.
+        # so we process each of these (same input/target response sets)
+        # independently (and keep them a list.)
+        filtered_resps = []
+        import regex
+        from word2number import w2n
+
+        # https://www.reddit.com/r/regex/comments/11a38uk/parsing_numbers_written_out_as_english_words
+        english_number_regex = regex.compile(
+            "((?:(?:zero|one|two|three|four|five|(?:twen|thir|for|fif|six|seven|nine)(?|teen|ty)|eight(?:|een|y)|ten|eleven|twelve|fourteen|hundred|thousand|(?:m|b|tr)illion)(?:zero|one|two|three|four|five|(?:twen|thir|for|fif|six|seven|nine)(?:|teen|ty)|eight(?|een|y)|ten|eleven|twelve|fourteen|hundred|thousand|(?:m|b|tr)illion|[^\S\r\n]|,|and|&)+)?(?:zero|one|two|three|four|five|(?:twen|thir|for|fif|six|seven|nine)(?|teen|ty)|eight(?|een|y)|ten|eleven|twelve|fourteen|hundred|thousand|(?:m|b|tr)illion))"
+        )
+
+        for r in resps:
+            filtered = []
+            for resp in r:
+                match = self.find_match(self.regex, resp)
+                if not match:
+                    match = self.find_match(english_number_regex, resp.lower())
+                    if match:
+                        match = str(w2n.word_to_num(match))
+                if not match:
+                    match = self.fallback
+                filtered.append(match)
+            filtered_resps.append(filtered)
+
+        return filtered_resps
+
+
+class WordSortFilter(Filter):
+    """ """
+
+    def apply(self, resps, docs):
+        filtered_resps = []
+
+        for r, doc in zip(resps, docs):
+            words = doc["input"].split("List:")[1].strip().split()
+            regex = re.compile("|".join([f"\\b{w}\\b" for w in words]))
+            filtered = []
+            for resp in r:
+                match = regex.findall(resp)
+                match.reverse()
+                ordered_words = reversed(
+                    collections.OrderedDict(zip(match, [None] * len(match)))
+                )
+                filtered.append(" ".join(ordered_words))
+            filtered_resps.append(filtered)
+
+        return filtered_resps
+
+
+class MultiChoiceRegexFilter(ExtendedRegexFilter):
+    def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
+        """
+        regex_pattern: The basic regex pattern to use. If fails to match, we will use the customized match procedure
+                        - step 1 : We parse the choices between ([A-Z])s then try to find these choices in the response.
+                        - step 2 : We parse the choice with regex :[\s]*([A-?]), where ? varies by number of choices.
+        group_select: Selects the (group_select)th match from the findall result.
+        ignore_case: Ignores the case during step 1 matching
+        ignore_punctuation: Remove the punctuation during step 1 matching
+        regexes_to_ignore: Remove these regexes during step 1 matching
+        """
+        super().__init__(*args, **kwargs)
+
+    def apply(self, resps, docs):
+        # here, we assume we have a list, in which each element is
+        # a list of model responses for some particular input/target pair.
+        # so we process each of these (same input/target response sets)
+        # independently (and keep them a list.)
+
+        filtered_resps = []
+
+        for r, doc in zip(resps, docs):
+            fallback_regexes = []
+            choice_to_alpha = {}
+            next_alpha = "A"
+
+            without_paren_fallback_regexes = []
+            without_paren_to_target = {}
+
+            multiple_choices_regex = re.compile(r"\([A-Z]\)([^\n^(]*)")
+            match = multiple_choices_regex.findall(doc["input"])
+            for m in match:
+                m = self.filter_ignores(m.strip())
+                fallback_regexes.append(f"{re.escape(m)}")
+                choice_to_alpha[m] = f"({next_alpha})"
+
+                without_paren_fallback_regexes.append(next_alpha)
+                without_paren_to_target[next_alpha] = f"({next_alpha})"
+
+                next_alpha = chr(ord(next_alpha) + 1)
+            fallback_regex = re.compile("|".join(fallback_regexes))
+            without_paren_fallback_regex = "|".join(without_paren_fallback_regexes)
+            without_paren_fallback_regex = re.compile(
+                f":[\s]*({without_paren_fallback_regex})"
+            )
+
+            filtered = []
+            for resp in r:
+                match = self.find_match(self.regex, resp)
+                if not match:
+                    match = self.find_match(
+                        fallback_regex, self.filter_ignores(resp), choice_to_alpha
+                    )
+                    if not match:
+                        match = self.find_match(
+                            without_paren_fallback_regex, resp, without_paren_to_target
+                        )
+                if not match:
+                    match = self.fallback
+                filtered.append(match)
+            filtered_resps.append(filtered)
+
+        return filtered_resps

lm_eval/tasks/bbh/cot_fewshot/web_of_lies.yaml

 "dataset_name": "web_of_lies"
 "description": "Evaluate a random boolean function expressed as a word problem.\n\n"
-"doc_to_text": "Q: Question: Fidel tells the truth. Jerry says Fidel tells the truth. Vina says Jerry tells the truth. Millicent says Vina lies. Raymond says Millicent lies. Does Raymond tell the truth?\nA: Let's think step by step.\n(1) Fidel tells the truth. So, we know that Fidel tells the truth.\n(2) Jerry says Fidel tells the truth. Since we know from (1) that Fidel tells the truth, if Jerry says that Fidel tells the truth, then Jerry tells the truth.\n(3) Vina says Jerry tells the truth. Since we know from (2) that Jerry tells the truth, if Vina says Jerry tells the truth, then Vine tells the truth.\n(4) Millicent says Vina lies. Since we know from (3) that Vina tells the truth, if Millicent says Vina lies, then Millicent lies.\n(5) Raymond says Millicent lies. Since we know from (4) that Millicent lies, if Raymond says Millicent lies, then Raymond tells the truth.\nNow, the question asks: Does Raymond tell the truth? We know from (5) that Raymond tells the truth. So the answer is Yes.\n\nQ: Question: Kristian lies. Millie says Kristian lies. Maybelle says Millie tells the truth. Fidel says Maybelle lies. Leda says Fidel lies. Does Leda tell the truth?\nA: Let's think step by step.\n(1) Kristian lies. So, we know that Kristian lies.\n(2) Millie says Kristian lies. Since we know from (1) that Kristian lies, if Millie says Kristian lies, then Millie tells the truth.\n(3) Maybelle says Millie tells the truth. Since we know from (2) that Millie tells the truth, if Maybelle says Millie tells the truth, then Maybelle tells the truth.\n(4) Fidel says Maybelle lies. Since we know from (3) that Maybelle tells the truth, if Fidel says Maybelle lies, then Fidel lies.\n(5) Leda says Fidel lies. Since we know from (4) that Fidel lies, if Leda says Fidel lies, then Leda tells the truth.\nNow, the question asks: Does Leda tell the truth? We know from (5) that Leda tells the truth. So the answer is Yes.\n\nQ: Question: Kristian tells the truth. Michaela says Kristian lies. Raymond says Michaela tells the truth. Osvaldo says Raymond tells the truth. Jamey says Osvaldo tells the truth. Does Jamey tell the truth?\nA: Let's think step by step.\n(1) Kristian tells the truth. So, we know that Kristian tells the truth.\n(2) Michaela says Kristian lies. Since we know from (1) that Kristian tells the truth, if Michaela says Kristian lies, then Michaela lies.\n(3) Raymond says Michaela tells the truth. Since we know from (2) that Michaela lies, if Raymond says Michaela tells the truth, then Raymond lies.\n(4) Osvaldo says Raymond tells the truth. Since we know from (3) that Raymond lies, if Osvaldo says Raymond tells the truth, then Osvaldo lies.\n(5) Jamey says Osvaldo tells the truth. Since we know from (4) that Osvaldo lies, if Jamey says Osvaldo tells the truth, then Jamey lies.\nNow, the question asks: Does Jamey tell the truth? We know from (5) that Jamey lies. So the answer is No.\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA: Let's think step by step.\n"
+"doc_to_text": "Q: Question: Fidel tells the truth. Jerry says Fidel tells the truth. Vina says Jerry tells the truth. Millicent says Vina lies. Raymond says Millicent lies. Does Raymond tell the truth?\nA: Let's think step by step.\n(1) Fidel tells the truth. So, we know that Fidel tells the truth.\n(2) Jerry says Fidel tells the truth. Since we know from (1) that Fidel tells the truth, if Jerry says that Fidel tells the truth, then Jerry tells the truth.\n(3) Vina says Jerry tells the truth. Since we know from (2) that Jerry tells the truth, if Vina says Jerry tells the truth, then Vine tells the truth.\n(4) Millicent says Vina lies. Since we know from (3) that Vina tells the truth, if Millicent says Vina lies, then Millicent lies.\n(5) Raymond says Millicent lies. Since we know from (4) that Millicent lies, if Raymond says Millicent lies, then Raymond tells the truth.\nNow, the question asks: Does Raymond tell the truth? We know from (5) that Raymond tells the truth. So the answer is Yes.\n\nQ: Question: Kristian lies. Millie says Kristian lies. Maybelle says Millie tells the truth. Fidel says Maybelle lies. Leda says Fidel lies. Does Leda tell the truth?\nA: Let's think step by step.\n(1) Kristian lies. So, we know that Kristian lies.\n(2) Millie says Kristian lies. Since we know from (1) that Kristian lies, if Millie says Kristian lies, then Millie tells the truth.\n(3) Maybelle says Millie tells the truth. Since we know from (2) that Millie tells the truth, if Maybelle says Millie tells the truth, then Maybelle tells the truth.\n(4) Fidel says Maybelle lies. Since we know from (3) that Maybelle tells the truth, if Fidel says Maybelle lies, then Fidel lies.\n(5) Leda says Fidel lies. Since we know from (4) that Fidel lies, if Leda says Fidel lies, then Leda tells the truth.\nNow, the question asks: Does Leda tell the truth? We know from (5) that Leda tells the truth. So the answer is Yes.\n\nQ: Question: Kristian tells the truth. Michaela says Kristian lies. Raymond says Michaela tells the truth. Osvaldo says Raymond tells the truth. Jamey says Osvaldo tells the truth. Does Jamey tell the truth?\nA: Let's think step by step.\n(1) Kristian tells the truth. So, we know that Kristian tells the truth.\n(2) Michaela says Kristian lies. Since we know from (1) that Kristian tells the truth, if Michaela says Kristian lies, then Michaela lies.\n(3) Raymond says Michaela tells the truth. Since we know from (2) that Michaela lies, if Raymond says Michaela tells the truth, then Raymond lies.\n(4) Osvaldo says Raymond tells the truth. Since we know from (3) that Raymond lies, if Osvaldo says Raymond tells the truth, then Osvaldo lies.\n(5) Jamey says Osvaldo tells the truth. Since we know from (4) that Osvaldo lies, if Jamey says Osvaldo tells the truth, then Jamey lies.\nNow, the question asks: Does Jamey tell the truth? We know from (5) that Jamey lies. So the answer is No.\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA: Let's think step by step."
 "include": "_cot_fewshot_template_yaml"
 "task": "bbh_cot_fewshot_web_of_lies"
+filter_list:
+  - name: "flexible-extract"
+    filter:
+      - function: !function utils.MapRegexFilter
+        group_select: -1
+        ignore_case: true
+        regex_pattern_to_value:
+          \b(no|does not tell the truth|is not telling the truth)\b: "no"
+          \b(yes|tells the truth|is telling the truth)\b: "yes"
+      - function: "take_first"
+  - name: "strict-match"
+    filter:
+      - function: "regex"
+        regex_pattern: "((?<=The answer is )(.*)(?=.)|(?<=the answer is )(.*)(?=.)|(?<=The answer: )(.*)(?=.)|(?<=The final answer: )(.*)(?=.))"
+      - function: "take_first"

lm_eval/tasks/bbh/cot_fewshot/word_sorting.yaml

 "dataset_name": "word_sorting"
 "description": "Sort a list of words.\n\n"
-"doc_to_text": "Q: Sort the following words alphabetically: List: oven costume counterpart\nA: Let's think step by step.\nThe first letter: \"oven\": \"o\" (15). \"costume\": \"c\" (3). \"counterpart\": \"c\" (3). We now have: (3) [\"costume\" ? \"counterpart\"] < (15) \"oven\". Now let's sort this subpart [\"costume\" ? \"counterpart\"] by looking at their second letters.\nThe second letter: \"costume\": \"o\" (15). \"counterpart\": \"o\" (15). We now have: (15) [\"costume\" ? \"counterpart\"]. Now let's sort this subpart [\"costume\" ? \"counterpart\"] by looking at their third letters.\nThe third letter: \"costume\": \"s\" (19). \"counterpart\": \"u\" (21). We now have: (19) \"costume\" < (21) \"counterpart\". Hence, we have [\"costume\" < \"counterpart\"] < \"oven\". So the answer is costume counterpart oven.\n\nQ: Sort the following words alphabetically: List: hypochlorite ponderosa phone credulity\nA: Let's think step by step.\nThe first letter: \"hypochlorite\": \"h\" (8). \"ponderosa\": \"p\" (16). \"phone\": \"p\" (16). \"credulity\": \"c\" (3). We now have: (3) \"credulity\" < (8) \"hypochlorite\" < (16) [\"ponderosa\" ? \"phone\"]. Now let's sort this subpart [\"ponderosa\" ? \"phone\"] by looking at their second letters.\nThe second letter: \"ponderosa\": \"o\" (15). \"phone\": \"h\" (8). We now have: (8) \"phone\" < (15) \"ponderosa\". Hence, we have \"credulity\" < \"hypochlorite\" < [\"phone\" <\"ponderosa\"]. So the answer is credulity hypochlorite phone ponderosa.\n\nQ: Sort the following words alphabetically: List: newt arson parthia seismography mugho aspect census\nA: Let's think step by step.\nThe first letter: \"newt\": \"n\" (14). \"arson\": \"a\" (1). \"parthia\": \"p\" (16). \"seismography\": \"s\" (19). \"mugho\": \"m\" (13). \"aspect\": \"a\" (1). \"census\": \"c\" (3). We now have: (1) [\"arson\" ? \"aspect\"] < (3) \"census\" < (13) \"mugho\" < (14) \"newt\" < (16) \"parthia\" < (19) \"seismography\". Now let's sort this subpart [\"arson\" ? \"aspect\"] by looking at their second letters.\nThe second letter: \"arson\": \"r\" (18). \"aspect\": \"s\" (19). We now have: (18) \"arson\" < (19) \"aspect\". Hence, we have [\"arson\" < \"aspect\"] < \"census\" < \"mugho\" < \"newt\" < \"parthia\" < \"seismography\". So the answer is arson aspect census mugho newt parthia seismography.\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA: Let's think step by step.\n"
+"doc_to_text": "Q: Sort the following words alphabetically: List: oven costume counterpart\nA: Let's think step by step.\nThe first letter: \"oven\": \"o\" (15). \"costume\": \"c\" (3). \"counterpart\": \"c\" (3). We now have: (3) [\"costume\" ? \"counterpart\"] < (15) \"oven\". Now let's sort this subpart [\"costume\" ? \"counterpart\"] by looking at their second letters.\nThe second letter: \"costume\": \"o\" (15). \"counterpart\": \"o\" (15). We now have: (15) [\"costume\" ? \"counterpart\"]. Now let's sort this subpart [\"costume\" ? \"counterpart\"] by looking at their third letters.\nThe third letter: \"costume\": \"s\" (19). \"counterpart\": \"u\" (21). We now have: (19) \"costume\" < (21) \"counterpart\". Hence, we have [\"costume\" < \"counterpart\"] < \"oven\". So the answer is costume counterpart oven.\n\nQ: Sort the following words alphabetically: List: hypochlorite ponderosa phone credulity\nA: Let's think step by step.\nThe first letter: \"hypochlorite\": \"h\" (8). \"ponderosa\": \"p\" (16). \"phone\": \"p\" (16). \"credulity\": \"c\" (3). We now have: (3) \"credulity\" < (8) \"hypochlorite\" < (16) [\"ponderosa\" ? \"phone\"]. Now let's sort this subpart [\"ponderosa\" ? \"phone\"] by looking at their second letters.\nThe second letter: \"ponderosa\": \"o\" (15). \"phone\": \"h\" (8). We now have: (8) \"phone\" < (15) \"ponderosa\". Hence, we have \"credulity\" < \"hypochlorite\" < [\"phone\" <\"ponderosa\"]. So the answer is credulity hypochlorite phone ponderosa.\n\nQ: Sort the following words alphabetically: List: newt arson parthia seismography mugho aspect census\nA: Let's think step by step.\nThe first letter: \"newt\": \"n\" (14). \"arson\": \"a\" (1). \"parthia\": \"p\" (16). \"seismography\": \"s\" (19). \"mugho\": \"m\" (13). \"aspect\": \"a\" (1). \"census\": \"c\" (3). We now have: (1) [\"arson\" ? \"aspect\"] < (3) \"census\" < (13) \"mugho\" < (14) \"newt\" < (16) \"parthia\" < (19) \"seismography\". Now let's sort this subpart [\"arson\" ? \"aspect\"] by looking at their second letters.\nThe second letter: \"arson\": \"r\" (18). \"aspect\": \"s\" (19). We now have: (18) \"arson\" < (19) \"aspect\". Hence, we have [\"arson\" < \"aspect\"] < \"census\" < \"mugho\" < \"newt\" < \"parthia\" < \"seismography\". So the answer is arson aspect census mugho newt parthia seismography.\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA: Let's think step by step."
 "include": "_cot_fewshot_template_yaml"
 "task": "bbh_cot_fewshot_word_sorting"
+filter_list:
+  - name: "flexible-extract"
+    filter:
+      - function: !function utils.WordSortFilter
+      - function: "take_first"
+  - name: "strict-match"
+    filter:
+      - function: "regex"
+        regex_pattern: "((?<=The answer is )(.*)(?=.)|(?<=the answer is )(.*)(?=.)|(?<=The answer: )(.*)(?=.)|(?<=The final answer: )(.*)(?=.))"
+      - function: "take_first"

lm_eval/tasks/bbh/fewshot/_fewshot_template_yaml

@@ -7,16 +7,22 @@ metric_list:
   - metric: exact_match
     aggregation: mean
     higher_is_better: true
-    # ignore_case: true
+    ignore_case: true
     # ignore_punctuation: true
+    regexes_to_ignore:
+      - "\\.$"
+      - ","
+      - "\\\\"
+      - "\n"
+      - '"'
 generation_kwargs:
   until:
     - "</s>"
-    - "Q"
-    - "\n\n"
+    - "Q:"
+    - "<|im_end|>"
   do_sample: false
   temperature: 0.0
 num_fewshot: 0
 metadata:
-  version: 1.0
+  version: 2.0
   num_fewshot: 3 # will be printed in results table

lm_eval/tasks/bbh/fewshot/boolean_expressions.yaml

@@ -3,3 +3,13 @@
 "doc_to_text": "Q: not ( ( not not True ) ) is\nA: False\n\nQ: True and False and not True and True is\nA: False\n\nQ: not not ( not ( False ) ) is\nA: True\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA:"
 "include": "_fewshot_template_yaml"
 "task": "bbh_fewshot_boolean_expressions"
+filter_list:
+  - name: "strict-match"
+    filter:
+      - function: "take_first"
+  - name: "flexible-extract"
+    filter:
+      - function: "regex"
+        group_select: 0
+        regex_pattern: "\\b(True|False)\\b"
+      - function: "take_first"

lm_eval/tasks/bbh/fewshot/causal_judgement.yaml

@@ -3,3 +3,13 @@
 "doc_to_text": "Q: How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nFrank T., had an ongoing dispute with his neighbor over a stretch of land and one day decided to shoot his neighbor in the body. Frank T. had no experience with guns, his hand slipped on the barrel of the gun, and the shot went wild. Nonetheless, the bullet bounced off a large boulder several feet away and hit the neighbor's body, causing significant injury. Did Frank T. intentionally shoot his neighbor in the body?\nOptions:\n- Yes\n- No\nA: No\n\nQ: How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nSuzy and Billy are working on a project that is very important for our nation's security. The boss tells them both: \"Be sure that you are here at exactly 9 am. It is absolutely essential that you arrive at that time.\" Both Billy and Suzy arrive at 9 am. As it happens, there was a motion detector installed in the room where they arrived. The motion detector was set up to be triggered if at least one person appeared in the room at the same time. So the motion detector went off. Did Billy cause the motion detector to go off?\nOptions:\n- Yes\n- No\nA: Yes\n\nQ: How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nGeorge and his sister Lena reunite at their parents' house for Thanksgiving. Whereas George just got into medical school, Lena is unhappy in her marriage and recently lost her job. Over the course of the day, George and Lena get into a number of heated arguments. Later in the afternoon they play a game of darts. They split the first two games, and the third game is close until the end. Who will win comes down to George's last shot. If he hits a high point region, he wins; if he hits a low point region, Lena wins. George thinks of the difficult time Lena is having, and he really wants to let her win. He aims the dart at the low point region. He sets up his shot and the dart lands in the low point region. After his shot, Lena wins the game and is very happy. Did George hit the low point region intentionally?\nOptions:\n- Yes\n- No\nA: Yes\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA:"
 "include": "_fewshot_template_yaml"
 "task": "bbh_fewshot_causal_judgement"
+filter_list:
+  - name: "strict-match"
+    filter:
+      - function: "take_first"
+  - name: "flexible-extract"
+    filter:
+      - function: "regex"
+        group_select: 0
+        regex_pattern: "\\b(Yes|No|yes|no)\\b"
+      - function: "take_first"

lm_eval/tasks/bbh/fewshot/date_understanding.yaml

@@ -3,3 +3,15 @@
 "doc_to_text": "Q: Today is Christmas Eve of 1937. What is the date 10 days ago in MM/DD/YYYY?\nOptions:\n(A) 12/14/2026\n(B) 12/14/1950\n(C) 12/14/2007\n(D) 12/14/1937\n(E) 07/14/1938\n(F) 12/14/1988\nA: (D)\n\nQ: Tomorrow is 11/12/2019. What is the date one year ago from today in MM/DD/YYYY?\nOptions:\n(A) 09/04/2018\n(B) 11/11/2018\n(C) 08/25/2018\n(D) 11/02/2018\n(E) 11/04/2018\nA: (B)\n\nQ: Jane and John married on Jan 2, 1958. It is their 5-year anniversary today. What is the date tomorrow in MM/DD/YYYY?\nOptions:\n(A) 01/11/1961\n(B) 01/03/1963\n(C) 01/18/1961\n(D) 10/14/1960\n(E) 01/03/1982\n(F) 12/03/1960\nA: (B)\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA:"
 "include": "_fewshot_template_yaml"
 "task": "bbh_fewshot_date_understanding"
+filter_list:
+  - name: "strict-match"
+    filter:
+      - function: "take_first"
+  - name: "flexible-extract"
+    filter:
+      - function: !function utils.MultiChoiceRegexFilter
+        group_select: 0
+        ignore_case: true
+        ignore_punctuation: true
+        regex_pattern: "(\\([A-Z]\\))"
+      - function: "take_first"

lm_eval/tasks/bbh/fewshot/disambiguation_qa.yaml

@@ -3,3 +3,15 @@
 "doc_to_text": "Q: In the following sentences, explain the antecedent of the pronoun (which thing the pronoun refers to), or state that it is ambiguous.\nSentence: The chief told the counselor that they took the day off.\nOptions:\n(A) The chief took the day off\n(B) The counselor took the day off\n(C) Ambiguous\nA: (A)\n\nQ: In the following sentences, explain the antecedent of the pronoun (which thing the pronoun refers to), or state that it is ambiguous.\nSentence: The manager sent a message to the secretary, but he didn't reply yet.\nOptions:\n(A) The secretary didn't reply yet\n(B) The manager didn't reply yet\n(C) Ambiguous\nA: (A)\n\nQ: In the following sentences, explain the antecedent of the pronoun (which thing the pronoun refers to), or state that it is ambiguous.\nSentence: Bailey will plan to meet the director at his office\nOptions:\n(A) It will be Bailey's office\n(B) It will be the director's office\n(C) Ambiguous\nA: (C)\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA:"
 "include": "_fewshot_template_yaml"
 "task": "bbh_fewshot_disambiguation_qa"
+filter_list:
+  - name: "strict-match"
+    filter:
+      - function: "take_first"
+  - name: "flexible-extract"
+    filter:
+      - function: !function utils.MultiChoiceRegexFilter
+        group_select: 0
+        ignore_case: true
+        ignore_punctuation: true
+        regex_pattern: "(\\([A-Z]\\))"
+      - function: "take_first"

lm_eval/tasks/bbh/fewshot/dyck_languages.yaml

@@ -3,3 +3,13 @@
 "doc_to_text": "Q: Complete the rest of the sequence, making sure that the parentheses are closed properly. Input: [ { [\nA: ] } ]\n\nQ: Complete the rest of the sequence, making sure that the parentheses are closed properly. Input: < > ( ( [ [ ( { } ) [ < > ] ]\nA: ] ) )\n\nQ: Complete the rest of the sequence, making sure that the parentheses are closed properly. Input: < [ < [ { < [ ] < { } > > } ] > { { ( ) } { < [ < > ] > }\nA: } ] >\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA:"
 "include": "_fewshot_template_yaml"
 "task": "bbh_fewshot_dyck_languages"
+filter_list:
+  - name: "strict-match"
+    filter:
+      - function: "take_first"
+  - name: "flexible-extract"
+    filter:
+      - function: "regex"
+        group_select: 0
+        regex_pattern: "(?<= )([\" \\[\\(<{}>\\)\\]]+)|([\" \\[\\(<{}>\\)\\]]+)"
+      - function: "take_first"

lm_eval/tasks/bbh/fewshot/formal_fallacies.yaml

@@ -3,3 +3,13 @@
 "doc_to_text": "Q: \"It is not always easy to see who is related to whom -- and in which ways. The following argument pertains to this question: To begin with, Lesley is a close friend of Fernando. Moreover, being a close friend of Fernando or a schoolmate of Lowell is sufficient for being a great-grandfather of Leroy. It follows that Lesley is a great-grandfather of Leroy.\"\nIs the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?\nOptions:\n- valid\n- invalid\nA: valid\n\nQ: \"It is not always easy to see who is related to whom -- and in which ways. The following argument pertains to this question: Whoever is not a great-grandfather of Clyde is a stepbrother of Brian. Being an ancestor of Dana is sufficient for not being a great-grandfather of Clyde. We may conclude: Everyone who is an ancestor of Dana is a stepbrother of Brian, too.\"\nIs the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?\nOptions:\n- valid\n- invalid\nA: valid\n\nQ: \"It is not always easy to grasp who is consuming which products. The following argument pertains to this question: Every infrequent user of Paul Mitchell shampoo is either a rare consumer of Nioxin shampoo or a loyal buyer of Caress soap, or both. No regular consumer of Lush soap is a rare consumer of Nioxin shampoo and, in the same time, a loyal buyer of Caress soap. It follows that whoever is an infrequent user of Paul Mitchell shampoo is not a regular consumer of Lush soap.\"\nIs the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?\nOptions:\n- valid\n- invalid\nA: invalid\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA:"
 "include": "_fewshot_template_yaml"
 "task": "bbh_fewshot_formal_fallacies"
+filter_list:
+  - name: "strict-match"
+    filter:
+      - function: "take_first"
+  - name: "flexible-extract"
+    filter:
+      - function: "regex"
+        group_select: 0
+        regex_pattern: "\\b(valid|invalid)\\b"
+      - function: "take_first"

lm_eval/tasks/bbh/fewshot/geometric_shapes.yaml

@@ -3,3 +3,15 @@
 "doc_to_text": "Q: This SVG path element <path d=\"M 31.00,73.00 L 32.00,59.00 L 44.00,50.00 L 49.00,41.00 L 64.00,37.00 L 71.00,55.00 L 64.00,76.00 L 52.00,61.00 L 31.00,73.00\"/> draws a\nOptions:\n(A) circle\n(B) heptagon\n(C) hexagon\n(D) kite\n(E) line\n(F) octagon\n(G) pentagon\n(H) rectangle\n(I) sector\n(J) triangle\nA: (F)\n\nQ: This SVG path element <path d=\"M 14.19,26.04 L 51.43,39.21 L 58.44,36.69 L 56.63,30.17 L 48.53,26.66 L 14.19,26.04\"/> draws a\nOptions:\n(A) circle\n(B) heptagon\n(C) hexagon\n(D) kite\n(E) line\n(F) octagon\n(G) pentagon\n(H) rectangle\n(I) sector\n(J) triangle\nA: (G)\n\nQ: This SVG path element <path d=\"M 41.00,43.00 L 37.00,34.00 L 41.00,33.00 L 45.00,34.00 L 41.00,43.00\"/> draws a\nOptions:\n(A) circle\n(B) heptagon\n(C) hexagon\n(D) kite\n(E) line\n(F) octagon\n(G) pentagon\n(H) rectangle\n(I) sector\n(J) triangle\nA: (D)\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA:"
 "include": "_fewshot_template_yaml"
 "task": "bbh_fewshot_geometric_shapes"
+filter_list:
+  - name: "strict-match"
+    filter:
+      - function: "take_first"
+  - name: "flexible-extract"
+    filter:
+      - function: !function utils.MultiChoiceRegexFilter
+        group_select: 0
+        ignore_case: true
+        ignore_punctuation: true
+        regex_pattern: "(\\([A-Z]\\))"
+      - function: "take_first"

lm_eval/tasks/bbh/fewshot/hyperbaton.yaml

@@ -3,3 +3,15 @@
 "doc_to_text": "Q: Which sentence has the correct adjective order:\nOptions:\n(A) rubber terrible ship\n(B) terrible rubber ship\nA: (B)\n\nQ: Which sentence has the correct adjective order:\nOptions:\n(A) repulsive small Brazilian exercise ship\n(B) Brazilian repulsive exercise small ship\nA: (A)\n\nQ: Which sentence has the correct adjective order:\nOptions:\n(A) blue gold wonderful square shoe\n(B) wonderful square blue gold shoe\nA: (B)\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA:"
 "include": "_fewshot_template_yaml"
 "task": "bbh_fewshot_hyperbaton"
+filter_list:
+  - name: "strict-match"
+    filter:
+      - function: "take_first"
+  - name: "flexible-extract"
+    filter:
+      - function: !function utils.MultiChoiceRegexFilter
+        group_select: 0
+        ignore_case: true
+        ignore_punctuation: true
+        regex_pattern: "(\\([A-Z]\\))"
+      - function: "take_first"

lm_eval/tasks/bbh/fewshot/logical_deduction_five_objects.yaml

@@ -3,3 +3,15 @@
 "doc_to_text": "Q: The following paragraphs each describe a set of three objects arranged in a fixed order. The statements are logically consistent within each paragraph. In a golf tournament, there were three golfers: Amy, Eli, and Eve. Eve finished above Amy. Eli finished below Amy.\nOptions:\n(A) Amy finished last\n(B) Eli finished last\n(C) Eve finished last\nA: (B)\n\nQ: The following paragraphs each describe a set of three objects arranged in a fixed order. The statements are logically consistent within each paragraph. On a shelf, there are three books: a white book, a green book, and an orange book. The green book is to the right of the white book. The orange book is the rightmost.\nOptions:\n(A) The white book is the leftmost\n(B) The green book is the leftmost\n(C) The orange book is the leftmost\nA: (A)\n\nQ: The following paragraphs each describe a set of three objects arranged in a fixed order. The statements are logically consistent within each paragraph. On a shelf, there are three books: a red book, a gray book, and a white book. The white book is to the left of the gray book. The red book is the second from the left.\nOptions:\n(A) The red book is the leftmost\n(B) The gray book is the leftmost\n(C) The white book is the leftmost\nA: (C)\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA:"
 "include": "_fewshot_template_yaml"
 "task": "bbh_fewshot_logical_deduction_five_objects"
+filter_list:
+  - name: "strict-match"
+    filter:
+      - function: "take_first"
+  - name: "flexible-extract"
+    filter:
+      - function: !function utils.MultiChoiceRegexFilter
+        group_select: 0
+        ignore_case: true
+        ignore_punctuation: true
+        regex_pattern: "(\\([A-Z]\\))"
+      - function: "take_first"

lm_eval/tasks/bbh/fewshot/logical_deduction_seven_objects.yaml

@@ -3,3 +3,15 @@
 "doc_to_text": "Q: The following paragraphs each describe a set of three objects arranged in a fixed order. The statements are logically consistent within each paragraph. In a golf tournament, there were three golfers: Amy, Eli, and Eve. Eve finished above Amy. Eli finished below Amy.\nOptions:\n(A) Amy finished last\n(B) Eli finished last\n(C) Eve finished last\nA: (B)\n\nQ: The following paragraphs each describe a set of three objects arranged in a fixed order. The statements are logically consistent within each paragraph. On a shelf, there are three books: a white book, a green book, and an orange book. The green book is to the right of the white book. The orange book is the rightmost.\nOptions:\n(A) The white book is the leftmost\n(B) The green book is the leftmost\n(C) The orange book is the leftmost\nA: (A)\n\nQ: The following paragraphs each describe a set of three objects arranged in a fixed order. The statements are logically consistent within each paragraph. On a shelf, there are three books: a red book, a gray book, and a white book. The white book is to the left of the gray book. The red book is the second from the left.\nOptions:\n(A) The red book is the leftmost\n(B) The gray book is the leftmost\n(C) The white book is the leftmost\nA: (C)\n\nQ: {{input}}\nA:"
 "include": "_fewshot_template_yaml"
 "task": "bbh_fewshot_logical_deduction_seven_objects"
+filter_list:
+  - name: "strict-match"
+    filter:
+      - function: "take_first"
+  - name: "flexible-extract"
+    filter:
+      - function: !function utils.MultiChoiceRegexFilter
+        group_select: 0
+        ignore_case: true
+        ignore_punctuation: true
+        regex_pattern: "(\\([A-Z]\\))"
+      - function: "take_first"