Commit 380cc18e authored by cardy20's avatar cardy20
Browse files

korean hate speech evaluation code updated.

parent 0d94326e
# coding=utf-8
# Copyright 2020 The HuggingFace Datasets Authors and the current dataset script contributor.
#
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
#
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
# limitations under the License.
""" Korean corpus for toxic speech detection and the large unlabeled corpus. """
import csv
import datasets
_CITATION = """\
@inproceedings{moon-etal-2020-beep,
title = "{BEEP}! {K}orean Corpus of Online News Comments for Toxic Speech Detection",
author = "Moon, Jihyung and
Cho, Won Ik and
Lee, Junbum",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media",
month = jul,
year = "2020",
address = "Online",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.socialnlp-1.4",
pages = "25--31",
abstract = "Toxic comments in online platforms are an unavoidable social issue under the cloak of anonymity. Hate speech detection has been actively done for languages such as English, German, or Italian, where manually labeled corpus has been released. In this work, we first present 9.4K manually labeled entertainment news comments for identifying Korean toxic speech, collected from a widely used online news platform in Korea. The comments are annotated regarding social bias and hate speech since both aspects are correlated. The inter-annotator agreement Krippendorff{'}s alpha score is 0.492 and 0.496, respectively. We provide benchmarks using CharCNN, BiLSTM, and BERT, where BERT achieves the highest score on all tasks. The models generally display better performance on bias identification, since the hate speech detection is a more subjective issue. Additionally, when BERT is trained with bias label for hate speech detection, the prediction score increases, implying that bias and hate are intertwined. We make our dataset publicly available and open competitions with the corpus and benchmarks.",
}
"""
_DESCRIPTION = """\
They provide the first human-annotated Korean corpus for toxic speech detection and the large unlabeled corpus.
The data is comments from the Korean entertainment news aggregation platform.
"""
_LICENSE = "(CC BY-SA 4.0)"
_URL = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kocohub/korean-hate-speech/master/labeled/"
_URLs = {
"train": _URL + "train.tsv",
"valid": _URL + "dev.tsv",
}
# TODO: Name of the dataset usually match the script name with CamelCase instead of snake_case
class HateSpeech(datasets.GeneratorBasedBuilder):
"""Korean Naver movie review dataset."""
VERSION = datasets.Version("1.1.0")
def _info(self):
return datasets.DatasetInfo(
description=_DESCRIPTION,
features=datasets.Features(
{
"comments": datasets.Value("string"),
"contain_gender_bias": datasets.ClassLabel(names=["False", "True"]),
"bias": datasets.ClassLabel(names=["none", "others", "gender"]),
"hate": datasets.ClassLabel(names=["none", "offensive", "hate"])
}
),
supervised_keys=None,
license=_LICENSE,
citation=_CITATION,
)
def _split_generators(self, dl_manager):
downloaded_files = dl_manager.download_and_extract(_URLs)
print(downloaded_files)
return [
datasets.SplitGenerator(
name=datasets.Split.TRAIN,
gen_kwargs={
"filepath": downloaded_files["train"],
"split": "train",
},
),
datasets.SplitGenerator(
name=datasets.Split.TEST,
gen_kwargs={
"filepath": downloaded_files["valid"],
"split": "valid",
},
),
]
def _generate_examples(self, filepath, split):
with open(filepath, encoding="utf-8") as f:
next(f)
reader = csv.reader(f, delimiter="\t")
for id_, row in enumerate(reader):
yield id_, {
"comments": row[0],
"contain_gender_bias": row[1],
"bias": row[2],
"hate": row[3]
}
......@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ from . import nsmc
from . import klue
from . import ko_translation
from . import korquad
from . import kohatespeech
########################################
# Translation tasks
......@@ -319,10 +320,11 @@ TASK_REGISTRY = {
"kobest_hellaswag": kobest.HellaSwag,
"kobest_sentineg": kobest.SentiNeg,
"ko_en_translation": ko_translation.KoEnTranslation,
"en_ko_translation": ko_translation.EnKoTranslation
"en_ko_translation": ko_translation.EnKoTranslation,
"kohatespeech":kohatespeech.HateSpeech,
"kohatespeech_gen_bias":kohatespeech.GenderBias
}
ALL_TASKS = sorted(list(TASK_REGISTRY))
......
"""
KLUE
https://aclanthology.org/2020.socialnlp-1.4.pdf
For hate speech, they introduce hate, offensive, and none labels.
They also added binary label whether a comment contains gender bias or not.
"""
import numpy as np
from lm_eval.base import Task, MultipleChoiceTask, rf
from lm_eval.metrics import macro_f1_score, mean, matthews_corrcoef, f1_score, yesno
from lm_eval.utils import general_detokenize
_CITATION ="""
@inproceedings{moon-etal-2020-beep,
title = "{BEEP}! {K}orean Corpus of Online News Comments for Toxic Speech Detection",
author = "Moon, Jihyung and
Cho, Won Ik and
Lee, Junbum",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media",
month = jul,
year = "2020",
address = "Online",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.socialnlp-1.4",
pages = "25--31",
abstract = "Toxic comments in online platforms are an unavoidable social issue under the cloak of anonymity. Hate speech detection has been actively done for languages such as English, German, or Italian, where manually labeled corpus has been released. In this work, we first present 9.4K manually labeled entertainment news comments for identifying Korean toxic speech, collected from a widely used online news platform in Korea. The comments are annotated regarding social bias and hate speech since both aspects are correlated. The inter-annotator agreement Krippendorff{'}s alpha score is 0.492 and 0.496, respectively. We provide benchmarks using CharCNN, BiLSTM, and BERT, where BERT achieves the highest score on all tasks. The models generally display better performance on bias identification, since the hate speech detection is a more subjective issue. Additionally, when BERT is trained with bias label for hate speech detection, the prediction score increases, implying that bias and hate are intertwined. We make our dataset publicly available and open competitions with the corpus and benchmarks.",
}
"""
class HateSpeech(MultipleChoiceTask):
VERSION = 0
DATASET_PATH = "cardy/kohatespeech"
DATASET_NAME = "hate_speech"
def has_training_docs(self):
return True
def has_validation_docs(self):
return True
def has_test_docs(self):
return False
def training_docs(self):
if self._training_docs is None:
self._training_docs = list(map(self._process_doc, self.dataset["train"]))
return self._training_docs
def validation_docs(self):
return map(self._process_doc, self.dataset["test"])
def doc_to_text(self, doc):
return doc["query"]
def _process_doc(self, doc):
out_doc = {
"query": "문장: {}".format(doc["comments"]),
"choices": ["없음", "공격적", "증오"],
"gold": doc['hate']
}
return out_doc
def process_results(self, doc, results):
pred = np.argmax(results)
gold = doc["gold"]
return {
"acc": pred == gold,
"macro_f1": (gold, pred)
}
def higher_is_better(self):
return {
"acc": True,
"macro_f1": True
}
def aggregation(self):
return {
"acc": mean,
"macro_f1": macro_f1_score
}
class GenderBias(Task):
VERSION = 0
DATASET_PATH = "cardy/kohatespeech"
DATASET_NAME = "hate_speech"
def has_training_docs(self):
return True
def has_validation_docs(self):
return True
def has_test_docs(self):
return False
def training_docs(self):
if self._training_docs is None:
self._training_docs = list(map(self._process_doc, self.dataset["train"]))
return self._training_docs
def validation_docs(self):
return map(self._process_doc, self.dataset["test"])
def doc_to_text(self, doc):
return "문장: {} 성적 편향이 있습니까?".format(doc["comments"])
def doc_to_target(self, doc):
return " {}".format({0: "아니오", 1: "예"}[doc["contain_gender_bias"]])
def construct_requests(self, doc, ctx):
ll_no, _ = rf.loglikelihood(ctx, " 아니오")
ll_yes, _ = rf.loglikelihood(ctx, " 예")
return ll_no, ll_yes
def process_results(self, doc, results):
pred = np.argmax(results)
gold = doc["contain_gender_bias"]
return {
"acc": pred == gold,
"macro_f1": (gold, pred)
}
def higher_is_better(self):
return {
"acc": True,
"macro_f1": True
}
def aggregation(self):
return {
"acc": mean,
"macro_f1": macro_f1_score
}
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment