title = "{PAWS}-{X}: A Cross-lingual Adversarial Dataset for Paraphrase Identification",
author = "Yang, Yinfei and
Zhang, Yuan and
Tar, Chris and
Baldridge, Jason",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP)",
month = nov,
year = "2019",
address = "Hong Kong, China",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/D19-1382",
doi = "10.18653/v1/D19-1382",
pages = "3687--3692",
}
```
### Groups and Tasks
#### Groups
*`pawsx`
#### Tasks
*`paws_de`: German
*`paws_en`: English
*`paws_es`: Spanish
*`paws_fr`: French
*`paws_ja`: Japanese
*`paws_ko`: Korean
*`paws_zh`: Chinese
### Checklist
For adding novel benchmarks/datasets to the library:
* [ ] Is the task an existing benchmark in the literature?
* [ ] Have you referenced the original paper that introduced the task?
* [ ] If yes, does the original paper provide a reference implementation? If so, have you checked against the reference implementation and documented how to run such a test?
If other tasks on this dataset are already supported:
* [ ] Is the "Main" variant of this task clearly denoted?
* [ ] Have you provided a short sentence in a README on what each new variant adds / evaluates?
* [ ] Have you noted which, if any, published evaluation setups are matched by this variant?
For adding novel benchmarks/datasets to the library:
* [ ] Is the task an existing benchmark in the literature?
* [ ] Have you referenced the original paper that introduced the task?
* [ ] If yes, does the original paper provide a reference implementation? If so, have you checked against the reference implementation and documented how to run such a test?
If other tasks on this dataset are already supported:
* [ ] Is the "Main" variant of this task clearly denoted?
* [ ] Have you provided a short sentence in a README on what each new variant adds / evaluates?
* [ ] Have you noted which, if any, published evaluation setups are matched by this variant?
Title: `PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Language`
Abstract: https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.11641
Physical Interaction: Question Answering (PIQA) is a physical commonsense
reasoning and a corresponding benchmark dataset. PIQA was designed to investigate
the physical knowledge of existing models. To what extent are current approaches
actually learning about the world?
Homepage: https://yonatanbisk.com/piqa/
### Citation
```
@inproceedings{Bisk2020,
author = {Yonatan Bisk and Rowan Zellers and
Ronan Le Bras and Jianfeng Gao
and Yejin Choi},
title = {PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in
Natural Language},
booktitle = {Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on
Artificial Intelligence},
year = {2020},
}
```
### Groups and Tasks
#### Groups
* Not part of a group yet.
#### Tasks
*`piqa`
### Checklist
For adding novel benchmarks/datasets to the library:
* [ ] Is the task an existing benchmark in the literature?
* [ ] Have you referenced the original paper that introduced the task?
* [ ] If yes, does the original paper provide a reference implementation? If so, have you checked against the reference implementation and documented how to run such a test?
If other tasks on this dataset are already supported:
* [ ] Is the "Main" variant of this task clearly denoted?
* [ ] Have you provided a short sentence in a README on what each new variant adds / evaluates?
* [ ] Have you noted which, if any, published evaluation setups are matched by this variant?
For adding novel benchmarks/datasets to the library:
* [ ] Is the task an existing benchmark in the literature?
* [ ] Have you referenced the original paper that introduced the task?
* [ ] If yes, does the original paper provide a reference implementation? If so, have you checked against the reference implementation and documented how to run such a test?
If other tasks on this dataset are already supported:
* [ ] Is the "Main" variant of this task clearly denoted?
* [ ] Have you provided a short sentence in a README on what each new variant adds / evaluates?
* [ ] Have you noted which, if any, published evaluation setups are matched by this variant?
Title: `PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answering`
Abstract: https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.06146
PubMedQA is a novel biomedical question answering (QA) dataset collected from
PubMed abstracts. The task of PubMedQA is to answer research questions with
yes/no/maybe (e.g.: Do preoperative statins reduce atrial fibrillation after
coronary artery bypass grafting?) using the corresponding abstracts. PubMedQA
has 1k expert-annotated, 61.2k unlabeled and 211.3k artificially generated QA
instances. Each PubMedQA instance is composed of (1) a question which is either
an existing research article title or derived from one, (2) a context which is
the corresponding abstract without its conclusion, (3) a long answer, which is
the conclusion of the abstract and, presumably, answers the research question,
and (4) a yes/no/maybe answer which summarizes the conclusion.
Homepage: https://pubmedqa.github.io/
### Citation
```
@inproceedings{jin2019pubmedqa,
title={PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answering},
author={Jin, Qiao and Dhingra, Bhuwan and Liu, Zhengping and Cohen, William and Lu, Xinghua},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP)},
pages={2567--2577},
year={2019}
}
```
### Groups and Tasks
#### Groups
* Not part of a group yet
#### Tasks
*`pubmed_qa`
### Checklist
For adding novel benchmarks/datasets to the library:
* [ ] Is the task an existing benchmark in the literature?
* [ ] Have you referenced the original paper that introduced the task?
* [ ] If yes, does the original paper provide a reference implementation? If so, have you checked against the reference implementation and documented how to run such a test?
If other tasks on this dataset are already supported:
* [ ] Is the "Main" variant of this task clearly denoted?
* [ ] Have you provided a short sentence in a README on what each new variant adds / evaluates?
* [ ] Have you noted which, if any, published evaluation setups are matched by this variant?
title={QA4MRE 2011-2013: Overview of Question Answering for Machine Reading Evaluation},
author={Anselmo Pe{\~n}as and Eduard H. Hovy and Pamela Forner and {\'A}lvaro Rodrigo and Richard F. E. Sutcliffe and Roser Morante},
booktitle={CLEF},
year={2013}
}
```
### Groups and Tasks
#### Groups
*`qa4mre`
#### Tasks
*`qa4mre_2011`
*`qa4mre_2012`
*`qa4mre_2013`
### Checklist
For adding novel benchmarks/datasets to the library:
* [ ] Is the task an existing benchmark in the literature?
* [ ] Have you referenced the original paper that introduced the task?
* [ ] If yes, does the original paper provide a reference implementation? If so, have you checked against the reference implementation and documented how to run such a test?
If other tasks on this dataset are already supported:
* [ ] Is the "Main" variant of this task clearly denoted?
* [ ] Have you provided a short sentence in a README on what each new variant adds / evaluates?
* [ ] Have you noted which, if any, published evaluation setups are matched by this variant?
