"dataset_name": "international_law"
"description": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about international\
  \ law.\n\nQ: How the consent to be bound of a State may be expressed?\n(A) The consent\
  \ of a State to be bound is expressed only by ratification (B) The consent of a\
  \ state to be bound by a treaty may be expressed by signature, ratification, acceptance,\
  \ approval or accession (C) The consent of a State to be bound is expressed by signature\
  \ (D) The consent of a State to be bound is expressed by whatever means they choose\n\
  A: Let's think step by step. We refer to Wikipedia articles on international law\
  \ for help. Article 11 of Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties signed in 1969\
  \ states that \"the consent of a State to be bound by a treaty may be expressed\
  \ by signature, exchange of instruments constituting a treaty, ratification, acceptance,\
  \ approval or accession, or by any other means if so agreed.\" (B) is the most precise\
  \ and accurate answer. The answer is (B).\n\nQ: What is the judge ad hoc?\n(A) If\
  \ a party to a contentious case before the ICJ does not have a national sitting\
  \ as judge, it is entitled to nominate someone as a judge solely for that case,\
  \ with the title of judge ad hoc (B) Judge ad hoc is the member of the bench of\
  \ the ICJ with a casting vote (C) Judge ad hoc is a surrogate judge, in case a judge\
  \ is disqualified or passes away (D) Judge ad hoc is the judge that each party will\
  \ always nominate in every contentious case\nA: Let's think step by step. We refer\
  \ to Wikipedia articles on international law for help. As \"ad hoc\" implies, a\
  \ judge ad hoc is appointed only for a specific case or period, when a party to\
  \ a contentious case before the International Court of Justice does not have a regular\
  \ national sitting as judge. The answer is (A).\n\nQ: When 'consent' can serve as\
  \ a circumstance precluding the wrongfulness of a State conduct?\n(A) Consent can\
  \ serve as a circumstance precluding the wrongfulness whenever it is given (B) Consent\
  \ can never serve as a circumstance precluding wrongfulness (C) Consent can serve\
  \ as a circumstance precluding wrongfulness, provided the consent is valid and to\
  \ the extent that the conduct remains within the limits of the consent given (D)\
  \ Consent can always serve as a circumstance precluding wrongfulness, no matter\
  \ which organ of the State gives it\nA: Let's think step by step. We refer to Wikipedia\
  \ articles on international law for help. Valid consent can serve as a circumstance\
  \ precluding the wrongfulness of a State conduct if the conduct remains within the\
  \ limits of that consent, according to Chapter V of the Responsibility of States\
  \ for Internationally Wrongful Acts, 2001, United Nations. The answer is (C).\n\n\
  Q: Would a reservation to the definition of torture in the ICCPR be acceptable in\
  \ contemporary practice?\n(A) This is an acceptable reservation if the reserving\
  \ country's legislation employs a different definition (B) This is an unacceptable\
  \ reservation because it contravenes the object and purpose of the ICCPR (C) This\
  \ is an unacceptable reservation because the definition of torture in the ICCPR\
  \ is consistent with customary international law (D) This is an acceptable reservation\
  \ because under general international law States have the right to enter reservations\
  \ to treaties\nA: Let's think step by step. We refer to Wikipedia articles on international\
  \ law for help. For it contravenes the object and purpose of the ICCPR, this is\
  \ an unacceptable reservation in contemporary practice. The answer is (B).\n\nQ:\
  \ What types of force does Article 2(4) of the UN Charter prohibit?\n(A) Article\
  \ 2(4) encompasses only armed force (B) Article 2(4) encompasses all types of force,\
  \ including sanctions (C) Article 2(4) encompasses all interference in the domestic\
  \ affairs of States (D) Article 2(4) encompasses force directed only against a State's\
  \ territorial integrity\nA: Let's think step by step. We refer to Wikipedia articles\
  \ on international law for help. Article 2(4) of the UN Charter prohibits states\
  \ from using armed forces in their international relations. The answer is (A).\n\n"
"group": "mmlu_flan_cot_fewshot_humanities"
"include": "_mmlu_flan_cot_fewshot_template_yaml"
"task": "mmlu_flan_cot_fewshot_international_law"
