prompt='{question}\nRemember to put your final answer within \\boxed{}.',
),
],
),
),
retriever=dict(type=ZeroRetriever),
inferencer=dict(type=GenInferencer),
)
GRADER_TEMPLATE="""
Please as a grading expert, judge whether the final answers given by the candidates below are consistent with the standard answers, that is, whether the candidates answered correctly.
Here are some evaluation criteria:
1. Please refer to the given standard answer. You don't need to re-generate the answer to the question because the standard answer has been given. You only need to judge whether the candidate's answer is consistent with the standard answer according to the form of the question. THE STANDARD ANSWER IS ALWAYS CORRECT AND THE QUESTION IS PERFECTLY VALID. NEVER QUESTION THEM.
2. ONLY compare the FINAL ANSWER - COMPLETELY IGNORE any potential errors in the REASONING PROCESSES.
3. Some answers may be expressed in different ways, such as some answers may be a mathematical expression, some answers may be a textual description, as long as the meaning expressed is the same. Before making a judgment, please understand the question and the standard answer first, and then judge whether the candidate's answer is correct.
4. Some answers may consist of multiple items, such as multiple-choice questions, multiple-select questions, fill-in-the-blank questions, etc. Regardless of the question type, the final answer will be considered correct as long as it matches the standard answer, regardless of whether the reasoning process is correct. For multiple-select questions and multi-blank fill-in-the-blank questions, all corresponding options or blanks must be answered correctly and match the standard answer exactly to be deemed correct.
5. If the prediction is given with \\boxed{{}}, please ignore the \\boxed{{}} and only judge whether the candidate's answer is consistent with the standard answer.
6. If the candidate's answer is invalid (e.g., incomplete (cut off mid-response), lots of unnormal repetitive content, or irrelevant to the question, saying it can't answer the question because some irresistible factors, like ethical issues, no enough information, etc.), select option C (INVALID).Please judge whether the following answers are consistent with the standard answer based on the above criteria. Grade the predicted answer of this new question as one of:
A: CORRECT
B: INCORRECT
C: INVALID
Just return the letters "A", "B", or "C", with no text around it.
Here is your task. Simply reply with either CORRECT, INCORRECT, or INVALID. Don't apologize or correct yourself if there was a mistake; we are just trying to grade the answer.
<Original Question Begin>:
{question}
<Original Question End>
<Standard Answer Begin>:
{answer}
<Standard Answer End>
<Candidate's Answer Begin>:
{prediction}
<Candidate's Answer End>
Judging the correctness of the candidate's answer:
""".strip()
aime2025_eval_cfg=dict(
evaluator=dict(
type=GenericLLMEvaluator,
prompt_template=dict(
type=PromptTemplate,
template=dict(
begin=[
dict(
role='SYSTEM',
fallback_role='HUMAN',
prompt="You are a helpful assistant who evaluates the correctness and quality of models' outputs.",
prompt='{question}\nRemember to put your final answer within \\boxed{}.',
),
],
),
),
retriever=dict(type=ZeroRetriever),
inferencer=dict(type=GenInferencer),
)
GRADER_TEMPLATE="""
Please as a grading expert, judge whether the final answers given by the candidates below are consistent with the standard answers, that is, whether the candidates answered correctly.
Here are some evaluation criteria:
1. Please refer to the given standard answer. You don't need to re-generate the answer to the question because the standard answer has been given. You only need to judge whether the candidate's answer is consistent with the standard answer according to the form of the question. Don't try to answer the original question. You can assume that the standard answer is definitely correct.
2. Because the candidate's answer may be different from the standard answer in the form of expression, before making a judgment, please understand the question and the standard answer first, and then judge whether the candidate's answer is correct, but be careful not to try to answer the original question.
3. Some answers may contain multiple items, such as multiple-choice questions, multiple-select questions, fill-in-the-blank questions, etc. As long as the answer is the same as the standard answer, it is enough. For multiple-select questions and multiple-blank fill-in-the-blank questions, the candidate needs to answer all the corresponding options or blanks correctly to be considered correct.
4. Some answers may be expressed in different ways, such as some answers may be a mathematical expression, some answers may be a textual description, as long as the meaning expressed is the same. And some formulas are expressed in different ways, but they are equivalent and correct.
5. If the prediction is given with \\boxed{}, please ignore the \\boxed{} and only judge whether the candidate's answer is consistent with the standard answer.
Please judge whether the following answers are consistent with the standard answer based on the above criteria. Grade the predicted answer of this new question as one of:
A: CORRECT
B: INCORRECT
Just return the letters "A" or "B", with no text around it.
Here is your task. Simply reply with either CORRECT, INCORRECT. Don't apologize or correct yourself if there was a mistake; we are just trying to grade the answer.
dict(role='HUMAN',prompt='{context}\n{hypothesis}\nQuestion: What is the relation between the two sentences?\nA. Contradiction\nB. Entailment\nC. Neutral\nAnswer: '),
APPS is a benchmark for code generation with 10000 problems. It can be used to evaluate the ability of language models to generate code from natural language specifications.
We also offer an apps_mini subset, which includes 1500 questions divided proportionally of introductory, interview, and competition categories, with a ratio of 1:1:1(500 questions each).
## How to Use
You can also filter the dataset based on difficulty level: introductory, interview and competition. Just pass a list of difficulty levels to the filter. For example, if you want the most challenging questions, you need to select the competition level:
Please refer to Table 3 of [code llama](https://scontent-nrt1-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.2365-6/369856151_1754812304950972_1159666448927483931_n.pdf?_nc_cat=107&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=3c67a6&_nc_ohc=TxT1PKkNBZoAX8zMHbm&_nc_ht=scontent-nrt1-2.xx&oh=00_AfDmmQAPzqX1-QOKIDUV5lGKzaZqt0CZUVtxFjHtnh6ycQ&oe=65F5AF8F) for original results if needed.
## Citation
```
@article{hendrycksapps2021,
title={Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPS},
author={Dan Hendrycks and Steven Basart and Saurav Kadavath and Mantas Mazeika and Akul Arora and Ethan Guo and Collin Burns and Samir Puranik and Horace He and Dawn Song and Jacob Steinhardt},
template='Please write a python program to address the following QUESTION. Your ANSWER should be in a code block format like this: ```python # Write your code here ```. \nQUESTION:\n{question} {starter}\nANSWER:\n'),
template='Please write a python program to address the following QUESTION. Your ANSWER should be in a code block format like this: ```python # Write your code here ```. \nQUESTION:\n{question} {starter}\nANSWER:\n'),
