<!--Copyright 2023 The HuggingFace Team. All rights reserved.

Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at

http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on
an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the

⚠️ Note that this file is in Markdown but contain specific syntax for our doc-builder (similar to MDX) that may not be
rendered properly in your Markdown viewer.

-->

# Optimize inference using torch.compile()

This guide aims to provide a benchmark on the inference speed-ups introduced with [`torch.compile()`](https://pytorch.org/tutorials/intermediate/torch_compile_tutorial.html) for [computer vision models in 🤗 Transformers](https://huggingface.co/models?pipeline_tag=image-classification&library=transformers&sort=trending).

## Benefits of torch.compile
   
Depending on the model and the GPU, `torch.compile()` yields up to 30% speed-up during inference. To use `torch.compile()`, simply install any version of `torch` above 2.0. 

Compiling a model takes time, so it's useful if you are compiling the model only once instead of every time you infer.
To compile any computer vision model of your choice, call `torch.compile()` on the model as shown below:

```diff
from transformers import AutoModelForImageClassification

model = AutoModelForImageClassification.from_pretrained(MODEL_ID).to("cuda")
+ model = torch.compile(model)
```

`compile()` comes with multiple modes for compiling, which essentially differ in compilation time and inference overhead. `max-autotune` takes longer than `reduce-overhead` but results in faster inference. Default mode is fastest for compilation but is not as efficient compared to `reduce-overhead` for inference time. In this guide, we used the default mode. You can learn more about it [here](https://pytorch.org/get-started/pytorch-2.0/#user-experience).

We benchmarked `torch.compile` with different computer vision models, tasks, types of hardware, and batch sizes on `torch` version 2.0.1.

## Benchmarking code 

Below you can find the benchmarking code for each task. We warm up the GPU before inference and take the mean time of 300 inferences, using the same image each time.

### Image Classification with ViT

```python 
import torch
from PIL import Image
import requests
import numpy as np
from transformers import AutoImageProcessor, AutoModelForImageClassification

url = 'http://images.cocodataset.org/val2017/000000039769.jpg'
image = Image.open(requests.get(url, stream=True).raw)

processor = AutoImageProcessor.from_pretrained("google/vit-base-patch16-224")
model = AutoModelForImageClassification.from_pretrained("google/vit-base-patch16-224").to("cuda")
model = torch.compile(model)

processed_input = processor(image, return_tensors='pt').to(device="cuda")

with torch.no_grad():
    _ = model(**processed_input)

```

#### Object Detection with DETR

```python 
from transformers import AutoImageProcessor, AutoModelForObjectDetection

processor = AutoImageProcessor.from_pretrained("facebook/detr-resnet-50")
model = AutoModelForObjectDetection.from_pretrained("facebook/detr-resnet-50").to("cuda")
model = torch.compile(model)

texts = ["a photo of a cat", "a photo of a dog"]
inputs = processor(text=texts, images=image, return_tensors="pt").to("cuda")

with torch.no_grad():
    _ = model(**inputs)
```

#### Image Segmentation with Segformer

```python 
from transformers import SegformerImageProcessor, SegformerForSemanticSegmentation

processor = SegformerImageProcessor.from_pretrained("nvidia/segformer-b0-finetuned-ade-512-512")
model = SegformerForSemanticSegmentation.from_pretrained("nvidia/segformer-b0-finetuned-ade-512-512").to("cuda")
model = torch.compile(model)
seg_inputs = processor(images=image, return_tensors="pt").to("cuda")

with torch.no_grad():
    _ = model(**seg_inputs)
```

Below you can find the list of the models we benchmarked.

**Image Classification** 
- [google/vit-base-patch16-224](https://huggingface.co/google/vit-base-patch16-224)
- [microsoft/beit-base-patch16-224-pt22k-ft22k](https://huggingface.co/microsoft/beit-base-patch16-224-pt22k-ft22k)
- [facebook/convnext-large-224](https://huggingface.co/facebook/convnext-large-224)
- [microsoft/resnet-50](https://huggingface.co/)

**Image Segmentation** 
- [nvidia/segformer-b0-finetuned-ade-512-512](https://huggingface.co/nvidia/segformer-b0-finetuned-ade-512-512)
- [facebook/mask2former-swin-tiny-coco-panoptic](https://huggingface.co/facebook/mask2former-swin-tiny-coco-panoptic)
- [facebook/maskformer-swin-base-ade](https://huggingface.co/facebook/maskformer-swin-base-ade)
- [google/deeplabv3_mobilenet_v2_1.0_513](https://huggingface.co/google/deeplabv3_mobilenet_v2_1.0_513)

**Object Detection** 
- [google/owlvit-base-patch32](https://huggingface.co/google/owlvit-base-patch32)
- [facebook/detr-resnet-101](https://huggingface.co/facebook/detr-resnet-101)
- [microsoft/conditional-detr-resnet-50](https://huggingface.co/microsoft/conditional-detr-resnet-50)

Below you can find visualization of inference durations with and without `torch.compile()` and percentage improvements for each model in different hardware and batch sizes. 

<div class="flex">
  <div>
    <img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/huggingface/documentation-images/resolve/main/transformers/torch_compile/a100_batch_comp.png" />
  </div>
  <div>
    <img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/huggingface/documentation-images/resolve/main/transformers/torch_compile/v100_batch_comp.png" />
  </div>
   <div>
    <img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/huggingface/documentation-images/resolve/main/transformers/torch_compile/t4_batch_comp.png" />
  </div>
</div>

<div class="flex">
  <div>
    <img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/huggingface/documentation-images/resolve/main/transformers/torch_compile/A100_1_duration.png" />
  </div>
  <div>
    <img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/huggingface/documentation-images/resolve/main/transformers/torch_compile/A100_1_percentage.png" />
  </div>
</div>


![Duration Comparison on V100 with Batch Size of 1](https://huggingface.co/datasets/huggingface/documentation-images/resolve/main/transformers/torch_compile/v100_1_duration.png)

![Percentage Improvement on T4 with Batch Size of 4](https://huggingface.co/datasets/huggingface/documentation-images/resolve/main/transformers/torch_compile/T4_4_percentage.png)

Below you can find inference durations in milliseconds for each model with and without `compile()`. Note that OwlViT results in OOM in larger batch sizes.

### A100 (batch size: 1)

| **Task/Model** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/ViT | 9.325 | 7.584 | 
| Image Segmentation/Segformer | 11.759 | 10.500 |
| Object Detection/OwlViT | 24.978 | 18.420 |
| Image Classification/BeiT | 11.282 | 8.448 | 
| Object Detection/DETR | 34.619 | 19.040 |
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | 10.410 | 10.208 | 
| Image Classification/ResNet | 6.531 | 4.124 |
| Image Segmentation/Mask2former | 60.188 | 49.117 |
| Image Segmentation/Maskformer | 75.764 | 59.487 | 
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | 8.583 | 3.974 |
| Object Detection/Resnet-101 | 36.276 | 18.197 |
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | 31.219 | 17.993 |


### A100 (batch size: 4)

| **Task/Model** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/ViT | 14.832 | 14.499 | 
| Image Segmentation/Segformer | 18.838 | 16.476 |
| Image Classification/BeiT | 13.205 | 13.048 | 
| Object Detection/DETR | 48.657 | 32.418|
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | 22.940 | 21.631 | 
| Image Classification/ResNet | 6.657 | 4.268 |
| Image Segmentation/Mask2former | 74.277 | 61.781 |
| Image Segmentation/Maskformer | 180.700 | 159.116 | 
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | 14.174 | 8.515 |
| Object Detection/Resnet-101 | 68.101 | 44.998 |
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | 56.470 | 35.552 |

### A100 (batch size: 16)

| **Task/Model** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/ViT | 40.944 | 40.010 | 
| Image Segmentation/Segformer | 37.005 | 31.144 |
| Image Classification/BeiT | 41.854 | 41.048 | 
| Object Detection/DETR | 164.382 | 161.902 |
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | 82.258 | 75.561 | 
| Image Classification/ResNet | 7.018 | 5.024 |
| Image Segmentation/Mask2former | 178.945 | 154.814 |
| Image Segmentation/Maskformer | 638.570 | 579.826 | 
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | 51.693 | 30.310 |
| Object Detection/Resnet-101 | 232.887 | 155.021 |
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | 180.491 | 124.032 |

### V100 (batch size: 1)

| **Task/Model** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/ViT | 10.495 | 6.00 | 
| Image Segmentation/Segformer | 13.321 | 5.862 | 
| Object Detection/OwlViT | 25.769 | 22.395 | 
| Image Classification/BeiT | 11.347 | 7.234 | 
| Object Detection/DETR | 33.951 | 19.388 |
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | 11.623 | 10.412 | 
| Image Classification/ResNet | 6.484 | 3.820 |
| Image Segmentation/Mask2former | 64.640 | 49.873 |
| Image Segmentation/Maskformer | 95.532 | 72.207 | 
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | 9.217 | 4.753 |
| Object Detection/Resnet-101 | 52.818 | 28.367 |
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | 39.512 | 20.816 |

### V100 (batch size: 4)

| **Task/Model** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/ViT | 15.181 | 14.501 | 
| Image Segmentation/Segformer | 16.787 | 16.188 |
| Image Classification/BeiT | 15.171 | 14.753 | 
| Object Detection/DETR | 88.529 | 64.195 |
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | 29.574 | 27.085 | 
| Image Classification/ResNet | 6.109 | 4.731 |
| Image Segmentation/Mask2former | 90.402 | 76.926 |
| Image Segmentation/Maskformer | 234.261 | 205.456 | 
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | 24.623 | 14.816 |
| Object Detection/Resnet-101 | 134.672 | 101.304 |
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | 97.464 | 69.739 |

### V100 (batch size: 16)

| **Task/Model** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/ViT | 52.209 | 51.633 | 
| Image Segmentation/Segformer | 61.013 | 55.499 |
| Image Classification/BeiT | 53.938 | 53.581  |
| Object Detection/DETR | OOM | OOM |
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | 109.682 | 100.771 | 
| Image Classification/ResNet | 14.857 | 12.089 |
| Image Segmentation/Mask2former | 249.605 | 222.801 |
| Image Segmentation/Maskformer | 831.142 | 743.645 | 
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | 93.129 | 55.365 |
| Object Detection/Resnet-101 | 482.425 | 361.843 |
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | 344.661 | 255.298 |

### T4 (batch size: 1)

| **Task/Model** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/ViT | 16.520 | 15.786 | 
| Image Segmentation/Segformer | 16.116 | 14.205 |
| Object Detection/OwlViT | 53.634 | 51.105 |
| Image Classification/BeiT | 16.464 | 15.710 | 
| Object Detection/DETR | 73.100 | 53.99 |
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | 32.932 | 30.845 | 
| Image Classification/ResNet | 6.031 | 4.321 |
| Image Segmentation/Mask2former | 79.192 | 66.815 |
| Image Segmentation/Maskformer | 200.026 | 188.268 | 
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | 18.908 | 11.997 |
| Object Detection/Resnet-101 | 106.622 | 82.566 |
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | 77.594 | 56.984 |

### T4 (batch size: 4)

| **Task/Model** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/ViT | 43.653 | 43.626 | 
| Image Segmentation/Segformer | 45.327 | 42.445 |
| Image Classification/BeiT | 52.007 | 51.354 | 
| Object Detection/DETR | 277.850 | 268.003 |
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | 119.259 | 105.580 | 
| Image Classification/ResNet | 13.039 | 11.388 |
| Image Segmentation/Mask2former | 201.540 | 184.670 |
| Image Segmentation/Maskformer | 764.052 | 711.280 | 
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | 74.289 | 48.677 |
| Object Detection/Resnet-101 | 421.859 | 357.614 |
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | 289.002 | 226.945 |

### T4 (batch size: 16)

| **Task/Model** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/ViT | 163.914 | 160.907 | 
| Image Segmentation/Segformer | 192.412 | 163.620 |
| Image Classification/BeiT | 188.978 | 187.976 | 
| Object Detection/DETR | OOM | OOM |
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | 422.886 | 388.078 | 
| Image Classification/ResNet | 44.114 | 37.604 |
| Image Segmentation/Mask2former | 756.337 | 695.291 |
| Image Segmentation/Maskformer | 2842.940 | 2656.88 | 
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | 299.003 | 201.942 |
| Object Detection/Resnet-101 |  1619.505 | 1262.758 | 
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | 1137.513 | 897.390|

## PyTorch Nightly
We also benchmarked on PyTorch nightly (2.1.0dev, find the wheel [here](https://download.pytorch.org/whl/nightly/cu118)) and observed improvement in latency both for uncompiled and compiled models. 

### A100
| **Task/Model** | **Batch Size** | **torch 2.0 - no compile** | **torch 2.0 -<br> compile** |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/BeiT | Unbatched | 12.462 | 6.954 | 
| Image Classification/BeiT | 4 | 14.109 | 12.851 | 
| Image Classification/BeiT | 16 | 42.179 | 42.147 | 
| Object Detection/DETR | Unbatched | 30.484 | 15.221 |
| Object Detection/DETR | 4 | 46.816 | 30.942 |
| Object Detection/DETR | 16 | 163.749 | 163.706  |

### T4
| **Task/Model** | **Batch Size** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/BeiT | Unbatched | 14.408 | 14.052 | 
| Image Classification/BeiT | 4 | 47.381 | 46.604 | 
| Image Classification/BeiT | 16 | 42.179 | 42.147  | 
| Object Detection/DETR | Unbatched | 68.382 | 53.481 |
| Object Detection/DETR | 4 | 269.615 | 204.785 |
| Object Detection/DETR | 16 | OOM | OOM   |

### V100
| **Task/Model** | **Batch Size** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/BeiT | Unbatched | 13.477 | 7.926 | 
| Image Classification/BeiT | 4 | 15.103 | 14.378 | 
| Image Classification/BeiT | 16 | 52.517 | 51.691  | 
| Object Detection/DETR | Unbatched | 28.706 | 19.077 |
| Object Detection/DETR | 4 | 88.402 | 62.949|
| Object Detection/DETR | 16 | OOM | OOM  |


## Reduce Overhead
We benchmarked `reduce-overhead` compilation mode for A100 and T4 in Nightly.

### A100
| **Task/Model** | **Batch Size** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | Unbatched | 11.758 | 7.335 | 
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | 4 | 23.171 | 21.490 | 
| Image Classification/ResNet | Unbatched | 7.435 | 3.801 | 
| Image Classification/ResNet | 4 | 7.261 | 2.187 | 
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | Unbatched | 32.823 | 11.627  | 
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | 4 | 50.622 | 33.831  | 
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | Unbatched | 9.869 | 4.244 |
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | 4 | 14.385 | 7.946 |


### T4
| **Task/Model** | **Batch Size** | **torch 2.0 - <br>no compile** | **torch 2.0 - <br>compile** | 
|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | Unbatched | 32.137 | 31.84 | 
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | 4 | 120.944 | 110.209 | 
| Image Classification/ResNet | Unbatched | 9.761 | 7.698 | 
| Image Classification/ResNet | 4 | 15.215 | 13.871 | 
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | Unbatched | 72.150 | 57.660  | 
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | 4 | 301.494 | 247.543  | 
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | Unbatched | 22.266 | 19.339  |
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | 4 | 78.311 | 50.983 |


