[torch.compile] CUDAGraph Inductor partition integration (#24281)

Signed-off-by: Boyuan Feng <boyuan@meta.com>
Signed-off-by: Boyuan Feng <fby.1994@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: boyuanfeng <boyuan@meta.com>
Co-authored-by: Luka Govedič <ProExpertProg@users.noreply.github.com>

tests/compile/piecewise/test_simple.py

@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ from vllm.config import (CompilationConfig, CompilationLevel, CUDAGraphMode,
                          VllmConfig, set_current_vllm_config)
 from vllm.envs import VLLM_USE_V1
 from vllm.forward_context import BatchDescriptor, set_forward_context
+from vllm.utils import is_torch_equal_or_newer
 
 # This import automatically registers `torch.ops.silly.attention`
 from ..silly_attention import get_global_counter, reset_global_counter
@@ -50,16 +51,21 @@ class SillyModel(nn.Module):
         return x
 
 
-@pytest.mark.parametrize("use_inductor", [True, False])
-@torch.inference_mode()
-def test_simple_piecewise_compile(use_inductor):
-    assert VLLM_USE_V1
-
+def _run_simple_model(
+    splitting_ops,
+    use_inductor_graph_partition,
+    use_inductor,
+    expected_num_piecewise_graphs_seen,
+    expected_num_piecewise_capturable_graphs_seen,
+    expected_num_backend_compilations,
+    expected_num_cudagraph_captured,
+):
     vllm_config = VllmConfig(compilation_config=CompilationConfig(
         level=CompilationLevel.PIECEWISE,
         use_cudagraph=True,
         use_inductor=use_inductor,
-        splitting_ops=["silly.attention"],
+        splitting_ops=splitting_ops,
+        use_inductor_graph_partition=use_inductor_graph_partition,
         cudagraph_copy_inputs=True,
         cudagraph_capture_sizes=[1, 2],
     ))
@@ -70,11 +76,11 @@ def test_simple_piecewise_compile(use_inductor):
 
     with compilation_counter.expect(
             num_graphs_seen=1,  # one graph for the model
-            num_piecewise_graphs_seen=5,  # 2 * num_layers + 1
-            num_piecewise_capturable_graphs_seen=3,  # 1 + num_layers
-            num_backend_compilations=3,  # num_piecewise_capturable_graphs_seen
-            num_cudagraph_captured=
-            6,  # num_cudagraph_sizes * num_piecewise_capturable_graphs_seen
+            num_piecewise_graphs_seen=expected_num_piecewise_graphs_seen,
+            num_piecewise_capturable_graphs_seen=
+            expected_num_piecewise_capturable_graphs_seen,
+            num_backend_compilations=expected_num_backend_compilations,
+            num_cudagraph_captured=expected_num_cudagraph_captured,
     ), set_forward_context(None,
                            vllm_config=vllm_config):  # background context
         # warm up with background context
@@ -104,3 +110,46 @@ def test_simple_piecewise_compile(use_inductor):
             output = model(input)
         assert get_global_counter() == 2
         assert torch.allclose(output.cpu(), torch.tensor([19.0, 19.0]))
+
+
+@pytest.mark.parametrize("use_inductor", [True, False])
+@torch.inference_mode()
+def test_simple_piecewise_compile(use_inductor):
+    assert VLLM_USE_V1
+    _run_simple_model(
+        splitting_ops=["silly.attention"],
+        use_inductor_graph_partition=False,
+        use_inductor=use_inductor,
+        expected_num_piecewise_graphs_seen=5,  # 2 * num_layers + 1
+        expected_num_piecewise_capturable_graphs_seen=3,  # 1 + num_layers
+        expected_num_backend_compilations=
+        3,  # num_piecewise_capturable_graphs_seen
+        expected_num_cudagraph_captured=
+        6,  # num_cudagraph_sizes * num_piecewise_capturable_graphs_seen
+    )
+
+
+@torch.inference_mode()
+@pytest.mark.parametrize("splitting_ops", [["silly.attention"], []])
+def test_simple_inductor_graph_partition(splitting_ops):
+    assert VLLM_USE_V1
+    if not is_torch_equal_or_newer("2.9.0.dev"):
+        pytest.skip("inductor graph partition is only available "
+                    "in PyTorch 2.9+")
+
+    _run_simple_model(
+        # inductor graph partition automatically resets splitting_ops
+        # to be an empty list
+        splitting_ops=splitting_ops,
+        use_inductor_graph_partition=True,
+        use_inductor=True,
+        expected_num_piecewise_graphs_seen=
+        1,  # since not splitting at fx graph level
+        expected_num_piecewise_capturable_graphs_seen=
+        1,  # since not splitting at fx graph level
+        expected_num_backend_compilations=
+        1,  # since not splitting at fx graph level
+        expected_num_cudagraph_captured=
+        6,  # inductor graph partition still captures 6
+        # graph, same as fx graph partition.
+    )

tests/compile/silly_attention.py

@@ -60,4 +60,5 @@ direct_register_custom_op(
     mutates_args=["out"],
     fake_impl=silly_attention_fake,
     target_lib=silly_lib,
+    tags=(torch._C.Tag.cudagraph_unsafe, ),
 )

tests/compile/test_full_graph.py

@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 
 from __future__ import annotations
 
+import logging
 import tempfile
 from typing import Any, Optional, Union
 
@@ -10,9 +11,13 @@ import pytest
 import torch
 
 from tests.quantization.utils import is_quant_method_supported
+from tests.v1.attention.utils import _Backend
 from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams
-from vllm.config import CompilationConfig, CompilationLevel, PassConfig
+from vllm.attention.selector import global_force_attn_backend_context_manager
+from vllm.config import (CompilationConfig, CompilationLevel, CUDAGraphMode,
+                         PassConfig)
 from vllm.platforms import current_platform
+from vllm.utils import is_torch_equal_or_newer
 
 from ..utils import create_new_process_for_each_test
 
@@ -105,6 +110,18 @@ def test_full_graph(
         (CompilationConfig(level=CompilationLevel.PIECEWISE,
                            debug_dump_path=tempfile.gettempdir()),
          ("facebook/opt-125m", {})),
+    ] + [
+        # graph inductor partition
+        (
+            CompilationConfig(
+                level=CompilationLevel.PIECEWISE,
+                # inductor graph partition uses
+                # torch._C.Tag.cudagraph_unsafe to specify splitting ops
+                use_inductor_graph_partition=True,
+                cudagraph_mode=CUDAGraphMode.PIECEWISE,
+                compile_sizes=[1, 2]),
+            model) for model in models_list(all=False)
+        if is_torch_equal_or_newer("2.9.0.dev")
     ])
 # only test some of the models
 @create_new_process_for_each_test()
@@ -112,11 +129,51 @@ def test_custom_compile_config(
     compilation_config: CompilationConfig,
     model_info: tuple[str, dict[str, Any]],
 ):
+    if (compilation_config.use_inductor_graph_partition
+            and not is_torch_equal_or_newer("2.9.0.dev")):
+        pytest.skip("inductor graph partition is only available "
+                    "in PyTorch 2.9+")
+
     model, model_kwargs = model_info
     print(f"MODEL={model}")
     run_model(compilation_config, model, model_kwargs)
 
 
+def test_inductor_graph_partition_attn_fusion(caplog_vllm):
+    if not is_torch_equal_or_newer("2.9.0.dev"):
+        pytest.skip("inductor graph partition is only available "
+                    "in PyTorch 2.9+")
+
+    model = "nvidia/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct-FP8"
+    compilation_config = CompilationConfig(
+        level=CompilationLevel.PIECEWISE,
+        use_inductor_graph_partition=True,
+        cudagraph_mode=CUDAGraphMode.PIECEWISE,
+        custom_ops=["+quant_fp8"],
+        pass_config=PassConfig(enable_attn_fusion=True, enable_noop=True),
+    )
+    model_kwargs = {
+        "kv_cache_dtype": "fp8",
+        "max_model_len": 1024,
+    }
+    with caplog_vllm.at_level(
+            logging.DEBUG), global_force_attn_backend_context_manager(
+                _Backend.FLASHINFER):
+        run_model(compilation_config, model, model_kwargs)
+
+    try:
+        assert ("Fused quantization onto 48 attention nodes"
+                in caplog_vllm.text), caplog_vllm.text
+    except AssertionError:
+        # Note: this message is only triggered when the compilation goes
+        # through the custom pass. Due to multiple layers of cache on
+        # PyTorch side, the compilation of a graph may be cached such
+        # that custom pass directly goes through cache. In this case,
+        # we go through this branch and assert that the pass is not
+        # triggered.
+        assert "Fused quantization" not in caplog_vllm.text
+
+
 def run_model(compile_config: Union[int, CompilationConfig], model: str,
               model_kwargs: dict[str, Any]):
     prompts = [

tests/compile/test_fusion_attn.py

@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ from vllm.model_executor.layers.quantization.utils.quant_utils import (
 from vllm.model_executor.layers.quantization.utils.w8a8_utils import (
     Fp8LinearOp)
 from vllm.platforms import current_platform
+from vllm.utils import is_torch_equal_or_newer
 from vllm.v1.kv_cache_interface import AttentionSpec
 
 FP8_DTYPE = current_platform.fp8_dtype()
@@ -339,6 +340,10 @@ else:
 @pytest.mark.parametrize(
     "split_attention",
     [False, True] if current_platform.is_rocm() else [False])
+# TODO(boyuan): test inductor graph partition on rocm
+@pytest.mark.parametrize(
+    "use_inductor_graph_partition",
+    [False] if current_platform.is_rocm() else [False, True])
 @pytest.mark.skipif(not current_platform.is_cuda_alike(),
                     reason="Only test ROCm or CUDA")
 @pytest.mark.skipif(not current_platform.supports_fp8(), reason="Need FP8")
@@ -352,9 +357,15 @@ def test_attention_quant_pattern(num_qo_heads: int, num_kv_heads: int,
                                  dtype: torch.dtype, model_name: str,
                                  model_class: type[AttentionQuantPatternModel],
                                  backend: _Backend, split_attention: bool,
-                                 monkeypatch, dist_init):
+                                 use_inductor_graph_partition: bool,
+                                 monkeypatch, dist_init, caplog_vllm):
     """Test AttentionStaticQuantPattern fusion pass"""
 
+    if use_inductor_graph_partition and not is_torch_equal_or_newer(
+            "2.9.0.dev"):
+        pytest.skip("inductor graph partition is only available "
+                    "in PyTorch 2.9+")
+
     monkeypatch.setenv("VLLM_USE_V1", "1")
     if split_attention:
         monkeypatch.setenv("VLLM_V1_USE_PREFILL_DECODE_ATTENTION", "1")
@@ -372,6 +383,7 @@ def test_attention_quant_pattern(num_qo_heads: int, num_kv_heads: int,
         compilation_config=CompilationConfig(
             level=CompilationLevel.PIECEWISE,
             custom_ops=["+quant_fp8"],
+            use_inductor_graph_partition=use_inductor_graph_partition,
         ),
         cache_config=CacheConfig(cache_dtype="fp8"))
 
@@ -444,6 +456,7 @@ def test_attention_quant_pattern(num_qo_heads: int, num_kv_heads: int,
                                        backend=test_backend,
                                        fullgraph=True)
         assert model_compiled.attn._o_scale_float is None
+
         result_fused_1 = model_compiled(q, k, v)
 
         if backend == _Backend.FLASHINFER:
@@ -453,6 +466,7 @@ def test_attention_quant_pattern(num_qo_heads: int, num_kv_heads: int,
             # _o_scale_float
             assert model_compiled.attn._o_scale_float is not None
             result_fused_2 = model_compiled(q, k, v)
+
             assert model_compiled.attn._o_scale_float is not None
 
             torch.testing.assert_close(result_unfused,

vllm/attention/layer.py

@@ -577,6 +577,7 @@ direct_register_custom_op(
     mutates_args=[],
     fake_impl=unified_attention_fake,
     dispatch_key=current_platform.dispatch_key,
+    tags=(torch._C.Tag.cudagraph_unsafe, ),
 )
 
 
@@ -627,4 +628,5 @@ direct_register_custom_op(
     mutates_args=["output", "output_block_scale"],
     fake_impl=unified_attention_with_output_fake,
     dispatch_key=current_platform.dispatch_key,
+    tags=(torch._C.Tag.cudagraph_unsafe, ),
 )

vllm/compilation/backends.py

@@ -329,6 +329,7 @@ class PiecewiseCompileInterpreter(torch.fx.Interpreter):
                 i for i, x in enumerate(args) if isinstance(x, torch.SymInt)
             ]
             global compilation_start_time
+
             compiled_graph_for_dynamic_shape = self.vllm_backend.\
                 compiler_manager.compile(
                 submod,
@@ -339,7 +340,6 @@ class PiecewiseCompileInterpreter(torch.fx.Interpreter):
                 num_graphs=len(self.compile_submod_names),
                 runtime_shape=None)
             # Lazy import here to avoid circular import
-            from .cuda_graph import CUDAGraphOptions
             from .cuda_piecewise_backend import PiecewiseBackend
 
             piecewise_backend = PiecewiseBackend(
@@ -347,7 +347,13 @@ class PiecewiseCompileInterpreter(torch.fx.Interpreter):
                 len(self.compile_submod_names), sym_shape_indices,
                 compiled_graph_for_dynamic_shape, self.vllm_backend)
 
-            if self.compilation_config.cudagraph_mode != CUDAGraphMode.NONE:
+            if (self.compilation_config.cudagraph_mode != CUDAGraphMode.NONE
+                    and
+                    not self.compilation_config.use_inductor_graph_partition):
+                # We're using Dynamo-based piecewise splitting, so we wrap
+                # the whole subgraph with a static graph wrapper.
+                from .cuda_graph import CUDAGraphOptions
+
                 # resolve the static graph wrapper class (e.g. CUDAGraphWrapper
                 # class) as platform dependent.
                 static_graph_wrapper_class = resolve_obj_by_qualname(

vllm/compilation/decorators.py

 # SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
 # SPDX-FileCopyrightText: Copyright contributors to the vLLM project
 
+import contextlib
 import inspect
 from typing import Callable, Optional, TypeVar, Union, overload
 from unittest.mock import patch
@@ -14,7 +15,7 @@ from vllm.compilation.wrapper import TorchCompileWrapperWithCustomDispatcher
 from vllm.config import CompilationLevel, VllmConfig
 from vllm.logger import init_logger
 from vllm.sequence import IntermediateTensors
-from vllm.utils import supports_dynamo
+from vllm.utils import resolve_obj_by_qualname, supports_dynamo
 
 from .monitor import start_monitoring_torch_compile
 
@@ -301,8 +302,11 @@ def _support_torch_compile(
 
             with patch.object(InliningInstructionTranslator, 'inline_call',
                               patched_inline_call), torch._dynamo.config.patch(
-                                  **dynamo_config_patches):
+                                  **dynamo_config_patches
+                              ), maybe_use_cudagraph_partition_wrapper(
+                                  self.vllm_config):
                 output = self.compiled_callable(*args, **kwargs)
+
             return output
 
         # usually, capturing the model once is enough, and then we can
@@ -314,3 +318,52 @@ def _support_torch_compile(
 
     cls.__call__ = __call__
     return cls
+
+
+@contextlib.contextmanager
+def maybe_use_cudagraph_partition_wrapper(vllm_config: VllmConfig):
+    """
+    Context manager to set/unset customized cudagraph partition wrappers.
+
+    If we're using Inductor-based graph partitioning, we currently have the
+    whole `fx.Graph` before Inductor lowering and and the piecewise
+    splitting happens after all graph passes and fusions. Here, we add
+    a custom hook for Inductor to wrap each partition with our static
+    graph wrapper class to maintain more control over static graph
+    capture and replay.
+    """
+    from vllm.config import CUDAGraphMode
+
+    compilation_config = vllm_config.compilation_config
+    if (compilation_config.cudagraph_mode != CUDAGraphMode.NONE
+            and compilation_config.use_inductor_graph_partition):
+        from torch._inductor.utils import CUDAGraphWrapperMetadata
+
+        from vllm.compilation.cuda_graph import CUDAGraphOptions
+        from vllm.platforms import current_platform
+
+        static_graph_wrapper_class = resolve_obj_by_qualname(
+            current_platform.get_static_graph_wrapper_cls())
+
+        def customized_cudagraph_wrapper(f,
+                                         metadata: CUDAGraphWrapperMetadata):
+            partition_id = metadata.partition_index
+            num_partitions = metadata.num_partitions
+            return static_graph_wrapper_class(
+                runnable=f,
+                vllm_config=vllm_config,
+                runtime_mode=CUDAGraphMode.PIECEWISE,
+                cudagraph_options=CUDAGraphOptions(
+                    debug_log_enable=partition_id == 0,
+                    gc_disable=partition_id != 0,
+                    weak_ref_output=partition_id == num_partitions - 1,
+                ))
+
+        torch._inductor.utils.set_customized_partition_wrappers(
+            customized_cudagraph_wrapper)
+
+    yield
+
+    if (compilation_config.cudagraph_mode != CUDAGraphMode.NONE
+            and compilation_config.use_inductor_graph_partition):
+        torch._inductor.utils.set_customized_partition_wrappers(None)

vllm/config/compilation.py

@@ -299,6 +299,26 @@ class CompilationConfig:
     minor release, i.e. v0.11.0 or v1.0.0. Please use cudagraph_mode instead.
     """
 
+    use_inductor_graph_partition: bool = False
+    """Use inductor graph partition to split the graph at cudagraph_unsafe ops.
+    This partition happens at inductor codegen time after all passes and fusions
+    are finished. It generates a single `call` function which wraps
+    cudagraph-safe ops into partition functions and leave cudagraph-unsafe ops
+    outside the partition functions. For a graph with N cudagraph-unsafe ops
+    (e.g., Attention), there would be N+1 partitions. To mark an op as
+    cudagraph unsafe, we can add `tags=(torch._C.Tag.cudagraph_unsafe)` when
+    register the custom op. 
+
+    This config supports both full cudagraph and piecewise cudagraph without
+    compiling twice. For piecewise cudagraph, it applies vLLM CUDAGraph wrapper
+    to each partition. For N+1 partitions, there would be N+1
+    CUDAGraph wrapper instances.
+
+    For full CUDAGraph, we always apply a single CUDAGraph wrapper outside the
+    inductor `call` function in the model runner. The top-level full cudagraph
+    capture ignores all partitioning.
+    """
+
     pass_config: PassConfig = field(default_factory=PassConfig)
     """Custom inductor passes, see PassConfig for more details"""
 
@@ -461,6 +481,12 @@ class CompilationConfig:
                                  "since full_cuda_graph is deprecated.")
             self.cudagraph_mode = CUDAGraphMode.FULL
 
+        if (self.use_inductor_graph_partition
+                and not is_torch_equal_or_newer("2.9.0.dev")):
+            raise ValueError("use_inductor_graph_partition is only "
+                             "supported with torch>=2.9.0.dev. Set "
+                             "use_inductor_graph_partition=False instead.")
+
     def init_backend(self, vllm_config: "VllmConfig") -> Union[str, Callable]:
         if self.level == CompilationLevel.NO_COMPILATION:
             raise ValueError("No compilation level is set.")
@@ -540,19 +566,36 @@ class CompilationConfig:
             "set_splitting_ops_for_v1 should only be called when "
             "level is CompilationLevel.PIECEWISE")
 
+        use_inductor_graph_partition_msg = (
+            "When use_inductor_graph_partition=True, splitting_ops "
+            "are ignored and set to an empty list. Instead, "
+            "\"tags=(torch._C.Tag.cudagraph_unsafe, ),\" is "
+            "used to annotate custom ops for graph partition.")
+
         if self.splitting_ops is None:
+            if self.use_inductor_graph_partition:
+                # When using inductor graph partition, we set splitting_ops
+                # to be empty and rely on torch._C.Tag.cudagraph_unsafe to
+                # annotate custom ops as splitting ops.
+                logger.warning_once(use_inductor_graph_partition_msg)
+                self.splitting_ops = []
+            else:
                 # NOTE: When using full cudagraph, instead of setting an empty
                 # list and capture the full cudagraph inside the flattened fx
-            # graph, we keep the piecewise fx graph structure but capture the
-            # full cudagraph outside the fx graph. This reduces some cpu
-            # overhead when the runtime batch_size is not cudagraph captured.
-            # see https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/20059 for details.
-            # make a copy to avoid mutating the class-level list via reference.
+                # graph, we keep the piecewise fx graph structure but capture
+                # the full cudagraph outside the fx graph. This reduces some
+                # cpu overhead when the runtime batch_size is not cudagraph
+                # captured. see https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/20059
+                # for details. make a copy to avoid mutating the class-level
+                # list via reference.
                 self.splitting_ops = list(self._attention_ops)
         elif len(self.splitting_ops) == 0:
-            logger.warning_once("Using piecewise compilation with empty "
-                                "splitting_ops.")
-            if self.cudagraph_mode == CUDAGraphMode.PIECEWISE:
+            logger.warning_once(
+                "Using piecewise compilation with empty "
+                "splitting_ops and use_inductor_graph_partition"
+                f"={self.use_inductor_graph_partition}.")
+            if (self.cudagraph_mode == CUDAGraphMode.PIECEWISE
+                    and not self.use_inductor_graph_partition):
                 logger.warning_once(
                     "When compilation level is piecewise with empty "
                     "splitting_ops, PIECEWISE cudagraph_mode will be "
@@ -562,7 +605,26 @@ class CompilationConfig:
                     "any problems.")
                 self.cudagraph_mode = CUDAGraphMode.FULL
             self.splitting_ops = []
+        elif self.use_inductor_graph_partition:
+            logger.warning_once(use_inductor_graph_partition_msg)
+            self.splitting_ops = []
 
     def splitting_ops_contain_attention(self) -> bool:
         return self.splitting_ops is not None and all(
             op in self.splitting_ops for op in self._attention_ops)
+
+    def is_attention_compiled_piecewise(self) -> bool:
+        use_fx_graph_piecewise_compilation = (
+            self.level == CompilationLevel.PIECEWISE
+            and self.splitting_ops_contain_attention())
+
+        inductor_used = (self.level == CompilationLevel.PIECEWISE
+                         and self.use_inductor) or (
+                             self.level >= CompilationLevel.DYNAMO_AS_IS
+                             and self.backend == "inductor")
+        use_inductor_piecewise_compilation = (
+            inductor_used and self.use_inductor_graph_partition
+            and not self.splitting_ops_contain_attention())
+
+        return use_fx_graph_piecewise_compilation or \
+            use_inductor_piecewise_compilation

vllm/v1/cudagraph_dispatcher.py

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 # SPDX-FileCopyrightText: Copyright contributors to the vLLM project
 from typing import Optional
 
-from vllm.config import CompilationLevel, CUDAGraphMode, VllmConfig
+from vllm.config import CUDAGraphMode, VllmConfig
 from vllm.forward_context import BatchDescriptor
 from vllm.logger import init_logger
 
@@ -39,11 +39,15 @@ class CudagraphDispatcher:
             CUDAGraphMode.FULL: set(),
         }
 
-        assert not self.cudagraph_mode.requires_piecewise_compilation() or \
-            (self.compilation_config.level == CompilationLevel.PIECEWISE and
-             self.compilation_config.splitting_ops_contain_attention()), \
+        not_use_piecewise_compilation = (
+            not self.cudagraph_mode.requires_piecewise_compilation())
+
+        assert not_use_piecewise_compilation or \
+            self.compilation_config.is_attention_compiled_piecewise(), \
             "Compilation level should be CompilationLevel.PIECEWISE when "\
             "cudagraph_mode piecewise cudagraphs is used, "\
+            "and attention should be in splitting_ops or "\
+            "inductor splitting should be used. " \
             f"cudagraph_mode={self.cudagraph_mode}, "\
             f"compilation_level={self.compilation_config.level}, "\
             f"splitting_ops={self.compilation_config.splitting_ops}"