- 22 Jul, 2022 1 commit
-
-
Krzysztof Chalupka authored
Summary: Adding MeshRasterizerOpenGL, a faster alternative to MeshRasterizer. The new rasterizer follows the ideas from "Differentiable Surface Rendering via non-Differentiable Sampling". The new rasterizer 20x faster on a 2M face mesh (try pose optimization on Nefertiti from https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~kmcrane/Projects/ModelRepository/!). The larger the mesh, the larger the speedup. There are two main disadvantages: * The new rasterizer works with an OpenGL backend, so requires pycuda.gl and pyopengl installed (though we avoided writing any C++ code, everything is in Python!) * The new rasterizer is non-differentiable. However, you can still differentiate the rendering function if you use if with the new SplatterPhongShader which we recently added to PyTorch3D (see the original paper cited above). Reviewed By: patricklabatut, jcjohnson Differential Revision: D37698816 fbshipit-source-id: 54d120639d3cb001f096237807e54aced0acda25
-
- 25 Aug, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Jeremy Reizenstein authored
Summary: Allow, and make default, align_corners=True for texture maps. Allow changing the padding_mode and set the default to be "border" which produces more logical results. Some new documentation. The previous behavior corresponds to padding_mode="zeros" and align_corners=False. Reviewed By: gkioxari Differential Revision: D23268775 fbshipit-source-id: 58d6229baa591baa69705bcf97471c80ba3651de
-
- 06 Mar, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Nikhila Ravi authored
Summary: ## Updates - Defined the world and camera coordinates according to this figure. The world coordinates are defined as having +Y up, +X left and +Z in. {F230888499} - Removed all flipping from blending functions. - Updated the rasterizer to return images with +Y up and +X left. - Updated all the mesh rasterizer tests - The expected values are now defined in terms of the default +Y up, +X left - Added tests where the triangles in the meshes are non symmetrical so that it is clear which direction +X and +Y are ## Questions: - Should we have **scene settings** instead of raster settings? - To be more correct we should be [z clipping in the rasterizer based on the far/near clipping planes](https://github.com/ShichenLiu/SoftRas/blob/master/soft_renderer/cuda/soft_rasterize_cuda_kernel.cu#L400) - these values are also required in the blending functions so should we make these scene level parameters and have a scene settings tuple which is available to the rasterizer and shader? Reviewed By: gkioxari Differential Revision: D20208604 fbshipit-source-id: 55787301b1bffa0afa9618f0a0886cc681da51f3
-