{ "cells": [ { "cell_type": "code", "execution_count": null, "metadata": { "collapsed": false }, "outputs": [], "source": [ "%matplotlib inline" ] }, { "cell_type": "markdown", "metadata": {}, "source": [ "\n# Speed Up Model with Mask\n\n## Introduction\n\nPruning algorithms usually use weight masks to simulate the real pruning. Masks can be used\nto check model performance of a specific pruning (or sparsity), but there is no real speedup.\nSince model speedup is the ultimate goal of model pruning, we try to provide a tool to users\nto convert a model to a smaller one based on user provided masks (the masks come from the\npruning algorithms).\n\nThere are two types of pruning. One is fine-grained pruning, it does not change the shape of weights,\nand input/output tensors. Sparse kernel is required to speed up a fine-grained pruned layer.\nThe other is coarse-grained pruning (e.g., channels), shape of weights and input/output tensors usually change due to such pruning.\nTo speed up this kind of pruning, there is no need to use sparse kernel, just replace the pruned layer with smaller one.\nSince the support of sparse kernels in community is limited,\nwe only support the speedup of coarse-grained pruning and leave the support of fine-grained pruning in future.\n\n## Design and Implementation\n\nTo speed up a model, the pruned layers should be replaced, either replaced with smaller layer for coarse-grained mask,\nor replaced with sparse kernel for fine-grained mask. Coarse-grained mask usually changes the shape of weights or input/output tensors,\nthus, we should do shape inference to check are there other unpruned layers should be replaced as well due to shape change.\nTherefore, in our design, there are two main steps: first, do shape inference to find out all the modules that should be replaced;\nsecond, replace the modules.\n\nThe first step requires topology (i.e., connections) of the model, we use ``jit.trace`` to obtain the model graph for PyTorch.\nThe new shape of module is auto-inference by NNI, the unchanged parts of outputs during forward and inputs during backward are prepared for reduct.\nFor each type of module, we should prepare a function for module replacement.\nThe module replacement function returns a newly created module which is smaller.\n\n## Usage\n" ] }, { "cell_type": "markdown", "metadata": {}, "source": [ "Generate a mask for the model at first.\nWe usually use a NNI pruner to generate the masks then use ``ModelSpeedup`` to compact the model.\nBut in fact ``ModelSpeedup`` is a relatively independent tool, so you can use it independently.\n\n" ] }, { "cell_type": "code", "execution_count": null, "metadata": { "collapsed": false }, "outputs": [], "source": [ "import torch\nfrom scripts.compression_mnist_model import TorchModel, device\n\nmodel = TorchModel().to(device)\n# masks = {layer_name: {'weight': weight_mask, 'bias': bias_mask}}\nconv1_mask = torch.ones_like(model.conv1.weight.data)\n# mask the first three output channels in conv1\nconv1_mask[0: 3] = 0\nmasks = {'conv1': {'weight': conv1_mask}}" ] }, { "cell_type": "markdown", "metadata": {}, "source": [ "Show the original model structure.\n\n" ] }, { "cell_type": "code", "execution_count": null, "metadata": { "collapsed": false }, "outputs": [], "source": [ "print(model)" ] }, { "cell_type": "markdown", "metadata": {}, "source": [ "Roughly test the original model inference speed.\n\n" ] }, { "cell_type": "code", "execution_count": null, "metadata": { "collapsed": false }, "outputs": [], "source": [ "import time\nstart = time.time()\nmodel(torch.rand(128, 1, 28, 28).to(device))\nprint('Original Model - Elapsed Time : ', time.time() - start)" ] }, { "cell_type": "markdown", "metadata": {}, "source": [ "Speed up the model and show the model structure after speed up.\n\n" ] }, { "cell_type": "code", "execution_count": null, "metadata": { "collapsed": false }, "outputs": [], "source": [ "from nni.compression.pytorch import ModelSpeedup\nModelSpeedup(model, torch.rand(10, 1, 28, 28).to(device), masks).speedup_model()\nprint(model)" ] }, { "cell_type": "markdown", "metadata": {}, "source": [ "Roughly test the model after speed-up inference speed.\n\n" ] }, { "cell_type": "code", "execution_count": null, "metadata": { "collapsed": false }, "outputs": [], "source": [ "start = time.time()\nmodel(torch.rand(128, 1, 28, 28).to(device))\nprint('Speedup Model - Elapsed Time : ', time.time() - start)" ] }, { "cell_type": "markdown", "metadata": {}, "source": [ "For combining usage of ``Pruner`` masks generation with ``ModelSpeedup``,\nplease refer to `Pruning Quick Start <./pruning_quick_start_mnist.html>`__.\n\nNOTE: The current implementation supports PyTorch 1.3.1 or newer.\n\n## Limitations\n\nFor PyTorch we can only replace modules, if functions in ``forward`` should be replaced,\nour current implementation does not work. One workaround is make the function a PyTorch module.\n\nIf you want to speed up your own model which cannot supported by the current implementation,\nyou need implement the replace function for module replacement, welcome to contribute.\n\n## Speedup Results of Examples\n\nThe code of these experiments can be found :githublink:`here `.\n\nThese result are tested on the `legacy pruning framework <../comporession/pruning_legacy>`__, new results will coming soon.\n\n### slim pruner example\n\non one V100 GPU,\ninput tensor: ``torch.randn(64, 3, 32, 32)``\n\n.. list-table::\n :header-rows: 1\n :widths: auto\n\n * - Times\n - Mask Latency\n - Speedup Latency\n * - 1\n - 0.01197\n - 0.005107\n * - 2\n - 0.02019\n - 0.008769\n * - 4\n - 0.02733\n - 0.014809\n * - 8\n - 0.04310\n - 0.027441\n * - 16\n - 0.07731\n - 0.05008\n * - 32\n - 0.14464\n - 0.10027\n\n### fpgm pruner example\n\non cpu,\ninput tensor: ``torch.randn(64, 1, 28, 28)``\\ ,\ntoo large variance\n\n.. list-table::\n :header-rows: 1\n :widths: auto\n\n * - Times\n - Mask Latency\n - Speedup Latency\n * - 1\n - 0.01383\n - 0.01839\n * - 2\n - 0.01167\n - 0.003558\n * - 4\n - 0.01636\n - 0.01088\n * - 40\n - 0.14412\n - 0.08268\n * - 40\n - 1.29385\n - 0.14408\n * - 40\n - 0.41035\n - 0.46162\n * - 400\n - 6.29020\n - 5.82143\n\n### l1filter pruner example\n\non one V100 GPU,\ninput tensor: ``torch.randn(64, 3, 32, 32)``\n\n.. list-table::\n :header-rows: 1\n :widths: auto\n\n * - Times\n - Mask Latency\n - Speedup Latency\n * - 1\n - 0.01026\n - 0.003677\n * - 2\n - 0.01657\n - 0.008161\n * - 4\n - 0.02458\n - 0.020018\n * - 8\n - 0.03498\n - 0.025504\n * - 16\n - 0.06757\n - 0.047523\n * - 32\n - 0.10487\n - 0.086442\n\n### APoZ pruner example\n\non one V100 GPU,\ninput tensor: ``torch.randn(64, 3, 32, 32)``\n\n.. list-table::\n :header-rows: 1\n :widths: auto\n\n * - Times\n - Mask Latency\n - Speedup Latency\n * - 1\n - 0.01389\n - 0.004208\n * - 2\n - 0.01628\n - 0.008310\n * - 4\n - 0.02521\n - 0.014008\n * - 8\n - 0.03386\n - 0.023923\n * - 16\n - 0.06042\n - 0.046183\n * - 32\n - 0.12421\n - 0.087113\n\n### SimulatedAnnealing pruner example\n\nIn this experiment, we use SimulatedAnnealing pruner to prune the resnet18 on the cifar10 dataset.\nWe measure the latencies and accuracies of the pruned model under different sparsity ratios, as shown in the following figure.\nThe latency is measured on one V100 GPU and the input tensor is ``torch.randn(128, 3, 32, 32)``.\n\n\n\n### User configuration for ModelSpeedup\n\n**PyTorch**\n\n.. autoclass:: nni.compression.pytorch.ModelSpeedup\n\n" ] } ], "metadata": { "kernelspec": { "display_name": "Python 3", "language": "python", "name": "python3" }, "language_info": { "codemirror_mode": { "name": "ipython", "version": 3 }, "file_extension": ".py", "mimetype": "text/x-python", "name": "python", "nbconvert_exporter": "python", "pygments_lexer": "ipython3", "version": "3.8.8" } }, "nbformat": 4, "nbformat_minor": 0 }