# LLM Deployment Examples using SGLang This directory contains examples and reference implementations for deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) in various configurations using SGLang. SGLang internally uses ZMQ to communicate between the ingress and the engine processes. For Dynamo, we leverage the runtime to communicate directly with the engine processes and handle ingress and pre/post processing on our end. ## Use the Latest Release We recommend using the latest stable release of dynamo to avoid breaking changes: [![GitHub Release](https://img.shields.io/github/v/release/ai-dynamo/dynamo)](https://github.com/ai-dynamo/dynamo/releases/latest) You can find the latest release [here](https://github.com/ai-dynamo/dynamo/releases/latest) and check out the corresponding branch with: ```bash git checkout $(git describe --tags $(git rev-list --tags --max-count=1)) ``` ## Deployment Architectures See [deployment architectures](../llm/README.md#deployment-architectures) to learn about the general idea of the architecture. SGLang currently supports aggregated and disaggregated serving. KV routing support is coming soon! ## Getting Started 1. Choose a deployment architecture based on your requirements 2. Configure the components as needed 3. Deploy using the provided scripts ### Prerequisites Start required services (etcd and NATS) using [Docker Compose](../../deploy/metrics/docker-compose.yml) ```bash docker compose -f deploy/metrics/docker-compose.yml up -d ``` ### Build docker ```bash # On an x86 machine - sglang does not support ARM yet ./container/build.sh --framework sglang ``` ### Run container ```bash ./container/run.sh -it --framework sglang ``` ## Run Deployment This figure shows an overview of the major components to deploy: ``` +------+ +-----------+ +------------------+ +---------------+ | HTTP |----->| processor |----->| Worker |------------>| Prefill | | |<-----| |<-----| |<------------| Worker | +------+ +-----------+ +------------------+ +---------------+ | ^ | query best | | return | publish kv events worker | | worker_id v | | +------------------+ | +---------| kv-router | +------------->| | +------------------+ ``` Note: The above architecture illustrates all the components. The final components that get spawned depend upon the chosen graph. ### Example architectures > [!IMPORTANT] > Below we provide some simple shell scripts that run the components for each configuration. Each shell script is simply running the `dynamo-run` to start up the ingress and using `python3` to start up the workers. You can easily take each commmand and run them in separate terminals. #### Aggregated ```bash cd $DYNAMO_ROOT/examples/sglang ./launch/agg.sh ``` #### Aggregated serving with KV Routing > [!NOTE] > The current implementation of `examples/sglang/components/worker.py` publishes _placeholder_ engine metrics to keep the Dynamo KV-router happy. Real-time metrics will be surfaced directly from the SGLang engine once the following pull requests are merged: > • Dynamo: [ai-dynamo/dynamo #1465](https://github.com/ai-dynamo/dynamo/pull/1465) – _feat: receive kvmetrics from sglang scheduler_. > > After these are in, the TODOs in `worker.py` will be resolved and the placeholder logic removed. ```bash cd $DYNAMO_ROOT/examples/sglang ./launch/agg_router.sh ``` #### Disaggregated serving
SGLang Load Balancer vs Dynamo Discovery SGLang uses a mini load balancer to route requests to handle disaggregated serving. The load balancer functions as follows: 1. The load balancer receives a request from the client 2. A random `(prefill, decode)` pair is selected from the pool of available workers 3. Request is sent to both `prefill` and `decode` workers via asyncio tasks 4. Internally disaggregation is done from prefill -> decode Because Dynamo has a discovery mechanism, we do not use a load balancer. Instead, we first route to a random prefill worker, select a random decode worker, and then send the request to both. Internally, SGLang's bootstrap server (which is a part of the `tokenizer_manager`) is used in conjuction with NIXL to handle the kv transfer.
> [!IMPORTANT] > Disaggregated serving in SGLang currently requires each worker to have the same tensor parallel size [unless you are using an MLA based model](https://github.com/sgl-project/sglang/pull/5922) ```bash cd $DYNAMO_ROOT/examples/sglang ./launch/disagg.sh ``` ##### Disaggregated with MoE models and DP attention SGLang also supports DP attention for MoE models. We provide an example config for this in `configs/disagg-dp-attention.yaml` which is based on the [DeepSeek-R1-Small-2layers](https://huggingface.co/silence09/DeepSeek-R1-Small-2layers) model. You can use this configuration to test out disaggregated serving on a single node before scaling to the full DeepSeek-R1 model across multiple nodes. ```bash # note this will require 4 GPUs cd $DYNAMO_ROOT/examples/sglang ./launch/disagg_dp_attn.sh ``` In order to scale to the full DeepSeek-R1 model, you can follow the instructions in the [multinode-examples.md](./multinode-examples.md) file. ##### Disaggregated with WideEP Dynamo supports SGLang's implementation of wide expert parallelism and large scale P/D for DeepSeek-R1! You can find detailed deployment and benchmarking instructions [here](./dsr1-wideep.md)