[Model] Unsupervised learning with GraphSAGE (#1440)

* unsupervised graphsage first commit

* fix

* disable remove_edges and still got 0.90 performance

* optimize edgeids with multimap

* change hyperparams

* update README
Co-authored-by: Minjie Wang <wmjlyjemaine@gmail.com>

examples/pytorch/graphsage/README.md

@@ -45,3 +45,21 @@ Accuracy:
 | Full Graph            | 0.9504   |
 | Neighbor Sampling     | 0.9495   |
 | Control Variate       | 0.9490   |
+
+### Unsupervised training
+
+Train w/ mini-batch sampling in an unsupervised fashion (on the Reddit dataset)
+```bash
+python3 train_sampling_unsupervised.py
+```
+
+Notably,
+
+* The loss function is defined by predicting whether an edge exists between two nodes or not.  This matches the official
+  implementation, and is equivalent to the loss defined in the paper with 1-hop random walks.
+* When computing the score of `(u, v)`, the connections between node `u` and `v` are removed from neighbor sampling.
+  This trick increases the F1-micro score on test set by 0.02.
+* The performance of the learned embeddings are measured by training a softmax regression with scikit-learn, as described
+  in the paper.
+
+Micro F1 score reaches 0.9212 on test set.

examples/pytorch/graphsage/train_sampling_unsupervised.py

+import dgl
+import numpy as np
+import torch as th
+import torch.nn as nn
+import torch.nn.functional as F
+import torch.optim as optim
+import torch.multiprocessing as mp
+from torch.utils.data import DataLoader
+import dgl.function as fn
+import dgl.nn.pytorch as dglnn
+import time
+import argparse
+from _thread import start_new_thread
+from functools import wraps
+from dgl.data import RedditDataset
+import tqdm
+import traceback
+import sklearn.linear_model as lm
+import sklearn.metrics as skm
+
+#### Negative sampler
+
+class NegativeSampler(object):
+    def __init__(self, g):
+        self.weights = g.in_degrees().float() ** 0.75
+
+    def __call__(self, num_samples):
+        return self.weights.multinomial(num_samples, replacement=True)
+
+#### Neighbor sampler
+
+class NeighborSampler(object):
+    def __init__(self, g, fanouts, num_negs):
+        self.g = g
+        self.fanouts = fanouts
+        self.neg_sampler = NegativeSampler(g)
+        self.num_negs = num_negs
+
+    def sample_blocks(self, seed_edges):
+        n_edges = len(seed_edges)
+        seed_edges = th.LongTensor(np.asarray(seed_edges))
+        heads, tails = self.g.find_edges(seed_edges)
+        neg_tails = self.neg_sampler(self.num_negs * n_edges)
+        neg_heads = heads.view(-1, 1).expand(n_edges, self.num_negs).flatten()
+
+        # Maintain the correspondence between heads, tails and negative tails as two
+        # graphs.
+        # pos_graph contains the correspondence between each head and its positive tail.
+        # neg_graph contains the correspondence between each head and its negative tails.
+        # Both pos_graph and neg_graph are first constructed with the same node space as
+        # the original graph.  Then they are compacted together with dgl.compact_graphs.
+        pos_graph = dgl.graph((heads, tails), num_nodes=self.g.number_of_nodes())
+        neg_graph = dgl.graph((neg_heads, neg_tails), num_nodes=self.g.number_of_nodes())
+        pos_graph, neg_graph = dgl.compact_graphs([pos_graph, neg_graph])
+
+        # Obtain the node IDs being used in either pos_graph or neg_graph.  Since they
+        # are compacted together, pos_graph and neg_graph share the same compacted node
+        # space.
+        seeds = pos_graph.ndata[dgl.NID]
+        blocks = []
+        for fanout in self.fanouts:
+            # For each seed node, sample ``fanout`` neighbors.
+            frontier = dgl.sampling.sample_neighbors(g, seeds, fanout, replace=True)
+            # Remove all edges between heads and tails, as well as heads and neg_tails.
+            _, _, edge_ids = frontier.edge_ids(
+                th.cat([heads, tails, neg_heads, neg_tails]),
+                th.cat([tails, heads, neg_tails, neg_heads]),
+                return_uv=True)
+            frontier = dgl.remove_edges(frontier, edge_ids)
+            # Then we compact the frontier into a bipartite graph for message passing.
+            block = dgl.to_block(frontier, seeds)
+            # Obtain the seed nodes for next layer.
+            seeds = block.srcdata[dgl.NID]
+
+            blocks.insert(0, block)
+        return pos_graph, neg_graph, blocks
+
+class SAGE(nn.Module):
+    def __init__(self,
+                 in_feats,
+                 n_hidden,
+                 n_classes,
+                 n_layers,
+                 activation,
+                 dropout):
+        super().__init__()
+        self.n_layers = n_layers
+        self.n_hidden = n_hidden
+        self.n_classes = n_classes
+        self.layers = nn.ModuleList()
+        self.layers.append(dglnn.SAGEConv(in_feats, n_hidden, 'mean'))
+        for i in range(1, n_layers - 1):
+            self.layers.append(dglnn.SAGEConv(n_hidden, n_hidden, 'mean'))
+        self.layers.append(dglnn.SAGEConv(n_hidden, n_classes, 'mean'))
+        self.dropout = nn.Dropout(dropout)
+        self.activation = activation
+
+    def forward(self, blocks, x):
+        h = x
+        for l, (layer, block) in enumerate(zip(self.layers, blocks)):
+            # We need to first copy the representation of nodes on the RHS from the
+            # appropriate nodes on the LHS.
+            # Note that the shape of h is (num_nodes_LHS, D) and the shape of h_dst
+            # would be (num_nodes_RHS, D)
+            h_dst = h[:block.number_of_dst_nodes()]
+            # Then we compute the updated representation on the RHS.
+            # The shape of h now becomes (num_nodes_RHS, D)
+            h = layer(block, (h, h_dst))
+            if l != len(self.layers) - 1:
+                h = self.activation(h)
+                h = self.dropout(h)
+        return h
+
+    def inference(self, g, x, batch_size, device):
+        """
+        Inference with the GraphSAGE model on full neighbors (i.e. without neighbor sampling).
+        g : the entire graph.
+        x : the input of entire node set.
+
+        The inference code is written in a fashion that it could handle any number of nodes and
+        layers.
+        """
+        # During inference with sampling, multi-layer blocks are very inefficient because
+        # lots of computations in the first few layers are repeated.
+        # Therefore, we compute the representation of all nodes layer by layer.  The nodes
+        # on each layer are of course splitted in batches.
+        # TODO: can we standardize this?
+        nodes = th.arange(g.number_of_nodes())
+        for l, layer in enumerate(self.layers):
+            y = th.zeros(g.number_of_nodes(), self.n_hidden if l != len(self.layers) - 1 else self.n_classes)
+
+            for start in tqdm.trange(0, len(nodes), batch_size):
+                end = start + batch_size
+                batch_nodes = nodes[start:end]
+                block = dgl.to_block(dgl.in_subgraph(g, batch_nodes), batch_nodes)
+                input_nodes = block.srcdata[dgl.NID]
+
+                h = x[input_nodes].to(device)
+                h_dst = h[:block.number_of_dst_nodes()]
+                h = layer(block, (h, h_dst))
+                if l != len(self.layers) - 1:
+                    h = self.activation(h)
+                    h = self.dropout(h)
+
+                y[start:end] = h.cpu()
+
+            x = y
+        return y
+
+class CrossEntropyLoss(nn.Module):
+    def forward(self, block_outputs, pos_graph, neg_graph):
+        with pos_graph.local_scope():
+            pos_graph.ndata['h'] = block_outputs
+            pos_graph.apply_edges(fn.u_dot_v('h', 'h', 'score'))
+            pos_score = pos_graph.edata['score']
+        with neg_graph.local_scope():
+            neg_graph.ndata['h'] = block_outputs
+            neg_graph.apply_edges(fn.u_dot_v('h', 'h', 'score'))
+            neg_score = neg_graph.edata['score']
+
+        score = th.cat([pos_score, neg_score])
+        label = th.cat([th.ones_like(pos_score), th.zeros_like(neg_score)]).long()
+        loss = F.binary_cross_entropy_with_logits(score, label.float())
+        return loss
+
+def prepare_mp(g):
+    """
+    Explicitly materialize the CSR, CSC and COO representation of the given graph
+    so that they could be shared via copy-on-write to sampler workers and GPU
+    trainers.
+
+    This is a workaround before full shared memory support on heterogeneous graphs.
+    """
+    g.in_degree(0)
+    g.out_degree(0)
+    g.find_edges([0])
+
+def compute_acc(emb, labels, train_nids, val_nids, test_nids):
+    """
+    Compute the accuracy of prediction given the labels.
+    """
+    emb = emb.cpu().numpy()
+    train_nids = train_nids.cpu().numpy()
+    train_labels = labels[train_nids].cpu().numpy()
+    val_nids = val_nids.cpu().numpy()
+    val_labels = labels[val_nids].cpu().numpy()
+    test_nids = test_nids.cpu().numpy()
+    test_labels = labels[test_nids].cpu().numpy()
+
+    emb = (emb - emb.mean(0, keepdims=True)) / emb.std(0, keepdims=True)
+
+    lr = lm.LogisticRegression(multi_class='multinomial', max_iter=10000)
+    lr.fit(emb[train_nids], labels[train_nids])
+
+    pred = lr.predict(emb)
+    f1_micro_eval = skm.f1_score(labels[val_nids], pred[val_nids], average='micro')
+    f1_micro_test = skm.f1_score(labels[test_nids], pred[test_nids], average='micro')
+    f1_macro_eval = skm.f1_score(labels[val_nids], pred[val_nids], average='macro')
+    f1_macro_test = skm.f1_score(labels[test_nids], pred[test_nids], average='macro')
+    return f1_micro_eval, f1_micro_test
+
+def evaluate(model, g, inputs, labels, train_nids, val_nids, test_nids, batch_size, device):
+    """
+    Evaluate the model on the validation set specified by ``val_mask``.
+    g : The entire graph.
+    inputs : The features of all the nodes.
+    labels : The labels of all the nodes.
+    val_mask : A 0-1 mask indicating which nodes do we actually compute the accuracy for.
+    batch_size : Number of nodes to compute at the same time.
+    device : The GPU device to evaluate on.
+    """
+    model.eval()
+    with th.no_grad():
+        pred = model.inference(g, inputs, batch_size, device)
+    model.train()
+    return compute_acc(pred, labels, train_nids, val_nids, test_nids)
+
+def load_subtensor(g, seeds, input_nodes, device):
+    """
+    Copys features and labels of a set of nodes onto GPU.
+    """
+    batch_inputs = g.ndata['features'][input_nodes].to(device)
+    return batch_inputs
+
+#### Entry point
+def run(args, device, data):
+    # Unpack data
+    train_mask, val_mask, test_mask, in_feats, labels, n_classes, g = data
+
+    train_nid = th.LongTensor(np.nonzero(train_mask)[0])
+    val_nid = th.LongTensor(np.nonzero(val_mask)[0])
+    test_nid = th.LongTensor(np.nonzero(test_mask)[0])
+
+    # Create sampler
+    sampler = NeighborSampler(g, [int(fanout) for fanout in args.fan_out.split(',')], args.num_negs)
+
+    # Create PyTorch DataLoader for constructing blocks
+    dataloader = DataLoader(
+        dataset=np.arange(g.number_of_edges()),
+        batch_size=args.batch_size,
+        collate_fn=sampler.sample_blocks,
+        shuffle=True,
+        drop_last=False,
+        num_workers=args.num_workers)
+
+    # Define model and optimizer
+    model = SAGE(in_feats, args.num_hidden, args.num_hidden, args.num_layers, F.relu, args.dropout)
+    model = model.to(device)
+    loss_fcn = CrossEntropyLoss()
+    loss_fcn = loss_fcn.to(device)
+    optimizer = optim.Adam(model.parameters(), lr=args.lr)
+
+    # Training loop
+    avg = 0
+    iter_tput = []
+    best_eval_acc = 0
+    best_test_acc = 0
+    for epoch in range(args.num_epochs):
+        tic = time.time()
+
+        # Loop over the dataloader to sample the computation dependency graph as a list of
+        # blocks.
+        for step, (pos_graph, neg_graph, blocks) in enumerate(dataloader):
+            tic_step = time.time()
+
+            # The nodes for input lies at the LHS side of the first block.
+            # The nodes for output lies at the RHS side of the last block.
+            input_nodes = blocks[0].srcdata[dgl.NID]
+            seeds = blocks[-1].dstdata[dgl.NID]
+
+            # Load the input features as well as output labels
+            batch_inputs = load_subtensor(g, seeds, input_nodes, device)
+
+            # Compute loss and prediction
+            batch_pred = model(blocks, batch_inputs)
+            loss = loss_fcn(batch_pred, pos_graph, neg_graph)
+            optimizer.zero_grad()
+            loss.backward()
+            optimizer.step()
+
+            iter_tput.append(len(seeds) / (time.time() - tic_step))
+            if step % args.log_every == 0:
+                gpu_mem_alloc = th.cuda.max_memory_allocated() / 1000000 if th.cuda.is_available() else 0
+                print('Epoch {:05d} | Step {:05d} | Loss {:.4f} | Speed (samples/sec) {:.4f} | GPU {:.1f} MiB'.format(
+                    epoch, step, loss.item(), np.mean(iter_tput[3:]), gpu_mem_alloc))
+
+            if step % args.eval_every == 0:
+                eval_acc, test_acc = evaluate(model, g, g.ndata['features'], labels, train_nid, val_nid, test_nid, args.batch_size, device)
+                print('Eval Acc {:.4f} Test Acc {:.4f}'.format(eval_acc, test_acc))
+                if eval_acc > best_eval_acc:
+                    best_eval_acc = eval_acc
+                    best_test_acc = test_acc
+                print('Best Eval Acc {:.4f} Test Acc {:.4f}'.format(best_eval_acc, best_test_acc))
+
+    print('Avg epoch time: {}'.format(avg / (epoch - 4)))
+
+if __name__ == '__main__':
+    argparser = argparse.ArgumentParser("multi-gpu training")
+    argparser.add_argument('--gpu', type=int, default=0,
+        help="GPU device ID. Use -1 for CPU training")
+    argparser.add_argument('--num-epochs', type=int, default=20)
+    argparser.add_argument('--num-hidden', type=int, default=16)
+    argparser.add_argument('--num-layers', type=int, default=2)
+    argparser.add_argument('--num-negs', type=int, default=1)
+    argparser.add_argument('--fan-out', type=str, default='10,25')
+    argparser.add_argument('--batch-size', type=int, default=10000)
+    argparser.add_argument('--log-every', type=int, default=20)
+    argparser.add_argument('--eval-every', type=int, default=1000)
+    argparser.add_argument('--lr', type=float, default=0.003)
+    argparser.add_argument('--dropout', type=float, default=0.5)
+    argparser.add_argument('--num-workers', type=int, default=0,
+        help="Number of sampling processes. Use 0 for no extra process.")
+    args = argparser.parse_args()
+    
+    if args.gpu >= 0:
+        device = th.device('cuda:%d' % args.gpu)
+    else:
+        device = th.device('cpu')
+
+    # load reddit data
+    data = RedditDataset(self_loop=True)
+    train_mask = data.train_mask
+    val_mask = data.val_mask
+    test_mask = data.test_mask
+    features = th.Tensor(data.features)
+    in_feats = features.shape[1]
+    labels = th.LongTensor(data.labels)
+    n_classes = data.num_labels
+    # Construct graph
+    g = dgl.graph(data.graph.all_edges())
+    g.ndata['features'] = features
+    prepare_mp(g)
+    # Pack data
+    data = train_mask, val_mask, test_mask, in_feats, labels, n_classes, g
+
+    run(args, device, data)

src/array/cpu/spmat_op_impl_coo.cc

@@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ std::vector<NDArray> COOGetDataAndIndices(
     COOMatrix coo, NDArray rows, NDArray cols) {
   const int64_t rowlen = rows->shape[0];
   const int64_t collen = cols->shape[0];
+  const int64_t len = std::max(rowlen, collen);
 
   CHECK((rowlen == collen) || (rowlen == 1) || (collen == 1))
     << "Invalid row and col id array.";
@@ -190,7 +191,34 @@ std::vector<NDArray> COOGetDataAndIndices(
 
   std::vector<IdType> ret_rows, ret_cols;
   std::vector<IdType> ret_data;
+  ret_rows.reserve(len);
+  ret_cols.reserve(len);
+  ret_data.reserve(len);
+
+  // NOTE(BarclayII): With a small number of lookups, linear scan is faster.
+  // The threshold 200 comes from benchmarking both algorithms on a P3.8x instance.
+  // I also tried sorting plus binary search.  The speed gain is only significant for
+  // medium-sized graphs and lookups, so I didn't include it.
+  if (len >= 200) {
+    // TODO(BarclayII) Ideally we would want to cache this object.  However I'm not sure
+    // what is the best way to do so since this object is valid for CPU only.
+    std::unordered_multimap<std::pair<IdType, IdType>, IdType, PairHash> pair_map;
+    pair_map.reserve(coo.row->shape[0]);
+    for (int64_t k = 0; k < coo.row->shape[0]; ++k)
+      pair_map.emplace(std::make_pair(coo_row_data[k], coo_col_data[k]), data ? data[k]: k);
 
+    for (int64_t i = 0, j = 0; i < rowlen && j < collen; i += row_stride, j += col_stride) {
+      const IdType row_id = row_data[i], col_id = col_data[j];
+      CHECK(row_id >= 0 && row_id < coo.num_rows) << "Invalid row index: " << row_id;
+      CHECK(col_id >= 0 && col_id < coo.num_cols) << "Invalid col index: " << col_id;
+      auto range = pair_map.equal_range({row_id, col_id});
+      for (auto it = range.first; it != range.second; ++it) {
+        ret_rows.push_back(row_id);
+        ret_cols.push_back(col_id);
+        ret_data.push_back(it->second);
+      }
+    }
+  } else {
     for (int64_t i = 0, j = 0; i < rowlen && j < collen; i += row_stride, j += col_stride) {
       const IdType row_id = row_data[i], col_id = col_data[j];
       CHECK(row_id >= 0 && row_id < coo.num_rows) << "Invalid row index: " << row_id;
@@ -203,6 +231,7 @@ std::vector<NDArray> COOGetDataAndIndices(
         }
       }
     }
+  }
 
   return {NDArray::FromVector(ret_rows),
           NDArray::FromVector(ret_cols),

src/graph/unit_graph.cc

@@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ IdArray UnitGraph::Successors(dgl_type_t etype, dgl_id_t src) const {
 }
 
 IdArray UnitGraph::EdgeId(dgl_type_t etype, dgl_id_t src, dgl_id_t dst) const {
-  const SparseFormat fmt = SelectFormat(SparseFormat::kAny);
+  const SparseFormat fmt = SelectFormat(SparseFormat::kCSR);
   const auto ptr = GetFormat(fmt);
   if (fmt == SparseFormat::kCSC)
     return ptr->EdgeId(etype, dst, src);
@@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ IdArray UnitGraph::EdgeId(dgl_type_t etype, dgl_id_t src, dgl_id_t dst) const {
 }
 
 EdgeArray UnitGraph::EdgeIds(dgl_type_t etype, IdArray src, IdArray dst) const {
-  const SparseFormat fmt = SelectFormat(SparseFormat::kAny);
+  const SparseFormat fmt = SelectFormat(SparseFormat::kCSR);
   const auto ptr = GetFormat(fmt);
   if (fmt == SparseFormat::kCSC) {
     EdgeArray edges = ptr->EdgeIds(etype, dst, src);